Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Young people today suddenly find themselves in a situation where, as a result of lifes
strange demands, an average intelligence is not enough []. Indeed, it is not enough
to play well; doubts repeatedly arise: is this the game we should be playing now? What
game is the most appropriate?
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Culture and Value, 1937
I'm very sorry not to be with you in this meeting of Varna. Actually, I wanted to know this city so interesting for
the richness of its culture and geography; as well, I wanted to meet the Sehud project partners, the students
and the professors belonging to Varna University.
But I will come soon. I hope.
Milan is present through the Polytechnic Foundation and well represented by Ing. Amarilli; however, the team
Polimi is close to you even if only virtually, in this final meeting, wishing you pleasant and fruitful days of work
and visits.
I send you some final thoughts about Sehud activities, inscribed in a broader reference frame related to the
issue of teaching and learning of the architecture with a focus on reality; difficult, complex, problematic status
(caused by the economic crisis, social upheaval, cultural uncertainty) that forces us to constantly ask ourselves
about the meaning of education and training (Bachelor, Master, PhD profiles) thinking to its impact on the
project and the consequent transformation of the reality; which urgently needs to make sure that every our
graduate is able to exercise, consciously, the profession of architect, facing difficulty and complexity of the
present and near future with determination, competency, intelligence, incisiveness.
And, to do this, acquiring high humanistic culture, technical and scientific skills, as well as attitude on the
conceptual processing or creative thinking concerning building conjectures, useful to improve the spatial
configurations that host our life.
1.
As coordinator of Sehud but, above all, as a passionate teacher, I explored with great enthusiasm, in the past
three years, the relationship between teaching and learning through the cooperation of many Universities, with
the comparison between different disciplinary approaches and skills. The intent was to produce materials and
methodologies aimed at an implementation of the quality of teaching in our Universities; the quality will be
validated by the effective 'social utility' of knowledge and experience transmitted and acquired in academia.
What interests me is to understand how much and what we are able to make useful and innovative for our
schools and society; I have at heart 'to measure' the immediate results and future legacy, in terms of content,
conceptual and methodological tools, stimulus on critical and purposeful exercises, that this program has been
able to produce.
Addressing issues
On different geographical and cultural fronts we questioned about issues that could be considered binding on
the contemporary for sustainable future, that must be the horizon of architecture in a wide and articulated
-Concreteness Vs liquidity.
The inability to conceive a contemporary global and unique vision, the widespread proliferation of speeches,
the devaluation of the individual thought in face of global vision, the inability 'to stay on course' as Bauman
says, have resulted in the impairment of each horizon of meaning. It is a phenomenon which affects everything,
including architecture, and before that, its teaching. The present 'liquefaction-fluidization' of the world, and thus
of knowledge, is forcing architecture to lose its consistency and disciplinary specificity, confusing it with
sociology, anthropology, communication, geopolitics and more.
It serves, then, seriously reconsider the confrontation with reality -with its processes and its criticalities- with
the "reality of architecture". Architecture between the arts / disciplines is the one that entertains stronger links
with reality and social phenomena - with the world of the "ideals", "physical" and "social" objects and the
possibility of their transformation and modification. Architecture, in fact, as rational and real construction, by its
very nature, determines, consistently, the scenarios of life, conforms the physical space and the artifacts of
city, territory, landscape.
The notions of concreteness, consistency, coherence, density, materiality about reality is thus a call to civil
liability of architecture and its effects on the physical transformations -immediate and future- of living places.
-Empowerment Vs indifference.
In The Art of Life, 2009, Zigmut Bauman outlines bold bet -for contemporary men - to demonstrate
inventiveness, creativity, reflection and personal commitment (to be able to decide and act accordingly).
