Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First of all my, heartful salutation to the almighty,
my studies.
Date :
GROWTH AND PRODUCTIVITY OF WHEAT (Triticum aestuvum L.)
UNDER MODIFIED RAIDED BEADS OF VARYING SIZES AND
IRRIGATION LEVELS
Depatment of Agriculture, SDBIT, Dehradun(U.K.)
E-Mail- anjukonthoujam@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Wheat is the second most important cereal after rice in India and rank 3 rd in
the Worlds cereal crops production. It is a staple food for 1/3 rd of the Worlds
population, thus primary food security concerns are focused on improving and
sustaining its productivity. In India, wheat is grown in 28.5 mha area with a
total production of 96.6mt (2016-2017) contributing 41.1 percent to the total
food grain production in the country, with productivity level of 27.03q/ha (
Directorate of Wheat Research, 2012-2013). As per an estimate, India
would need 109 mt wheat by 2020, which can be achieved by its assured
annual growth rate of 4.1 percent ( Nagarajan, 2005). Food security dilemma
is the major problem of the future for countries like India, where resources are
getting stretched to the limits. There is no doubt that intensive agriculture in
irrigated areas has brought out substantial enhancement in food grain
production but has also threatened the environmental safety and accelerated
the degradation and inefficient use of basic resources and production inputs.
In the present situation, the only option left is to shift towards eco-friendly
advance and efficient utilization of production resource especially soil, water
nutrients. Amongst the various agronomic practices, proper crop
establishment method may considerably increase
the efficiency of inputs/ productivity of wheat. It is also well known fact that
water management is one of the major factors responsible for
achieving better harvest in crop establishment method ( Maurya and Singh,
2008).
In many parts of the country, the availability of irrigation water is
decreasing as both ground and surface water are being over exploited. The
situation has further aggravated due to changing climate, especially the
rainfall pattern. In such areas, the wheat productivity is being hampered due to
inadequate availability of irrigation water.
Flat bed planting is the most common and popular wheat establishment
practice all over the country but consumes unrealistically high amount of
irrigation water resulting into low water use efficiency. Therefore, there is
need to find out the alternative water efficient planting method. The efficiency
of available irrigation water can be increased by resorting to raised bed
planting as in this method, the application of irrigation water is restricted to
furrows only, made between two parallel beds. The moisture of crop root zone
is made available through lateral movement of water. APart from this, such
configurations have also been found useful in trapping the rain water for soil
moisture augmentation. The piling up of fertile top soil in the form of bed
which also helps in vigorous root system, enabling the plant to explore more
soil volume and resist against lodging. The raised bed planting system with
furrow irrigation has been found to give higher water use efficiency and also
resulted 30 per cent saving in irrigation water over conventional flat planting
with flood irrigation (Wang et al., 2004). The added advantage observed with
former has been reduced crust problem on the soil surface and improved soil
physical health. Asif et al. (2003) reported that bed furrow method consumed
about 35.6 percent less irrigation water as compared to flat border irrigation
method. Also germination count and yield components were considerably
improved under bed furrow irrigation technique leading to 13.4 per cent
higher grain yield. In the recent years, the furrow irrigated raised bed system
has proved to be one of the important components of low cost sustainable
production system. This planning system facilitates mechanical weed control,
increase water use efficiency, reduces crop lodging and has lower seed
requirement (Sayre, 2000 and Yadav et al., 2002). In bed planting, some area
remains unsown in the form of furrows and crop in planted on the top of the
beds only. The yield compensation or advantage is assumed due to
border/edge effect, which may vary depending upon the soil type and actual
area sown. In this respect, bed width may play significant role in determining
the wheat as well as water productivity.
Irrigation water is one of the most crucial inputs for wheat growth,
development and yields expression. Maintaining adequate soil moisture in the
crop root zone is the prime aim of irrigation application. However, the time of
irrigation application is governed by type of the soil (texture), stage of the
crop as well as evapourative demand of the atmosphere. Improper scheduling
of irrigation results not only in wastage of water, but also decreases crop
yield. In flat bed planting, irrigation water is applied to the entire field, while
in raised bed system; it is restricted to furrows only, resulting in reduced
quantity of applied irrigation water. Therefore, crop is likely to respond
differently to variable irrigation applications under different methods of
establishment and bed sizes. Kakar (2003) reported notable variations in yield
of wheat under raised beds and flat bed planting, when subjected to variable
suply of irrigation water. For seeding wheat on raised bed, machines are
available for large, uniform fields of plain areas. However in resource poor
areas ( small plot size, terraced fields, high gravel content etc.), the
availability and operation ability of such devices are still limited. Therefore in
the present study efforts were made to make raised bed using the local tool
spade to offer and alternative for such areas. In view of above facts, the
present investigation entitled Growth and productivity of wheat (Triticum
aestivum L.) under modified raised beds of varying sizes and irrigation
levels was conducted with the following objectives:
1. To optimize the bed width for higher wheat and water productivity.
2. To optimize the irrigation levels under different planting techniques.
3. To work out the water use, nutrient uptake and economics.
Review
Of
Literature
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Wheat is the second most important cereal after rice in India and rank in 3 rd in
the Worlds cereal crops production evolved for different crops with an
objective to improve/sustain input use efficiency and crop productivity. Water
being the prime input in agricultural production, needs to be economized as
agriculture is likely to face tough competition from other user sectors. A brief
resume of the work carried out on these aspects has been reviewed and
presented under various heads in this chapter.
2.1 Effect of planting techniques
2.1.1 Wheat growth
At Karnal, Haryana Khatri et al. (2002) studied the performance of
wheat cv. UP 2338 under raised and flat beds sowing and irrigation levels.
Growth parameters such as number of tillers per meter row length, leaf area
index, crop growth rate and dry matter accumulation were favored by raised
bed plating method. Asif et al. (2003) found that the germination count of
wheat got improved considerably under bed furrow irrigation technique as
compared to flat border irrigation method.
Walia et al. (2003) reported that bed sown crop with two rows per bed
had significantly less effective tillers as compared to bed sown crop with three
rows.
Jat and singh (2004) did not find significant variation in the overall
growth and productivity of wheat under furrow irrigated raised bed system
(FIRBs) that with cross-sowing system under flat field condition.
Kumar et al. (2007) observed faster growth, better root development
and aeration under furrow irrigated raised bed system than flat sown crop
owing to more free space available on both sides of the bed.
Wang et al. (2007) found that as compared to conventional flat planting,
the plant morphological characters related to the grain yield of winter wheat
changed greatly by the raised bed planting model, besides having heavier dry
weight of green leaves in canopy. While, comparing four winter wheat
varieties under raised bed planting (RBP) and conventional flat planting
(CFP), Li et al. (2008) found that the RBP inhibited the occurrence of invalid
tillers, promoted vigorous tillers and increased year-bearing tiller rate. This
resulted in significantly improved light conditions of the lower leaves of the
plants and increase the contribution of the 4th leaf from the top of seed yield. It
also increased the leaf area index (LAI) and dry matter accumulation of the
shoots.
Kong et al. (2010) found that furrow irrigation in a raised bed planting
system improved the root vitality by 8.9%, and root dry weight by 3.7 percent
as compared to conventional planting.
Kumar et al. (2010) reported that furrow irrigated raised bed system
with 3 rows per bed has significantly higher leaf area indez, dry matter
accumulation and more taller plants as compared to 2 rows per bed and
conventional sowing.
2.1.2 Yield and yield attributes
At karnal, Haryana Khatri et al. (2002) studied the performance of
wheat cv. UP 2338 under raised or flat bed sowing and irrigation levels and
found that the yield attributes such as number of grains per year head and test
weight were the highest with sowing in 3 row beds and irrigation at 1.2 IW :
CPE ratio. The highest grain (49.21q/ha and straw yield (60.52q/ha) were
recorded with 3-row beds and irrigation at 1.0 IW: CPE ratio, respectively.
Yadav et al (2002) credited the increase in wheat yield under furrow
irrigated raised bed system to higher number of spikelets/spike, grains /spike
and 1000- grain weight.
Asif et al. (2003) reported that the yield components were improved
considerably under bed furrow irrigation technique leading to 13.4 per cent
higher grain yield than flat sown crop.
Jat and Singh (2003) reported that furrow irrigated raised bed planting
of wheat with 2 rows per bed and simultaneous sowing of berseem in furrows
with multiple cuttings gave the highest wheat- equivalent yield (7.03 tones/
ha) and per day productivity (57.07 kg/ha/day).
Kumar et al (2004) obtained at per yields of different wheat
cultivators under the furrow irrigated raised bed system even with reduced
irrigation up to 70 per cent of the recommended to that under flat bed system
of sowing.
Moreno et al. (2004) conducted an experiment during winter season at
the yaqui valley agricultural experiment station, on beds widths and plant
density. Results indicated that yields were not modified when the broad bed
width (DBB) was changed.
