Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Drillstring Forces
Theory Book
NS-8
Contents
1 Drag and Torque and Stuck Pipe Mechanics Theory 3
1.3 Buckling 7
Written by
O.C.T.G. Procter Consultancy Ltd
Specialist Drilling Engineers
21 Rubislaw Terrace, Aberdeen
AB10 1XE, Scotland.
www.stuckpipe.co.uk
Thanks to Ian Pettit and Kees Langeveld for helping to edit this document.
1 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
May 2001 2
1 Drag and Torque and Stuck Pipe Mechanics Theory
This section covers the theory required to understand the mechanical aspects of
sticking a string in a wellbore and the forces required to free the string. In this
section string refers to a drill string, casing string or any other string run into the
wellbore.
------------ Eqn 1
This assumes the buoyancy force due to the density of drilling fluid is distributed
along the whole length of the string.
Question: What is the surface string weight of 1000 ft of drill collars that have an air
weight of 150 lb/ft, when they are suspended in 520 pptf mud. The mud gives a
buoyancy factor of 0.847.
Answer:
Using Eqn 1
If this method is used to calculate the tension in a vertical string at any other depth
then the formula is as follows:
---------------- Eqn 2
3 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
fluid is distributed along the whole
length of the string (Archemides
Principle - Ref 13).
If we use the buoyancy method
to calculate the tension in the string
at depths A and B (Fig 1) we get
the following results
Tx = String Weight
Archimedes Principle states that upward force is equal to the weight of the dis-
placed fluid. However, this is a simplification for calculating the total effect for the
whole submersed body. To calculate force in the middle of a submersed drill string
the vertical component of all the pressure area forces acting on all the surfaces
must be integrated (added).
In the case of a vertical drill string the only surface facing down (ignoring tooljoints)
is at B (Fig 1). Here the hydrostatic force equals 520 psi x cross sectional area of
the string (assume 45 sq inches). This will be 23400 lbs, which is a significantly
different result than obtained in the above calculation ( Tx = 0). This illustrates that
Eqn 2 is only valid for tension when x = L.
Calculating the actual tension in the string using the buoyancy method is only
possible when x=L, and the tension in the string at surface is being calculated
(i.e., the string weight). The tension calculated using the buoyancy method will
therefore be referred to as pseudo tension to distinguish it from the real tension in
the string
In order to remain consistent for subsequent equations, Eqn 2 is now renamed as
shown below:
--------------------------Eqn 3
Answer:
Using Eqn 3
If the pressure area method is used to calculate the tension in a vertical string at
any other depth then the formula is as follows:
------------------------------ Eqn 4
2
Tension should not be confused with axial stress (? ):
5 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
If we use the pressure area
method to calculate the tension in
the string at points A and B (Fig 2)
we see the following results:
Tension in the string at point A
At A, x = L
therefore from Eqn 4:
Tx = (150 x 1000)
- (0.52 x 1000 x 45.36)
= 126414 lbs
---------------------------------Eqn 5
-------------------------------- Eqn 6
This result is significantly different to the pseudo tension result obtained using the
buoyancy method. The pseudo tension is always zero at the bottom string pro-
vided the WOB is equal to zero.
May 2001 6
1.3 Buckling
Buckling occurs when part of the string is in
compression and the amount of compres-
sion is sufficient to bend the string. This
bending (buckling) may or may not perma-
nently deform the string. When the string is
permanently deformed due to buckling it is
plastically buckled. When the string is tem-
porarily deformed due to buckling it is elasti-
cally buckled.
For example, the critical buckling force (Fcrit) for 5 20.89 lbs/ft Grade E drill pipe
at an inclination of 1 degree in 10.19 inside diameter casing is 2.5k lbs.
For the same drill pipe at an inclination of 24 degrees Fcrit = 20k lbs and 32k lbs for
drill pipe at 90 degrees. (Source - Wellplan for Windows TDA module calculation)
1. Sinusoidal buckling.
2. Transition from sinusoidal to helical buckling.
3. Helical buckling.
4. Permanent deformation of the drill string
The occurrence of these modes of buckling are all indicated by the Wellplan for
Windows TDA module as part of a normal report.
7 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
can occur with coil tubing) or in some special cases pre-packed screens or liners .
4, because this is the point where the string is damaged.
Whats in a name.
In Section 2.1 the buckling neutral point is called the pseudo tension = zero point.
It is also well documented that a drill string will only buckle below the Drillers
neutral point (Ref 10). This Drillers neutral point refers to the same point. For
clarity it will be referred to in this booklet as the buckling neutral point.
From Eqn 2.1 the position of the buckling neutral point can be established for a
vertical string that is off bottom. To take into account WOB the formula is modified
as follows:
Eqn 7
For the actual tension in a vertical string the pressure area equation is used. It is
modified to take WOB into account.
