Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1
Learning objectives
To understand the types and sources of greenhouse gases (GHGs)
from anthropogenic (human-caused) sources and how these impact on
the GHG balance in the atmosphere;
To appreciate the amounts of GHG emissions from key countries,
industries and activities;
To understand the classifications of GHG emissions into Direct and
Indirect Emissions and to consider organisational and operational
boundaries;
To be aware of some institutional and legal structures driving the need
for GHG measurement and reporting.
The bolded gases or groups of gases are the so-called Kyoto gases -
those GHG emissions covered by targets for emissions reduction set
under the Kyoto Protocol in 1997.
The synthetic GHGs (HFCs, PFCs, SF6) do not exist in nature and their
concentrations in the atmosphere are entirely due to anthropogenic
sources.
Greenhouse gas measurement, reporting and management CHE3163 9
Why do anthropogenic human-caused GHGs matter?
Humans have
been emitting
large quantities of
GHGs (especially
carbon dioxide)
since the
industrial
revolution (18th
century) and the
rate of emissions
is accelerating.
Assessment
The amount of elemental carbon (including in carbon dioxide, methane
Report (2007)
etc.) in the environment is regulated by the natural carbon cycle.
1st row
IPCC AR4 (2007) values
2nd row
IPCC SAR (1996) values. Red values represent Kyoto Protocol agreed values (100 year timeframe)
Red values are also stipulated in ISO 14064-1
The red values are the standard GHG accounting GWPs used worldwide.
Greenhouse gas measurement, reporting and management CHE3163 28
Global warming potentials and CO2
equivalence
Calculating GWP for emissions of multiple GHGs:
Each GHG quantity (tonnes) is multiplied by that gass GWP
(Kyoto standard values shown in red) to arrive at a CO2-
equivalent (CO2-e) value for each gas.
These can then be added together to give a single CO2-
equivalent GHG emissions figure for the facility.
where
Qi = quantity of fuel in tonnes (solid), kilolitres (liquid) or Sm3 (gaseous)
ECi = Energy content of the fuel (typically GJ per tonne/kL/Sm3). This is typically the higher heating value
(HHV).
EFijoxec = Emissions of GHG j from combustion of fuel i in kg of CO2-equivalent per GJ of fuel energy. The
EC in the subscript refers to the fact that the emissions are per unit of energy content of the fuel. This is
distinct from emissions being given per unit mass of the fuel.
Note - OX represents that the oxidation factor (percentage of carbon in fuel combusted, allows for some fuel
to be uncombusted) is included in this factor.
Note - EC represents that this emissions factor is on an Energy Content basis (i.e. is per GJ of energy, not per
tonne/Sm3/kL of fuel)
It therefore assumes a typical oxidation factor (typically 98-99% for solids, 99% for liquids and 99.5% for
gases) and takes this into account in the EF figure.
The 1000 in the denominator converts kg of emissions in the EF into tonnes of emissions in Eij.
32
Method 1 for calculating GHG emissions
from the combustion of fuels
Method 1 - using default factors for emissions per tonne (solid fuel), kilolitres (liquid
fuel) or Sm3 (gaseous fuel). These factors are provided from sources like the GHG
protocol (Global), the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, Global) or
the NGER (Measurement) Determination (Australia)
E.g. 1000 tonnes of lignite (brown coal) are burnt in a power station. Looking up
this fuel in the NGER (Measurement) Determination (Schedule 1, Part 1) we obtain:
EC = 10.2 GJ / tonne of fuel. EFCO2 = 92.7 kg CO2-e / GJ.
EFCH4 = 0.01 kg CO2-e / GJ. EFN2O = 0.4 kg CO2-e / GJ.
(Note that CH4 and N2O emission factors already have GWPs included).
And Qi = 1000 tonnes (from this example).
Advantages of method 1:
Simple. Only one piece of activity data (i.e. measurement) is required
- fuel quantity. Can be measured directly by weighbridge / belt-weigher
/ flowmeter etc., or taken from supplier invoices.
Cheap.
Disadvantages:
For variable fuels like coal (range of possible carbon contents) it may
overestimate (commonly) or underestimate CO2 emissions.
For CH4 and N2O, emissions are a function of the combustion
technology as well as the fuel. Method 1 does not take this into
account. If youve used low NOx burners, for example, Method 1 may
overestimate your N2O emissions.
37
Method 2/3 continued
To convert the SOLID FUEL mass-based EF to the energy-based EF
(EFiCO2oxec) (kg CO2-e / GJ):
ECi is the same as for the fuel (i.e. GJ/tonne). Check for yourself that
units make sense.
To convert the LIQUID FUEL mass-based EF to the energy-based EF
(EFiCO2oxec) (t CO2-e / kL fuel):
38
Example - Method 2 for coal
An electricity generation facility combusts 1200 tonnes of anthracite
(black coal). From sampling and analysis the following coal properties
are found:
Property Analysis
Carbon (ar) (wt%) 92.7
Moisture (wt%) 3.1
Energy content (GJ/t) 28.3
40
Example - Method 2 for fuel oil (liquid)
A steam boiler combusts 18,100 kL of fuel oil. From sampling and
analysis the following fuel oil properties are found:
Property Analysis
Carbon (ar) (wt%) 88.1
Density (kg/m3) 850
Energy content (GJ/kL) 40.1
41
Example - Method 2 for fuel oil
So EF (mass basis) = 67.8 kg CO2-e / GJ
EC = 40.1 GJ / kL
Qi = fuel quantity = 18100 kL
So total CO2 emissions are:
Efuel oil,CO2 = 18100 x 67.8 x 40.1 / 1000 = 49222 tonnes CO2-e
42