Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 9

Environ Earth Sci (2011) 64:373381

DOI 10.1007/s12665-010-0860-4

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar


watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district,
Tamil Nadu, India: a GIS approach
N. S. Magesh N. Chandrasekar

John Prince Soundranayagam

Received: 24 November 2009 / Accepted: 8 November 2010 / Published online: 25 November 2010
Springer-Verlag 2010

Abstract A morphometric analysis was carried out to involving the assessment of groundwater potential, water-
describe the topography and drainage characteristics of shed management and environmental assessment. The cor-
Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds. These watersheds relation between physiographic characteristics of drainage
are part of Western Ghats, which is an ecologically sensitive basins such as size, shape, slope of drainage area, drainage
region. The drainage areas of Papanasam and Manimuthar density, size and length of the tributaries, etc., to various
watersheds are 163 and 211 km2, respectively and they show hydrologic phenomena has been reported by Rastogi and
patterns of dendritic to sub-dendritic drainage. The slope of Sharma (1976). The morphodynamic evaluation of drainage
both watersheds varied from 0 to 59 and 0 to 55, data provides a quantitative explanation of basin geometry
respectively. Moreover, the slope variation is chiefly con- used to reveal the geological and geomorphic history of each
trolled by the local geology and erosion cycles. Each drainage basin. This necessitates the analysis of various
watershed was classified as a fifth-order drainage basin. The drainage parameters such as ordering of various streams,
stream order of the basin was predominantly controlled by measurement of drainage area and perimeter, length of
physiographic and structural conditions. The increase in drainage channels, drainage density (Dd), stream frequency
stream length ratio from lower to higher order suggests that (Fs), bifurcation ratio (Rb), texture ratio (T), basin relief
the study area has reached a mature geomorphic stage. The (Bh) and length of overland flow (Lg) to predict the
development of stream segments is affected by rainfall and approximate behavior of the watersheds during periods of
local lithology of the watersheds. heavy rainfall (Verstappen 1983; Kumar et al. 2000). GIS-
based evaluation using Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission
Keywords Morphometric analysis  (SRTM) data has given a precise, fast, and an inexpensive
Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds  way for analyzing hydrological systems (Farr and Kobrick
Western Ghats  GIS  Watershed management 2000; Smith and Sandwell 2003; Grohmann 2004; Groh-
mann et al. 2007).
Introduction The present paper describes the drainage characteristics
of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds in Western
The geographic and geomorphic characteristics of a drain- Ghats to understand their hydrological behavior through
age basin are important for hydrological investigations remote sensing and GIS analysis.

N. S. Magesh (&)  N. Chandrasekar  J. P. Soundranayagam


Study area
Centre for Geotechnology, Manonmaniam Sundaranar
University, Tirunelveli 627012, Tamil Nadu, India
e-mail: mageshissivan@gmail.com The Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds are in the
N. Chandrasekar Tirunelveli district of Tamil Nadu (Fig. 1). These water-
e-mail: profncsekar@gmail.com sheds cover an area of 163 and 212 km2, respectively and lie
J. P. Soundranayagam between 77120 77290 E longitudes and 8280 8430 N lati-
e-mail: johnprince06@gmail.com tudes. The study area has high relief and steep slopes. Hills