May 2001 8
Using Eqn 3 for the tension:
Eqn 8
NB The above formula Eqn 1 to 8 are for a perfectly vertical string. Once the string
is no longer vertical the formulae become complicated and can only practically be
performed with the aid of a computer program such as Wellplan for Windows TDA
module.
9 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
1.5 Example of calculating the position of the buckling neutral
point and tension = 0 point.
Data: 1000 ft of drill collars that have an air weight of 150 lb/ft, are suspended in
520 pptf mud. The dimensions of the string are OD = 8 , ID = 2.5.
Questions
When 10k lbs WOB is applied:
(a) Where in the string is the buckling neutral point?
(b) Where in the string is the tension equal to zero?
Answer (a)
The buckling neutral point has moved
up the string from the bottom by a dis-
tance equivalent to 10k lbs of string
weight as in Fig 3.
We know pseudo tension = 0 at the
buckling neutral point so using Eqn 7
and setting pTx = 0 we have:
? 79 ft
Fig 3 - String pseudo tension schematic
when WOB is added.
i.e. at a depth of 921 ft.
Answer (b)
The tension = zero when Tx = 0 in Eqn 8.
May 2001 10
Comparing the two results illustrates that the tension zero point is not in the same
position as the buckling neutral point. The tension is zero 145ft above the buckling
neutral point.
Note: When no WOB was present the tension was zero 157ft above the buckling
neutral point. The discrepancy between the results of the two methods (pseudo
tension and pressure area tension) decreases as the points move towards the
surface, where the results are the same.
A drill string consists of 100ft of 8 by 3 Drill Collar weighing 147lb/ft and the mud
weight is 520 pptf. The rig has a top-drive weighing 30k lbs. The Buoyancy factor
for 520 pptf mud is 0.847. The critical buckling force (Fcrit) for these collars in a
vertical well is 21.8k lbs.
If the above string is 100ft, 1000ft and 10000ft long, fill in the answers to the ques-
tions in the table below:
Table 1
You will notice that the lower part of the string is in compression. The compression
forces can be large, even in excess of the critical buckling force for the string
component and the string does not buckle. This is due to hydrostatic restraining
forces acting all around the string. The critical buckling force only applies to forces
over and above hydrostatic forces, i.e. WOB. This is why pressure area calcula-
tions are not used for establishing the buckling state of a drill string.
11 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
1.7 Drill string tension when tripping in and pulling out.
Fig 13 has three separate curves showing the tension in the string in a deviated
wellbore while moving the string up, down and rotating off bottom with the bit at
7500ft. The tension in the string while moving the string down (down weight) is
less than the tension when moving the string up (up weight). The difference comes
from the interaction between gravity and friction.
When the string is moving up both gravity and friction are acting down. When the
string is moving down friction is acting up and gravity is acting down. Thus we see
more drag when moving a string up than when moving it down.
LEGEND
Trip In: Tension
Trip Out: Tension
Rotate Off Bottom: Tension
Tension Forces (k lbs)
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250
0
2000
4000
Measured
Depth [ft]
6000
May 2001 12
Tension Forces (k lbs)
-140 -120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
0
2000
4000
Depth [ft]
6000
Fig 13 is the typical tension plot created during well planning. Unfortunately, it tells
us nothing of the risk of buckling, margin of overpull etc. It tells us only what the
tension in all parts of the string will be when the bit is at 7500 ft.
In general for both vertical and deviated wells the tension at surface, shown in this
type of plot (Fig 13 and Fig 14), will indicate the highest tension that will be seen
while drilling the well. However, in certain cases such as in horizontal wells, (Fig
14) this type of plot does not show the highest tension and if used could result in
significantly less margin of overpull than expected! Fig 14 shows the highest
tension to be 130k lbs while pulling out at TD. The drag chart for the same well -
Fig 16 shows the highest tension (bit is at 5600ft) to be 200k lbs - 50% higher!
13 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
1.8 Creating a drag chart
Creating a drag chart from actual data
By measuring the up weight, down weight and free rotating weight every stand a
drag profile can be created for the well being drilled, similar to the example in Fig
15.
Surface weights are monitored when the string is being pulled out of the hole or run
into the hole without rotation. If the string is rotating, such as when reaming in and
out, then drag values must be accompanied by the torque and RPM values for any
of them to be meaningful. A note should be made to show whether the pumps
were on or off when the readings were taken. The rig travelling equipment weight
is also required for each well, this should be recorded on the chart.
When this drag profile (Fig 15) is combined with a set of lines showing:
a) the maximum allowable measured weight (yield strength),
b) the onset of buckling (sinusoidal),
c) the minimum allowable measured weight, [the onset of damage due to buck-
ling (plastic deformation)],
a complete drag chart is obtained (Fig 16).
