Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
4, 1995
675
Method
Subjects
the sample for the present study. We included in the study a l l sexual assault
victims who received exposure treatment and for whom an audible first
and last exposure tape were available. Eleven victims were Caucasians and
three were African-Americans. Mean age was 30.1 years (SD = 9.4; range
1848 years), mean number of years of education was 14 (range 10-18),
and mean time since assault was 4.85 years (SO = 7.9 years; range 3.3
months-28.9 years). Four victims were raped by acquaintances and ten by
strangers. All had sought treatment for psychological symptoms related to
their assault and met DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for PTSD based on
the SCID-R (Spitzer, Williams, & Gibbon, 1987). Victims were excluded
from the treatment outcome study if they met DSM-III-R criteria for
schizophrenia, organic mental disorder, substance abuse, or bipolar disor-
der or if they did not speak English. Victims who were assaulted by a
spouse, family member, or intimate partner were also excluded if they were
still involved with the perpetrator at the time they sought treatment.
Procedure
Assessment Measures-Interview
Kilpatrick Modified Fear Survey (1980) that most differentiated rape vic-
tims from nonvictims.
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). BDI (Beck, Ward, Mendelsohn,
Mock, & Erbaugh, 1961) is a 21-item inventory measuring depressed mood
and vegetative symptoms of depression. The inventory has a split-half re-
liability coefficient of .93. Correlations with clinician ratings of depression
range from .62 to .66.
The first rape narrative of the initial exposure treatment session and
the last rape narrative of the final exposure session were transcribed and
submitted to content analysis according to a manual for the study (the cod-
ing manual is available upon request). The beginning of a rape narrative
was defined as the first expressed realization of danger and the end was
defined as the first expressed realization that threat had terminated. Be-
cause some clients included in their narrative information about events oc-
curring before or after these points, while others did not, we decided to
analyze the actual rape experience only. More importantly, our hypotheses
pertained only to the threatening portion of the memory, which started
with the realization of danger and ended with the realization of safety.
Narratives were divided into utterance units. An utterance unit was
defined as a clause containing only one thought, action, or speech utter-
ance. Examples of utterances are: I know he is going to kill me, Im
going down the street, I said get off me now. Frequency of utterances
in each category were to be converted to percentages because stories vaned
greatly within and across subjects. Consequently, each utterance could be
assigned to only one coding category.
Because utterances could in principle be coded as belonging to several
categories, coding priorities had to be decided a priori. The order of priority
assigned to each category was determined by its pertinence to the hypothe-
ses examined in the study. Degree of cohesiveness of trauma narratives
was the main concept of interest. Therefore, we assigned greater priority
to categories that seemed to best assess organization and fragmentation.
When an utterance met criteria for more than one category, it was assigned
to the highest priority category. The 13 utterance categories are presented
in Table 1 and are described below in the order of their priority.
Repetition Utterances. The category of repetition was thought to be
the most direct index of fragmentation, and therefore this category was
assigned the highest priority. An utterance was considered to be a repeti-
tion when it was repeated more than once within five lines.
682 Foa et al.
ing due to the decision to assign higher priority to thought utterances rather
than feelings.
Sensation Utterances. Utterances were coded as sensations when they
made reference to one of the five senses. Examples included, I hear him
He feels heavy on me, I cant see anything, and He smells
so horrible. Utterances implying dissociation, such as, by now, I cant feel
anything, and my whole body is numb, were coded as negative feelings.
Action Utterances. Utterances involving descriptions of actions were
coded according to who engaged in the action. Actions the victim engaged
in were coded as action self and actions of the assailant were coded as
action perpetrator Examples of action self are: I walked to the door, I
am crying, whereas He is walking out of the front door, and He started
undressing me, are examples of action perpetrator.
Dialogue Utterances. Any verbalizations made were coded as dialogue.
Dialogue utterances were classified according to speaker (self or perpetra-
tor). Examples of dialogue Perpetrator are: He says, I will kill you if youre
not quiet. and He told me to take my clothes off. Dialogue self included:
I said, leave me alone, I begged him dont hurt me.
Speech Fillen. These utterances did not compete with the other coding
categories and therefore they were assigned the lowest priority. Examples
are: CCum,?7 like, and but anyway.
