Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Contents
[hide]
Most complex system models are often formulated in terms of concepts drawn from statistical
physics, information theory and non-linear dynamics; however, such approaches are not focused on,
or do not include, the conceptual part of complexity related to organization and topological attributes
or algebraic topology, such as network connectivity of genomes, interactomes and biological
organisms that are very important.[6][9][10] Recently, the two complementary approaches based both
on information theory, network topology/abstract graph theory concepts are being combined for
example in the fields of neuroscience and human cognition.[7][11] It is generally agreed that there is
a hierarchy of complexity levels of organization that should be considered as distinct from that of the
levels of reality in ontology.[7][12][13]The hierarchy of complexity levels of organization in the biosphere
is also recognized in modern classifications of taxonomic ranks, such as: biological domain and
biosphere, biological kingdom, Phylum, biological class, order, family, genus and species. Because
of their dynamic and composition variability, intrinsic "fuzziness", autopoietic attributes, ability to self-
reproduce, and so on, organisms do not fit into the 'standard' definition of general systems, and they
are therefore 'super-complex' in both their function and structure; organisms can be thus be defined
in CSB only as 'meta-systems' of simpler dynamic systems[7][14] Such a meta-system definition of
organisms, species, 'ecosystems', and so on, is not equivalent to the definition of a system of
systems as in Autopoietic Systems Theory,;[15] it also differs from the definition proposed for example
by K.D. Palmer in meta-system engineering,[16] organisms being quite different from machines
and automata with fixed input-output transition functions, or a continuous dynamical system with
fixed phase space,[17]contrary to the Cartesian philosophical thinking; thus, organisms cannot be
defined merely in terms of a quintuple A of (states, startup state, input and output sets/alphabet,
transition function),[18] although 'non-deterministic automata', as well as 'fuzzy automata' have also
been defined. Tessellation or cellular automata provide however an intuitive, visual/computational
insight into the lower levels of complexity, and have therefore become an increasingly popular,
discrete model studied in computability theory, applied mathematics, physics, computer science,
theoretical biology/systems biology, cancer simulations and microstructure modeling. Evolving
cellular automata using genetic algorithms[19][20][21] is also an emerging field attempting to bridge the
gap between the tessellation automata and the higher level complexity approaches in CSB.
The following is only a partial list of topics covered in complex systems biology:
Acta Biotheoretica
Bioinformatics
Biological Theory
BioSystems
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
Ecological Modelling
Journal of Mathematical Biology
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Mathematical Biosciences
Medical Hypotheses
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling