Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

24 MARCH 2016

CORPORATE
AND COMMERCIAL
ALERT
A PREVIEW OF KING IV
IN THIS Recently a draft of the latest instalment of the King Reports on Corporate

ISSUE Governance, namely King IV, was released by the Institute of Directors in Southern
Africa (IoDSA) and the King Committee for public comment.
Comments are to be submitted by 15 May 2016.

1 | CORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL ALERT 24 March 2016


A PREVIEW OF KING IV

Currently the King Report on Governance


for South Africa, 2009 (King III) and
the accompanying King Code together
constitute the premier corporate
governance code in South Africa.

Recently a draft of the latest instalment of the King Reports on Corporate


Governance, namely King IV, was released by the Institute of Directors in Southern
Africa (IoDSA) and the King Committee for public comment.
Comments are to be submitted by 15 May 2016.

Currently the King Report on Governance and more concrete new principles
for South Africa, 2009 (King III) and the contained in the draft of King IV, as these
accompanying King Code together give us a sense of what may be expected
constitute the premier corporate governance in the final version (subject of course to
code in South Africa. King III is not legally any changes that may be made pursuant to
binding. However, for entities with a comments received).
primary listing on the JSE Limited securities
King IV addresses and exchange certain aspects of King III are
Notably the test for the independence of
directors is expanded. Currently King III lists
bolsters numerous general binding by virtue of the listings requirements
the following criteria in order to be classified
imposing obligations on issuers to comply
principles pertaining as an independent non-executive director:
therewith. In respect of those matters in
to good corporate King III which the JSE does not consider It is a director who:
citizenship and the mandatory, an issuer is nevertheless required
(i) is not a representative of a shareholder
to describe the extent of its compliance, and
RAFT governance ideals explain any non-compliance, in its annual
who has the ability to control or
significantly influence management or
that have always been report to shareholders. This is in accordance
the board;
with the overall apply and explain
at the core of the King philosophy of King III. There have also been (ii) does not have a direct or indirect interest
Reports responsibility, cases where the high court has considered in the company (including any parent or
the principles expounded by King to be subsidiary in a consolidated group with
accountability, fairness binding on state-owned entities (SABC v the company) which exceeds 5% of the
and transparency. Mpofu 2009), and where it has referred groups total number of shares in issue;
to those principles as a yardstick against
(iii) does not have a direct or indirect interest
which the conduct of directors should be
in the company which is less than 5%
measured in the context of their fiduciary
of the groups total number of shares
duties (Minister of Water Affairs and Forestry
in issue, but is material to his personal
v Stilfontein Gold Mining Company 2006).
wealth;
The draft of King IV retains the apply and
(iv) has not been employed by the company
explain philosophy currently found in King
or the group of which it currently
III. It addresses and bolsters numerous
forms part in any executive capacity, or
general principles pertaining to good
appointed as the designated auditor or
corporate citizenship and the RAFT
partner in the groups external audit firm,
governance ideals that have always been at
or senior legal adviser for the preceding
the core of the King Reports responsibility,
three financial years;
accountability, fairness and transparency.
This note addresses some of the material

2 | CORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL ALERT 24 March 2016


A PREVIEW OF KING IV

CONTINUED

The role of the social (v) is not a member of the immediate family in terms of a non-binding, advisory vote
of an individual who is, or has during the at every annual general meeting (AGM).
and ethics committee is preceding three financial years, been This has found its way into numerous listed
expanded beyond that employed by the company or the group companies AGM notices as a regular item
in an executive capacity; for shareholders to consider and vote on. At
which is envisaged in the present this entails an ordinary majority (a
(vi) is not a professional adviser to the
Companies Act, 2008. company or the group, other than as a
50% + 1 vote); King IV envisages increasing
this to a special resolution (75%). Of course
director;
this is aside from the normal Companies Act
(vii) is free from any business or other requirement to have directors remuneration
relationship (contractual or statutory) approved in advance by a shareholder
which could be seen by an objective special resolution (s66(8) and (9)), but that
outsider to interfere materially with is concerned only with remuneration qua
the individuals capacity to act in an director (ie director fees, typically payable
independent manner, such as being a only to non-executive directors) and not
director of a material customer of or with remuneration to executives in their
supplier to the company; and capacities as such.

