III Guerra Mundial?

Teatro del Indo-Pacfico

NetWars
Pacfico
20/10/2016
China

Kerry Bolton

La oligarqua mundial ha reconocido desde hace tiempo la importancia del Pacfico en la

planificacin estratgica y econmica. En los ltimos aos se ha producido una convergencia de
Rusia, China y los EE.UU. en el Pacfico, ya que todos intentar extender su influencia en la regin.
La oligarqua de EE.UU. y sus aliados tienen una ventaja inicial de dcadas. Los objetivos de esta
oligarqua no necesariamente coinciden con las suposiciones de otros sectores del complejo del
poder de Estados Unidos, incluidos los militares y el Senado. Donde los militares y ciertas
influencias polticas ven amenazas, la oligarqua ve oportunidades, sobre todo en lo que se refiere a
China.
Los EE.UU. han buscado durante mucho tiempo cooptar a China en un sistema global. A pesar del
ruido de sables en ocasiones, no hay ninguna indicacin de que este panorama haya cambiado. La
diferencia en la actitud de los EE.UU. hacia Rusia y China no es difcil de discernir, a pesar de
cualquier boxeo de sombras que pueda haber en el escenario mundial. En resumen: los EE.UU.
aspiran a la "reforma" en China, que se ha desarrollando desde hace varias dcadas, mientras que
para Rusia bajo Putin, los EE.UU. estn convencidos de que debe haber un "cambio de rgimen", y
persiguen este objetivo con ardor. Los escandalosos intentos por demonizar a Putin son comparables
a los utilizados contra Gadafi, Milosevic, Saddam y actualmente Assad. La ofensiva de relaciones
pblicas en contra de Putin es la misma que se utiliza como preludio a las guerras subsidiarias y las
"revoluciones de color" que han derribado a una serie de hombres de estado en toda la antigua
Unin Sovitica, el Norte de frica y en otros lugares. Uno no ve tal ofensiva contra el liderazgo de
China; y ni siquiera se produjo bajo Mao, que era considerado como un socio dispuesto a rodear a
Rusia. Carl Gershman, cuya rusofobia proviene de un fondo trotskista, como en muchos otros, jefe
de la National Endowment for Democracy, que ha sido un instigador clave del "cambio de rgimen"
en todo el mundo y est financiado por el Congreso de Estados Unidos, ha llamado recientemente a
la eliminacin de Putin por parte de los EE.UU.. (Robert Parry, Regime change in Russia: Key
Neocon calls for Washington to remove President Putin form office, Global Research, 7 de octubre
de 2016; http://www.globalresearch.ca/regime-change-in-russia-key-neocon-calls-on-washington-
to-remove-president-putin-from-office/5550248).
Las oligarquas americanas y aliadas establecieron la Asia Society para la promocin de un bloque
econmico regional del Pacfico. La Asia Society fue fundada en 1956 por John D. Rockefeller III.
El encabezado en la pgina web de la Asia Society es: "Preparing Asians and Americans for a
shared future" [Preparando a asiticos y norteamericanos para un futuro compartido, (Asia
Society, "About", http://www.asiasociety.org/about/mission.html). Otro de tales grupos polticos es
la Trilateral Comision, fundada en 1973, de nuevo por la dinasta Rockefeller, cuyo primer director
es el rusfobo Zbigniew Brzezinski. Se estableci un "Asian Pacific Group" de la comisin, lo que
refleja el creciente inters en la regin. El Acuerdo de Asociacin Trans-Pacfico fue pensado para
formalizar la regionalizacin del Pacfico. (Ver Bolton, Globalists Pacific Agenda, Geopolitics of
the Indo-Pacific, Black House Publishing, London, 2013, 138-144; y Bolton, Regional
Globalization: The Trans Pacific Partnership, Foreign Policy Journal, 19 de noviembre de 2011,
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/11/19/regional-globalization-the-trans-pacific-
partnership/).
Estas estrategias econmicas, son reforzadas por el ejrcito de los EE.UU.. Sin embargo, China
tambin ha entrado en la regin con el enfoque de ayudar a las numerosas naciones insulares del
Pacfico, y ms recientemente, tambin Rusia ha extendido su presencia.
El Lowy Institute, un think tank globalista con sede en Australia, fundado por el veterano magnate
sionista Frank Lowy, dice sobre China:
"La Repblica Popular de China (RPC) tiene un compromiso fuerte y creciente en la regin de las
Islas del Pacfico. Actualmente, China tiene relaciones diplomticas con ocho pases - las Islas
Cook, los Estados Federados de Micronesia, Fiji, Niue, Papa Nueva Guinea (PNG), Samoa, Tonga
y Vanuatu. La regin ha sido testigo de una muy activa "diplomacia de chequera" en el pasado, ya
que Taiwan tambin tiene seis aliados diplomticos en el Pacfico. La abierta 'diplomacia de
chequera' lleg en gran medida a su fin en 2008, cuando el presidente de Taiwn, Ma Ying-jeou,
alcanz una tregua con Pekn despus de prometer Taiwan no competir ya con China por los aliados
en el Pacfico. (China and the Pacific Island, http://www.lowyinstitute.org/issues/china-pacific).
Rusia ha entrado con retraso en la regin. Esta presencia se centra en Fiji, hasta entonces un foco de
China, desde que Nueva Zelanda, Australia, la Unin Europea y los EE.UU. trataron de jugar de
