Individual Performance and Commitment Review Form

Name of Employee: ALFONSO M. DIRECTO JR. Name of Rater: ___________________________________

Position: Teacher I Date of Review:___________________________
Review Period: March 2016 - March 2017
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd/Division of City Schools, Quezon City

Performance Indicators
Major (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Key Result Weight
Final Objectives ACTUAL
Areas Timeline Per RESULTS
RATING SCORE
Output KRA
(KRAs) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
(MFOs) Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Poor (1)
(3) (2)

1.Prepared, submitted 93%-100% well-prepared,
and implemented submitted, and
DLPs/DLLs to facilitate 10% implemented DLPs/DLLs
quality teaching and or learning plan within
learning process the school year
85%-92%
well-prepared, submitted,
and implemented
DLPs/DLLs or learning plan
within the school year
75%-84%
well-prepared, submitted,
and implemented
DLPs/DLLs or learning plan
within the school year
50%-74%
prepared, submitted, and
implemented DLPs/DLLs or
learning plan within the
school year
49% & below
prepared, submitted, and
implemented DLPs/DLLs
or learning plan within
the school year

2.Used appropriate
teaching strategies and techniques to Used at least 17-20 Used at least 13-16 Used at least 9-12 Used at least 6- Used at least 1-5
improve delivery of instruction updated,varied, and updated,varied, and updated,varied, and 8updated,varied, and updated,varied, and
and use updated appropriate instructional appropriate instructional appropriate instructional appropriate instructional appropriate instructional
instructional materials 10% materials and teaching materials and teaching materials and teaching materials and teaching materials and teaching
that are suited to the methods/strategies that methods/strategies that methods/strategies that methods/strategies that methods/strategies that
learning styles of elicited positive results elicited positive results elicited positive results elicited positive results elicited positive results
students
Basic Education Services

Teaching June
Learning 2016 -
Process March Achieved 5% decrease in Achieved 4% decrease in Achieved 3% decrease in Achieved 2% decrease in Achieved 1% decrease in
(30%) 3. Monitored and maintained safe, 2017 losses/worn out of school losses/worn out of school losses/worn out of school losses/worn out of school losses/worn out of school
positive and motivating environment, facilities, equipment, and facilities, equipment, and facilities, equipment, and facilities, equipment, and facilities, equipment, and
overall physical atmosphere, cleanliness 5% 100%-93% observed 100%-93% observed 100%-93% observed 100%-93% observed 100%-93% observed
and orderliness of classrooms including cleanliness and cleanliness and orderliness cleanliness and orderliness cleanliness and orderliness cleanliness and
proper waste disposal orderliness including including proper waste including proper waste including proper waste orderliness including
proper waste disposal disposal disposal disposal proper waste disposal

Students were 100-93% Students were 50% and

guided in the observation Students were 85-92% Students were 75-84% Students were 51-74% below guided in the
guided in the observation guided in the observation guided in the observation observation of classroom
4. Maintained and of classroom rules and of classroom rules and of classroom rules and of classroom rules and rules and regulations
managed discipline of students by setting regulations hence there regulations hence there regulations hence there regulations hence there hence there was 10 and
classroom/school rules and regulations, 5% was no recorded was 1-3 recorded incidents was 4-6 recorded incidents was 7-9 recorded incidents above recorded incidents
guidelines incidents of violations as of violations as manifested of violations as manifested of violations as manifested of violations as
and norms of conduct manifested in in records/journal within in records/journal within in records/journal within manifested in
records/journal within
the school year the school year the school year records/journal within the
the school year
school year