Kumar et al. (2007) reported that under furrow irrigated raised bed
system, wheat varieties PBW 343, and HD 2687 were at per in terms of grain
yield and both produced significantly higher number of effective tillers/ m2
and 1000- grain weight and ultimately resulted in higher grain and straw
yields compared to WH-147 , WH-283 , C-306 and WH-896 varieties.
While comparing the performance of 20 wheat genotypes under two crop
establishment methods Satya and Choudhury (2005) reported that the wheat
genotypes thrived better under the furrow irrigated raised bed system than
under the surface seeding.
Buttar et al. (2006) conducted a field experiment and find that the
grain yields of wheat in flat (35.32q/ha) and bed planting (35.33q/ha)
treatments were not statistically different.
Bakker et al . (2007) found that the wheat grain yields on the raised
beds were significantly higher than the yields from crop grown on the flat bed
with an average yield enhancement of 0.48 t/ha.
The grain yield of wheat was marginally higher under bed planting than in
conventional method due to higher number of spike/m row length and number
of grain /spike (Mascangi et al., 1995 and Kumar et al., 2007).
Mollah et al. (2009) compared the bed widths, number of rows per bed
and seed rates along with conventional method. Bed width of 70 cm increased
the mean grain yield of wheat up to 21 per cent over conventional method due
to increased number of panicles/m2, grains / panicle 1000- grains weight.
They also reported that the sterility percentage was lower in bed planting.
In central Punjab , India Singh et al. (2009) studied the rice- wheat
system on permanent raised beds (37 cm wide, 15 cm high, furrow width 30
cm) in sandy loan soils. Permanent raised beds offered benefits for rice
wheat system in terms of both production and the possibility that furrow-
irrigation may be more efficient than flood irrigation in flat bed. Akbar et al.
(2010) reported that wide beds produced higher wheat (15%) and maize
(26%) yields than the flat basin system.
Kukal et al. (2010) found that yields of wheat on raised beds and
conventionally tilled wheat were similar on the loam but were sometimes
lower on beds on the sandy loam. Kumar et al. (2010) reported that the
higher grain yield found in bed planting was due to higher number of
spikelets/spike, grains /spike and 1000-grain weight as compared to
conventional sowing. The results of field studies conducted by Sepat et al.
(2010) revealed that furrow irrigated raised bed planting registered higher
mean spikes/ m2, grains/spike and 1000-grain weight resulting in 8.6% higher
grain yield than conventional planting (4.36 tones/ ha). While comparing the
performance of winter wheat under furrow irrigated raised bed planting and
flood irrigated conventional planting wang et al. (2010) found that the furrow
irrigated raised bed planting system improved the wheat grain yield by 7.6 per
cent (698.7 g/m2) than that in conventional planting.
2.1.3 Nutrient uptake
2.1.4 Econimics
The total variable cost of conventional method (16600 ha-1) was higher
than bed planting in 70, 80 and 90 cm wide beds with both two and three plant
rows. Many researchers have also reported lower costs of production in bed
planting which ranged from 20-30% compared to conventional method
(Reeves et al. 2000; Sayre, 2003 and Connor et al. 2003).
Jat and Singh ( 2003) reported that furrow irrigated raised bed planting of
wheat with 2 rows per bed and simultaneous sowing of berseem in furrows
with multiple cuttings gave the higher net returns ( Rs 33,265/ha ) than sole
wheat.
Goel and Verma ( 2005) compared the economics of different wheat
establishment systems and observed that bed planting system produced higher
monetary benefits than zero tillage and conventional tillage.
Maurya and Singh ( 2008) reported the maximum cost of cultivation
(Rs 17773/ha) under bed planting , while the minimum (Rs 14510/ha) was
recorded under zero tillage. Mollah et al (2009) found that the cost of
cultivation was lower and benefit cost ratio was higher in bed planting than
conventional method of sowing .
2.1.5 Water saving and water use efficiency :-
Planting of wheat on the bed required 25% less quantity of irrigation water
over the flat sown crop ( Aquino 1998). While assessing the water
productivity of wheat kukal et al ( 2010) recorded that in the small plots,
irrigation water productivity (WPIV)on beds and in conventnioally tilled
wheat was similar ( mean 2 g /kg) on the loam , but about 20% less on the
sandy loam mainly due to lower yields. In the farmers field, water
productivity of irrigation water ( 1.5 g/kg) was 15%. higher on the fresh beds
than on the permanent bed due to lower requirement of irrigation water.
Maurya and Singh, (2008) reported that the highest water use
efficiency was recorded under bed planting followed by Rota till drill, zero
tillage and conventional method.It increased by 26.88 and 40.70 kg/ha-cm
than that obtained under conventional method. They also found that the
maximum total soil moisture depletion (24.07 and 22.83 cm) by wheat crop
from 0-15 and 15-30 cm layers was recorded under conventional method of
sowing.
Wang et al. (2004) compared the two wheat varieties under two
planting system and observed that raised-bed planting system in comparision
to flat increased the soil moisture content, decreased soil surface crust and
improved soil physical properties.
Sayre (2000) found that the raised bed planting system increases the
water use efficiency and reduces the crop lodging.
Yadav et al .(2002) reported a saving of 46-56 prr cent in time and
quantity of irrigation water in wheat in case of tube well irrigation and 36 per
cent in case of canal irrigation under bed planting as compared to the
conventional planting.
Goel and Verma (2005) reported that the sowing of wheat on raised
beds by bed planter had 30 per cent more water use efficiency compared to
sowing by no-tillage seed-cum-fertilizer drill in untilled condition and sowing
by broadcasting method in conventional tillage.
Jin et al.(2008) found that the permanent raised beds significantly
increased the soil water content in 0.30 m depth by 7.2-10.7 per cent and ZT
treatments . Mean wheat yields over 3 years on PRB plots were slightly
greater and furrow irrigation in permanent beds was particularly effective in
increasing irrigation water use efficiency (similar to 18 per cent), compared
with TT and ZT treatments.
Maurya and Singh ( 2008) found that the consumptive use of water by
wheat decreased in the order of conventional method , rota till drill zero tillage
and bed planting , Ghane et al (2009) found that the furrow irrigated raised
wavy beds with 60 cm top produced higher grain yields with less irrigation
water and increased the water productivity by 14.9 and 18.4 percent in
comparison with the conventional flat planting method. Mollahet al (2009)
reported that the conventional method of wheat establishment received the
highest amount of water in every irrigation and the total amount was 316.5
mm. Total water savings by 70,80 and 90 cm wide beds over conventional
method were 41-46 per cent and 44-48 per cent, respectively.
Akbar et al (2010) reported that the lower water application in the
permanent raised bed compared to basin treatment was sound to be closely
related to bed width. The narrow, medium and wide beds used 31,16-17 and
18-22 per cent less wate than the basins, respectively.
Different approaches are used for irrigating the wheat crop viz IW CPE
ratio critical growth stages, soil moisture depletion etc. As the basis for
applying irrigation is different in different approaches, thus these are likely to
affect the crop growth and productivity differently.
2.2.1 Growth
Li et al ( 2005) observed that in the semi arid regions in loamy soils
irrigation treatment in comparison to treatments without irrigation
significantly increased the root biomass of wheat.
Memon (2000) reported that wheat when irrigated only twice at the
stage of tillering and milky stage, produced plants with a minimum height,
formed smaller spikes and bore less number of grains . These parameters
2.2.4 Economics
Sayre (2000) reported that with FIRBs the irrigation water requirement
can be reduced upto 35 per cent compared to the conventional row planting in
2 Crop Wheat
3 Season Rabi ( 2016-17)
4 Treatments 15
5 Replications 3
6 Gross plot size 4.20 m x 4.0 m ( 16.8
m2)
7 Net plot size As per treatment
8 Variety UP 2584
9 Irrigation depth 6 cm
Table 3.5 Net plot size as per treatment
The crop of the individual plot was harvested manually when more than
90 percent of the grains in the spikes were fully ripened and free from
greenish tinge. At first, the border and sample rows of all the plots were
removed and then net plot was measured and harvested individually.
Subsequently after 6 days of sun drying, the product of individual plot was
threshed by a plot thresher.
Crop area as mentioned in 3.8 was clipped from ground surface and
number of active leaves were counted. A leaf having more than half green
area was treated as active leaf. The active leaf number has been reported on
per m.
The plants clipped for active leaves count were also used for dry
matter accumulation. The samples were initially sun dried and then in plant
drier at 70 2C temperature to record the dry matter production/m.
For root study, the soil sample were drawn using a core of 7.5 cm
diameter upto 20 cm depth and put in a fine mesh nylon bag. The bag with all
contents was immersed in running water nearby Pucca Canel for about 1 hour
so that soil mass gets sufficiently lossened and roots are recovered during
washing. After thoroughly cleaning, the roots were soaked in bloating paper
then put in a measuring cylinder partially fill with clean water and the rise in
water level in the cylinder due to immersion of roots was noted ass root
volume. After determining the root volume, this were placed in numbered
brown paper bags and dried in an oven at 70 2 C until a constant weight
was obtained. Clipped shoots were also dried following the similar process.