hermano mayor castigando a los habitantes de Fiji por su falta de democracia liberal, e imponiendo
sanciones. Si los EE.UU. fueran serios a la hora de contrarrestar la influencia china en la regin, tal
movimiento sera impensable. Los esfuerzos de la URSS para asegurar posiciones en Tonga y
Samoa Occidental fracasaron. Sin embargo, en enero de 2016, 20 contenedores de armas de Rusia
llegaron a Suva, Fiji, causando mucha especulacin en cuanto a si este es el comienzo de una
ofensiva diplomtica rusa para establecer una presencia entre los estados del Pacfico, en una parte
del mundo que se considera simblicamente como el "punto dbil" de Occidente. (Romana Madaus,
"The Bear Returns to the South Pacific: Russia Sends Arms to Fiji", The Diplomat, 9 de abril de
2016, http://thediplomat.com/2016/04/the-bear-returns-to-the-south-pacific-russia-sends-arms-to-
fiji/).
En julio del ao 2016, el anual Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) se llev a cabo bajo los auspicios de
Estados Unidos. Cabe destacar que estuvo presente China; la gran ausente fue Rusia. Sin embargo,
incluso en Mongolia, una zona de inters directo de Rusia, se llev a cabo en 2015 un ejercicio
multinacional de juegos de guerra militares patrocinado por los EE.UU., que tambin inclua China,
pero excluy a Rusia. (Bolton, US Navy Rim of The Pacific (RIMPAC) War Games, Co-opting
China, Isolating Russia?, Global Research, July 10, 2016, http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-
sponsored-rim-of-the-pacific-rimpac-war-games-coopting-china-isolating-russia/5535240).
Los conflictos futuros en la regin del Indo-Pacfico, sern sobre o por la influencia de los recursos
hdricos. Desde que este autor escribi sobre el tema en 2010 (Bolton,Water Wars: Rivalry Over
Water Resources, World Affairs, Vol. 14, No. 1 , Spring 2010; tambien, Bolton, Rivalry over
Water Resources as a Potential Cause of Conflict in Asia, Journal of Social, Political, and
Economic Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1, Spring 2010, 23-44,
http://search.proquest.com/openview/4daabb344fd4e09d9a7e705c541eea15/1?pq-
origsite=gscholar) la cuestin de las "guerras del agua" ha estado bajo una creciente atencin. Por
ejemplo, el teniente coronel H. Jin Pak, profesor militar de EE.UU. escribi sobre el tema en The
U.S. Army War College journal Parameters, concluyendo:
"A medida que el agua se vuelve cada vez ms deseada entre los estados de esa regin, e incluso en
todo el mundo, es hora de que Estados Unidos y el Departamento de Defensa eleven las cuestiones
de seguridad medioambiental a un nivel a la par con los intereses de seguridad nacional, tales como
la lucha contra la proliferacin de armas de destruccin masiva y la prevencin de los ataques
contra el territorio. Cada vez es ms importante promover medidas de confianza entre ciertos
estados para garantizar que errores militares no agraven las cuestiones de soberana territorial, como
el que cubre Arunachal Pradesh. Por ltimo, es hora de que el Departamento de Defensa invierta en
ms capacidad de purificacin/tratamiento de aguas, no centrndose slo en el mantenimiento de la
salud de los Estados Unidos y las fuerzas de la coalicin, sino tambin en mitigar las crisis de
escasez de agua". (Pak, "China, India and War over Water, Parameters, Vol. 46, No. 2, Summer
2016, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/issues/Summer_2016/8_Pak.pdf)
Al igual que asegurando los recursos petroleros, la idea que se est planteando es que la rivalidad
por los recursos hdricos podra justificar el que los EE.UU. se hicieran cargo de los recursos
hdricos de los Estados en aras de la paz. Encontraremos pronto corporaciones estadounidenses y
otras controlando los recursos de agua despus de la intervencin militar de EE.UU., y ultimtums
para la privatizacin de los recursos hdricos para permitir el control de las empresas? Se utilizarn
"revoluciones de color" contra aquellos estados que insistan en mantener el control sobre los
recursos hdricos? Tales conflictos por el agua son especialmente problemticos en la totalidad de la
regin del Indo-Pacfico, con el control por parte de China de las cabeceras en el Tbet. Esta es
tambin una cuestin que podra confundir las relaciones ruso-chinas, las respuestas israeles al
control del agua, y los problemas del agua en los EE.UU. con el agotamiento de las capas freticas.
La destruccin de Serbia fue causada por medios militares con el fin de obtener los recursos
minerales de Kosovo, en particular el complejo minero de Trepca, siendo la privatizacin uno de los
ultimtums a Serbia de guerra primaria para permitir la toma de control corporativo de los recursos
de Kosovo, segn el diktat de Rambouillet impuesto al estado (Vase: Privatization Agency of
Kosovo, http://www.pak-ks.org/?page=2,1). Las guerras se librarn por el agua, como se han
librado por el opio, el oro y el petrleo, y como ha ocurrido sistemticamente cuando los globalistas
han intervenido en aras de la "humanidad, y el resultado ser un caos permanente.