1. Undertaken activities to improve Increased the MPS in
NAT/PTs/Pretest-Posttests
performance indicators through access,
to at least 5% from the
quality and efficiency baseline and there was
a. Mean Percentage Score in 10% increase/decrease to
NAT/PTs/Pretest-Posttests specified indicators to at
b. Failure Rate least 5% from the
c. Promotion rate
baseline within the rating least 2% from the baseline within the rating period least 2% from the baseline baseline within the rating
d. Drop-out Rate
period
Increased the MPS in Decreased the MPS in Decreased the MPS in
NAT/PTs/Pretest-Posttests
NAT/PTs/Pretest-Posttests Maintained the MPS in NAT/PTs/Pretest-Posttests
to at least 5% from the
to at least 5% from the NAT/PTs/Pretest-Posttests to at least 2% from the baseline and there was
baseline and there was and there was maintained baseline and there was increase/decrease to
increase/decrease to rate to specified indicators increase/decrease to specified indicators to at
specified indicators to at based on the baseline specified indicators to at least 5% from the
within the rating period within the rating period
period
 93%-100% monitored, 51%-74% monitored, 50% and below
June 85%-92% monitored, 75%-84% monitored,
Student 2.Monitored, evaluated evaluated evaluated monitored, evaluated
2016 - evaluated evaluated
Outcomes and maintained and maintained and maintained and maintained and maintained and maintained
students progress through class record, March 10% students progress students progress students progress
(25%) 2017 students progress through students progress through
portfolio, through class record, class record, portfolio, class record, portfolio, through class record, through class record,
anecdotal record, etc portfolio, anecdotal record, etc anecdotal record, etc portfolio, portfolio,
anecdotal record, etc anecdotal record, etc anecdotal record, etc

Planned, implemented, Planned, implemented, Planned, implemented,

and monitored at least 3 and monitored at least 2 and monitored at least 1 Planned, implemented,
remediation/enrichment remediation/enrichment remediation/enrichment and monitored at least 1 No
3.Conducted remediation/enrichment remediation/enrichment
programs to improve performance of programs with positive programs with positive program with positive remediation/enrichment program planned and
5% results, properly results, properly results, properly program but failed to
students and learning outcomes documented and documented and documented and document and submit implemented within the
school year
submitted within the submitted within the submitted within the within the school year
school year school year school year
 Conducted at least 5
regular and quarterly PTA
1.Conducted regular and quarterly meeting / conferences
PTA /meeting / conferences. 8%
with 76-100%
Basic Education Services
Conducted at least 4
regular and quarterly PTA
meeting / conferences
Conducted at least 3
regular and quarterly PTA
meeting / conferences
Conducted at least 1
Conducted at least 2
regular and quarterly PTA
regular and quarterly PTA meeting / conference
meeting / conferences
with 10% and below

attendance. with 51-75% attendance.. with 31-50% attendance.. with 11-30% attendance.. attendance..

Community March
2016 - Conducted at least 5 Conducted at least 1
Involvement Conducted at least 2 home
March home Conducted at least 4 home Conducted at least 3 home visitations/invitation to home
(20%) 2017 visitations/invitation to visitations/invitation to visitations/invitation to visitations/invitation to
parents/guardians of parents/guardians of parents/guardians of parents/guardians of parents/guardians of
2.Conducted Meetings/ home visitations students needing students needing academic students needing academic students needing students needing
or invited parents/ guardian of students 7% academic monitoring and monitoring and follow-up monitoring and follow-up academic monitoring and academic monitoring and
needing academic monitoring/ follow up. follow-up with with accomplishment of with accomplishment of follow-up with follow-up with
accomplishment of visits visits and successful visits and successful accomplishment of visits accomplishment of visits
and successful interventions. interventions. and successful and successful
interventions. interventions. interventions.

