Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS Printed in U.S.A.

Copyright 2001 by The American Association of Endodontists VOL. 27, NO. 1, JANUARY 2001

Effect of Prophylactic Amoxicillin on Endodontic


Flare-Up in Asymptomatic, Necrotic Teeth

Leigh Pickenpaugh, DDS, MS, Al Reader, DDS, MS, Mike Beck, DDS, MA, William J. Meyers, DMD, MEd,
and Larry J. Peterson, DDS, MS

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, dou- found antibiotics were less effective than analgesics in reducing
ble-blind, placebo-controlled study was to deter- interappointment emergencies. Walton and Chiappinelli (12) con-
mine the effect of prophylactic amoxicillin on the cluded that posttreatment symptoms were not affected by prophy-
occurrence of endodontic flare-up in asymptom- lactic administration of penicillin.
Various studies (1517) have provided evidence that prophy-
atic, necrotic teeth. Seventy patients participated
lactic doses of antibiotics may be used to prevent infections. If
and had a clinical diagnosis of an asymptomatic,
bacteria are responsible for endodontic flare-up, perhaps prophy-
necrotic tooth with associated periapical radiolu- lactic antibiotics could prevent their occurrence.
cency. One hour before endodontic treatment, pa- The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, pla-
tients randomly received either 3 g of amoxicillin or cebo-controlled study was to determine the effect of prophylactic
3 g of a placebo control in a double-blind manner. amoxicillin on the occurrence of flare-up in asymptomatic, ne-
After endodontic treatment, each patient received: crotic teeth.
ibuprofen; acetaminophen with codeine (30 mg);
and a 512-day diary to record pain, swelling, per-
cussion pain, and number and type of pain medi- MATERIALS AND METHODS
cation taken. The results demonstrated 10% of the
70 patients had a flare-up characterized by mod- Seventy adult patients participated in this study. All patients
erate-to-severe postoperative pain or swelling that were in good health as determined by a written health history and
began 30 h after endodontic treatment and per- oral questioning. Subjects were not taking antibiotics nor had they
received them within 30 days before participation in the study. The
sisted for an average of 74 h. Of the seven patients
study was approved by The Ohio State University Human Subjects
who had flare-ups, 4 were in the amoxicillin group Review Committee, and written consent was obtained from each
and 3 were not. Prophylactic amoxicillin did not patient.
significantly (p 0.80) influence the endodontic Each patient had an asymptomatic, necrotic tooth needing end-
flare-up. We concluded that a prophylactic dose of odontic therapy. Information on each subject was recorded and
amoxicillin before endodontic treatment of asymp- included a patient history and biographical information. Addition-
tomatic, necrotic teeth had no effect on the end- ally information regarding patient allergies, presence of a sinus
odontic flare-up. tract, and previous endodontic therapy were also recorded. Each
tooth had to test negative to an electric pulp test (Analytic Tech-
nology Corp., Redmond, WA) and to ice, and had to have a
periapical radiolucency of at least 3 3 mm.
One hour before endodontic treatment, each patient randomly
Endodontic treatment of an asymptomatic, necrotic tooth is a received an oral dose of either 3 g (six capsules) of amoxicillin
frequent type of therapy in endodontic practice. Postoperatively (Parke-Davis, Inc., Morris Plains, NJ) or 3 g (six capsules) of a
there may be some discomfort associated with this treatment (1, 2). placebo control in a double-blind manner. The medications were
However there may be an acute exacerbation of symptoms, com- blinded, randomized, and packaged by The Ohio State University
monly known as a flare-up, that occurs in some patients resulting Hospital Pharmacy. Each 500 mg gelatin capsule of either amoxi-
in moderate-to-severe postoperative pain and/or swelling. The in- cillin or placebo were identical in form (i.e. pink and red color with
cidence of an endodontic flare-up has been reported to be 1 to 24% P.D. 731 imprinted on each capsule).
of the time (314). One hour after taking the medications, standard endodontic
The use of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent a flare-up in treatment was performed by graduate endodontic students or end-
asymptomatic, necrotic teeth has been investigated. Morse and odontic faculty. After local anesthetic administration, standard
co-workers (4 6) concluded that prophylactic antibiotics signifi- access openings were performed. The working length was deter-
cantly decreased the incidence of flare-up. Torabinejad et al. (7) mined to be 1 mm from the radiographic apex. The canals were