123
374 Environ Earth Sci (2011) 64:373381

Fig. 1 Location of the study area with stream networks

are covered by moderately dense forest. The type of drainage Maps on a 1:50,000 scale and also with SRTM data. The
is dendritic to sub-dendritic which is characterized by Consultative Group for International Agriculture Research
irregular branching of tributary streams in many directions Consortium for Spatial Information (CGIAR-CSI) Geo-
joining the main channel. Major rock types found in the portal was able to provide SRTM 90 m Digital Elevation
study area are garnetiferous mica gneisses and leptynites Data for the entire world. Global Mapper software was
with patches of Charnockite. Typical tropical climate pre- used for delineating the study area and exporting the
vails in the catchment for the better part of the year. The information to DEM format. The SRTM DEM data was
climate in the catchment is generally dry, except during the then imported to ArcGIS 9.2. Based on these data, the
monsoon months. Generally, the study area experiences two slope, aspect, and topographic elevation maps with con-
seasons: dry (DecMay); and wet (JuneNov). The study tours for the watersheds were prepared.
area receives about 1,037 mm rainfall annually. Most of the The drainage networks of the watersheds were scanned
study area is covered by tropical wet evergreen and tropical from Survey of India (SOI) Toposheets no. 58H/2 and 58H/
moist deciduous forests. Temperature of the area varies from 6 (1:50,000) and digitized in ArcGIS 9.2 platform. Based
20 to 38C. The elevation varies between 100 m in the east on the drainage order, the channels were classified
to 1,700 m above sea level in the west. Recent arid condi- according to drainage order following Strahler (1964).
tions in the two catchments have decreased the discharge Watershed parameters, such as: area, perimeter, length,
and stream power of stream considerably, as well as the rate stream length, and stream order were also calculated. Later,
of hill slope denudation in the region. these parameters were used to determine other influence
factors, such as bifurcation ratio, stream length ratio,
stream frequency, drainage density, texture ratio, total
Methodology relief, relief ratio, elongation ratio, circulatory ratio, form
factor and length of overland flow. Table 1 provides a list
The base maps of the Papanasam and Manimuthar water- of the main parameters and, where appropriate, the for-
sheds were prepared based on Survey of India Topographic mulae used to calculate them.

123
Environ Earth Sci (2011) 64:373381 375

Table 1 Linear relief and areal


S.no. Parameters Formulae References
morphometric parameters
1 Stream order (U) Hierarchial rank Strahler (1964)
2 Stream length (Lu) Length of the stream Horton (1945)
3 Mean stream length (Lsm) Lsm Lu=Nu Strahler (1964)
4 Stream length ratio (RL) RL Lu=Lu  1 Horton (1945)
5 Bifurcation ratio (Rb) Rb Nu=Nu 1 Schumm (1956)
6 Mean bifurcation ratio (Rbm) Rbm average of bifurcation Strahler (1957)
ratios of all order
7 Drainage density (Dd) Dd Lu=A Horton (1945)
8 Drainage texture (T) T Dd  Fs Smith (1950)
9 Stream frequency (Fs) Fs Nu=A Horton (1945)
p
10 Elongation ratio (Re) Re D=L 1:128 A=L Schumm (1956)

11 Circularity ratio (Rc) Rc 4pA P2 Strahler (1964)

12 Form factor (Ff) Ff A L2 Horton (1945)
13 Length of overland flow (Lg) Lg 1=D  2 Horton (1945)
14 Relief RHh Hadley and Schumm
(1961)
15 Relief ratio Rr R=L Schumm (1963)