The root volume has been expressed as cm, and root dry weight as root
weight density (g/cm).
The shoots ears marked for recording plant height during vegetative
phase were used for height determination at maturity also.
Ears marked sampling area was clipped and in each plot the number of
spikes were counted and then multiplied with computed factor to get spikes
/m.
The numbers of spikelet with grain were treated as fertile spikelet and
those without grain as sterile. Both fertile and sterile spikelet were counted
separately on all the 10 spikes and averaged to get fertile and sterile
spikelets/spike.
The sampled plants were threshed manually and cleaned for grains.
The total grain weight was divided by number of spikes to obtain grain weight
per spike.
Form the grain produce of the net plot, 1000 grains were counted
weighted and reported as 1000 grain weight.
The entire produce form each net plot was threshed by a plot
thresher. Then grains were cleaned by winnowing and weighted and expressed
as quintal per hectare.
The total produce form net plot was harvested and dried in sun for 3-
4 days, bundled and labeled then weighed to record biological yield per plot
and expressed in quintal per hectare.
Straw yield from net plot was obtained by substracting the grain
yield form the total biomass produce of the net plot and expressed as quintal
per hectare.
The index (HI) was calculated using the expression and expressed as
per cent value.
( / )
Harvest index (%) = ( / ) 100
3.11. Soil moisture studies
Soil moisture content was determined for different depths viz. 0-20,
20-40 and 40-60 cm taking samples from the respective depths with the help
of screw auger. The sampling spots were close to the row during early stages
and between rows at later stages of crop growth. The layer wise soil samples
were collected in moisture boxes and brought to laboratory to record their
fresh weight. Then the samples were dried in oven at 105 C 2 C till they
attained constant weight.
Moisture content was determined as
12
Pw = 100
2
Where
Pw = moisture content per cent by weight
W1 = fresh weight of soil sample
W2 = oven dry weight of soil sample
Where,
MD = depth of water (mm)
MP = Moisture percent on oven dry weight basis.
BD = Bulk density of soil (g/cc)
d = depth of soil layer (mm)
()
ET (mm) = 1 + ER
100
Where,
MAi = Percent moisture on oven dry basis after irrigation in ith layer
MBi = Percentage moisture on oven dry basis before irrigation in ith layer
BDi = Bulk density of the ith layer (g/cc)
di = depth of 1st layer (mm)
n = Number of layers
= Summation of
ER = Effective rainfall (mm)
In order to account for water used by the crop during the period from
date of irrigation to date of sampling after irrigation, the total water loss from
open pan evaporation (Eo) for this period was multiplied with 0.85 to get
evapotranspiration, and then added to the value of ET for particular cycle.
Thus CU (consumptive use) for any one cycle was computed as:
Cu= ET + 0.85 Eo
The crop water use for the entire growth period was the summation of all
these values.
CU = 1 cuj
Where,
CU = Consumptive use
n = Number of time intervals
j = jth cycle
cuj = Consumptive use in the jth time interval
Initial composite soil sample from the whole experimental site from 0-15 and
15-30 cm depths was drawn. The soil sample was analyzed for organic
carbon, pH, available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium following the
procedure given in table 1.
The grain and straw samples collected from each plot at harvest were analyzed
for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. The plant materials were oven dried
at 70 2 C for 48 hrs, ground separately and passed through a 2mm sieve and
then subjected to chemical analysis. The plant samples were digested with
concentrated sulphuric acid containing salicylic acid (1 g salicylic acid in
30ml of concentrated sulphuric acid) for estimation of nitrogen, phosphorus
and potassium. The plant material were oxidized for release of nutrients with
di- acid mixture of concentrated HNO3 (70 per cent) and perchloric acid (70
per cent) in 4:1 ratio. The methods use for determination of various elements
in the plant samples are given in table 3.9
3.14 Economics
The experimental findings based on the data recorded during the course of
investigation entitled Growth and productivity of wheat (Triticum
aestivum L.) under modified raised beds of varying sizes and irrigation
levels has been presented in this chapter in the form of tables and illustrated
through figures wherever necessary.
The data pertaining to emergence count/m2 are given in table 4.1 and
their analyses of variance in appendix II.
The data pertaining to number of tillers/m are given in table 4.1 and their
analyses of variance in appendix III.
At both 45 and 90 DAS, the number of tillers was affected significantly
due to planting techniques. Flat bed sown wheat recorded the maximum and
significantly higher number of tillers (1201/m and 791/m), respectively at 45
and 90 DAS than all raised bed treatments. All the raised bed planting
techniques did not differ significantly in terms of tillers/m at both the stages
of recording.
S.Em 23.6
C.D. (5%) 68.4
The data pertaining to number of active leaves/m are given in table 4.3
and their analyses of variance in appendix IV.
At all the irrigation levels the flat sown crop recorded significantly higher
tillers than raised bed planting techniques. Among raised bed planting
techniques, MRB 60/25 at CGS recorded the highest tillers (641/m), but it
was significantly higher only than MRB 60/25 at IW : CPE 0.80 (523/m) and
MRB 80/25, at IW : CPE 1.20 (524/m).
Table 4.3 Number of active leaves and dry matter accumulation as
influenced by planting techniques and irrigation levels
Planting Technique
Flat 4350 3078 69 1286
RB45/15 3070 2702 53 1073
MRB 45/25 3759 2687 60 956
MRB 60/25 3793 2830 59 1078
MRB 80/25 4186 2887 53 1109
Irrigation Level
IW:CPE 0.80 3645 2847 54 1079
IW : CPE 1.20 3953 2771 62 1046
CGS 3897 2892 60 1175
S.Em 46
C.D. (5%) 135
The data pertaining to dry matter accumulation are given in table 4.3
and their analyses of variance in appendix V.
At both 45 and 90 DAS, the dry matter accumulation was affected
significantly due to planting techniques. At both the stages flat bed sown
wheat accumulated the maximum and significantly higher dry matter than all
the raised bed treatments. Among raised bed treatments it did not differ
significantly at 45 DAS, while at 90 DAS, MRD 45/25 recorded the lowest
and significantly lowers dry matter (956 g/m) as compared to remaining
planting techniques.
At all the irrigation levels, the number of active leaves in flat sown
crop was significantly higher than the raised bed sown crop. In general, the
active leaves increased with increased in bed size, being the maximum in
MRB 80/25 at CGS (2956/m). MRB 60/25 and MRB 80/25, produced higher
active leaves than RB 45/15, at all the irrigation levels.
The data pertaining to plant height are given in table 4.5 and their
analyses of variance in appendix VI.
At 45 DAS, planting techniques did not affect the plant height
significantly but at 90 DAS the difference was found to be significant. At 45
DAS, the plant height ranged from 25 cm (RB 45/15) to 28.1 (MRB 60/25).
The plant height decreased by 11.0, 2.5. 1.8 and 1.4 per cent under RB 45/15,
MRB 80/25 and MRB 45/25 and flat, respectively as compared to MRB
60/25. At the DAS, MRB 60/25 (77.2 cm) recorded significantly taller plants
but at par with treatment MRB 45/25. Flat sown wheat recorded the lowest
(71.2 cm) plant height, but it was at par with RB 45/25 (72.6 cm) and MRB
80/25 (72.5).
Irrigation level
IW : CPE 0.80 27.6 73.6 79.3
IW : CPE 1.20 26.7 74.7 80.5
CGS 27.2 72.9 79.6
The data pertaining to root weight density are given in table 4.6 and their
analyses of variance in appendix VII and VIII.
At both 45 and 90 DAS, the root weight density was not affected
significantly both due to planting techniques and irrigation levels. At 45 DAS,
among planting techniques the root weight density ranged from 13.4 mg/cm3
(MRB 60/25 and MRB 80/25) to 16.4 mg/cm3 (MRB 45/25) and at 90 DAS
from 24.8 mg/cm3 (MRB 45/25) to 26.8 mg/cm3 (RB 45/15), respectively. At
45 DAS, the root weight density decreased by 18.3, 18.3, 17.7 and 9.8 per
cent in MRB 60/25, MRB 80/25, RB 45/15 and flat sown crop, respectively .
At 90 DAS, the root weight density decreased by 7.5, 6.0, 2.2 and 0.8 percent
under MRB 45/25, MRB 60/25, MRB 80/25 and flat, respectively as
compared to RB 45/15 (26.8 Mg/cm3).
45 90 45 90 45 90
Planting technique
Flat 14.8 26.6 3.5 7.9 0.42 0.30
RB 45/15 13.5 26.8 3.3 7.9 0.41 0.26
MRB 45/25 16.4 24.8 3.0 7.4 0.46 0.24
MRB 60/25 13.4 25.2 2.8 7.1 0.38 0.26
MRB 80/25 13.4 26.2 3.3 8.1 0.40 0.25
Irrigation Level
IW:CPE 0.80 14.5 25.0 3.2 7.2 0.38 0.26
IW : CPE 1.20 15.1 26.4 3.2 7.6 0.43 0.26
CGS 13.3 26.4 3.1 8.2 0.43 0.27
S.Em 1.8
C.D. (5%) 5.3
Root Volume (cm3)
The data pertaining to root volume are given in table 4.6 and their analyses of
variance in appendix VII and VIII.