53
54 Pickenpaugh et al. Journal of Endodontics

TABLE 1. Distribution of patients by groups and by teeth

Maxillary Mandibular
Group No. (%)
Anterior Premolar Molar Anterior Premolar Molar
Nonflare-up group
Group I 15 (21%)
Amoxicillin 7 (10%) 2 2 0 2 0 1
Placebo 8 (11%) 2 0 2 2 0 2
Group II 35 (50%)
Amoxicillin 18 (26%) 5 2 3 3 3 2
Placebo 17 (24%) 3 2 5 3 1 3
Group III 13 (19%)
Amoxicillin 5 (7%) 0 0 2 1 1 1
Placebo 8 (11%) 4 0 2 0 0 2
Total 63 (90%) 16 6 14 11 5 11

Flare-up group
Amoxicillin 4 (6%) 1 1 1 1 0 0
Placebo 3 (4%) 0 2 0 0 1 0
Total 7 (10%) 1 3 1 1 1 0
n 70.

prepared using a step-back preparation and K-type files (L. D. moderate to severe swelling that began 12 to 48 h after treatment
Caulk, Inc., Milford, DE). The canals were irrigated with 2.62% and lasted at least 48 h.
sodium hypochlorite initially and after every other file placed to Data were collected and statistically analyzed. Bivariate analy-
working length. Complete biomechanical preparation of all canals ses for differences between the flare-up and nonflare-up groups
was accomplished. The canals were dried, and a sterile cotton were completed as follows. Age was analyzed using the indepen-
pellet was placed over the canal orifices and the access opening dent t test, whereas gender, prophylactic amoxicillin status, allergy,
was sealed with Cavit. The occlusion was not adjusted. sinus tract, and previous endodontic therapy were assessed using
Each patient received a labeled bottle of 200 mg tablets of Fishers exact test. An estimate of the radiographic lesion area was
ibuprofen (Advil, Whitehall Laboratories, New York, NY), along calculated by averaging the smallest and largest measurements and
with verbal and written instructions on how to take the medication. dividing this number by 2. This number served as a proxy for the
They were instructed to take two tablets every 4 to 6 h as needed lesions radius had it been round. Lesion area was then estimated
for pain and to take the ibuprofen first if an analgesic was required. by the following formula: area radius2. Estimated lesion
Each subject also received a labeled bottle of acetaminophen with area was assessed using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. Multi-
30 mg of codeine (Tylenol #3, MacNeil Consumer Products, Fort variate analysis was accomplished using a logistic regression
Washington, PA), along with verbal and written instructions. They model with flare-up occurrence as the dependent variable and age,
were instructed to take the acetaminophen with codeine (one or gender, sinus tract, prophylactic amoxicillin status, allergy, previ-
two tablets every 4 h as needed for pain), only if two ibuprofen ous endodontic therapy, and estimated lesion area as the predictor
tablets did not relieve their discomfort. They were instructed to variables. Differences were considered significant at p 0.05.
take only these two medications and to return the unused medica-
tions at the obturation appointment.
Each patient received a 512-day diary to record postoperative RESULTS
symptoms. The symptoms were recorded before going to bed on
the day of the treatment, then on arising, and before bedtime each The results were divided into nonflare-up and flare-up groups
day for 5 days. The information recorded was: pain, percussion according to the onset, severity, and duration of postoperative
pain (the patient was asked to tap on her/his tooth), swelling, and symptoms. Table 1 shows the distribution of patients by group and
number and type of pain medication taken. Pain and percussion a summary of the tooth distribution.
rating scales were: 0 no discomfort, 1 mild (recognizable, not The nonflare-up group was subdivided into three subgroups
discomforting), 2 moderate (discomforting, but bearable), and (Table 1). Subgroup I of the nonflare-up group comprised 21% of
3 severe (considerable discomfort, difficult to bear). Each pa- the amoxicillin and placebo patients. They had no pain, no swell-
tient rated their swelling on a scale from 0 to 3: 0 no swelling, ing, no percussion sensitivity, and did not take any pain medica-
1 mild swelling (mild puffiness of the face that was not both- tions.
ersome), 2 moderate swelling (swelling that caused facial dis- Subgroup II included 50% of the amoxicillin and placebo pa-
tortion and was bothersome), and 3 severe swelling (swelling tients. They had mild-to-moderate pain, mild swelling, mild-to-
that caused serious facial distortion and was very bothersome). moderate percussion pain, or took ibuprofen pain medication (two
Patients also recorded if they took pain medications, the amount, patients took acetaminophen with codeine on day of treatment).
and the type (ibuprofen or acetaminophen with codeine). A section However all symptoms resolved within 48 h. Generally the symp-
was also included for subjects comments. At the scheduled obtu- toms started the day of treatment and decreased steadily over the
ration appointment the patient returned the diary and all unused next 2 days.
pain medication to verify the amount of medication taken. A Subgroup III included the other 19% of the amoxicillin and
flare-up was defined as moderate-to-severe postoperative pain or placebo patients. They had mild-to-moderate pain, mild swelling,
Vol. 27, No. 1, January 2001 Effect of Amoxicillin on Flare-up 55

