Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Yvonne Bezrucka
banity, see his The Literary Influence of Academies, in Arnold (1983: 30-59: in par-
ticular, see 34, 40, 44 et passim).
2 Gilmour (1989: 51-60). See also Snell (1998), who expands the category re-
gional, usually pertaining to the rural and the provincial, to encompass gothic and
detective fiction of a strong local setting (5) and also, and more disputably, city-litera-
ture. See also LeClaire (1954); Bentley (1941); Keith (1988). For the country novel sta-
tus at the mid nineteenth century, see M. Williams (1972: ch. 4). The political aspect of
regional literature is dealt with in Bell (1995), and in Dainotto (2000). I have myself
tackled the issue of regionalism in Bezrucka (ed.) (1999; 1997); and specifically, con-
cerning Hardy, in Regionalismo e antiregionalismo: Thomas Hardy e V.S. Naipaul,
in (1999b: 99-116). See also Giovanazzi (2006).
3 The canonical study of the falsely binary opposition of country and city as rural
(or Portland) as a spot, once the Roman Vindilia home of a [] distinctive people,
cherishing strange beliefs and singular customs apt to generate a type [] a native
of natives, a fantast produced by the genius loci, the spirit of place (Hardy 1997:
171, Preface).
342 Yvonne Bezrucka
man labor is the force that binds together the natural order [] and
the social order; ibid.), but rather depicts spatial regions as distinc-
tive cultural environments: places and milieux with their own
myths, superstitions and mores, which are subject to the pressures of
time and change as all biological organisms are. He thus sees Wessex
as a paradigmatic spatially holistic cultural environment, but also as
a transitory, biological organism threatened by exogenous forces
which drive and compel drastic evolutionary changes. If the Wessex
topographic organism registers only barely recognizable, uniform
and long-reaching phylogenetic changes, the people of the region
will register correspondingly strong, ontogenetic and intraspecies
ones.9 In particular, they will be subjected to and pay the price of
irony,10 the indifference of the external changes active in the su-
perstructure to which they belong the inexorable laws of na-
ture,11 indifferent to mans condition, the intangible Cause (TW:
126) which determine the tragic quality of their life.12 Hardy, nev-
ertheless, opposes a reading of change in terms of preordained fate.
Rather he speaks of the operation of chance and interdependent
converging destinies (TW: 85) on people and things,13 and
records these interpretations as ironies whose impact characters view
superstitiously. For example, in The Woodlanders, Marty Souths
father believes himself to be identified with his garden tree, a tree
planted at his birth, and accordingly dies when the tree is felled on
the orders of Fitzpiers, the deterministic doctor who comes from the
city.
9 The mechanism of such influences in the intercourse of people Hardy registers as
a natural process: Such anticipated glimpses of her [Grace] now and then realized
themselves in the event. Encounters of not more than a minutes duration, frequently
repeated, will build up mutual interest, even an intimacy, in a lonely place. Theirs grew
as imperceptibly as the tree-twigs budded. There never was a particular moment at
which it could be said they became friends; yet a delicate understanding now existed
between two who in the winter had been strangers, in Hardy (1985: 183), hereafter re-
ferred to directly in the text with TW and page number.
10 Cf. Hardys 1894 collection of short stories.
11 Cf. Hardy (1985b: 129).
12 Cf.: Giles Winterborne, by obtaining for her a horse of such intelligence and
docility, had been the means of saving her [Graces] husbands [Fitzpierss] life (TW:
271).
13 Compare to this The Convergence of the Twain, in Hardy (1975: 45-47).
Thomas Hardys The Woodlanders 343
given at the end of ch. 4 of his Origin of Species: From the first growth of the tree,
many a limb and branch has decayed and dropped off; and these lost branches of vari-
ous sizes may represent those whole orders, families, and genera which have now no liv-
ing representatives, and which are known to us only from having been found in a fossil
state (Darwin 1998: 106-107).
344 Yvonne Bezrucka
quoting: I shrink to seek a modern coast // Whose riper times have yet to be;// Where the
new regions claim them free // From that long drip of human tears // Which peoples old in
tragedy // Have left upon the centuried years. // For, wonning in these ancient lands, [...]
Though my own Being bear no bloom // I trace the lives such scenes enshrine, // Give
past exemplars present room, // And their experience count as mine (my emphases;
Hardy 1902).