Results and discussion have a higher moisture content and lower evaporation rate
then for the Manimuthar watershed, whose slopes are more
The total drainage areas of Papanasam and Manimuthar commonly west facing. This indicates that the slopes of
watersheds are 163 and 211 km2, respectively. The SRTM the Manimuthar watersheds are drier, and have a higher
DEM has been obtained with a pixel size of 90 m, which evaporation rate. As a result, the vegetation index is higher
covers the two watersheds (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the DEM for the Papanasam watershed than for the Manimuthar
has been used to calculate slope, contour and aspect maps. watershed.
The development of drainage networks depends on geology
and precipitation, apart from exogenic and endogenic Slope
influences. The drainage pattern of the basin is dendritic to
sub-dendritic. Based on the drainage order, the Papanasam Slope analysis is an important parameter in geomorphic
and Manimuthar watersheds are classified as fifth order studies. The slope elements, in turn, are controlled by the
basins to interpret the morphodynamic parameters listed in climatomorphogenic processes in areas having rock of
Table 1. (Horton 1932, 1945; Smith 1950; Schumm 1956, varying resistance. An understanding of slope distribution is
1963; Hadley and Schumm 1961; Strahler 1964; Sreedevi essential, as a slope map provides data for planning, settle-
et al. 2005; Mesa 2006). ment, mechanization of agriculture, deforestation, planning
of engineering structures, morpho-conservation practices,
Aspect etc., (Sreedevi et al. 2005). A slope map of the study area was
prepared based on SRTM data using the spatial analysis tool
Aspect generally refers to the direction to which a mountain in ArcInfo 9.2. Slope grid is identified as the maximum rate
slope faces. The aspect of a slope can make very significant of change in value from each cell to its neighbors
influences on its local climate because the suns rays are in (Burrough 1986). The degree of slope in Papanasam
the west at the hottest time of day in the afternoon, and so in watershed varies from 0 to 59 whereas Manimuthar
most cases a west-facing slope will be warmer than sheltered watershed slope varies from 0 to 55. The slope map of
east-facing slope. This can have major effects on the distri- Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds are shown in Fig. 4.
bution of vegetation and bio-diversity in the study area. The Higher degree of slope results in rapid runoff and increased
value of the output raster data set represents the compass erosion rate with feeble recharge potential.
direction of the aspect. 0 is true north; a 90 aspect is to the
east, and so forth. The aspect map of Papanasam and Stream number (Nu)
Manimuthar watersheds are shown in Fig. 3. From the visual
interpretation it is clearly seen that east-facing slopes mainly It is obvious that the total number of streams gradually
occur in the Papanasam watershed. Therefore, these slopes decreases as the stream order increases. The number of

123
376 Environ Earth Sci (2011) 64:373381

Fig. 2 DEM map of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds

streams of each order and the total number of streams were drainage divide are measured with the help of ArcGIS
computed (Table 2) using GIS tools. software. The length of stream segments is maximum for
first order streams and decreases as the stream order
Stream order (u) increases.

The stream orders of the study area are classified according Mean stream length (Lsm)
to Strahlers (1964) method of classification. The order
wise stream length and stream numbers of Papanasam and Mean stream length (Lsm) is a characteristic property
Manimuthar watersheds are presented in Table 2. The related to the size of drainage network components and
variations in stream order and the basin area are largely due its contributing basin surfaces (Strahler 1964). This has
to physiographic and structural conditions of the region. been calculated by dividing the total stream length of
Application of this ordering procedure through GIS shows order u by the number of streams of segments in the
that the maximum drainage networks of both watersheds order (Table 2). It should be noted that the Lsm values of
correspond to a fifth-order basin (Fig. 1). the Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds vary from
0.61 to 4.51 and 0.56 to 10.64, respectively. Lsm of any
Stream length (Lu) given order is greater than that of the lower order and
less than that of its next higher order in both the
The stream length (Lu) has been computed based on the watersheds.
law proposed by Horton (1945). Stream length is indicative
of the contributing area of the basin of a given order. For Stream length ratio (RL)
both watersheds, the stream lengths (at various orders)
have been estimated from scanned topographical maps in Stream length ratio (RL) is the ratio of the mean length of
GIS platform. The stream numbers at various orders in a the one order to the next lower order of the stream seg-
watershed are counted and their lengths from mouth to ments (Horton 1945). The RL between streams of different

