Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Rhyan Delatorre
Professor Flowers
EDU 214
26 June 2017
Education is becoming increasingly consumed by technology and that is not a bad way
for the educational system to be moving. Our students are surrounded by technology and are
constantly engaging in it and the world itself has become engaged with technology. That being
said, it makes sense to teach our students to use the tools that are quickly enveloping and
redefining the world we live in. However, as we teach our students how to understand
technology, we must not forget students with special needs, as technology can have a profound
effect on their skill set, thus increasing their ability for the future, as well as increasing quality of
education.
The biggest struggle of in cooperating technology into special education is that special
education is more often an afterthought. It is not necessarily part of the group when making
decisions about technology. If the school gets X amount of money for technology, a plan will be
made for how to best distribute the money and get the most use out of it. For example, school A
is granted X amount of money and their plan is to spend it on new tablets for the fifth-grade
classrooms and on new software for general education. The money is spent and now special
education teachers are left trying to figure out how to get their students the technology that will
make simple tasks for other students possible to a student with special needs.
or improve the functional capabilities of students with disabilities (Individuals with Disabilities
Delatorre 2
Education Act 2004). Assistive technology can range from a tablet to a computer to a specialized
switch that enables a child to use a piece of equipment given their disability. Children with all
types of disabilities from dyslexia to autism to cerebral palsy to down syndrome utilize these
technologies to make education possible for them. Students with hearing impairments, vision
impairments, muscular diseases all rely on these types of technology to receive their best
education. And access to these technologies tends to be a problem, simply because special
education isnt always in the forefront of the mind when deciding where technology funding will
go.
In David Netherton and Walter Deals article, Assistive Technology in the Classroom, the
authors talk about a seventh-grade student named Henry. This is a student with a neuro-muscular
disease that has taken away his physical function. This is a child that is nonverbal but willing to
learn and interact with the world around him but his disease limits him. However, with the use of
assistive technology, and the help from a friend and teacher, a simple laptop with the right
programs have been able to transform his life. Henry can now use his elbow to hit buttons and
communicate. He can use a computer attached to his wheelchair to engage, learn, and grow. The
use of technology for Henry didnt make tasks easier, it truly made them possible.
Another student has a vision impairment and needs assignments read aloud to her. She
can understand the assignment but just cant read the words. This is a student that needs a device
to help her complete assignments. Assistive technology allows students like this one to be in the
general education classroom setting, learning side by side, her peers and not being alienated for
her disability.
As educators, it is our job to teach our students and to see them to their greatest potential.
Our students do not have any say in how they are born and what challenges they will face, but as
Delatorre 3
part of our job, teachers need to be able to address the challenges that students are facing. But
without the technology or the money readily available for the technology teachers are unable to
At the time of Netherton and Deals 2006 article, there were several states that have and
continue to create programs to get assistive technology to disabled people. However, as the
authors say, this still is not enough. As great of a step as federal and state resources are, there is
innovation on the federal level. The programs available now are effective and life changing for
our students, but more can be done. If on the federal level, there is a push to find and achieve the
best technology at a low cost for our students then all the states have to do is purchase the
technology and implement it. On the federal level, there is time and money on hand to put into
this necessary research and in some ways, they are already doing it. With all of the time the
government is putting into technological research, it would be smart to direct some of that
Another quicker solution would be to widen the conversation. Make a mandate that at
schools with special needs programs, someone from SPED is on the panel deciding where
funding goes. That way an entire school is not getting new computers but the non-verbal student
in special education cannot find the funding to update software on a device that allows him to
communicate. This issue is not so much about big steps, something as simple as having a specific
teacher on the panel for distributing funding could make a huge difference, especially in schools
with small special education programs that could often get over looked.
Delatorre 4
For people without disabilities, technology makes things easier. For people with
disabilities, technology makes things possible., Rudabaugh. This is the quote I have continued
to come back to throughout my research into the technological needs of special education. As a
person without special needs who grew up in general education, technology did make
assignments easier and less tedious. Making a PowerPoint to present my research project to the
class instead of using a trifold, typing a paper instead of writing it out, using applications like
Quizlet to study instead of hand writing study guides and flashcards: all of those things made my
educational career simpler. They took away some of the tediousness and made projects more
enjoyable because I was getting to use the computer. But now, as someone who works daily with
special education students Ive seen the flip side of that quote. Ive witnessed first-hand how
giving assistive technology to students with intellectual, physical, and learning disabilities has
made education possible. Students with cerebral palsy can use a laptop to type instead of writing
them, which is easier on them, having limbs that arent always able to pick up the pencil and
write. Tablets with voice programs to help nonverbal students communicate. It is ultimately our
job as educators to help our students learn to the best of their ability and a big part of that for
special needs students is providing them with the technology that gets them past their disability.
State and federal programs need to be pushed harder that way each of our students is
getting the best education possible. Students shouldnt have to wait for the funding to come in to
get access to devices that will improve the quality of their education. If districts can spend
money on new computer labs full of Apple Computer, surely, they can invest in tablets, laptops,
Works Cited
http://ezproxy.library.csn.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1549220418
?accountid=27953.
Edyburn, Dave L. "Critical Issues in Advancing the Special Education Technology Evidence
Base." Exceptional Children, vol. 80, no. 1, 2013, pp. 7-24, ProQuest Central,
http://ezproxy.library.csn.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1430460435
?accountid=27953.
Netherton, David L., and Walter F. Deal. "Assistive Technology in the Classroom."
The Technology Teacher, vol. 66, no. 1, 2006, pp. 10-15, ProQuest Central,
http://ezproxy.library.csn.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/235321336?
accountid=27953.