Participated/ involved to Participated/ involved to

at least 4 in community Participated/ involved to at Participated/ involved to at at least 1 in community No community projects/
3.Participated/ involved in community projects / events/ least 3 in community least 2 in community projects / events/ events/ activities
projects / events/ activities funded or 5% activities funded or projects / events/ activities projects / events/ activities activities funded or initiated/ participated/
sponsored by external stakeholders. sponsored by external funded or sponsored by funded or sponsored by sponsored by external involved.
stakeholders. external stakeholders. external stakeholders. stakeholders.
 Observed / mentored by Observed / mentored by Observed / mentored by
Observed / mentored by
Master Teacher/ Head Master Teacher/ Head Master Teacher/ Head
Master Teacher/ Head Not observed / mentored
1.Observed / mentored by Master Teacher to improve Teacher to improve Teacher to improve Teacher to improve by Master Teacher/ Head
teaching skills and teaching skills and teaching skills and
Teacher/ Head Teacher to improve teaching skills and Teacher to improve
teaching skills and competence for better 5% competence for better competence for better competence for better competence for better teaching skills and
learning outcomes twice learning outcomes twice learning outcomes once
learning outcomes. learning outcomes twice competence for better
within the school year within the school year with within the school year
with outstanding very satisfactory within the school year with with satisfactory learning outcomes.
remarks/rating. remarks/rating. satisfactory remarks/rating. remarks/rating.

Attended at least 2 INSETs Attended at least 2 INSETs Attended at least 2 INSETs

and 5 and 4 and 3 Attended at least 2 INSETs Attended at least 2 INSETs
2.Attended INSETs, outside seminars/workshops/ seminars/workshops/ seminars/workshops/ and 2 seminars/workshops/ and 1 seminar/workshop/
seminars/workshops/ demo teachings/ demo teachings/ demo teaching/
collaborative planning/ brainstorming , 5% demo teachings/ demo teachings/ demo teachings/ collaborative planning/ collaborative planning/
March collaborative planning/ collaborative planning/ collaborative planning/
e.g.LAC sessions. 2016 - brainstorming , e.g.LAC brainstorming , e.g.LAC
brainstorming , e.g.LAC brainstorming , e.g.LAC brainstorming , e.g.LAC sessions. session.
March sessions. sessions. sessions.
Professio 2017
nal Develop
ment 3.Reported on time in the workplace and
(25%) work station.

5%
No recorded absences or Incurred at least 4-8 Incurred at least 9-11 Incurred at least 12-14 Incurred at least 15 and
a. Attendance incurred at least 1-3 above absences within
absences within the year absences within the year absences within the year absences within the year the year

No recorded tardiness/
undertime or incurred at Incurred at least 10-14 Incurred at least 15-19 Incurred at least 20-24 Incurred at least 25 and
b. Punctuality 5% least 1-9 times of tardiness/ undertime tardiness/ undertime tardiness/ undertime up tardiness/ undertime
tardiness/ undertime within the school year. within the school year. within the school year. within the school year.
within the school year.

Participated to at least 5
4.Participated in co- curricular/ school co- curricular/ school
5%
activities within the rating period. activities properly
documented
Participated to at least 4 Participated to at least 3 Participated to at least 2 Participated to at least 1
co- curricular/ school co- curricular/ school co- curricular/ school co- curricular/ school
activities proeprly activities properly activities properly activity properly
documented. documented. documented. documented.
 Render services over and beyond duties
and responsibilities

1. Provided assistance to co-teachers in

improving their teaching competence

2. Assisted the school administrator in

planning and managing In-Service
trainings.
Basic Education Services

3. Served as consultant in the

preparation of supplementary materials
March
Plus Factor 4. Served as Demo Teacher of innovative 2016 -
5%
At least 3 performance At least 2 performance At least 1 performance A performance indicator No performance indicator
(5%) teaching techniques / classroom March indicators were met indicators were met indicator was met was met but no evidence was met
management 2017
5.Conducted action research where
findings and recommendations have
been adopted by the schools

6. Served as subject area coordinator/

chairman in school/ district/ division.

7. Served as grade level chairman/

OIC/winning trainor/coach/ outstanding
teacher awardee.

Others: Pls. Specify:

4.500-5.000 Outstanding Overall Rating of Accomplishments

3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory

2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

Overall rating/assessment for the accomplishments shall fall withinthe

following adjectival ratings and shall be in three(3) decimal points.

