Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The median latency for development of diffuse pleural fibrosis from first asbestos
exposure was 34 years. Seventy-three per cent of patients had unilateral disease at
presentation and 24% of these were observed to develop contralateral disease after a
median of 2 years. Unilateral pleural disease was commonest on the right. Forty per
cent of patients presented with pleural effusions preceding the development of diffuse
pleural thickening. The median latency for development of pleural effusions from onset
of exposures was 38 years. Eighty per cent of the pleural effusions were unilateral.
Once established, pleural thickening was reported to have remained stable in 91% on
the ipsilateral side
Asbestosis
[Incidence of asbestosis and other benign lung diseases:
Spain, 1962-2010].
Garca Gmez M, Menndez-Navarro A, Castaeda Lpez R.
Analysis of occupational mortality in England and Wales during 1991-2000 showed no decline in
work-attributable deaths from asbestosis.
Our findings suggest that in time, mortality in Great Britain from both asbestosis and
mesothelioma can be expected to decline at even the oldest ages, the reduction for
asbestosis occurring a little earlier than that for mesothelioma. However, because death
rates from both diseases increase steeply with age and largely reflect exposures early in
working life, it will be many years before we can be confident that controls on
occupational exposure to asbestos have fully eliminated the risks associated with the
mineral.
Controls on asbestos exposure in the UK started to have major impact in the 1970s, when
the birth cohort with highest death rates from mesothelioma would have been in their
thirties.
Controls on exposure appear to have had little impact on older workers who had already
accumulated higher exposures during their first few decades of work.
Patients with histologically proven mesothelioma and resectable tumor load who could
tolerate the different treatment modalities (including surgery) should be considered for a
multimodal approach and be included in a trial whenever possible.
Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an epidemiological
perspective.
Benjamin M. Robinson
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 November; 1(4): 491496.
Pleural mesothelioma is the most common of these, accounting for approximately 90%
of disease (1,2). Patients commonly present with dyspnoea, chest wall pain and pleural
effusion (3). Diagnosis is often made at an advance stage of disease and in untreated
patients median survival is less than one year
Asbestos exposure is the most thoroughly established risk factor for malignant mesothelioma.
Disease incidence varies markedly within and between countries. The highest annual rates of
disease, approximately 30 case per million, are reported in Australia and Great Britain. The risk of
disease increases with age and is higher in men. Time from asbestos exposure to disease diagnosis
is on average greater than 40 years.
In Australia, male diagnoses dominate and more than 75% of newly diagnosed patients
are aged 65 years or older.
Diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma (DMPM) is a challenging disease in all of its aspects, from
presentation and diagnosis to staging and treatment. Single-modality therapy was the initial approach
to this disease. It generally has not been effective in changing the natural history of DMPM. As a
result, multimodality regimens involving surgery with radiation, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy
delivered regionally or systemically have been evaluated. Randomized controlled studies comparing
various strategies are lacking and, thus, the debate continues regarding the effectiveness of different
treatment approaches.
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains an aggressive thoracic malignancy associated with
poor prognosis. There is no standard treatment regimen,