TABLE 2. Bivariate analysis for flare-up For example, moderate-to-severe pain began 30 h after treatment
and lasted through the fourth day in 60% of the patients in the
Flare-up Nonflare-up
Variable p flare-up group. The patients in the nonflare-up group had only a
(n 7) (n 63)
3% incidence of moderate pain, with the remaining 97% recording
Age* 51 14 41 17 0.1150
none-to-mild pain for the entire 5 days. Moderate-to-severe swell-
Lesion size (mm2)* 14 6 25 23 0.2043
Sinus tract 1.00 ing occurred in three patients in the flare-up groupstarting 15 to
Yes 1 (14%) 8 (13%) 48 h after treatment. Two of the patients continued to report
No 6 (86%) 55 (87%) swelling through the fifth day. The three patients who reported
Gender 0.699 swelling also reported moderate pain and percussion pain.
Female 4 (57%) 29 (46%) Prophylactic amoxicillin did not significantly influence the oc-
Male 3 (43%) 34 (54%) currence of the endodontic flare-up in asymptomatic, necrotic teeth
Drug 0.706
when considered alone or when controlled for age, estimated lesion
Amoxicillin 4 (57%) 30 (48%)
Placebo 3 (43%) 33 (52%)
area, sinus tract, gender, allergy, or previous endodontic therapy.
Allergy 1.00 Our results agree with the findings of Walton and Chiappinelli
Yes 1 (14%) 13 (21%) (12), but disagree with the work of Morse and co-authors (4 6).
No 6 (86%) 50 (79%) However, even if this study showed that prophylactic antibiotics
Previous endodontic therapy 1.00 prevented a flare-up, then 100 patients would have to be prophy-
Yes 1 (14%) 13 (21%) laxed to prevent 10 patients from having moderate-to-severe post-
No 6 (86%) 50 (79%) operative symptoms. We do not believe this is a sufficient inci-
* Mean standard deviation. dence to warrant the use of prophylactic antibiotics for all patients,
Independent t test (two-tailed).
Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test (two-tailed). considering the adverse reactions involved with indiscriminate use
Fishers exact test (two-tailed). of antibiotics (12).
The use of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent an infection is
based on the work of Burke and Miles (15, 18, 19). They demon-
mild-to-moderate percussion pain, or took ibuprofen pain medica- strated that, for antibiotics to be effective, they must be in the
tion (one patient took acetaminophen with codeine for 1 day). The system when the wound is seeded with bacteria. Delays of 3 to 4 h
symptoms started the day of the appointment, but persisted past in antibiotic administration resulted in lesions that were identical to
48 h. None of the ratings were severe. those in the animals receiving no prophylaxis. Clinically then the
In the flare-up group, 10% of the amoxicillin and placebo
antibiotic must be effective against the organisms encountered, it
patients had moderate-to-severe pain or moderate-to-severe swell-
must be present in the tissues when contamination begins (initial
ing, moderate-to-severe percussion pain, or took acetaminophen
instrumentation), continued during the period of operation (de-
with codeine medications for at least 3 days. The moderate-to-
bridement of the root canal), and discontinued after the operation
severe symptoms began 30 h (range 15 to 48 h) after treatment
is complete. The dose of amoxicillin used in this study would fulfill