http://katehon.com/article/world-war-iii-indo-pacific-theatre

World War III? Indo-Pacific Theatre

Primary tabs

View(active tab)
Track
Facebook VK blogger LiveJournal Twitter Google+ Email Print Compartir
Netwars
Pacific
20.10.2016
China
Kerry Bolton

The global oligarchy has long recognised the importance of the Pacific in strategic and economic
planning. In recent years there has been a convergence of Russia, China and the USA on the Pacific
as each attempt to extend influence into the region. The U.S. oligarchy and its allies have a head-
start by decades. The aims of this oligarchy are not necessarily going to coincide with the
assumptions of other sectors of the American power complex, including the military and the Senate.
Where the military and certain political influences see threats, the oligarchy sees opportunities,
particularly in regard to China.

The USA has long sought to co-opt China into a global system. Despite the sabre-rattling on
occasion, there is no indication that this outlook has changed. The difference in attitude of the USA
towards Russia and China is not difficult to discern, despite whatever shadow-boxing there might
be on the world stage. In brief: the USA aims for reform in China, which has been proceeding for
several decades, while for Russia under Putin, the USA is adamant that there must be regime
change, and pursues this goal ardently. The outrageous attempts to demonise Putin are comparable
to those used against Gaddafi, Milosevic, Saddam and presently Assad. The public relations
offensive against Putin is the same as that used as a prelude to proxy wars and colour revolutions
that have toppled a string of statesmen throughout the former Soviet bloc, North Africa and
elsewhere. One does not see such an offensive against the leadership of China; and it did not even
occur under Mao, who was regarded as a willing partner in encircling Russia. Carl Gershman,
whose Russophobia stems from a Trotskyite background, like many others, head of the National
Endowment for Democracy which has been a key instigator of regime change throughout the
world, and is funded by U.S. Congress, has recently called for Putins removal by the USA. (Robert
Parry, Regime change in Russia: Key Neocon calls for Washington to remove President Putin form
office, Global Research, October 7 2016; http://www.globalresearch.ca/regime-change-in-russia-
key-neocon-calls-on-washington-to-remove-president-putin-from-office/5550248).

The American and allied oligarchies set up the Asia Society for the promotion of a Pacific regional
economic bloc. The Asia Society was founded in 1956 by John D. Rockefeller III. The by-line on
the Asia Societys website is: Preparing Asians and Americans for a shared future. (Asia Society,
About, http://www.asiasociety.org/about/mission.html). Another such policy group is the
Trilateral Commission, founded in 1973, again by the Rockefeller dynasty, the first director of the
Commission being the Russophobe, Zbigniew Brzezinski. A Pacific Asian Group of the
Commission was established, reflecting the growing interest in the region. The Trans-Pacific
Partnership Agreement was intended to formalise Pacific regionalisation. (See Bolton, Globalists
Pacific Agenda, Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific, Black House Publishing, London, 2013, 138-144;
and Bolton, Regional Globalization: The Trans Pacific Partnership, Foreign Policy Journal,
November 19 2011, http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/11/19/regional-globalization-the-
trans-pacific-partnership/).

These economic strategies are buttressed by the U.S. military. However, China has also entered the
region with a focus of assisting the numerous Pacific island nations, and more recently still Russia
has extended a presence.

