Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
com
3
Earth Retention Systems
Externally Stabilized Walls
In-Situ Walls
Soldier Piles, Secant/Tangent Piles, Sheet Piles
Gravity Walls
Reinforced Concrete, Massive Blocks, Gabion Baskets
Internally Stabilized Walls
Reinforced Soils
MSE Walls - Geogrid or Strap Reinforcement
In-Situ Reinforcement
Soil Nail Walls
4
Earth Retention Systems
Wall Design Consideration
Engineering Properties
Soil Classification
Unit Weight
Shear Strength
Chemical Properties (Corrosion Potential)
Groundwater Conditions
Facing Stability
Wall Type Selection
Basal Heave/Stability
5
Earth Retention Systems
Geotechnical Study
6
Earth Retention Systems
FHWA Recommended Soil Boring Layout
7
Earth Retention Systems
Results of an Adequate Geotechnical Study
8
Apparent Earth Pressure Diagram (AEP)
Measured brace loads have led to the development of the AEP envelopes by Karl
Terzaghi & Ralph Peck.
9 AEP were calculated by dividing measured braced loads by the area of the wall supported
by each brace.
Apparent Earth Pressure Diagram
Experience indicates that the method of constructing a wall can affect the pressures which act on it top
down vs. bottom up
During the construction of many early braced excavations the top braces failed because the load was higher
than what was calculated.
We know that pressure increases with depth against many types of walls, but this is not the case against
braced and tied-back walls.
10
Pressures behind braced and tied-back walls build up quicker because soils are not allowed to develop
active pressures like a traditional cantilevered walls.
Full Scale Wall Study Texas A&M National Science Foundation
Sand - Wall Height 25 FT.
Plan View
11
Full Scale Wall Study Texas A&M National Science Foundation
One Tier Apparent Earth Pressure Diagram Comparison
Sand - Wall Height 25 FT.
25H
12
Full Scale Wall Study Texas A&M National Science Foundation
One Tier AEP Bending Moment Comparison
Sand - Wall Height 25 FT.
25H 25H
13
Full Scale Wall Study Texas A&M National Science Foundation
Two Tier Apparent Earth Pressure Diagram Comparison
Sand - Wall Height 25 FT.
25H
14
Full Scale Wall Study Texas A&M National Science Foundation
Two Tier AEP Bending Moment Diagram Comparison
Sand - Wall Height 25 FT.
25H 25H
15
Challenges Associated with Earth Retention
Systems
16
Earth Retention Systems
Excavation Height
Movement Tolerance
Project Budget ($$)
Geology/Soils
Water Table Elevation
Site Constraints
17
Types of Earth Retention Systems
Soldier Beam and Lagging
Advantages
Generally one of the cheapest
types of Earth Retention
Systems
Installation goes quickly
Can be installed with minimal
vibrations (drilled)
Can work around utilities and
structures
Disadvantages
Can be difficult to install in
granular soils
No water cut-off
Exposes soil during lagging
installation
18
Types of Earth Retention Systems
Soldier Beam and Lagging
20
Drilled Driven
Types of Earth Retention Systems
Lagging Typically
Lagging Installation
Installed in 5 ft. Lifts
Cantilevered Soldier
Beam and Lagging
22
Types of Earth Retention Systems
Soil Nails Soil Nailing is an in situ
technique for reinforcing,
stabilizing and retaining
excavations and deep cuts
through the introduction of
relatively small, closely
spaced inclusions (usually
steel bars) into a soil mass,
the face of which is then
locally stabilized. A zone of
reinforced ground results
that functions as a soil
retention system.
23
Types of Earth Retention Systems
Soil Nails
Advantages Disadvantages
Installation happens with excavation Works best in cohesive soils that
Usually the most cost effective per have good stand-up time
square foot Passive system so deflections are
Shotcrete face can be sculpted for higher than other systems
architectural finish Requires close coordination
25 Minimal vibrations between installer and excavator
Types of Earth Retention Systems
Soil Nails
Installation of
Permanent Shotcrete
27
Soil Nails Shotcrete Finishes
Screed Finish
28
Soil Nails Shotcrete Finishes
Stamped Finish
29
Soil Nails Shotcrete Finishes
Sculpted
Finishes
30
Types of Earth Retention Systems
Sheet Piling
Advantages
Works in almost all soil conditions
Readily Available from multiple suppliers
Prevents soil loss during excavation
Can minimize water infiltration
Can be re-used
Disadvantages
Tough installation through stiff/dense
soils
Steel is expensive
Vibrations during installation
31
Types of Earth Retention Systems
Sheet Piling Installation Methods
Newest, modern system for Sheet Pile
Installation
Installs very quickly and safely
Limited to installing 30 from face of
structure
Length of sheeting limited
Hydraulic Press No Vibration
32
Types of Earth Retention Systems
Sheet Piling Installation Methods
Multipiler Crane
Excavator-mounted vibratory hammer Old system for Sheet Pile Installation
Can work in low headroom conditions Can install almost any length
Generally very slow compared to ABI Can reach for installation
33 Much slower than ABI
Requires templates
Types of Earth Retention Systems
Tangent/Secant and Slurry Walls
Advantages Disadvantages
Can be built as very stiff system Generally very expensive compared to
(reduced deflections) other earth retention systems
Can be designed to carry large vertical Slow installation
loads Requires more equipment and large
34 Good water control setup area
Works in almost all soils Wale installation difficult
Types of Earth Retention Systems
Secant Wall - Installation
Gap Between
Piers
Tiebacks
36
Types of Earth Retention Systems
Slurry Wall - Installation
Wall is formed in panels
Panels held open with slurry
Reinforcement cage placed and
grout pumped from bottom up
37
Specialized Types of Earth Retention Systems
39
Earth Retention Systems
Internal Bracing
40
Earth Retention Systems
Internal Bracing - Rakers
41
Earth Retention Systems
Ground Anchors
42
Earth Retention Systems
Ground Anchors
43
Risks Associated with Earth Retention Systems
Soldier Beam Settlement
The Fix
Installation of Brace
44
Risks Associated with Earth Retention Systems
Soldier Beam Settlement
Aggregate Pier
45
Risks Associated with Earth Retention Systems
Footing Excavation fill Site Not Dewatering
with Water
47
48