123
Environ Earth Sci (2011) 64:373381 377

Fig. 3 Aspect map of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds

order in the study area reveals that there is a variation in Drainage density (Dd)
RL in Papanasam watershed (Table 1). This variation
might be due to changes in slope and topography. The Drainage density is defined as the closeness of spacing of
Manimuthar watershed exhibits an increasing trend in the channels. It is a measure of the total length of the stream
length ratio from lower order to higher order indicating segment of all orders per unit area. Slope gradient and
their mature geomorphic stage. relative relief are the main morphological factors control-
ling drainage density. Strahler (1964) noted that low Dd
Bifurcation ratio (Rb) occurs where basin relief is low, while high Dd is favored
where basin relief is high. The Dd values for Papanasam
Bifurcation ratio (Rb) may be defined as the ratio of the and Manimuthar watersheds are 3.03 and 3.27 km/km2,
number of stream segments of given order to the number of respectively. The Dd of these two watersheds reveals that
segments of the next higher order (Schumm 1956). Horton the nature of subsurface strata is permeable, which is a
(1945) considered the bifurcation ratio as an index of relief characteristic feature of coarse drainage as the density
and dissections. Strahler (1957) demonstrated that the values are less than 5.0. The drainage density is higher in
bifurcation ratio shows a small range of variation for dif- garnetiferous mica gneiss and leptynites. Usually, Dd
ferent regions or different environmental conditions, except should have a relatively low value because of the resistance
where the geology dominates. It is observed that Rb is not posed by such gneisses to weathering and erosion. The
the same from one order to its next order. These irregu- measurement of drainage density provides a numerical
larities depend upon the geological and lithological measurement of landscape dissection and runoff potential.
development of the drainage basin (Strahler 1964). The
mean bifurcation ratios of Papanasam and Manimuthar Drainage texture (T)
watersheds are 4.13 and 4.52, respectively, which indicate
that these watersheds do not exercise a dominant influence Drainage texture is the total number of stream segments of
on the drainage pattern. all orders per perimeter of that area (Horton 1945). The

123
378 Environ Earth Sci (2011) 64:373381

Fig. 4 Slope map of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds

drainage texture (T) depends upon a number of natural generally vary from 0.6 to 1.0 over a wide variety of
factors such as climate, rainfall, vegetation, rock and soil climatic and geologic types. Re values close to unity
type, infiltration capacity, relief and stage of development correspond typically to regions of low relief, whereas
(Smith 1950). Following Smith (1950), the drainage texture values in the range 0.60.8 are usually associated with
is classified as shown in Table 3. From the classification it high relief and steep ground slope (Strahler 1964). These
is noted that the Papanasam watershed has an intermediate values can be grouped into three categories namely
drainage texture (T = 9.29), whereas the Manimuthar Circular ([0.9), Oval (0.90.8), Less elongated (\0.7).
watershed exhibits fine drainage texture (T = 12.68). The Re values of the Papanasam and Manimuthar
watersheds are 0.75 and 0.65, respectively. This reveals
Stream frequency (Fs) that the area has high relief, is steep sloped, and that the
watersheds are elongated.
The stream frequency (Fs) of a basin may be defined as the
number of streams per unit area (Horton 1945). The Fs Circularity ratio (Rc)
values for the Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds are
4.27 and 4.98 km/km2, respectively. Fs mainly depend on Circularity ratio (Rc) is defined as the area of the basin to
the lithology of the basin and reflect the texture of the the area of a circle having the same circumference as the
drainage network. It is found that the Fs and the drainage perimeter of the basin (Miller 1953). It is influenced by the
density values of the watersheds are positively correlated. length and frequency of streams, geological structures, land
This indicates that the increase in stream population is use/land cover, climate, relief and slope of the basin. Rc is
connected to that of drainage density. a significant ratio that indicates the dendritic stage of a
watershed. Low, medium and high values of Rc indicate
Elongation ratio (Re) the young, mature, and old stages of the life cycle of the
tributary watershed. The Rc values of Papanasam and
Elongation ratio (Re) is defined as the ratio between the Manimuthar watersheds are 0.37 and 0.38, respectively
diameter of a circle of the same area as the basin and the which indicates both watersheds are at an early stage of
maximum basin length (Schumm 1956). Values of Re topographical maturity.

123
Table 2 Results of morphometric analysis of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds
S.no. Parameters Papanasam watershed Manimuthar watershed
Stream orders Stream orders
Environ Earth Sci (2011) 64:373381

