Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Consider the liquid blending control system shown in Figure 1 where stream 1
(25) consists of a mixture of two components and stream 2 has x2 = 1. An overflow
line maintains a constant holdup in the tank. The control objective is to control
the blend composition, x, which can be measured on-line but there is a significant
transport time delay associated with the location of the composition measurement,
which is downstream of the blending tank. Inlet flow rate w2 can be manipulated
but its upstream pressure can vary significantly. The exit flow rate w can also be
measured. The chief disturbance variable is inlet flow rate w1, which can exhibit
very large and frequent changes.
Propose and justify two possible advanced control strategies for this blending
control problem using control techniques considered in Chapters 15 and 16 of the
text. They should also be based on the assumption that no additional control
valves are available; you do not necessarily need to use all of the sensors shown,
but you can add one inexpensive sensor if necessary. Be as specific as possible;
however, a detailed quantitative control system design is not required, although be
sure to clearly identify the MV, CV, and DV for each control loop in your
proposed control strategy.
(a) When the reactor is shut down, the vaporizer undergoes a pressure surge
(5) that can trip a relief valve/rupture disk on the exit line (undesirable
behavior). Why can a pressure surge occur?
(b) Analyze the P&ID and the valve failure conditions for shutdown. What
(15) function does each of the four valves perform? Determine whether each
valve should fail open or fail close (and state why).
(c) Note that there is no level control. Without adding more sensors, how
(5) could you improve control of the liquid level?
4
Liquid Chlorine
(b) Calculate the relative gain array for the system and recommend a pairing of
(15) controlled and manipulated variables.
6. In the BP plant accident in Texas City, TX, the malfunctioning level sensor
(5) played a critical role. What were possible reasons for the incorrect level
measurement?