At both 45 and 90 DAS, the root volume was not affected significantly
both due to planting techniques and irrigation levels. Among planting
techniques, it ranged from 2.8 cm3 (MRB 60/25) to 3.5 cm3 (flat) at 45 DAS
and 7.1 cm3 MRB 60/25) to 8.1 cm3 (MRB 80/25) at 90 DAS. At 45 DAS the
root volume decreased by 20 14.3, 5.7 and 5.7 per cent under MRB 60/25,
MRB 45/25 RB 80/15 and RB 45/15 respectively as compared to flat. At 90
DAS the root volume decreased by 12.4 , 7.8, 2.1 and 2.0 per cent in MRB
60/25 , MRB 45/25 RB 45/15 and flat, respectively as compared to MRB
80/25. At 45 DAS the irrigation applied at IW : CPE 0.80 and IW : CPE 1.20
recorded the highest root volume ( 3.23 cm3) which decreased by 3.1 percent
in irrigation at CGS. At 90 DAS the irrigation applied at CGS recorded
significantly the highest higher root volume than IW : CPE 0.80 but it was
at par with IW : CPE 1.20. The interaction effect between planting technique
and irrigation levels on root volume was found to be significant ( Table 4.8)
at 45 DAS but non-significant at 90 DAS. Planting techniques treatment MRB
60/25 at CGS ( 1.9 cm3) recorded the lowest root volume, which was
significantly lower than other treatment except RB 45/15 at IW : CPE 1.20 (
2.5 cm3) , MRB 45/25 IW : CPE 0.80 ( 2.0 cm) and MRB 80/25 at CGS( 2.7
cm3). Remaining all the combination of planting techniques and irrigation
levels did not differ significantly with respect to root volume.
Table 4.8 Interaction effect of planting technique and irrigation levels
on root volume (cm3) at 45 DAS
S.Em 0.3
C.D.(%) 1.0
The data pertaining to root: shoot ratio are given in table 4.6 and their
analyses of variance in appendix VII and VIII.
The root: shoot ratio decreased with the advancement of the crop age.
Both at 45 and 90 DAS, the root: shoot ratio was not affected significantly
due to planting techniques and irrigation levels. Among planting techniques
the root: shoot ratio ranged from 0.40 (MRB 80/25) to 0.49 (flat, MRB 45/25,
MRB 60/25) at 45 DAS and 0.24 (MRB 45/25 to 0.30 (flat). It decreased by
18.4 and 12.2 per cent under MRB 80/25 and RB 45/15, respectively
compared to the highest value (0.49). At 90 DAS, the root : shoot decreased
by 20.0, 16.7, 13.3 and 13.3 per cent in MRB 45/2 , MRB 80/25 ,MRB 60/25
and RB 45/15, respectively as compared to the maximum value (0.30)
recorded in flat sown crop.
Among techniques, days taken to 50% heading ranged from 99 (MRB 60/25)
to 103 (flat). Irrigation applied at CGS and IW : CPE 1.20 TOOK 4 MORE
DAYS (102) than IW : CPE 0.80 (98) to attain the 50% heading stages.
The duration of crop maturity was the maximum ( 137 days) in flat
bed sown crop, while RB 45/15 ( 134 days ) took the minimum time to attain
the maturity .
Irrigation at CGS took significantly higher number of day (137) to
attain maturity then IW : CPE 0.80 (133 days) but was at par with irrigation
at IW : CPE 1.20 ( 136 days )
Ears /m
The data pertaining to ears / m are given in table 4.12 and their
analyses of variance in appendix X.
The data pertaining to ear length are given in table 4.12 and their
analyses of variance in appendix X.
Among irrigation levels, IW : CPE 1.20 recorded the longest ear (8.9
cm), which was higher by 4.5 per cent than IW : CPE 0.80 and only 1.1 per
cent than CGS treatment ( 8.8 cm).
The interaction effect between planting techniques and irrigation levels on ear
length was found to be non - significant.
The grain weight / ear was not affected significantly both due to
planting techniques and irrigation levels. Among planting techniques, the
grain weight / ear ranged from 1.29 g (flat) to 1.34 g (MRB 60/25). The grain
weight / ear decreased by 3.7, 1.5, 1.5 and 0.8 per cent under flat, RB 45/15,
MRB 80/25, MRB 45/25 respectively as compared to MRB 60/25. All the
raised bed treatment recorded higher grain weight / ear than flat sown crop.
Among irrigation level, the grain weight / ear did not differ much and
range from 1.31 g/ear (CGS) to 1.32 g/ ear in IW : CPE 1.20 and 0.80 ratios.
IW : CPE 0.80 30 29 31 32 35
IW : CPE 1.20 29 30 35 32 34
CGS 32 32 32 33 30
S.Em 1.2
CD(5%) 3.6
The interaction effect between planting technique and irrigation levels on
grain number / ear was found to be significant (Table 4.13)
The highest and significantly higher grain ear (35) was recorded in
MRB 45/25 at IW : CPE 1.20 and MRB 80/25 at IW :CPE 0.80. The (29)
grain /ear was in flat at IW : CPE 1.20 and RB 45/15 at IW : CPE 0.80 which
was significantly lower than MRB 80/25 at IW : CPE 0.80, MRB 45/25 and
MRB 80/25 at IW : CPE 1.20 and MRB 60/25 at CGS.
Grain yield
The data pertaining to grain yield are given in table 4.15 and their analyses of
variance in appendix XII and fig 4.1.
The grain yield was not affected significantly both due to planting
techniques and irrigation levels. Among planting techniques, the grain yield
ranged from 46.0 q/ha (MRB 80/25) to 48.3 q/ha (flat). As compared to flat
the grain yield decreased by 4.8, 1.7, 1,7 and 1.5 per cent under MRB 80/25,
MRB 60/25, MRB 45/25 and RB 45/15, respectively. The grain yield in
general decreased as the bed size was increased upto 80 cm however, the
decreased was not significant.
Straw yield
The data pertaining to straw yield are given in table 4.15 and their analyses of
variance in appendix XII.
50
49
48
Grain Yield q/ha
47
46 IW:CPE 0.80
IW:CPE 1.20
45
CGS
44
43
42
41
flat RB 45/15 MRB 45/25 MRB 60/25 MRB 80/25
Fig 4.1 Grain yield of wheat under different planting techniques and irrigation levels
The straw yield was not affected significantly due to planting techniques but
due to irrigation levels. Among planting techniques the straw yield ranged
from 65.5 q/ha (MRB 60/25) to 70.9 q/ha (MRB 45/25). The straw yield
decreased by 7.6, 4.9, 4.4 and 1.7 percent under MRB 60/2 , MRB 80/25, RB
45/15 and flat, respectively, as compared to MRB 45/25 ( 70.q/ha).
The straw yield was found to increase as the number of irrigation was
increased. Irrigation applied at CGS recorded the maximum straw yield ( 72.3
q/ha) which was statistically at par with irrigation at IW : CPE 1.20 but
significantly higher than IW : CPE 0.80.
The interaction effect between planting techniques and irrigation levels
on straw yield was found to be non- significant.
Biological Yield
The data pertaining to biological yield are given in table 4.15 and their
analyses of variance in appendix XII.
Planting Technique
Flat 48.3 69.7 119.0 40.9
RB45/15 47.6 67.8 115.4 41.3
MRB 45/25 47.5 70.9 118.4 40.1
MRB 60/25 47.5 65.5 113.0 42.0
MRB 80/25 46.0 67.4 113.4 40.6
Irrigation Level
IW : CPE 0.80 46.6 65.5 111.9 41.6
IW : CPE 1.20 48.2 67.0 115.2 41.8
CGS 47.4 72.3 119.7 39.6
The cost of wheat cultivation increased as the bed size was decreased, being
the maximum in RB 45/15 (22,708/ha). However, the higher cost of the
cultivation was found in case of flat sown crop (23,721/ ha).
Gross Return
Net return
Net return was also not affected significantly both due to planting techniques
and irrigation levels (Table 4.16, analyses of Variance in appendix XIII). The
highest net return of (46,668/ha) was obtained from MRB 45/25 and the
lowest (44,167/ha) from MRB 80/25. All the raised bed treatments recorded
numerically higher net return than flat, except MRB 80/25.
Irrigation level at IW : CPE 1.20 recorded the highest net return
(45,883/ha), it was closely followed by irrigation at CGS(45,880/ha).
Irrigation applied at IW : CPE 0.80 recorded lower net return by 1,096/ha at
CGS and 1,099/ha at IW : CPE 1.20.
The interaction effect planting techniques and irrigation levels on net
return was found to be non significant.