(viii) does not receive remuneration King IV will include sector supplements that
contingent upon the performance of the provide specific guidance to the following
company. categories of organisations and sectors, in
addition to the traditional audience of listed,
In King IV it will be clearly stated that this is
public and large private companies:
not an exhaustive list, and that other factors
may still affect a directors independence SMEs
despite him fulfilling the bright-line criteria.
Non-profit organisations
Further, the material supplier or customer
criterion is refined: The question will be Public sector organisations and entities
whether one is a member of the governing
Municipalities
body or an executive of such supplier or
customer. Pension funds

The role of the social and ethics committee King IV is also more prescriptive with regard
is expanded beyond that which is envisaged to:
in the Companies Act, 2008 (more
the content of the terms of reference/
specifically regulation 43 of the Companies
charters of board and audit committees.
Regulations, 2011). King IV envisages this
These must set out the composition
expansion to be in the context of the
and rotation of membership, the overall
committees direction and oversight of the
role and associated responsibilities
management of ethics, as well as the socially
of the committee, the delegated
responsible aspects of the remuneration
authorities (including the extent of the
policy.
committees decision-making powers),
Currently King III recommends that tenure, resources and access to
the companys remuneration policy be information and meeting procedures;
submitted to shareholders for their approval

3 | CORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL ALERT 24 March 2016


A PREVIEW OF KING IV

CONTINUED

Ultimately the general the group governance framework. This will undoubtedly require companies, at
These should include the delineation the appropriate stage in the future, to review
theme of King IV is of the rights and role of the holding their charters and framework documents
an expansion and company, the extent of delegation by to ensure compliance with King IVs
a subsidiary of certain functions to a recommendations.
heightening of the holding companys committee (King
Ultimately the general theme of King IV is
RAFT principles. IV reiterates the age-old adage that
an expansion and heightening of the RAFT
delegation cannot be abdication), the
principles. It remains to be seen to what
extent of adoption of governance and
extent the commentary phase moulds the
operational policies across the group,
draft. It will also be important to look out
engagement by the holding company
for movements from regulators such as the
with subsidiary boards before directors
JSE with regard to the implementation of
are elected to the subsidiary boards,
King IV, importantly, for instance, how long
and structures and procedures with
entities will be given to ensure and procure
regard to information-sharing amongst
full compliance with the new code once the
group entities.
final version is published.

Yaniv Kleitman

2013 2015
1ST
South African law firm and
12th internationally for Africa

HIGHEST & Middle East by deal value

2ND
RANKING South African law firm and
2nd internationally for Africa
& Middle East by deal count FINANCIAL AND
of Client Satisfaction YEARS IN A ROW ST
CORPORATE
amongst African Firms for client service excellence 1
South African law firm and RECOMMENDED
15th internationally for Europe
buyouts by deal value FIRM

2016

VALUE ADDED SERVICE OFFERING TO CLIENTS


Weve recently published a new edition of the Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr (CDH) Corporate Governance Guide
A Guide for Directors. The publication explains all you need to know about being a director and deals with the
duties, responsibilities and personal liability of directors, prescribed officers and committee members under
the Companies Act, 2008. Kindly contact your legal partner at CDH should you wish to receive a copy.

4 | CORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL ALERT 24 March 2016


OUR TEAM
For more information about our Corporate and Commercial practice and services, please contact:

Willem Jacobs Andr de Lange Banzi Malinga David Pinnock


National Practice Head Director Director Director
Director T +27 (0)21 405 6165 T +27 (0)11 562 1100 T +27 (0)11 562 1400
Corporate and Commercial M +27 (0)82 781 5858 M +27 (0)82 469 5758 M +27 (0)83 675 2110
T +27 (0)11 562 1555 E andre.delange@cdhlegal.com E banzi.malinga@cdhlegal.com E david.pinnock@cdhlegal.com
M +27 (0)83 326 8971
E willem.jacobs@cdhlegal.com Lilia Franca Giada Masina Allan Reid
Director Director Director
David Thompson T +27 (0)11 562 1148 T +27 (0)11 562 1221 T +27 (0)11 562 1222
Regional Practice Head M +27 (0)82 564 1407 M +27 (0)72 573 1909 M +27 (0)82 854 9687
Director E lilia.franca@cdhlegal.com E giada.masina@cdhlegal.com E allan.reid@cdhlegal.com
Corporate and Commercial
T +27 (0)21 481 6335 Johan Green Nonhla Mchunu Thina Siwendu
M +27 (0)82 882 5655 Director Director Director
E david.thompson@cdhlegal.com T +27 (0)21 405 6200 T +27 (0)11 562 1228 T +27 (0)11 562 1326
M +27 (0)73 304 6663 M +27 (0)82 314 4297 M +27 (0)83 345 6679
Chris Baird E johan.green@cdhlegal.com E nonhla.mchunu@cdhlegal.com E thina.siwendu@cdhlegal.com
Director
T +27 (0)11 562 1556 Allan Hannie Werner Mennen Ludwig Smith
M +27 (0)82 544 4988 Director Director Director
E chris.baird@cdhlegal.com T +27 (0)21 405 6010 T +27 (0)11 562 1040 T +27 (0)11 562 1500
M +27 (0)82 373 2895 M +27 (0)83 317 2367 M +27 (0)79 877 2891
Roelof Bonnet E allan.hannie@cdhlegal.com E werner.mennen@cdhlegal.com E ludwig.smith@cdhlegal.com
Director
T +27 (0)11 562 1226 Peter Hesseling William Midgley Sibongile Solombela
M +27 (0)83 325 2185 Director Director Director
E roelof.bonnet@cdhlegal.com T +27 (0)21 405 6009 T +27 (0)11 562 1390 T +27 (0)11 562 1534
M +27 (0)82 883 3131 M +27 (0)82 904 1772 M +27 (0)71 360 3196
Tessa Brewis E peter.hesseling@cdhlegal.com E william.midgley@cdhlegal.com E sibongile.solombela@cdhlegal.com
Director
T +27 (0)21 481 6324 Quintin Honey Anita Moolman Ben Strauss
M +27 (0)83 717 9360 Director Director Director
E tessa.brewis@cdhlegal.com T +27 (0)11 562 1166 T +27 (0)21 405 6122 T +27 (0)21 405 6063
M +27 (0)83 652 0151 M +27 (0)72 252 1079 M +27 (0)72 190 9071
Michael Bromley E quintin.honey@cdhlegal.com E anita.moolman@cdhlegal.com E ben.strauss@cdhlegal.com
Director
T +27 (0)21 405 6021 Roelf Horn Jo Neser Deepa Vallabh
M +27 (0)82 826 3493 Director Director Director
E michael.bromley@cdhlegal.com T +27 (0)21 405 6036 T +27 (0)21 481 6329 T +27 (0)11 562 1188
M +27 (0)82 458 3293 M +27 (0)82 577 3199 M +27 (0)82 571 0707
Ian Burger E roelf.horn@cdhlegal.com E jo.neser@cdhlegal.com E deepa.vallabh@cdhlegal.com
Director
T +27 (0)11 562 1177 Yaniv Kleitman Francis Newham Roux van der Merwe
M +27 (0)83 215 8266 Director Director Director
E ian.burger@cdhlegal.com T +27 (0)11 562 1219 T +27 (0)21 481 6326 T +27 (0)11 562 1199
M +27 72 279 1260 M +27 (0)82 458 7728 M +27 (0)82 559 6406
Etta Chang E yaniv.kleitman@cdhlegal.com E francis.newham@cdhlegal.com E roux.vandermerwe@cdhlegal.com
Director
T +27 (0)11 562 1432 Johan Latsky Gasant Orrie Charl Williams
M +27 (0)72 879 1281 Director Director Director
E etta.chang@cdhlegal.com T +27 (0)11 562 1149 T +27 (0)21 405 6044 T +27 (0)21 405 6037
M +27 (0)82 554 1003 M +27 (0)83 282 4550 M +27 (0)82 829 4175
Clem Daniel E johan.latsky@cdhlegal.com E gasant.orrie@cdhlegal.com E charl.williams@cdhlegal.com
Director
T +27 (0)11 562 1073 Badian Maasdorp Verushca Pillay Lauren Wilson
M +27 (0)82 418 5924 Director Director Director
E clem.daniel@cdhlegal.com T +27 (0)11 562 1777 T +27 (0)11 562 1800 T +27 (0)11 562 1223
M +27 (0)82 924 8429 M +27 (0)82 579 5678 M +27 (0)82 414 8549
Jenni Darling E badian.maasdorp@cdhlegal.com E verushca.pillay@cdhlegal.com E lauren.wilson@cdhlegal.com
Director
T +27 (0)11 562 1878
M +27 (0)82 826 9055
E jenni.darling@cdhlegal.com

BBBEE STATUS: LEVEL TWO CONTRIBUTOR


This information is published for general information purposes and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in
relation to any particular situation. Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication.

JOHANNESBURG
1 Protea Place, Sandton, Johannesburg, 2196. Private Bag X40, Benmore, 2010, South Africa. Dx 154 Randburg and Dx 42 Johannesburg.
T +27 (0)11 562 1000 F +27 (0)11 562 1111 E jhb@cdhlegal.com

CAPE TOWN
11 Buitengracht Street, Cape Town, 8001. PO Box 695, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa. Dx 5 Cape Town.
T +27 (0)21 481 6300 F +27 (0)21 481 6388 E ctn@cdhlegal.com

2016 0977/MAR

CORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL | cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com

Вам также может понравиться