The Lowy Institute, an Australian-based globalist think tank founded by veteran Zionist magnate
Frank Lowy, states of China:
The Peoples Republic of China (PRC) has a strong and growing engagement in the Pacific Islands
region. China currently has diplomatic relations with eight countries the Cook Islands, Federated
States of Micronesia, Fiji, Niue, Papua New Guinea (PNG), Samoa, Tonga, and Vanuatu. The
region witnessed very active chequebook diplomacy in the past, as Taiwan also has six diplomatic
allies in the Pacific. Overt chequebook diplomacy largely came to an end in 2008 when Taiwans
President Ma Ying-Jeou struck a truce with Beijing after promising Taiwan would no longer
compete with China for allies in the Pacific. (China and the Pacific Island,
http://www.lowyinstitute.org/issues/china-pacific).

Russia has belatedly entered the region. This presently centres on Fiji, hitherto a focus of China,
since New Zealand, Australia, the European Union and the USA tried to play big-brother in
castigating the Fijians for their lack of liberal-democracy, and imposed sanctions. If the USA was
serious about countering Chinese influence in the region such a move would be unthinkable. The
efforts by the USSR to secure positions in Tonga and Western Samoa failed. However, in January
2016 20 containers of arms from Russia arrived in Suva, Fiji, causing much speculation as to
whether this is the start of a Russian diplomatic offensive to establish a presence among the Pacific
states, in a part of the world that is regarded symbolically as the Wests soft underbelly. (Roman
Madaus, The Bear Returns to the South Pacific: Russia Sends Arms to Fiji, The Diplomat, April
9, 2016, http://thediplomat.com/2016/04/the-bear-returns-to-the-south-pacific-russia-sends-arms-to-
fiji/).

In July 2016 the annual Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) war games were held under U.S. auspices.
Notably present was China; notably absent was Russia. Yet even in Mongolia, a direct area of
Russian interest, a U.S. sponsored multinational army war games exercise was held in 2015 also
included China but excluded Russia. (Bolton, US Navy Rim of The Pacific (RIMPAC) War
Games, Co-opting China, Isolating Russia?, Global Research, July 10, 2016,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-sponsored-rim-of-the-pacific-rimpac-war-games-coopting-china-
isolating-russia/5535240).

Future conflict in the Indo-Pacific region will be fought over or influence by water resources. Since
this author wrote on the subject in 2010 (Bolton, Water Wars: Rivalry Over Water Resources,
World Affairs, Vol. 14, No. 1 , Spring 2010; also Bolton, Rivalry over Water Resources as a
Potential Cause of Conflict in Asia, Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, Vol. 35,
No. 1, Spring 2010, 23-44,
http://search.proquest.com/openview/4daabb344fd4e09d9a7e705c541eea15/1?pq-
origsite=gscholar) the question of water wars has come under increasing consideration. For
example, Lt. Col. Jin H. Pak, a U.S. military lecturer writing on the subject in the U.S. Army War
College journal Parameters, concludes:

As water becomes increasingly sought after among states in that region, and even around the
globe, it is time for the United States and the Department of Defense to elevate environmental
security issues to a level on par with national security interests such as countering WMD
proliferation and preventing attacks on the homeland. It is increasingly important to promote
confidence-building measures between certain states to ensure military missteps do not aggravate
territorial sovereignty issues like the one over the Arunachal Pradesh. Finally, it is time for the
Department of Defense to invest in more water purification/treatment capabilities so it is not
focused only on sustaining the health of US and coalition forces, but also on mitigating water
shortage crises. (Pak, China, India and War over Water, Parameters, Vol. 46, No. 2, Summer
2016, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/issues/Summer_2016/8_Pak.pdf
Like the securing of oil resources, the idea is being floated that rivalry over water resources could
justify the USA taking over the water resources of states in the interests of peace. Will we soon find
American and other corporations controlling water resources after U.S. military intervention, and
ultimatums for the privatisation of water resources to enable corporate control? Will war or colour
revolution be used against those states that insist on maintaining control over water resources?
Such conflicts over water are especially problematic for the entirety of the Indo-Pacific region with
the control by China of the headwaters in Tibet. It is also a question that could confound Russo-
Chinese relations, Israeli responses to water control, and water problems in the USA with the
depletion of water tables. The destruction of Serbia was wrought by military means for the purpose
of securing the mineral resources of Kosovo, particularly the Trepca mining complex, one of the
primary war ultimatums to Serbia being privatisation to enable the corporate takeover of Kosovos
resources., as per the Rambouillet diktat imposed on the state (See: Privatization Agency of
Kosovo, http://www.pak-ks.org/?page=2,1). Wars will be fought for water as they have been fought
over opium, gold and oil, and as has consistently occurred when the globalists have intervened for
the sake of humanity, the outcome will be an enduring shambles.