B : C ratio
The B : C ratio was not affected significantly both due to planting techniques
and irrigation levels. Data on B : C ration are given in table 4.16 and their
analyses of variance in appendix XIII.
The B : C ratio was the lowest in flat (1.91) and the highest in
MRB 45/25 (2.15). The B : C ratio decreased by 11.2, 6.5, 5.6 and 1.9 under
flat, RB 45/15, MRB 80/25 and MRB 60/25, respectively as compared to
MRB 45/25. All the raised bed treatments had higher B : C ratio than flat
sown wheat.
Among irrigation levels, the B : C Ratio did not very much. It was
2.03 with IW : CPE 1.20 and CGS and 2.07 with IW : CPE 0.80.
The interaction effect between planting techniques and irrigation
levels on B : C ratio was found to be non-significant.
Table 4.16 Effect of different planting techniques and irrigation levels on
economics of wheat production
Planting techniques
The seasonal consumptive water use was the maximum in flat sown crop (296
mm), which decreased as the bed size was increased. The decreased follows
the order of 26.4, 30.7, 34.5 and 35.8 percent, in RB 45/15, MRB 45/25, MRB
60/25 and MRB 80/25, respectively.
The consumptive use of water was the highest at IW:CPE 1.20 (254 mm),
which was higher by 87 mm and 14 mm than IW : CPE 0.80 and CGS,
respectively.
Consumptive water use efficiency (CWUE)
The data pertaining to consumptive water use efficiency are given in table
4.17 analyses of variance in appendix XIV and fig. 4.2.
The consumptive water use efficiency (CWUE) was affected significantly due
to planting techniques and irrigation levels. All the raised bed planting
techniques recorded significantly higher CWUE than the flat bed sown crop (
17.1 kg/ha-cm). the raised bed planting techniques did not differ significantly
with respect to CWUE.
The interaction effect between planting techniques and irrigation levels on
consumptive water use efficiency was found to be significant table 4.18.
SEm 0.83
C.D ( 5%) 2.4
Irrigation water use efficiency
The data pertaining to irrigation water use efficiency (Table 4.17
analyses of variance appendix XV and fig 4.3) revealed that the irrigation
water use efficiency (IWUE) affected significantly both due to planting
technique and irrigation levels. Among planting techniques, MRB 80/25 the
recorded maximum and significantly higher IWUE (539 kg/ha-cm) than all
other planting techniques. Flat bed sown wheat crop recorded the lowest
IWUE (266kg/ha-cm). Irrigation applied at IW : CPE 0.80 recorded
significantly the highest IWUE (623 kg ha-cm). It was higher by 49.4 per cent
and 48.3 per cent than CGS and IW : CPE 1.20, respectively.
35
30
Kg/ha-cm
25
Series1
IW:CPE 0.80
20
Series2
IW:CPE 1.20
15 Series3
CGS
10
0
Flat RB 45/15 MRB 45/25 MRB 60/25 MRB 80/25
900
800
700
600
Kg/ha-cm
400 Series2
IW:CPE 1.20
300 Series3
CGS
200
100
0
Flat RB 45/15 MRB 45/25 MRB 60/25 MRB 80/25
20
Irrigation applied (cm)
15
Irrigation
10 Series1
applied (cm)
0
Flat RB MRB MRB MRB IW:CPE IW:CPE CGS
45/15 45/25 60/25 80/25 0.80 1.20
Fig 4.4 Amount of irrigation water applied under different planting techniques
and irrigation levels
70
60
50
Water saving (%)
40
30 Water Saving
Series1
20
10
0
Flat RB MRB MRB MRB IW:CPE IW:CPE CGS
45/15 45/25 60/25 80/25 0.80 1.20
Fig 4.5 Irrigation water saving under different planting techniques and
irrigation levels
Flat sown crop, over the irrigation levels a total 20 cm water was applied. The
water saving was the maximum in MRB 80/25 (53%) and decreased as the
bed size was decreased being 47 per cent t in MRB 60/25, 35 per cent in MRB
45/25 and 28 per cent in RB 45/15. During the crop season 74.4 mm rainfall
was received.
Among irrigation level, IW: CPE 0.80 required almost 50 percent water as
compared to IW : CPE 1.20 and CGS, each required 16 cm irrigation water.
Table 4.20 Repeat Water saving under different treatments,
Nitrogen uptake by grain and total N-uptake were not affected significantly
due to planting techniques and irrigation levels, while N uptake by straw
affected significantly due to both the practices. Among planting techniques,
the nitrogen uptake by grain ranged from 92.3 (MRB 80/25) to 97.1 (flat). As
compared to flat, the nitrogen uptake by grain decreased by 4.9, 2.7, 1.9 and
1.4 per cent under MRB 80/25, MRB 45/25, RB 45/15 and MRB 60/25,
respectively. Among planting techniques, the nitrogen uptake by straw was
the maximum by flat bed sown wheat (28.8 kg/ha), but it was at par with
MRB 45/25. The lowest nitrogen uptake was recorded by MRB 60/25 (25.2
kg/ha) but it was at par with all the raised bed planting techniques. Among
planting techniques, the total nitrogen uptake ranged from 118.3 kg/ha (MRB
80/25) to 125.9 kg/ha (flat). As compared to flat, the total nitrogen uptake
decreased by 6.0, 4.0, 3.3 and 3.0 per cent under MRB 80/25, MRB 60/25, RB
45/15 and MRB 45/25, respectively.
Grain Straw
Planting Technique
Flat 97.1 28.8 125.9
RB45/15 95.3 26.5 121.8
MRB 45/25 94.5 27.6 122.1
MRB 60/25 95.7 25.2 120.9
MRB 80/25 92.3 26.1 118.3
Irrigation Level
IW : CPE 0.80 94.1 26.1 120.2
IW : CPE 1.20 96.2 26.2 122.5
CGS 94.5 28.3 122.8
Phosphorus uptake by grain, straw and total was affected significantly both
due to planting techniques and irrigation levels. Among planting techniques
phosphorus uptake in grain under flat (14.3 kg/ha) was significantly higher
than all the raised bed planting techniques. The lowest phosphorus uptake by
grain was recorded in MRB 80/25 (9.3 Kg/ha), but it was at par with
remaining all the raised bed planting techniques. Phosphorus uptake in straw
was the maximum (2.1 kg/ha) in flat sown and MRB 45/25 crop. The lowest
phosphorus uptake by straw was recorded under MRB 60/25 and 80/25 (1.9
kg/ha), which was significantly lower than flat and MRB 45/25. Among
planting techniques, Significantly higher total phosphorus uptake (16.4 kg/ha)
was recorded by flat sown wheat crop than rest of the planting techniques. All
the raised bed planting techniques recorded at par total P-uptake, except MRB
80/25 (14.4 kg/ha).
Grain Straw
Planting Technique
Flat 14.3 2.1 16.4
RB45/15 13.2 2.0 15.2
MRB 45/25 13.3 2.1 15.4
MRB 60/25 13.1 1.9 15.0
MRB 80/25 12.5 1.9 14.4
Irrigation Level
IW : CPE 0.80 13.0 1.9 14.9
IW : CPE 1.20 13.6 2.0 15.6
CGS 13.2 2.1 15.4
The data pertaining to potassium uptake by grain, straw and total K- uptake
are given in table 4.23 and their analyses of variance in appendix XVIII.
Grain Straw
Planting techniques
Flat 19.4 108.9 120.1
RB 45/15 17.7 104.2 116.1
MRB 45/25 18.0 105.1 121.5
MRB 60/25 18.3 96.8 109.6
MRB 80/25 17.6 98.6 108.5
S.Em 0.4 3.2 3.4
C.DE (5%) 1.1 NS NS
Irrigation
IW : CPE 0.80 17.8 97.8 115.2
IW : CPE 1.20 18.5 101.8 120.3
CGS 18.3 109.0 127.3
S.Em 0.3 2.5 2.6
C.D (5%) NS 7.1 7.6
CV % 6.1 9.2 8.4
Interaction NS NS NS
uptake by grain (18.5 kg/ha), which decreased by 3.8 percent at IW : CPE
0.80 and only 1.1 percent at CGS treatment (18.3 kg/ha). Irrigation applied at
CGS (109.0 kg/ha) recorded the highest potassium uptake by straw. The
lowest uptake was recorded at IW: CPE 0.80 (97.3 kg/ha), but it was at par
with IW : CPE 1.20 (101.8 kg/ha).
Flat sown plots registered higher emergence count than raised bed
plots, which could be due to use of higher seed rate and more net area sown.
Higher tillers count/m2 in flat may also be ascribed to these variables.
Frequent irrigation at IW : CPE 1.20 and at CGS favoured the tillers
production over IW : CPE 0.80 probably by ensuring better moisture
availability to the crop during the growing season.