Ratee Rater Approving Authority

 Individual Performance and Review Form

Name of Employee: Teacher Y Name of Rater: MRS. NORA V. VILLALOBOS

Position: MASTER TEACHER I , II Date of Review: April 15, 2017
Review Period: March 2016 - March 2017
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd/Division of City Schools, Quezon City/Lagro High School

Major Key Result Objectives Time Line Weight Per Performance Indicator To Be Filled During Evaluation
Final Areas KRA Actual Result
Output (KRAs) Qualit Efficie Timeli Rating Score
(MFOs) 5 4 3 2 1 Target
y ncy ness

Total no. of DLL for Total no. of DLL for Total no. of DLL for Total no. of DLL for Total no. of DLL for
1. Prepared and submitted lesson the whole year the whole year the whole year the whole year 60% the whole year Submitted a total 160
plans/daily logs of activities on 100% with 90%-99% with 80%-89% with - 79% with 59% - 1% with DLL with appropriate ,
time including appropriate, 15% appropriate , appropriate , appropriate , appropriate , appropriate , adequate and updated 0.00 0.00
adequate and updated adequate and adequate and adequate and adequate and adequate and instructional materials on
instructional materials updated instructional updated instructional updated instructional updated instructional updated instructional time
materials on time materials on time materials on time materials on time materials on time

2. Incurred 85% of present

attendance with no late and June 2016 100% Complete Attendance of 69%
- March Attendance of 90%- Attendance of 80%- Attendance of 70%- Incurred a total of 170
undertime based on the total Attendance with no and below with no
2017 99% with no late 89% with no late 79% with no late attendance with no late
number of days for the SY. 5% late and undertime late and undertime 0.00 0.00
and undertime based and undertime based and undertime based and undertime based on
based on official based on official
on official time. on official time. on official time. official time.
time. time.

Implemented CIP Submitted CIP

Finished CIP Launched CIP Proposed CIP
3.Launched of CIP (Continuous (Continuous (Continuous
(Continuous
Launched CIP
Improvement Project) to address (Continuous (Continuous
5% Improvement Improvement Improvement (Continuous
learning needs of the students Improvement Improvement
Project) in school Project) title and Project) Improvement Project)
Project) Project)
level. organized team.

INSTRUC
TIONAL
COMPE
TENCE
cation Services
 INSTRUC
TIONAL
COMPE achieved 14% achieved 12% achieved 10% achieved 8% achieved 6%
4. Achieved an Increased school achieved 10% increased
TENCE increased in school increased in school increased in school increased in school increased in school
mean of at least 10% in 5% in school mean Test 0.00 0.00
mean Test Result in mean Test Result in mean Test Result in mean Test Result in mean Test Result in
Achievement Test Results Result in Periodic test
Periodic test Periodic test Periodic test Periodic test Periodic test

90%-99% of 80%-89% of 70%-79% of

100% of students
5.a. Promoted 100% of the
handled passed 25%
students, 25% among them with
among them with at
at least 85% rating in Math. June 2016
least 85% rating..
- March
2017 5%
100% of students
5.b. Promoted 100% of the
handled passed 25%
students, 25% among them with
among them with at
at least 80% rating in Math.
least 80% rating..
Basic Education Services
69% of students
students handled students handled students handled 85% of students handled
handled passed 25%
passed 25% among passed 25% among passed 25% among passed 25% among them
among them with at
them with at least them with at least them with at least with at least 85% rating..
least 85% rating..
85% rating.. 85% rating.. 85% rating..
90%-99% of 70%-79% of
80%-89%of students 69% of students
students handled students handled 83%of students handled
handled passed 25% handled passed 25%
passed 25% among passed 25% among passed 25% among them 0.00 0.00
among them with at among them with at
them with at least them with at least with at least 80% rating..
least 80% rating.. least 80% rating..

80% rating.. 80% rating..

6. Monitored and evaluated

Submitted class
students' progress through to
record and item
preparation and submission of 5%
analysis two days
class record and Item analysis to
ahead of deadline.
the department head on time.
Submitted class Submitted class Submitted class
Submitted class Submitted class record
record and item record and item record and item
record and item and item analysis on 0.00 0.00
analysis one day analysis one day analysis two days
analysis on time. time.
ahead of deadline. after the deadline. after the deadline..