Thomas Hardys The Woodlanders 347
can neither render them immune from change nor help them resist
its seduction. The new sometimes simply comes as a form of inter-
nal, economic, colonialism.
Thomas Hardy should thus be considered a critical regional-
ist.19 He does not take a sentimental or conservative regionalistic
stand in dealing with his historical Wessex material,20 not even
when he talks about the folklore or the superstitions of the region.21
Rather he wants to deconstruct perceptions of the area as an in-
stance of inferiority and marginality and to transform it into a criti-
cal regionalism recognizing its status as a minority culture able
dialogically and dialectically to contest the supposed superiority of
the culture of the centre. He thus preserves its trace by documenting
its threatened existence and makes it accessible to collective cultural
memory,22 in his awareness that memory is too readily prone to for-
getfulness in its worship of novelty. Doing so, he registers it as a
spatial, historical, and cultural cycle, as a nearly bygone identity-
heritage phase. In this respect, Hardy acts thus as an archaeologist
who in a Foucauldian way registers discourses, their power, their
development and their demise.
In order to deconstruct atemporality and universality and their
dangerous essentialisms the all too easy declension of reactionary
regionalism into a Blut und Boden ideology or the projection on it of
a nationalistic ideology based on the questionable metaphor of
modern social cohesion the many as one which eludes the cul-
tural liminality within the nation(Bhabha 1990: 294, 299) in
The Woodlanders Hardy offers us a reading of cultural traditions
adopting a Darwinian evolutionary pattern, indifferent to, though
not uninfluenced by, human subjects. As he demonstrates, novelty
reigns, variety triumphs, people die if they do not adapt themselves
to the pressure of outside stronger forces. (Marty can have and reign
over Giles only once he is dead and she, indeed, sacrifices herself in
19
See Bezrucka, forthcoming.
20
See Draper (1987) for Hardys reworking of the pastoral tradition.
21 For the superstitions and apotropaic elements in the region, see Pinion (1968:
131-133).
22 Cf. Assman and Czaplicka (1995: 125-133); see also Agazzi (2004: 254-261).
Thomas Hardys The Woodlanders 349
his memory.)
The Darwinian model becomes most clear in this novel (M.
Williams 1987: 170-179). Even the strongly adamic Giles Winter-
borne Autumns very brother, the specimen of Nature una-
dorned and undiluted manliness (TW: 261) is, tellingly, bound
to die in his effort to preserve the old values of Graces reputation,
to save her integrity. Graces modern nerves, the result of her edu-
cation in the city, and the remnants of her primitive emotions,
make her the perfect mixture and hybrid product of the grafting of
tradition and innovation, but also an impressible creature, who [...]
was doomed by such coexistence to be numbered among the dis-
tressed (TW: 362). Grace is dissociated and is not happy; she per-
ceives herself as a tropical plant in the hedgerow of Little
Hintock (TW: 91), and fails to recognize love as it should be and
could have been, choosing as her husband an adulterous Tann-
huser, the intruder Edred Fitzpiers instead of Giles Winterborne.
Only in a rare moment of self-recognition can her early instincts
finally triumph when she gives vent to a truthful language: her
senses revelled in the sudden lapse back to nature unadorned
[Giles] (TW: 261). At that point she fully perceives her lost oppor-
tunities. But, as a divided being, this revelation of her capacity to
read Natures language, and in parallel the language of her own
body, is immediately sublimated by her and downplayed as a too
destabilizing excursion of the imagination (ibid.). This capacity to
access ones inner self, which Grace refuses, Giles and Marty, the
tree-planters, still retain, even if menaced by the tree-fellers, Fitzpiers
and Mrs Charmond. Nevertheless, ironically, the natural Giles
constrains himself through nave morality (neglecting his sexual
drives to Grace, even when she calls him (cf. TW: 375), whereas
Fitzpiers, a Darwinian, brute, narcissistic force, spends all his in
every possible direction (Suke Damson, Grace, Mrs Charmond).