Irrigation at IW : CPE 1.20 and CGS produced higher active leaves and dry
matter over IW : CPE 0.80. Better moisture availability through frequent
irrigations, favoured the plant growth by way of maintaining better moisture
regime. Increase in dry matter production with increase in irrigation frequency
has also been reported by Pal et al. (2000) and Shivani et al. (2003). Taller
plants were observed in raised bed plots than the flat bed. The better soil
environment in the form of raised bed might have caused the enhancement in
plant height. Better soil conditions inturn plant growth conditions in raised
bed techniques have also been reported by Kumar et al. (2007). Root growth
parameters were not affected significantly due to planting techniques. The
medium texture (sandy loam soil) of study area probably did not cause any
impedance in the root development under flat sown condition, thus resulting
in non significant variation in root growth between flat and raised bed plots.
Irrigation levels at IW : CPE 1.20 and CGS (4 irrigations) improved the root
growth over IW : CPE 0.80 (2 irrigations) at 90 DAS. This may be credited to
regular supply of soil moisture. Better root growth under higher soil moisture
regime are in accordance with Bandopadhay and Mallick (2003).
Flat sown wheat took 3 to 4 more days to 50% heading and maturity
than raised bed sown crop. More soil moisture loss from raised beds as
compared to flat beds owing to larger exposed area might have created
moisture stress, which in turn advanced the wheat growth under raised bed
plots. Moisture stress under IW : CPE 0.80 (2 irrigations) as compared to IW :
CPE 1.20 and CGS (4 irrigations), might have advanced the crop maturity in
the former treatment. The yield attributes except ears/m2, were favoured by
raised bed planting techniques. Higher ears/m2 in flat bed sown plots could be
attributed to larger net sown area and more tiller/m2. Improvement in the
remaining yield attributes under raised bed plots may be due to better plant
growth as evidenced from plant height under these treatments. Sterile
spikelets/spike were higher in raised bed plots, which may be ascribed to more
moisture loss, resulting into low moisture availability, leading to poor
translocation of Photosynthates. The results corroborated with the findings of
Kumar et al. (2007). More frequent irrigation IW : CPE 1.20 and at critical
growth stages resulted in higher values of yield attributes than IW : CPE 0.80
(less frequent irrigation). Variable availability of soil moisture under variable
soil moisture regimes might have caused such variation. More number of
sterile spikelets/spike in IW : CPE 0.80 indicates that under this treatment,
wheat might have experienced some moisture stress. Lower values of yield
attributes at less frequent irrigations are in line with Shivani et al. (2003).
Amont the planting techniques flat bed sown wheat crop recorded
higher (48.3 q/ha) grain yield but did not differ significantly with other
planting techniques, comprising of varying sizes of raised beds. Buttar et al.
(2006) also did not find significant variation in the wheat grain yield due to
planting techniques. The slight reduction in wheat grain yield under raised
beds as a compared to flat sowing are in match with Bouman et al. (2007).
Several other workers have also reported non-significant variations in yields
between raised bed and flat bed sown crop (Mishra, 2002; Singh et al., 2006;
Kumar et at., 2007 and Kukal et al., 2009). All the raised bed planting
techniques produced at par yield with flat sown crop. This may be attributed
to reasonably good plant stand, higher panicle weight and number of grain/ear
(Table 4.12 and 4.13). In the present study, contrarily the 1000-grain weight
was not improved significantly under the raised bed planting techniques,
which may be due to poor moisture supply by the soil especially during the
grain filling period, coinciding with high ET period (March second fortnight),
because raised bed have more expose area. In the modified raised bed
treatments, increasing bed size caused some reduction in grain yield and was
the lowest in MRB 80/25 (46.0 q/ha). Inspite of more net sown area in the
wider beds, did not contribute correspondingly to grain yield. The poor
moisture availability especially in the central portion of the wider beds, owing
to limited lateral movement of water applied in furrows, may be cited as
possible cause. Inspite of some area lost in making furrows, still comparable
yields in raised beds techniques can be supported by enhanced ear length,
grain number and grain weight per ear under these treatments (Table 4.12 and
4.13).
The grain yield did not increase significantly with increase in number
of irrigation i.e. from 2 in IW : CPE 0.80 to 4 in IW : CPE 0.80 to 4 in IW :
CPE 1.20 and irrigation applied at critical growth stages. During the crop
season, 74.4 mm rainfall was received, which was probably good enough to
fulfill the water requirement of the wheat crop along with 2 irrigations applied
at IW : CPE 0.80. Some enhancement was found in wheat yield with increase
number of irrigation at IW : CPE 1.20 and CGS, but increase was not enough
to become significant. Almost similar trend was observed in straw and
biological yield. Similar findings also have been reported by pal et al. (2000).
Total expenditure in raising flat bed wheat was the maximum (23721/ha),
while less in raised bed plots. Lowers seed rate in raised bed plots (seed rate
was in accordance with net sown area) and less volume of irrigation water
brought down the cost of the production of raised bed plots(Appendix XV).
Lower cost of production under bed planting are in accordance with Reeves et
al. (2000); Sayre (2003). Higher cost of the production in IW : CPE 1.20 and
CGS, was mainly due to more number of irrigations applied as compared to
IW : CPE 0.80. Maurya and Singh (2008), also recorded maximum cost of
cultivation at IW : CPE 1.20.
The gross return was the maximum from flat sown wheat (69,023/ha).
Higher grain and straw yield under this treatment resulted in higher gross
return. The lowest gross return in MRB 80/25 was largely due to the lowest
grain and straw yield under this treatment. Findings of Goel et al. (2005)
matches with the results of present study. The net return was highest in MRB
45/25 (46,668/ha), while the lowest in MRB 80/25 (44167/ha). Although flat
bed had higher gross return, but due to higher cost of production, the net
return got reduced. The B : C, ratio was higher n raised bed treatment as
comprared to flat (1.91). variation in net return and cost of production resulted
in higher B : C ratio in these treatments. Mollah et al., (2009) found higher
return and B : C ratio under bed planting The variation in gross return and net
return among irrigation levels can be explained in the light of variation in cost
of production, grain and straw yield. In IW : CPE 0.80, although the cost of
production was lower but due to lower yield, it could not achieve higher net
return as compared to IW : CPE 1.20 and CGS. Although IW : CPE 0.80 had
lower net return but owing to lower cost of production, it could surpass IW :
CPE 1.20 and CGS, in terms of B:C ratio.
6. Root volume due to planting techniques and irrigation was not affected
significantly both at 45 and 90 DAS, except irrigation levels at 90 DAS. The
maximum root volume was recorded in flat sown wheat and MAB 80/25 at 45
and 90 DAS ,respectively. Among irrigation levels, the maximum root volume
was recorded at IW : CPE 1.20 and irrigation at CGS at 45 and 90 DAS ,
respectively.
7. Root: shoot ratio was not affected significantly due to planting techniques
and irrigation levels. Treatment MRB 45/25 at 45 DAS, flat shown wheat at
90 DAS recorded the maximum root : shoot ratio. Among irrigation levels, IW
: CPE 1.20 and irrigation at CGS recorded the maximum root : shoot ration at
45 and 90 DAS, respectively
9. .Flat bed sown wheat recorded significantly higher number levels of ears
/m2 than raised bed methods. Among raised bed plots, it did not vary
significantly. Irigation at CGS recorded the maximum number of ears /m2.
10. Raised bed plots favoured the ear length over flat. MRB 60/25 and 80/25,
recorded significantly larger ears that flat sown wheat. Irrigation levels did not
affect significantly the ear length however it was favoured by more frequent
irrigation applied At CPE1.20 and CGS.
11. Grain weight per ear was not affected significantly both due to planting
techniques and irrigation levels. Raised bed sown wheat prouduced higher
grain weight per ear than flat sown (1.29/ear). Among irrigation levels it did
not differ much.
12. 1000-grain weight was not affected significantly both due to planting
techniques and irrigation levels. Planting techniques, MRB 45/25 an irrigation
at CGS recorded the higher 1000-grain weight than remaining planting
techniques and irrigation levels, respectivelty.
13. Planting method MRB 80/25 recorded significantly higher grain number
/ear than flat, but remained at par with MRB 60/25 and MRB 45/25. The
grains/ear, although not affected significantly due to irrigation at IW : CPE
1.20 and CGS.
14. Numbers of fertile spikelets were not affected significantly both due to
planting techniques and irrigation levels. Among plating techniques, MRB
60/25 had the maximum number of fertile spikeletS/spike . Irrigation at IW:
CPE 1.20 and CGS recorded similar (15.1/spike) fertile spikelets/spike and
higher than IW : CPE 0.80 (14.8/ear).
15. Number of sterile spikelet/spike slightly more in case of raised bed plots.
Among planting techniques, MRB 60/25 recorded significantly the maximum
sterile spikelets (2.33/spike). Irrigation at IW : CPE 0.80 recorded the
maximum and significantly higher sterile spikelets /ear than CGS (1.43/spike).