The parts of a drag chart that cannot be measured on site are the maximum and
minimum allowable measured weights. These should be calculated at the rig site
using Wellplan for Windows TDA module. This requires the use of friction factors,
May 2001 14
which should be back calculated from actual well data.
Creating a forecast drag chart
To create a drag chart in the planning stage of a well the up, down and free rotating
measured weight values are calculated by a torque & drag program and are plotted
in, for example, 200ft bit depth increments. This will result in three curves repre-
senting the up, down and free rotating weights for the string at all bit depths in the
well, a similar result to a manually created drag chart. Wellplan for Windows TDA
module can be used to automatically create a drag chart. Ref 11.
It is common practice to produce only the TD tension (Fig 14) when planning a well.
However, a drag chart gives more information than a TD tension plot, since the
highest tension at surface is not always when the bit is at TD. With the types of wells
currently being drilled it is advisable to always calculate a drag chart.
15 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
2000
A
4000
B1
B2 LEGEND
C: Trip In
E 1000
6000 F
D 2000
3000
Vertical
4000 Depth [ft]
6000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Vertical Section
The high maximum allowable measured weights at bit depths shallower than 1400ft
are due to the BHA components being in the rotary table.
May 2001 16
Measured Weight at Surface
Deviated Well
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
0
2000
2000 4000
6000
LEGEND
Trip In
4000 Actual Trip In
Trip Out
Actual Trip Out
Rotate Off Bottom
Bit Depth [ft] Actual Rotate Off Bottom
Min Weight Plastic
Min Weight Buckle
Max Meas Weight
6000
17 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
Torque at Surface
H o rizontal W e ll
0
LEGEND
R o tate On Bottom
R o tate Off Bottom
2000
B it D e p th [ft]
4000
6000
Fig 18 Shows the expected surface torque while drilling for bit depths down to TD.
The two lines shown are the on and off bottom rotary torque assuming an on bottom
bit torque of 1000ft/lbs.
May 2001 18
1.9 Buoyancy and drag when stuck
When stuck, the drill string does not loose its buoyancy. The string remains im-
mersed in a fluid and therefore still has buoyancy. The sticking mechanism may
absorb all the buoyancy and other forces (those transmitted from surface for exam-
ple) applied to it, however, if the internal forces in the steel are to be calculated
buoyancy must be taken into account.
[Imagine a balloon filled with hydrogen. The balloon will float upwards until you catch it in your hands.
Where does the buoyancy force go then? Of course it goes into your hands. The buoyancy force is still
present, it is purely absorbed by you - acting as the sticking mechanism.]
There are circumstances where buoyancy is lost - The Gulfax concrete platform structures
were floated out to position, placed on the sea-bed and 15m steel skirts on the base of the
storage tanks are sunk into the mud. The storage tanks above were then evacuated causing
the water hydrostatic pressure to push the structure down into the mud - this is effectively
loss of buoyancy. Similarly a drill string in a deviated wellbore can loose a small percentage
of its buoyancy when it is differentially stuck or if the string is run into green cement.
When a string is free and the up weight is applied to start pulling out of the hole, the
tension in the string increases from its rotating weight by an amount equal to the up
drag and the string moves upwards. When the string is stuck (or the hole is tight)
and an overpull (i.e., over and above normal up weight) is applied, the string stretches.
The tension and therefore the drag in the string increases to a higher level than
when the string was free.
Conclusion: When applying overpull the effective drag is higher than when the
string is free. This increase in drag has nothing to do with the mechanism causing
the overpull.
Consequence 1: The down hole overpull is always less than the surface overpull
applied. The difference is the extra drag due to the higher contact forces.
Example 1: If 100k lbs overpull is applied at surface, depending on the drag profile
of the well, only 80k lbs overpull may be seen down hole. (a setdown is defined in
Ref 3 as the amount of string weight slacked off below the down weight). The
downhole value of setdown is more than the surface setdown (see Chapter 2.6).
When the string is set down the tension throughout the string decreases thus the
drag decreases and hence the setdown is larger.
Consequence 2: When applying a setdown weight the effective drag will be less
than the down drag. In a highly deviated or horizontal well the drag in the high angle
sections would need to be overcome before any force is transmitted along the
string.
19 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
Example 2: If 50k lbs setdown (i.e. 50k lbs below the down weight) is applied at
surface in a well with inclination less than 45 degrees, depending on the drag profile
of the well, 60k lbs may be seen down hole. This is because the tension in the whole
string is lower so the down drag decreases.
0
Force
at Stuck While RIH
Stuck
Point Free
Buckled Up Weight
Rotating
(klbs) Down
Weight
Weight
-50
Fig 19 is a schematic of the Force at Stuck Point vs Surface Weight. There are four
areas of interest.