and persisted for at least another 48 h. The average duration of the
this requirement (i.e. it is effective against the bacteria present in
flare-up was 74 h (range 48 to 120 h).
the root canal system, serum blood levels are high initially and are
Bivariate analysis (Table 2) revealed no significant differences
between the nonflare-up and flare-up patients for age, gender, maintained for 10 to 12 h, thus making it an excellent choice for
prophylactic amoxicillin status, allergy, sinus tract, previous end- a single dose regimen (20)). However the difference between the
odontic therapy, or lesion area. Similarly multivariate analysis experimental lesion of Burke and Miles (15, 19), a freshly seeded
failed to demonstrate a significant effect for any of these variables bacterial wound, and the endodontic lesion is that the lesion of
when considered simultaneously. Prophylactic amoxicillin had no endodontic origin is long-standing in nature. Therefore immuno-
effect on the incidence of flare-up. logical factors of a pre-existing, chronic lesion may also be in-
volved in a flare-up.
What are the predictive factors associated with a flare-up?
DISCUSSION Previous studies have related flare-ups to retreatment cases (8, 13),
maxillary lateral incisors (3), canines (4 6), and mandibular pre-
The nonflare-up and flare-up groups describe the range of molars (7), gender (5), age (3, 7), and patients with allergies (7).
experiences that patients may encounter after endodontic treatment We did not find a statistical relationship between endodontic
of an asymptomatic, necrotic tooth. In the nonflare-up group, flare-up and any of the predictive factors studied. If further re-
subgroup I is representative of the patients who do not experience search could determine which patient and what factors are specif-
any problems following endodontic treatment. Subgroup II repre- ically involved in the flare-up, we may then be able to direct
sents immediate postoperative problems related to endodontic therapy to treat or prevent its occurrence.
treatment. Subgroup III is representative of the variability in pa-
We conclude that a prophylactic dose of amoxicillin before
tients with postoperative symptoms. That is patients may have
endodontic treatment of asymptomatic, necrotic teeth has no effect
problems past 48 h, but none of the problems were severe. Some
on the postoperative flare-up.
patients in this group related that the pain and percussion sensi-
tivity started after they bit down on something hard.
The flare-up group represents patients who have significant This study was supported by research funding from the Graduate End-
postoperative sequelae. Moderate-to-severe symptoms began 30 odontic Student Research Fund and the Goldberg Memorial Fund, Graduate
h (range 15 to 48 h) after treatment and lasted 74 h (range 48 to Endodontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University. A portion of this
article was presented at the 49th Annual Session of the American Association
120 h). Clearly this group of patients reacted very differently to of Endodontists, San Francisco, CA, and was awarded a second place in the
endodontic treatment than the patients in the nonflare-up group. graduate student competition.
56 Pickenpaugh et al. Journal of Endodontics