1.Observed at least 3 teachers

every month Observed at least 5 Observed at least 4 Observed at least 3 Observed at least 2 Observed at least 1 Observed 3 teachers
15% teachers every teachers every teachers every teachers every teachers every
month month month month month every month

2.Checked 75% of the lesson June 2016 95%-100% lesson 85%-94% lesson plans 75%-84% lesson plans 51%-74% lesson plans 50% -below lesson
SUPER
plans of teachers. - March plans checked checked checked checked plans checked 75% lesson plan checked
VISION 10%
2017

3.Mentored at least 10 teachers in

a year. Mentored at least 15 Mentored at least 12 Mentored at least 10 Mentored at least 8 Mentored at least 6
15% teachers mentored teachers mentored teachers mentored teachers mentored teachers mentored
10 teachers mentored
 Initiated/ Conducted
1. Initiated/ Conducted at least 2 Initiated/ Conducted Initiated/ Conducted Initiated/ Conducted Initiated/ Conducted
participated at least school based seminars 1
school based seminars/ training , at least 4 school at least 3 school at least 2 school at least 1 school
5% 1 Regional training, is on test constructions
workshop based seminars/ based seminars/ based seminars/ based seminars/
seminars , workshop and other 1 is on Team
training , workshop training , workshop training , workshop training , workshop
Building

Conducted 2 Demo
Conducted at least 4 Conducted at least 3 Conducted at least 2 Conducted at least 1
2. Conducted at least 2 School Teaching last August 24,
5% School Based Demo School Based Demo School Based Demo School Based Demo No Demo teaching
Based Demo Teaching 2016 and last Novemeber
Teaching Teaching Teaching Teaching
11, 2016
Professional
Developmen
t 100% Complete 90%-99% 80%-89% 70%-79%
69% Attendance
3. Attended / participated with Attendance with Attendance with Attendance with Attendance with
with output based 85% attendance with
output in Inset/Department 5% output based on output based on output based on output based on
on Program/Meeting output
meetings Program/Meeting Program/Meeting Program/Meeting Program/Meeting
Scheduled.
Scheduled. Scheduled. Scheduled. Scheduled.

submitted chapter 1-
4. submitted chapter 1-3 of implemented action submitted chapter 1- submitted propose submitted chapter 1-3 of
finished action 3 of Action Research
Action Research to the Division 5% research to the 3 of action research title of action Action Research to the
research to the Division
Office School level to the principal. research. Division Office
Office

March Trained / coached Trained / coached Trained / coached Trained / coached Trained / coached First place MTAP 0.15
Trained / coached students who First Place Intl. First Place National First Place Regional First Place Division First Place District Sectoral Team Category
2016 -
Plus Factor represented the school in the Level (0.25) Level (0.20) Level (0.15) Level (0.10) Level (0.05)
March
Division Math contest.
2017
0.15

NORA V. VILLALOBOS Teacher Y MARIA NOEMI M. MONCADA ED.D.LL.B

Rater Ratee Approving Authority
 Ind

Name of Employee: Teacher X

Position: TEACHER I , II, III
Review Period: March 2016 - March 2017
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd/Division of City Schools, Quezon City/Lagro High School

Major Key Result

Final Weight
Output
Areas Objectives OUTPUT
Per KRA
(MFOs) (KRAs)

1. Prepared and Required

submitted lesson number of
plans/daily logs of lesson plans
activities on time with within the
appropriate, adequate school year 20%
and updated with
instructional materials appropriate
within the rating instructional
period. materials.
 activities on time with within the
appropriate, adequate school year 20%
and updated with
instructional materials appropriate
within the rating instructional
period. materials.