Meek nature, Giless purity [...] his freedom from grosser passions
(TW: 381) is undone by natures stronger and much more elemen-
tary forces and drives.23
23 In the entry for 16th Feb. 1882 in his dictated autobiography Hardy speaks of
350 Yvonne Bezrucka
and thus choices can have a posteriori, casual results, which may be
either progressive or regressive.24
Hardys organic view of the changing of historical processes and
of the sources of identity of, by now, less adaptable people and rural
communities render him a far from nostalgic, vernacular, or reac-
tionary writer. Hardy, as has been seen, is rather a cultural scientist
and archaeologist25 who records and analyses changes as they occur
in the nineteenth-century Wessex environment and registers the
epistemological impact, often downright havoc, they have on the
people. If questions of authenticity are not an issue in Hardys writ-
ing, he nevertheless tackles the question in the terms of peoples per-
ception of their subjectivity and identity, which he sees as contermi-
nous with the historically contingent values of the locality in which
they choose or are constrained to live. People are thus organisms
which are subject to their cultural environments. But people tend,
nomadically, to move. New discourses come and go, intersect, pro-
duce changes; they seduce, confuse, improve, cancel or supplant
other cultural representations, as happens with cultural ideas and
ideologies and with language itself.26 The shearing of the sheep in
the Great Barn in chapter 22 of Far from the Madding Crowd, the
Mummers play in The Return of the Native, past working occupa-
tions like that of the reddleman Diggory Venn, the folksongs,
idiolects, and dialects, in Far from the Madding Crowd all are ar-
chaeological cultural phases which Hardy decides to record not be-
cause he considers them worth keeping for nostalgic or reactionary
reasons, but simply as a significant, historical and cultural heritage
which needs to be preserved and analyzed in order not to die out
completely and be thus simply forgotten.
24 Cf. the pessimistic note on nature given in Jude the Obscure and underlined in
(1979).
26 Hardy feels thus bound to record the dialect of the Hintock community: What
maggot has the gaffer got in his head now? said Tangs the elder. Sommit to do with
that chiel of his! When youve got a maid of yer own, John Upjohn, that costs ye what
she costs him, that will take the squeak out of your Sunday shoes, John! (TW: 208).
352 Yvonne Bezrucka
REFERENCES
Hardy F.E., (1962) 1970, The Life of Thomas Hardy 1840-1928, Macmillan, Lon-
don.
Hardy T., 1894, Lifes Little Ironies. A Set of Tales. With Some Colloquial Sketches
Entitled A Few Crusted Characters, Macmillan, London.
Hardy T., 1902, Poems Past and Present, Harper & Brothers, London.
Hardy T. 1975, Selected Shorter Poems, Macmillan, London.
Hardy T., (1874) 1985, Far from the Madding Crowd, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
Hardy T., (1895) 1985, Jude the Obscure, Dent, London.
Hardy T., (1887) 1985, The Woodlanders, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
Hardy T., (1878) 1989, The Return of the Native, Bantam, London.
Hardy T., (1892, 1895) 1997, The Pursuit of the Well-Beloved and The Well-Be-
loved, London, Penguin.
Harris M., 1968, The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture,
Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Himmelfarb G., (1968) 1995, Victorian Minds. A Study of Intellectuals in Crisis and
Ideologies in Transition, Elephant, Chicago.
Hobsbawm E., T. Ranger, (1983) 1984, The Invention of Tradition, C.U.P., Cam-
bridge.
Keith W.J., 1988, Regions of the Imagination: the Development of British Rural Fic-
tion, Toronto U.P., Toronto.
LeClaire, L., 1954, A General Analytical Bibliography of the Regional Novelists of the
British Isles 1800-1950, Clermont-Ferrand, Paris.
Marroni F., 2002, Disarmonie vittoriane. Rivisitazioni del canone della narrativa
inglese dellOttocento, Carocci, Roma.
Moore K.Z., 1990, The Descent of the Imagination. Postromantic Culture in the Later
Novels of Thomas Hardy, New York U.P., New York 1990.
Pinion F.B., 1968, A Hardy Companion. A Guide to the Works of Thomas Hardy and
their Background, St. Martins Press, New York.
Snell K.D.M. (ed.), 1998, The Regional Novel in Britain and Ireland, C.U.P., Cam-
bridge.
Williams M., 1972, Thomas Hardy and Rural England, Macmillan, London.
Williams M., 1987, A Post-Darwinian Viewpoint of Nature, in Draper (1987),
pp. 170-179.
Williams R., (1973) 1985, The Country and the City, Hogarth, London.
All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and