16. The grain yield was not affected significantly both due to planting
techniques and irrigation levels. All the raised bed plots produced comparable
yields with than of flat (48.3q/ha). The grain yield in general decreased with
increase in bed size . Frequent irrigation at IW : CPE 1.20 and CGS increased
the grain yield over IW : CPE 0.80 but the difference was not significant.
17. The straw yield was not affected significantly both due to planting
techniques and irrigation levels. Among planting techniques, MRB 45/25
(70.9q/ha) and irrigation at CGS (72.3q/ ha) recorded the maximum straw
yield .
18. The biological yield was also not affected significantly both due to
planting techniques and irrigation levels. Flat sown wheat, among planting
methods and irrigation at CGS, among irrigation levels recorded the
maximum biological yield.
19. The harvest index (H.I.) was not affected significantly both due to planting
techniques and irrigation levels. Panting techniques, RB 45/15 (41.3%) and
MRB 60/25 (24.0%), registered higher H.I. than flat (40.9 %). Among
irrigation levels, IW : CPE 1.20 had the highest H.I. (41.8%) and the lowest
was with CGS (39.6%).
20. Gross return net return and B : C ratio were not affected significantly both
due to planting techniques and irrigation levels. Among planting techniques,
the highest gross return (68,335/ha) and B : C (2.15) ratio were with MRB
45/25. Among irrigation levels, the highest gross return (68,519/ha) and net
return (45,883/ha) were recorded in irrigation at IW : CPE 1.20, and B:C
ration at IW : CPE 0.80 (2.07)
21. Among planting techniques, irrigation water saving was the maximum
(53%) in MRB 80/25. Irrigation levels IW : CPE 0.80 requried only half
number of irrigation (2)than CGS & iw : CPE 0.80required only half number
of irrigation (2) than CGS & IW : CPE 1.20 (4 each) .
22. The highest consumptive water use efficiency was recorded with MRB
60/25 among planting techniques and IW : CPW 0.80, among irrigation levels.
23. Among planting techniques, MRB 80/25 recorded the maximum irrigation
water use efficiency. Irrigation applied at IW : CPE 0.80 recorded the
maximum irrigation water use efficiency which decreased with increase in
irrigation frequency .
24. .Nitrogen uptake by grain and total was not affected significantly, while
in straw difference were significantly. The lowest uptake in grain and total
was recorded with MRB 80/25. Among planting techniques, nitrogen uptake
by grain straw and total was the maximum under flat sown wheat . Among
irrigation levels, the maximum uptake by strew and total was recorded at
irrigation at CGS ,while in it was grain at IW : CPE 1.20.
25. Among planting techniques the maximum phosphorus uptake in grain and
total was recorded in flat sown wheat and the lowest in MRB 80/25. Among
irrigation levels the maximum grain, straw and total uptake of phosphorus was
recorded at irrigation at IW: CPE 1.20 and the lowest at IW : CPE 0.80.
Akbar, G.; Steven R.; Greg, H.; Raine.2010. Permanent raised beds
configurations and renovation methods affect crop performance. In: 19th
World Congress of Soil Science: Soil Solutions for a changing world,
Aquino, P. 1998. The adoption of bed planting of wheat in the Yaqui valley,
Sonora, Mexico. Wheat Special report No. 17a. Mexico City: CYMMYT.
Ashraf, M.; Saeed, M.M. And Asgher, M.N. 2002. Evaporation pan: A tool
for irrigation scheduling. Journal Drainage Water management 6(1):
45-51.
Bakker, D. M.: Hamilton G.J.; Houlbrooks D.J. and Spamn C. 2005. The
effect of raised beds on soil structure, waterlogging, and productivity on
duplex soils in Western Australia. Australia Journal of Soil Research
43: 575-585.
Bakker, D. M.: Hamilton G.J.; Houlbrooks D.J. and Burgel, A. 2007.
Furrow irrigated raised bed system. Productivity of crops grown on raised
beds on duplex soils prone to water logging in Western Australia. Australian
Journal of Experiment Agriculture 47 (11): 1368-1376.
Bouman, B.A.M.: Singh, A.K. and Choudhury, B.U. 2007. Yield and water
productivity of rice-wheat on raised beds at New Delhi, India. Field Crop
Research. 100 (2/3): 229-239.
Buttar, G.S,: Jalota, S.K.: Mahey R.K. and Aggarwal, N. 2006. Early
prediction of wheat yield in south-western Punjab sown by different planting
methods, irrigation schedule and water quality using the ceres model Journal
of Agricultural Physics, 6 (1): 46-5.
Chhokar,R.S. and Sharma, R.K. 2001. Time of Sulfosulfuron in wheat for
Phalaris minor control. Indian J. Weed Science 33 (1&2): 85-86.
Connor, D.J.; Gupta, R.K. Hobbs, P.R. and Sayre, K.D. 2003. Bed
planting in rice-wheat systems. Addressing Resource Conservation Issues in
Rice-wheat systems of south Asia: A Resource book. Rice-Wheat consortium
for the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Intl. Maize and wheat Impr. Cent., New Delhi,
India. pp. 103-108
Directorate of Wheat Research. 2010. All India area, production and yield
of wheat. Released on 9 July 4.7 (a). Dubey, Y.P. and Sharma, S.K. 1996.
Effect of irrigation and fertilizers on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian journal of Agronomy 41 (1): 48-51.
Ghane, E.; Feizi, M.B.; Fard, M. and Landi, E. 2009. Water productivity of
winter wheat in different irrigation/ planting methods with the used of saline
irrigation water. International Journal of Agriculture Biology 11: 131-137.
Ghodpage, R.M. and Gawande, R.L. 2001. Effect of scheduling of
irrigation on yield of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on Morna
command area. Annas of Plant physiology. 15(1): 77-79.
Goel, A.C. and Verma, K.S. 2005. Bed planting of wheat a viable sowing
method to improve yield and water-use- efficiency. Haryana Agricultural
University Journal of Research 35 (1): 27-29.
Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical procedures for agriculture
research second edition, John Willey and Sons, New York, pp; 97-411 IARI
Manila.
Gupta, R.K.; Hobbs, P.R.; Salim, M.; Malik, R.K.; Varma, M.R.;
Pokharel, T.P.; Thakur, T.C. and Tripathri, J. 2000. Research and
extension issues for farm-level impact on the productivity on rice-wheat
systems in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India and Pakistan. Rice-Wheat
Consortium Sem. Rep. Ser. 1. Rice-Wheat Consortium for the Indo-Gangetic
plains. New Delhi, India. 26 p.
Hobbs, P.R. and Gupta, R.K. 2003. Rice-wheat cropping systems in indo-
Gangetic plains: Issues of water productivity in Relation to New Resource-
Conserving Technologies.
Hobbs, P.R.; Giri, G.S. and Grace, P. 1997. Reduced and Zero-tillage
options for the establishment of wheat after rice in South Asia. RWCIGP
paper No.2. Mexico : Rice-Wheat Consortium for the Indo- Gangetic plains
(RWCIGP) and CIMMYT.
Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall Pvt. Ltd., New
Delhi, India. Jat, L. N. and Singhi, S.M. 2003. Varietal Suitability,
productivity and profitability of wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) intercrop and
relay cropping under furrow-irrigated raised bed system. Indian Journal of
Agricultural Sciences. 73(4): 187-190.
Jat, L.N. and Singhi, S.M. 2004. Growth, Yield attributes and yield of wheat
(Triticum aestivum L.) under different planting pattern or cropping system and
varieties. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 49(2): 111-113.
Jin ,H,: Li, H,; Mchugh, A.D.; Ma Z.; Cao X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, X. and
Zhang, X. 2008. Spring wheat performance and water use efficiency on
permanent raised beds in arid northwest China. Aust. J. Soil Res . 46(8):
659666. Jiyang, Z.; Jingsheng, S.; Aiwang D.; Jinglei., W.; Xiaojun, S.
and Xiaofei, L. 2007. Effect of different planting pattern on water use and
yield performance of winter wheat in the Huang-Huai Hai plain of China .
Agriculture water management. 92: 41-44.
Kakar, K. M. .2003. Irrigation and nitrogen levels for wheat varieties under
bed planting system. Ph.D. Thesis NWFP Agriculture University, Peshawar.
Khatri, R.S.; Goel, A.C. and Malik, R.K. 2002. Comparative wheat crop
performance in bed sowing and conventional flat sowing in rice-wheat system
under different irrigation levels. Haryana agricultural university journal of
research. 32(1): 11-18.
Kong, L.; Wang, F.; Feng, B.; Li, S. and Zhang, Si, J. B. 2010. A root
zone soil regime of Wheat: Physiological and Growth Responses to Furrow
Irrigation in Raised Bed Planting in Northern China. Agronomy journal. 102
(1): 154-162.
Kukal, S.S.; Yadav, S.; Humphreys, E.; Kour, A.; Singh, Y.; Singh, T.;
Singh, B. and Timsina, Timsina J. 2010 .Factors affecting irrigation water
saving in raised beds in rice and wheat. Field Crop Research. 118: 43-50.