Among the few viable ways, he assumes an empowerment, which he sees and hopes to be like "ability to
make decisions and act effectively on the basis of the choices made. Extremely current is the consideration
that Wittgenstein said in 1937: Young people today suddenly find themselves in a situation where, as a result
of lifes strange demands, an average intelligence is not enough []. Indeed, it is not enough to play well;
doubts repeatedly arise: is this the game we should be playing now? What game is the most appropriate?
Empowerment, for training, becomes fundamental. According to Bauman "authentic empowerment means not
only acquire the abilities necessary, to successfully play in a game projected by others, but necessary also the
power to influence the objectives, the stakes and the rules of the game"
For the students, to promote imagination, self-esteem, independent ability to reason and deal with problems,
means to know how to evaluate alternatives, to take action in a flexible manner according to the changes
taking place. And the architecture of empowerment can be a challenge to take on, with determination, themes
/ goals, specific to the contexts and physical space. For example, the relationship between architecture and
aesthetics. 'Empowerment of Aesthetics' was the title of an exhibition presented last Venice Architecture
Biennial, 2014. The Danish Pavilion reintroduces the forgotten power of aesthetics as the complementary to
the rational as essential for our common road into a sustainable future.
These, I have proposed, are points of reflection for Sehud and especially for its legacy; I also think they are
issues that underline the work done, at least for a good part. Many materials prepared, lectures, cultural
references, bibliographies, etc. incorporate methodologies and themes mentioned; as meaning that to the
development of each of the 7 major problem areas of the modules are always subtended questions put to the
disciplines of the architectural and urban design, about the meaning of doing and on theoretical and applied
instrumentation, adequate to face reality. This is the approach, by which we held the experimental design of
the workshop, conceived as a moment in which students have tested knowledge and cultural paradigms
coming both of their background, both from Sehud experience. They have investigated strategic contexts of
The issues have had particular focus and developments in relation to specific urban contexts.
For Osnova area, in Kharkiv the aim of project design research was been developing methods of
implementing a step-by-step strategy of ecological rehabilitation of depressive districts in the city : the steps
concern strategies of environmental restoration, both acting on the redevelopment of the fundamental
resources soil, air, water- and by favouring the potentiality of urban and territorial reorganization and
stimulating the development of new economic and social activities. To give concreteness to the interventions
, it is necessary to ask ourselves what is the specific nature of these issues in the specific case of Osnova,
what are the specific architectural and town planning design moves that we can do. A specificity of the city
of Kharkiv is its particular relationship between 'culture and nature'.
The Osnova is placed in a territorial context characterized by the -non common- presence of green areas,
relevant for quality and quantity. The relationship between nature and culture could developed constructing
a strong structural system where green spaces, rivers, lakes, hills, -flora and fauna- , but also filaments of
vegetation, 'green' roads, environmentally friendly infrastructure, new responsible productive and residential
settlements , friendly public spaces could become the backbone of the Kharkov territory and strengthen its
identity. The system asks innovative technologies, both in relation to the methodology of the processes - such
as - knowledge / information - ; both aspects of production of alternative energy, sources of income, individual
and collective wellbeing, but they must be referred to an idea of city where the new urban relationships are
weak, reversible and spread. The weak urbanization may provide the area to finance measures of the tasks
associated with the increase of 'naturalistic' qualities.
The aim for Zapadnyi area of Dnipropetrovsk is Enhancing the quality of the urban environment; renovating
the riverside (post) industrial areas; recognising the potentiality of the new -morphological and functional
relationship between the Zapadnyi zone and the urban context. changing the quality of the urban environment
towards sustainable innovation vector of development of the area through public and private structures.
From its origins, Dnipropetrovsk was shaped like a connection between geography and topography (the skyline
of the hills and the irregular pattern of the river) and the characters of the settlements; the structure of the
orthogonal grid, the measurement of blocks, the relationship between public and private space has been
useful, in time, to ensure urban development consistent with its natural and historical environment. In the last
Decades fast and hard transformations took place outside of this logic of consistency, but the challenge of this
study is to face innovation and tradition: developing specific design guidelines consistent with the 'character'