0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
374 просмотров1 страница
This rubric evaluates group presentations on four criteria: visual appeal, comprehension, presentation skills, and content/preparedness. Groups can earn up to 4 marks in each category. The highest scoring groups will have error-free slides, engage and inform the audience, demonstrate full understanding through eye contact and clear speaking, and present concisely while all participating equally. Lower scores are given for issues like poor design, lack of understanding, weak delivery, irrelevant information, and imbalance between group members.
This rubric evaluates group presentations on four criteria: visual appeal, comprehension, presentation skills, and content/preparedness. Groups can earn up to 4 marks in each category. The highest scoring groups will have error-free slides, engage and inform the audience, demonstrate full understanding through eye contact and clear speaking, and present concisely while all participating equally. Lower scores are given for issues like poor design, lack of understanding, weak delivery, irrelevant information, and imbalance between group members.
This rubric evaluates group presentations on four criteria: visual appeal, comprehension, presentation skills, and content/preparedness. Groups can earn up to 4 marks in each category. The highest scoring groups will have error-free slides, engage and inform the audience, demonstrate full understanding through eye contact and clear speaking, and present concisely while all participating equally. Lower scores are given for issues like poor design, lack of understanding, weak delivery, irrelevant information, and imbalance between group members.
4 3 2 1 Mark Visual Appeal There are no errors in spelling, There are some errors in There are many errors in spelling, There are many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. spelling, grammar and grammar and punctuation. Too grammar and punctuation. The slides Information is clear and concise punctuation. Too much much information was contained were difficult to read and too much on each slide. information on two or more on many slides. information had been copied onto Visually appealing/engaging. slides. Minimal effort made to make slides them. Significant visual appeal. appealing or too much going on. No visual appeal. Extensive knowledge of topic. Most showed a good Few members showed good Presenters didnt understand topic. Comprehension Members showed complete understanding of topic. understanding of some parts of Majority of questions answered by understanding of assignment. All members able to answer topic. only one member or majority of Accurately answered all most of audience questions. Only some members accurately information incorrect. questions posed. answered questions. Presentation Regular/constant eye contact, Most members spoke to Members focused on only part of Minimal eye contact by more than Skills The audience was engaged, majority of audience; steady audience. one member focusing on small part and presenters held the eye contact. Sporadic eye contact by more than of audience. audiences attention. The audience was engaged one presenter. The audience was not engaged. Appropriate speaking volume & by the presentation. The audience was distracted. Majority of presenters spoke too body language. Majority of presenters spoke Speakers could be heard by only quickly or quietly making it difficult to at a suitable volume. half of the audience. understand. Some fidgeting by member(s). Body language was distracting. Inappropriate/disinterested body language. Content The presentation was a concise The presentation was a good The presentation was informative The presentation was a brief look at summary of the topic with all summary of the topic. but several elements went the topic but many questions were questions answered. Most important information unanswered. left unanswered. Comprehensive and complete covered; little irrelevant info. Much of the information irrelevant; Majority of information irrelevant and coverage of information. coverage of some of major points. significant points left out. All presenters knew the Slight domination of one Significant controlling by some Unbalanced presentation or tension information, participated presenter. Members helped members with one minimally resulting from over-helping. Preparedness/ equally, and helped each other each other. contributing. Multiple group members not Participation/ as needed. Very well prepared. Primarily prepared but with some participating. Group Dynamics Extremely prepared and dependence on just reading off Evident lack of preparation/rehearsal. rehearsed. slides. Dependence on slides. Total /20 Comments: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________