Lso,) ((
Results
Treatment Efficacy
Means and standard deviations were calculated for pre- and post-
treatment scores of all measures of psychopathology. These are presented
in Bble 2. All fourteen clients improved from pre- to post-treatment on
684 Foa et al.
Data Reduction
To test the hypothesis that narrative length would increase from be-
ginning to end of treatment, means and standard deviations were computed
for the first and last narratives. Mean number of utterances in the first
narrative was 141.09 (SD = 37.71) and the mean number of utterances in
the last narrative was 216.85 (SD = 57.96). A paired t-test revealed a trend
in the predicted direction (t = (13) = - 1 . 9 6 , ~< .08). Because of the small
sample size p values of less than .10 will be reported. Because narratives
Change in Rape Narratives 685
Table 3. Means and Standard Deviations of Category Groups in the First and Last
Narrative
First Narrative Last Narrative
Organized thoughts 5.72 (4.30) 9.02 (4.20) f(13) = 2.50, p < .03
Thoughts/feelings 16.80 (7.80) 22.03 (9.60) f(13) = 2.19, p < .05
Actioddialogues 41.06 (17.00) 34.39 (15.30) r(13) = 2.06, p = .06
Fragmentation 18.40 (12.10) 17.68 (11.00) (13) = 43, ns
686 Foa et at.
global index of trauma-related anxiety comes from the DSM-IV (1994) defi-
nition of PTSD as consisting of three symptom clusters: reexperiencing,
avoidance, and increased arousal. The PSS assessed all three of these symp-
tom clusters. The RAST is conceptually related to the reexperiencing and
avoidance clusters of PTSD, while the STAI is conceptually related to in-
creased arousal. It was thought that the use of multiple measures would
increase the reliability of assessing the construct of trauma-related anxiety.
Percentage improvement in depression was obtained from the BDI scores.
Pearson correlations were computed between percent change scores
in anxiety and depression and both organized thoughts and fragmentation.
The hypothesis that fragmentation would be related to improvement was
supported by the data: reduction in the index of fragmentation was posi-
tively correlated with reduction in the global index of trauma-related anxi-
ety (r(13) = .73, p < .002) but not with depression (r(l1) = .35,ns). The
hypothesis that increase in an index of organization would relate to im-
provement was supported for depression ((11) = -.63, p < .02), but not
for trauma-related anxiety (r(l1) = .07, ns). Reduction in trauma related
anxiety, however, was highly correlated with reduction in depression (r(13)
= .71, p < .02).
Discussion
Unfortunately, such statistics could not be used in the present study due
to the small sample size. An examination of the narratives of those bene-
fitting least from treatment indicated that they expressed more negative
feelings, particularly helplessness, both at the beginning and end of treat-
ment. Further, these narratives contained a greater percentage of descrip-
tions of what the victim said to the perpetrator, which seem to reflect
feelings of helplessness and hopelessness (e.g., please dont). Finally,
these narratives contained more repetitions (an index of fragmentation)
than did those of individuals benefitting most from treatment, further sug-
gesting fragmented narratives reflect the absence of emotional processing.
Future studies should examine whether fragmentation and organization are
two aspects of the same process or they reflect two different processes.
Our results suggest that fragmentation is not simply an absence of organi-
zation and that the two are related differently to outcome on trauma-re-
lated anxiety and on depression. While fragmentation was related to
trauma-related anxiety, organization was related to depression.
The present study should be viewed as piloting a method for assessing
narrative organization in an attempt to investigate the processing of trau-
matic events. If the present results are replicated, and the validity of the
method introduced here is established, future research should examine
changes in narratives within and between treatment sessions. In addition
further studies should attempt to elucidate the relationship between
changes in narratives and established indicators of emotional processing
such as activation and habituation of physiological fear responses (Foa,
Riggs, Massie, & Yarczower, in press; Kozak, Foa, & Steketee, 1988).
Acknowledgrnents
The authors wish to thank Nader Amir for his help in statistical analy-
sis, Elizabeth Turk, Karen Bogert, and Patty DiSavino for their help in de-
veloping the manual and coding the narratives. We also wish to thank the
emergency room staff at Thomas Jefferson University for their help in re-
cruiting participants for ongoing treatment studies. This study was sup-
ported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH42178 awarded
to the first author.
References
Beck, A. T.,& Emery, G. (1985). Anriefy disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective (pp.
54-66). NY: Basic Books.
Change in Rape Narratives 689
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelsohn, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory
for measuring depression. Archives of Generd Psychiahy, 4, 561-571.
Burke, A., Heuer, F., & Reisberg, D. (1992). Remembering emotional events. Memory and
Cognili011, 20, 277-290.
Christianson, S . (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review.
Psychologicnl Bulletin, 112, 284-309.
Davidson, J. R. T., Hughes, D., Blazer, D. G., & George, L. K (1991). Posttraumatic stress
disorder in the community: An epidemiological study. PsycholrogiafMedicine, 21, 713-721.
Derogatis, L R. (1977). SCL 90: Admin&nztioq scoring and procedures manual, I. (for the
rorired) Version. Towson, MD: Clinical Psychometrics Research.
Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of
behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183-201.
Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and arousal Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (1990). Cognitive psychology: A student's handbook London:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective
information. P ~ h o l o g i c a Bulletin,
l 99, 20-35.
Foa,E. B., & Riggs, D. S. (1993). Posttraumatic stress disorder in rape victims. In J. Oldham,
M. B. Riba, & A. Tasman (Eds.), American Psychiatric Press Review of Psychiuhy, Volume
I2 (pp. 273-303). Washington, D C American Psychiatric Press.
Foa, E. B., Riggs,, D. S.. Dancu, C. V., & Rothbaum, B. 0. (1993). Reliability and validity
of a brief instrument for assessing posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic
Sms, 6, 459-473.
Foa, E. B., Riggs, D. S.. Massie, E. D., Yaraower, M. (in press). The impact of fear activation
and anger on the efficacy of exposure treatment for PTSD. Behavior Themm.
Foa, E. B., Rothbaum, B. O., Riggs, D., & Murdock, T. (1991). Treatment of post-traumatic
stress disorder in rape victims: A comparison between cognitive-behavioral procedures
and counseling. Journal of Conrulting and Cljnkal Psychology, 59, 715-723.
Harber, K. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1992). Overcoming traumatic memories. In S.
Christianson (Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory (pp.
359-387). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Heuer, F., & Reisberg, D. (1992). Emotion, arousal, and memory for detail. In S. Christianson
(Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and rheov (pp. 151-180). Hillsdale:
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Horowitz, M. J., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of Event scale: A measure of
subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 207-218.
Keane, T. M., Fairbank, J. A., Caddell, J. M., & Zimering, R. T. (1989). Implosive (flooding)
therapy reduces symptoms of PTSD in Vietnam combat veterans. Behavior Therapy, 20,
245-260.
Kilpatrick, D. G. (1988). Rape Aftermath Symptom Test. In M. Hersen & A. S . Bellack (Eds.),
Dictionary of behavioral ussessment techniques (366-367). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Koss, M. P.. Koss, P. G., & Woodruff, W. J. (1991). Deleterious effects of criminal
victimization on women's health and medical utilization. Archives of Internal Medicine,
151, 342-347.
Koss, M. P., Tromp, S., & Tharan, M. (in press). Traumatic memories: Empirical foundations,
forensic and clinical implications. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice.
Kozak, M. J., Foa, E. B., & Steketee, G. (1988). Process and outcome of exposure treatment
with obsessive-compulsives: Psychophysiological indicators of emotional processing.
Behavior Thempy, 19, 157-169.
Kramer, T., Buckhout, R., & Eugenio, P. (1990). Weapon focus, arousal, and eyewitness
memory: Attention must be paid. Low and Human Behavior, 14, 167-184.
Lisak, D. (1994). The psychological impact of sexual abuse: Content analysis of interviews
with male survivors. Journal of Traumatic Shess, 7, 525-548.
Maass, A., & Kohnken, G. (1989). Eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 11,
397-408.
Mandler, G. (1975). Mind and emotion. NY: Wiley.
690 Foa et al.
Murray, E. J., Lamnin, A. D., & Carver, C. S. (1989). Emotional expression in written essays
and psychotherapy. Journal of Sociul and Clinical Psychology, 8, 414-429.
Murray, E. J., & Segal, D. L. (1994). Emotional processing in vocal and written expression
of feelings about traumatic experiences. Journal of Traumatic Sfress, 7, 391-405.
Payne, D. G. (1987). Hypermnesia and reminiscence in recall: A historical and empirical
review. Psychological Bulkfin, 101, 5-27.
Pennebaker, J. W., & Beall, S. K. (1986). Confronting a traumatic event: Toward an
understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 274-281.
Pennebaker, J. W., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J., & Glaser, R. (1988). Disclosure of traumas and
immune function: Health implications for psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and
Clinical Psychology, 56, 239-245.
Rachman, S. (1980). Emotional processing. Behavior Research and Therapy, 18, 51-60.
Roth, S., & Newman, E. (1991). The process of coping with sexual trauma. Journal of
Traumatic Stress, 4, 279-297.
Scrivner, E., & Safer, M. k (1988). Eyewitnesses show hypermnesia for details about a violent
event. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 371-371.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L,& Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anriety
Inventory (SelfEvaluarbn Questionnaire). Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.
Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Gibbon, M. (1987). Sfrucfured Clinical Interview for
DSM-III-R (SCID).NY:Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric
Institute.
Veronen, L. J., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (1980). Self-reported fears of rape victim. Behavior
Modification, 4, 383-396.