Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

Reference Book - Essentials of Intellectual Property Law

by Ernesto C. Salao (A guidebook on RA 8293 and other Related Laws


Republic Act 8293 or the IP Code of the Philippines (3rd edition) 2016
Reference websites : www.wipo.int ; www.ipophil.gov.ph
KISS Guide in Intellectual Property

Illustrative Cases re different kinds of IP


(no unfair competition in copyright)
1. Pearl & Dean vs. Shoemart Inc, GR No. 148222, Aug 15, 2003
2. Kho vs. CA, GR No. 115758, Mar. 19, 2002
3. Air Philippines Corporation v.Pennswell, Inc.
G.R. No. 172835, December 13, 2007
> Constitution Secs XII and XIV
ASSIGNMENT
> Sec. 2 of IP Code Pages 273-344 of Salao's Book
Copyright being a statutory right
IP Code Sections 2,3 and 4 Secs. 171-229 of the IP Code (Cases for 5.1 to 5.4)
pages 1-56 5. Joaquin v. Drilon G.R No. 108946, 28 Jan 1999)
6. Ching v. Salinas, GRN. 161295, June 29, 2005
See WIPO website and ipophil.gov.ph 7. United Feature Syndicate Inc., vs. Munsingwear Manufacturing
Company, G.R. No. 76193 November 9, 1989

Cases Assigned for 5.1 to 5.4


Functions and Jurisdiction of IPO 8. Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone 499 US 340 (1991)
9. Manly Sportwear Manufacturing vs. Dadodette
4. Pest Management Association of the Philippines vs. GR.N. 165306, September 20, 2005
Fertilizer and Pesticides Authority, Secretary of DA, 10. Ong Ching Kian Chuan vs. CA, Lorenzo Tan,G.R. No. 130360
G.R. NO. 156041 , February 21, 2007
August 15, 2001 Columbia Pictures Inc. vs. CA, GR No. 110318, Aug 28, 1996
11. Santos vs.McCullough PrintingG.R. No. L-19439,October 31, 1964
12. Brandir Int'l Inc., vs. Cascade Pacific Lumber Company, Cases for 5.15
844 F 2D. 1142, U.S CA Second Circuit, Dec. 2, 1987 Pearl & Dean vs. Shoemart Inc, GR No. 148222, Aug 15, 2003
Cases for 5.5 to 5.12 Kho vs. CA, GR No. 115758, Mar. 19, 2002
13. Lotus v. Borland US Court of Appeals No. 93-2214 Secs. 121-170 of the IP Code
14. Triad Systems vs.Southeastern Express Co USC, 8th Circuit Pages 123-221 of Salao's book
August 31, 1995 Section 21, RA 8239 or the IP Code
15. Los Angeles News Service vs. Frank Tullo, 973F. 2D 791 Cases for 6.2 - 6.7
16. Campbell vs. Acuff-Rose Music, - US Court of Appeals for Ang Tibay v. Teodoro (74 Phil 50)
the 6th Circuit, March 7, 1994 Philip Morris, Inc. v. CA (224 SCRA 624, Dissenting Opinion
17. Bayanihan Music vs. BMG, Jose Mari Chan,
Mirpuri vs. CA
GR No. 166337, March 7, 2005
Victorias Milling Co. vs. Ong Su (79 SCRA 207)
18. Filscap v. Tan ( 148 SCRA 461, 16 March 1987)
Unno Commercial vs. Gen Milling Corp, 205 Phils.707
19. ABS CBN Corp vs. Gozon, Duavit, et.al, G.R. No. 195956

March 11, 2015
Philip Morris, Inc. v. CA (274 SCRA 576)
20. Habana vs. Robles,GRN 131522, July 19, 1999
Shangrila Hotels vs. DGCI, GR No. 159938, March 31, 2006

Asia Brewery vs. CA, GR No. 103543, 5 July 1993


Cases for 6.8-6.9
Sterling Products vs. Faber Farbenfabriken AG 27 SCRA 1214

Asia Brewery v. CA (ibid, dissenting opinion)


ASSIGNMENT
Cases for 6.11 a)
Cases for 5.13 -5.14 Pag-asa Industrial Corp. vs. CA, 118 SCRA 526
NBI-Microsoft Corp. vs. Hwang GR No. 147043, June 21, 2005 Mc Donald's Corp. vs. LC Big Mak Burger, GR No. 243993,
Microsoft Corp.vs. Maxicorp Inc.,GR No. 140946, Sept. 3, 2004 August 18, 2004
20th Century Fox Film Corp v. CA , L-76649-51, Aug 19, 1988
Columbia Pictures Inc. vs. CA, 237 SCRA 367 (1994)
ASSIGNMENT
Cases for 6.11a
Mc Donald's Corp. vs. MacJoy Fastfood Corp,GR No 16615
February 2, 2007
Cases for 6.11b)
Ang v. Teodoro (74 Phil 50) ASSIGNMENT
Sta. Ana vs. Maliwat ([G.R. No. L-23023. August 31, 1968.] Ses. 21 -84 of the IP Code
Phil. Refining Co. vs. Ng Sam[G.R.No. L-26676.July 30, 1982.]
Mighty Corp. vs. E.J Gallo Winery [G.R. No. 154342
July 14, 2004
Cases for item VII
Manzano vs. CA G.R.No.113388.Sept 5, 1997
Cases for 6.10c
Aguas vs. de Leon, 111 SCRA 238 ,1982
Ang v. Teodoro, ibid
Maguan vs. CA, 146 SCRA 107 , 1986
Puma Sportschufabriken v. CA (G.R. No.75067, 26 Feb 1998)
Godines vs. CA, GR No. 97343, Sept. 13, 1993
Schuartz vs. CA, GR No. 113407, July 12, 2000
Cases for 6.11
Creser Precision System vs.CA, GR No. 118708,Feb. 2, 1998
La Chemise Lacoste vs. Hernandez, [G.R. Nos. L-63796-97.
G. Sell v. Yap Jue, 12 Phil 519, 1909
May 21, 1984
Smith Kline v. CA, 409 SCRA 33 (2003)
Kabushi Kaisha Isetan v. IAC, [G.R. No. 75420. Nov 15, 1991.]

Esso Standard v. CA [G.R. No. L-29971. August 31, 1982.] Pages 286-312 of the IP Code
A.M No. 02-1-06-SC Rule on Search and Seizure in Civil Actions for
Cases for 6.17 to 6.20 Infringement of IPR (took effect on Feb. 15, 2002)
1. Mighty Corp. vs. E.J Gallo Winery [G.R. No. 154342 July 14, 2004]
People et.al vs. Choi, GR No. 152950, Aug. 3, 2006
2 Mc Donald cases
Solid Triangle Sales Corp.vs. Sheriff, 422 Phils. 72,83, 2001
Societe Des Produits Nestles v. CA, 356 SCRA 207, 2001)
Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. vs. Bright Tech
Levi Strauss vs. Clinton Aparelle,GR No. 138900,Sept 20,2005
G.R. No. 169156, February 15, 2007
Samson vs. Daway, GR Nos. 160054-55, 21 July 2004

Вам также может понравиться