I II III IV V I II III IV V

1 Stream order (Total) 554 106 26 7 2 823 179 41 8 2


2 Stream length (Lu) (km) 338 80 47.7 19.5 9.02 462 125 55.3 28.3 21.3
3 Mean stream length (Lsm) (km) 0.61 1 1.8 2.8 4.51 0.56 0.69 1.3 3.5 10.6
4 Stream length ratio (RL) II/I III/II IV/III V/IV II/I III/II IV/III V/IV
1.2 2.43 2 1.62 1.2 1.94 2.6 3.01
5 Bifurcation ratio (Rb) I/II II/III III/IV IV/V I/II II/III III/IV IV/V
5.23 4.08 3.71 3.5 4.6 4.37 5.13 4
6 Mean bifurcation ratio (Rbm) 4.12 4.52
7 Perimeter (P) (km) 74.78 83.06
8 Basin length (Lb) (km) 19.27 25.41
9 Basin area (Km2) 163 211.45
10 Total relief (R) (m) 1,500 1,660
11 Relief ratio (Rh) 77.84 65.32
12 Elongation ratio (Re) 0.74 0.64
13 Length of overland flow (Lg) 0.65 0.61
14 Drainage density (D) (km/km2) 3.03 3.27
15 Stream Frequency (Fs) 4.26 4.97
16 Texture ratio (Rt) 9.29 12.67
17 Form factor (Rf) 0.43 0.32
18 Circulatory ratio (Rc) 0.36 0.38
379

123
380 Environ Earth Sci (2011) 64:373381

Table 3 Drainage texture (T) classification based on Smith (1950) Length of overland flow (Lg)
Range Texture
The length of the overland flow is defined as the length of
For 4.0 and below Course the longest drainage path that water takes before it gets
From 4.0 to 10.0 Intermediate concentrated (Horton 1945). The length of overland flow
Above 10.0 Fine (Lg) approximately equals half the reciprocal of the
Above 15.0 Ultra fine (bad land topography) drainage density (Horton 1945). This factor relates inver-
sely to the average slope of the channel and is quite syn-
onymous with the length of sheet flow. The Lg values of
the Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds are 0.66 and
Form factor (Ff) 0.61, respectively.

Form factor (Ff) is defined as the ratio of the basin area to Relief (R)
the square of the basin length. This factor indicates the flow
intensity of a basin of a defined area (Horton 1945). The Relief is defined as the difference in elevation between the
form factor value should be always less than 0.7,854 (the lowest and the highest point of a basin. Basin relief is an
value corresponding to a perfectly circular basin). The important factor in understanding the denudational char-
smaller the value of the form factor, the more elongated acteristics of the basin. It plays a significant role in land-
will be the basin. Basins with high-form factors experience forms development, drainage development, surface and
larger peak flows of shorter duration, whereas elongated subsurface water flow, permeability and erosional proper-
watersheds with low-form factors experience lower peak ties of the terrain. The total reliefs of the Papanasam and
flows of longer duration. The Ff values for Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds are 1,500 and 1,660 m, respec-
Manimuthar are 0.44 and 0.33, respectively, indicating tively. The high relief value indicates the gravity of water
both watersheds comprise elongated basin with lower peak flow, low infiltration and high runoff conditions. Figure 5
flows of longer duration than the average. presents relief maps for both watersheds.