This article was adapted from a thesis submitted by Dr. Pickenpaugh in asymptomatic pulpal-periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;
partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MS degree at The Ohio State 64:96 109.
University. 6. Morse DR, Esposito JV. A clarification on endodontic flare-ups. Oral
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;70:3457.
Dr. Pickenpaugh is in private practice limited to endodontics, Columbus, 7. Torabinejad M, Kettering JD, McGraw JC, Cummings RR, Dwyer TG,
OH. Dr. Reader is professor and director of the Graduate Endodontic Pro- Tobias TS. Factors associated with endodontic interappointment emergen-
gram, Dr. Beck is associate professor and acting chairperson in the Depart- cies of teeth with necrotic pulps. J Endodon 1988;14:261 6.
ment of Health Services Research, Dr. Meyers is emeritus professor and 8. Trope M. Relationship of intracanal medicaments to endodontic flare-
director of Endodontics, Dr. Peterson is professor and former chairperson in ups. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990;6:226 9.
the Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Pathology, and Anesthesiology,
9. Trope M. Flare-up rate of single-visit endodontics. Int Endod J 1991;
College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Address
24:24 7.
requests for reprints to Dr. Al Reader, Program Director of Graduate End-
odontics, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, 305 W. 12th Avenue, 10. Walton R, Fouad A. Endodontic interappointment flare-ups: a pro-
Columbus, OH 43210. spective study of incidence and related factors. J Endodon 1992;18:1727.
11. Mor C, Rotstein I, Friedman S. Incidence of interappointment emer-
gency associated with endodontic therapy. J Endodon 1992;18:509 11.
12. Walton RE, Chiappinelli J. Prophylactic penicillin: effect on posttreat-
ment symptoms following root canal treatment of asymptomatic periapical
References pathosis. J Endodon 1993;19:466 70.
13. Imura N, Zuolo ML. Factors associated with endodontic flare-ups: a
1. Mulhern JM, Patterson SS, Newton CW, Ringel AM. Incidence of post- prospective study. Int Endod J 1995;28:2615.
operative pain after one-appointment endodontic treatment of asymptomatic 14. Eleazer PD, Eleazer KR. Flare-up rate in pulpally necrotic molars in
pulpal necrosis in single-rooted teeth. J Endodon 1982;8:370 5. one-visit versus two-visit endodontic treatment. J Endodon 1998;24:614 6.
2. Harrison JW, Baumgartner JC, Svec TA. Incidence of pain associated 15. Burke JF. The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in exper-
with clinical factors during and after root canal therapy. Part 1. Interappoint-
imental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery 1969;50:161 8.
ment pain. J Endodon 1983;9:384 7.
16. Peterson LJ, Booth DB. Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in intraoral
3. Balaban FS, Skidmore AE, Griffin JA. Acute exacerbations following
initial treatment of necrotic pulps. J Endodon 1984;10:78 81. orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1976;34:1088 91.
4. Morse DR, Koren LZ, Esposito JV, Goldberg JM, Belott RM, Sinai IH, 17. Scher KS, Wroczynski AF, Jones CW. Duration of antibiotic prophy-
Furst ML. Asymptomatic teeth with necrotic pulps and associated periapical laxis. Am J Surg 1986;151:209 11.
radiolucencies: relationship of flare-ups to endodontic instrumentation, anti- 18. Burke JF, Miles AA. The sequence of vascular events in early infective
biotic usage and stress in three separate practices at three different time inflammation. J Pathol Bacteriol 1958;76:119.
periods. Int J Psychsom 1986;33:5 81. 19. Burke JF. Use of preventive antibiotics in clinical surgery. Ann Surg
5. Morse DR, Furst ML, Belott RM, Lefkowitz RD, Spritzer IB, Sideman BH. 1973;39:6 11.
Infectious flare-ups and serious sequelae following endodontic treatment: a 20. Barza M. Antimicrobial spectrum, pharmacology, and therapeutic use
prospective randomized trial on efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in cases of of antibiotics. II. Penicillins. Am J Hosp Pharm 1977;34:57 67.

The Way It Was

Ever wonder why smallpox was small? It was to contrast it with syphilis, the
great pox, which having just ravaged a previously unexposed 16th century
population caused numerous extensive cutaneous lesions.

Lewis Pallid

Вам также может понравиться