1 Overpull (surface weight > 150k lbs in Fig 19).
2 Hysteresis (Surface weight 80 - 150k lbs in Fig 19). The force transmitted to
the stuck point is changing from tension to compression or vice versa and the
friction in the well is in the process of changing direction. This hysteresis loop
has minimal effect on the force at the stuck point and is not computed in the
Wellplan for Windows stuckpipe module. See Chapter 2.10.
3 Setdown (surface weight 80 - 40k lbs in Fig 19)
4 Buckling (surface weight <30k lbs in Fig 19). The surface weight is sufficiently
low to allow the string to buckle. From Fig 19 there is no way of telling where
in the string buckling will occur, a normal report from the Wellplan for Windows
TDA module is required to show this.
May 2001 20
Fig 20 shows the force at stuck
Stuck Pipe
point for a vertical well. This force
(in this case a compression) can
increase faster than the slack-off
weight is applied.
0
As the measured weight reduces 100 k lbs
from 200k lbs to 100k lbs (100k
lbs difference) the compressional 50
force at the stuck point increases
from -12k lbs to -126k lbs (114k 114 k lbs
lbs difference).
100
Force [kip]
This will not always be the case,
especially if the well is highly de-
150
viated or horizontal. However, it
is important to understand how the
friction in the well is behaving. This
type of calculation can help the 200
analysis is useful not only when Fig 22 - Wellplan for Windows example
the string is stuck, but also when Illustrating the Downhole Force is Greater
shearing down hole pins or bolts than the Surface Slackoff
etc. Operational experience con-
firms that shear pins often require more pull than expected to shear. This extra
pull required is often extra drag due to the 100k lbs overpull required to shear the
pin!
The input for the STU module is the same as for the TDA module; BHA, survey,
casing scheme, friction coefficient and mud data with the addition of stuck depth, jar
position, maximum and minimum applied weight.
The output data includes:
- The force at the stuck point.
- The force applied at the jar.
- Surface force required to Back-off.
21 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
The STU module graphical
output (Fig 23) provides the Stuck Pipe
force at stuck point result for Horizontal Well
40
May 2001 22
1.11 Backing off
Compression 0 Tension
When a back-off shot is used to
break a connection down hole the
tension at the back-off point should
be close to zero for best effect.
23 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
Compression 0 Tension
Fig 26 shows the tension in the
string after slacking off the string
weight at surface to place the zero
tension point just above the stuck
point - the point where you may
wish to back-off.
Tx = pstA.x - pm.A.L
= pst .A.D
May 2001 24
When the back-off shot breaks the connection, the hydrostatic force acts on the
freed part of the string. The zero tension point will then move up the string. This is
illustrated by the example below.
Example of the position of the zero tension point before and after a back-off
shot has been fired in a vertical well.
Drill pipe details. 5 19.5 lb/ft G, NC50, Cross sectional area = 5.275 inch2, actual
weight = 21.92 lbs/ft.
Before the shot is fired the surface weight (SW) to place the tension = zero point at
the back off depth of 6000ft, will be:
After the back-off shot has fired, but the connection has not yet fully unscrewed, the
force on the engaged threads will be:
SW = 131520 - 16450 = 115062 lbs ( the buoyant weight of the free string)
If a back-off has apparently not worked, slacking off by the hydrostatic force acting
on the string above the back-off point while holding in left hand torque may be re-
quired to back-off the string.
Horizontal wells
When the wellbore is deviated or horizontal the buoyancy situation requires a differ-
ent solution. Calculating these results is only practically possible by using a compu-
ter model such as Wellplan for Windows STU Module. In Fig 27 the stuck point has
been assumed to be at 6900 ft MD. To place zero tension on the back-off point at or
close to this depth would require the surface string weight to be increased.
25 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
2000
4000
Depth [ft]
6000
LEGEND
Rotate Off Bottom: Tension
Fig 27 - Tension in the string when initially stuck and when applying
zero tension at the back-off point (6800ft) for a Horizontal well with a
stuck point at 6800ft.
May 2001 26
References
Ref 9 Cheatham, J.B. Chen, Y.C New design considerations for Tubing &
Casing buckling in inclined wells, OTC Paper 5826, May 1988
Ref 10 Basic Fluid and pressure forces on oil well tubulars. SPE 7594.
Hammerlindl. D.J. 1980.
Ref 11 Wellplan for Windows user manual, Landmark Graphics (DRD for older
versions)
Ref 13 Technician Fluid Dynamics, P J Ascroft & N J Cooper. cassel ltd 1979
ISBN 0 304 30289 9
27 May 2001
Drillstring Forces Theory
May 2001 28