Fig. 5 Relief map of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds

123
Environ Earth Sci (2011) 64:373381 381

Relief ratio from bedrock, sediment, and geochemistry to identify sites,


which are suitable for assessing the fluvial ecosystem with
Relief ratio, Rh, is defined as the horizontal distance along future mineral exploitation in mind.
the longest dimension of the basin parallel to the principal
drainage line (Schumm 1956). Rh indicates the overall Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the State
Land Use Board, State Planning Commission, Government of Tamil
steepness of a drainage basin and is an indicator of inten-
Nadu for the financial assistance provided during the period of study.
sity of erosion processes operating on the slopes of the
basin. The relief ratios of Papanasam and Manimuthar
watersheds are 78 and 65, respectively, corresponding to
References
steep slopes and high relief.
Burrough PA (1986) Principles of geographical information systems
for land resources assessment. Oxford University Press,
Conclusion New York, p 50
Farr TG, Kobrick M (2000) Shuttle radar topography mission
produces a wealth of data. Amer Geophys Union EOS
The drainage basin is a fundamental landform unit in fluvial 81:583585
terrain and it is of particular relevance to morphometric Grohmann CH (2004) Morphometric analysis in geographic infor-
analysis. Landscape morphology is a function of drainage, mation systems: applications of free software GRASS and R.
climate, and structure of a given basin. The present paper has Comput Geosci 30:10551067
Grohmann CH, Riccomini C, Alves FM (2007) SRTM-based
described morphometric analysis of the Papanasam and
morphotectonic analysis of the Pocos de caldas alkaline massif
Manimuthar watersheds based on several drainage param- Southeastern Brazil. Comput Geosci 33:1019
eters, by which the watersheds have been classified as fifth Hadley RF, Schumm SA (1961) Sediment sources and drainage basin
order basins. Each basin is mainly dominated by lower order characteristics in upper Cheyenne River Basin. US Geol Survey
Water-Supply Paper 1531-B, pp 198
streams. The drainage density values of the Papanasam and Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans Amer
Manimuthar watersheds have values below 5 revealing that Geophys Union 13:350361
the subsurface strata are permeable, a characteristic feature Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their
of coarse drainage. The aspect of Papanasam watershed is drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative mor-
phology. Bull Geo Soc Am 56:275370
dominated by east-facing slopes indicative of high-moisture Kumar R, Kumar S, Lohani AK, Nema RK, Singh RD (2000)
content, whereas the Manimuthar watershed is dominated by Evaluation of geomorphological characteristics of a catchment
west-facing slopes and their correspondingly lower moisture using GIS. GIS India 9(3):1317
content. This is because the suns radiation intensity is Mesa LM (2006) Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean
basin (Tucuman, Argentina). J Environ Geol 50(8):12351242
greater on west-facing slopes, causing increased evapora-
Miller VC (1953) A quantitative geomorphologic study of drainage
tion. For the Papanasam watershed, the stream length ratio basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and
fluctuates according to local changes in slope and topogra- Tennessee, Project NR 389042, Tech Rept 3, Columbia Univer-
phy. For the Manimuthar watershed the stream length ratio sity Department of Geology, ONR Geography Branch, New York
Rastogi RA, Sharma TC (1976) Quantitative analysis of drainage
exhibits an upward trend from lower to higher order due to basin characteristics. Jour Soil and water Conservation in India
the geomorphic stage being more mature. The bifurcation 26(1, 4):1825
ratio indicates that the watershed areas do not exercise a Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in
dominant influence on drainage patterns. The study areas badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Am Bull
67:597646
experience intermediate to fine drainage textures. Rainfall Schumm SA (1963) Sinuosity of alluvial rivers in the great plains.
may affect the development of stream segments in the Bull Geol Soc Am 74:10891100
watersheds. However, present-day drainage has evolved Smith KG (1950) Standards for grading texture of erosional
from high-density drainage when the climate was wetter in topography. Am J Sci 248:655668
Smith B, Sandwell D (2003) Accuracy and resolution of shuttle radar
the past compared to drainage characterized by intermittent topography mission data. Geophys Res Lett 30(9):2021
runoff consistent with recent drier climatic conditions. The Sreedevi PD, Subrahmanyam K, Shakeel A (2005) The significance
elongation ratio indicates that both watersheds have high of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential
relief, steep slopes and are less elongated (than average) zones in a structurally controlled terrain. J Environ Geol
47(3):412420
the latter mainly due to the guiding effect of thrusting and Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphol-
forcing. The relief ratio indicates that the discharge capa- ogy. Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913920
bility of these watersheds is very high and the potential Strahler AN (1964) Quantative geomorphology of drainage basins
groundwater resource is meager. and channel networks. In: Ven Te Chow (ed) Hand book of
Aplied Hydrology. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York
The present study is valuable for ecosystem manage- Verstappen H (1983) The applied geomorphology. International
ment of watersheds in Tamil Nadu. Work is underway to Institute for Aerial Survey and Earth Science (I.T.C), Enschede,
correlate data from drainage analysis with relevant data The Netherlands. Amsterdam, Oxford, New York

123

Вам также может понравиться