Kukal, S. S.; Yadav, S.; Kour, A. and Singh, Y. 2009. Performance of rice
(Oryza Sativa) wheat (triticum aestivum L.) on raised bed in farmers scale
field plots. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science. 79 (1): 75-77.
Kumar, A.; Chowdhury, S.; Pandey, I.B. and Faruqui, O.R. 2004.
Performance of wheat varieties under Furrow Irrigation Raised Bed Planting
System in sandy loam soil of North Bihar. Annals Agricultural research
25 (1): 52-55.
Kumar, A.; Sharma, D.K..; Sharma, H.C. and Kumar, A. 1995. Nitrogen
uptake recovery and nitrogen use efficiency in wheat (triticum aestivum L.) as
influenced by nitrogen and irrigation levels in semi reclaimed sodic soils.
Indian Journal of Agronomy.40 (2): 198-203.
Kumar, A.; Sharma, D.K.; Sharma, K.D.; Yadav, A. 2010. Enhancing
yield and water productivity of wheat (triticum aestivum L.) through furrow
irrigated raised bed system in the Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Indian
Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 80 (3):198 -202.
Li, J.; Inanaga, S.; Li, Z. and Eneji, A.E. 2005. Optimizing irrigation
scheduling for winter wheat in the North China Plain. Agricultural water
management 76 (1): 8-23.
Li, S.D.; Wang, F.; Si, J., Kong, L.; Feng, B. and Zhang, B.2008. Crop
performance in permanent raised bed rice wheat cropping system in Punjab,
India. Journal of Triticeae Crops. 28 (4) : 638-643. Lyon, T.L., Buckman,
H.O. and Brady, N.C. 1952. The nature and property of soil. V edition , New
York, The Macmillan Co. p. 55.
Meisner, C. A.; Talukdar, H. M.; Hossain, I.; Gill, M.; Rahmen, H. M.;
Baksh, E.; Justice, S. and Sayre, K.D. 2005. Introduction and implementing
a permanent bed system in the rice wheat cropping pattern in Bangladesh and
Pakistan. Presented in ACIAR Workshop on Permanent Bed Planting
Systems. 1-3 mar. 2005. Griffith .NSW, Australia.
Narang, R.S.: Gill, M.S.; Gosal, K.S. and Mahal, S.S. 2000. Irrigation and
N-Fertilizer requirement for maximum yield potential of wheat. J. Res.
Punjab Agric. Univ. 37 (1-2): 20-27.
Ortega, L.A.: Sayre, K.D. and Francis, C.A. 2000. Wheat Nitrogen use
efficiency in a bed planting system in Northwest Mexico. Agronomy Journal.
92 : 303-308.
Pahlavan-Rad M.R.; Movahedi-Naeini S. A. R. and Pessarakli M. 2011.
Responses of wheat plants in terms of soil water content, bulk density,
salinity, and root growth under different planting systems and various
irrigation frequencies. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 34: 1133-1143.
Pal, S.K.: Verma, U.N.; Thakur, R.: Singh, M.K. and Upasani, R.R. 2000.
Dry Matter partitioning of late sown wheat under different irrigation schedule.
Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 70 (12): 831-834.
Pereira, L.S., Goncalves, J.M.: Dong, B.; Mao, Z. and Fang, S.X. 2007.
Assessing basin irrigation and scheduling strategies for saving irrigation water
and controlling salinity in the upper Yellow River Basin, China. Agricutlure
water Management. 93 (3): 109-122.
Piper, C.S. 1950. Soil and plant analysis, ( Indian Ed.) Hane Pub., Bombay.
Ram, H.; Singh, Y.; Kler, D.S.; Kumar, K.; Humphreys, L. and Timsina,
J. 2005. Performance of non-rice crops and alternative cropping systems on
permanent raised beds in the Indo-Gangetic plains of north-western India.
Presented in ACIAR Workshop on permanent Bed planting Systems. 1-3 Mar.
2005. Griggith, NSW, Australia.
Satya, P.; Chowdhury, S.; and Tomar, S.M.S. 2002. Path coefficient
analysis of agronomic characters affecting grain yield in wheat (Triticum
aestivum L.) under furrow irrigated raised bed planting system. Annals of
Agricultural Research. 23(2): 248-255.
Sayre, K. D. 2000. Saving water and increasing sustainability with bed
planting. Outlook, Int. Maize and Wheat Improvement centre, CIMMYT
Mexico, Vol. I : 2.
Sepat, R.N.; Rai, R.K. and Dhar, S. 2010. Planting systems and integrated
nutrient management for enhanced wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity.
Indian Journal of Agronomy. 55(2): 114-118.
Shivani., Verma, U.N., Kumar, S., Pal, S.K. And Thakur, R. 2003. Growth
analysis of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars under different seeding
dates and irrigation levels in Jharkhand. Indian Journal of Agrinomy. 48 (4):
282-286.
Singh, L. 2001. Tillage-cum-herbicide use studies in wheat grown under rice-
wheat cropping system. Thesis, Ph.D. submitted to G.B. Pant University of
Agric. & Tech., Pantnagar.
Singh, S.S.; Prasad, L.K. and Upadhyaya, A. 2006. Root growth, yield and
economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as affected by irrigation and tillage
practices in South Bihar. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 51(2): 131-134.
Singh, Y: Humphreys, E.: Kukal, S.S; Singh, B.; Kaur, A.; Thaman, S.;
Prashar, A.; Yadav S.; Timsina, J.: Dhillon, S.S.; Kaur, N.; Smith, D.J.
and Gajri, P.R. 2009. Crop performance in permanent raised bed rice-wheat
cropping system in Punjab, India. Field Crop Research. 110(1): 1-2.
Subbaiah, B.V. and Asija G.L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the determition
of available nitrogen in soil. Current Sci. 25: 259-262.
Talukder, A.S. M.H.; Meisner, C.A.; Kabir, M.H.; Hossain, A.B. S. and
Rashid, M.H. 2004. Productivity of Multi-Crops sown on permanent raised
beds in the tropics. New directions for a diverse planet: presented in 4th Intl.
Crop Sci. Cong. 26 Sep.-10 Oct. 2004. Brisbane, Australia.
Wang, F.; Wang, P.X; Song, f.: Han, D.M: Zhang, Y.H. and Liu, X. 2010.
A Study of root water uptake of crops indicated by hydrogen and oxygen
stable isotopes; a case in Shanxi Province, China, Agriculture Water
management. 97 (2010), pp. 475-482.
Wang, F.; Yang, H.; Xu, C.; Li, S. and Si, J. 2007. Effect of raised bed
planting on plant morphological characters and grain yield of winter wheat.
Acta Agrinomica Sinica. 33 (6):1038- 1040.
Yadav, A.; Malik, R.K.; Chauhan, B. S.; Kumar, V.; Banga, R.S.; Singh,
Yadav, S., Punia, J.S.; Rathee, SS. and Sayre. K.D. 2002. Feasibility of
raising wheat on furrow irrigated raised beds in south-western Haryana. In :
Proc. Int. Workshop on Herbicide Resistance Management and Zero-Tillage
in Rice-wheat Cropping Systems. Held at CCSHAU, Hisar, India from 4-6
March, pp. 201-216.
Yadav, S.; Kukal, S.S.; Kour, A.; Singh, Y.; Thaman, S.; Humphreys, E.;
Singh, B.; Timsina, J. 2010. Factors affecting irrigation water savings in
raised beds in rice and wheat. Field Crop Research. 118 (1): 43-50.
Zhang, J.; Sun , J.S.; Duan, A., Wang, J.: Shen, X. and Liu, X. 2007.
Efects of different planting patterns on water use and yield performance of
winter wheat in the Huang-huai-Hai plain of China. Agriculture Water
Management. 92 (1-2): 41-47.
Appendices
Appendix I
Analyses of variance for field emergence count / m2
Appendix II
Analyses of variance for tillers at 45 DAS and 90 DAS
Appendix III
Analyses of variance for plant dry mater accumulation (m2)
Source of variation d.f. mean sum of squares
45 days 90 days
Replication 2 46.74375 22775.60
Planting techniques 4 374.6163** 127300.3**
Irrigation levels 2 388.7104* 67635.34**
Interaction 8 75.69782ns 14852.50ns
Error 28 77.62321 8966.171
Appendix-IV
Analyses of variance for number of activity leaves count at 45 and 90 DAS
Appendix V
Analyses of variance for root density, root volume and root: Shoot ratio
45 DAS
Appendix-VII
Analyses of variance for root density, root volume and root : shoot ratio
90 DAS
Appendix-XI
Analyses of variance for Consumptive use of water (CWUE)
Appendix-XIII
Analyses of variance for economics of wheat
Irrigation
18.59896 22.13587* 30.96875 1.367497** .1975332** 1.685286 1.790829 521.9667** 559.9479*
level 2 ns ns ns ns
Error
32.71480 5.682305 54.44732 .6516579 .03299637 .8704637 1.216972 90.05364 103.7359
28 ns