Teaching
Learning 2.Initiated and
Process implemented CIP
(Continuous 5%
Improvement Project)
to address learning
needs of the students
 3. Formulated and
implemented
Basic Education Services

remediation /
enhancement 5%
programs /
intervention programs
to address learning
needs of the students
 1. Achieved an
Increased school
mean of at least 10% 20%
in Achievement Test
Results
2.a. Promoted 100%
of the students, 25%
among them with at
Pupil/ least 85% rating in
June 2016 - March
Student Math. 2017 10%
Outcome 2.b. Promoted 100%
of the students, 25%
among them with at
least
3. Monitored
80% rating
andin
Math.
evaluated students'
progress through to
preparation and
submission of class 5%
record and Item
analysis to the
department head on
1. Attended PTA
time.
General Assembly , 5%
Family Day and other
school activities
2.Conducted
Meetings/ Visitation of
Communi at least 75% of
3%
ty parents to discuss the March 2016 -
Involvem learner's progress and March 2017
ent behavior in class.
Communi
ty March 2016 -
Involvem March 2017
ent

3. Conducted /
participated at least 3 2%
community
involvement.

1. Participated/ Re-
echo at least 2
Division level of 5%
conventions,
trainings/seminars and
workshop.
2. Conducted at least
Professio 2 School Based Demo 3%
nal Teaching March 2016 -
Develop March 2017
ment 3. Attended /
participated with
output in 5%
Inset/Department
meetings

4. Enrolled /finished 2%
graduate Studies
Trained / coached
students who
Plus March 2016 -
represented the school
Factor March 2017
in the Division Math
contest.

NORA V. VILLALOBOS
Rater
 Individual Performance and Review Form

City/Lagro High School

To Be Filled During Evaluation

Actual Result

Quality Timeliness

Prepared daily lesson plans/

daily logs with appropriate and
5
updated instructional materials All 5 indicators were met.
within the period of time.

well prepared lesson plan

checked by the Master teacher/
4 At least 4 indicators were met.
Grade Level Chairman/ Head
Teacher/ Principal/ Supervisor

Weel- prepared (3 SMART

objectives, Complete parts)
3 lesson plans/ daily logs with At least 3 indicators were met.
appropriate instuctional
materials.
 Prepared the required number of
lesson plans/ daily logs with
2 At least 2 indicators were met.
appropriate instructional
materials within the rating period.

Prepared the required number of

1 lesson plan / daily logs within the At least 1 indicators was met.
rating period.

Implemented CIP
5 (Continuous Improvement
Project) in school level.

Finished CIP (Continuous

4
Improvement Project)

Launched CIP (Continuous

3
Improvement Project)

Submitted CIP (Continuous

2 Improvement Project) title
and organized team.
 Proposed CIP (Continuous
1
Improvement Project)

Finished the remediation /

enhancement / intervention
5 to address learning needs of
the studentsand submitted
accomplishment report.

Conducted intervention
intervention to address
4
learning needs of the
students

formulated remediation /
enhancement program to
3
address learning needs of
the students.

Submitted the initiated

remediation / enhancement/
2
intervention program to the
depart head

Submitted remediation
1 program to address learning
needs of the students
Ratee
o Be Filled During Evaluation
al Result

Efficiency SCORE Rating Score

100% well-prepared daily

lesson logs with appropriate
and updated instructional
materials within the rating
period.

91-99% well prepared

lesson plan checked by the
Master teacher/ Grade Level
Chairman/ Head Teacher/
Principal/ Supervisor

86-90% Well- prepared (3

SMART objectives,
Complete parts) lesson
plans/ daily logs with
appropriate instuctional
materials.
 81-85% Prepared the
required number of lesson
plans/ daily logs with
appropriate instructional
materials within the rating
period.

80% Prepared the required

number of lesson plan / daily
logs within the rating period.

All 5 indicators were

met.

At least 4 indicators were

met.

At least 3 indicators were

met.

At least 2 indicators were

met.
At least 1 indicators was
met.

All 5 indicators were

met.

At least 4 indicators were

met.

At least 3 indicators were

met.

At least 2 indicators were

met.

At least 1 indicators was

met.