Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
/ I I
across the site due to local geological 0 10% / I
I
I
I
variations or to nearby construction. / I
I
R1 4
R1 Rl
R2
R4
80
R8
r'u R( 4~
b
b 40 n 2Me~~~edsb
b,b moarofa m~st'ated Xo
~~gggyii4is(ted low'++
R2
vari soff4fatf tf
R4
0 scale; b) strain on a loyantbmic scale.
R8
' '
recent hist ory
ry of the soil varies in the two
2 3 4 halves of the site. Half the site is occupi
Axial s1rain e: % by an existing building which is tobe
(a) hshed to allow construction of a
lar
larger structure covering the whole of the
12 site.. Tw o elements of soil are identifi 'A
beneath the existing building, and,
beneath the undeveloped portion of the
site.
Fiyare Sb shows the stress paths for the
ru soil elements before the site was initially
developed by construction of the existing
b
huildin . Element A was loaded in
b
4
co 'aded
compression and will he unl
the building is demolished, Hyars $c.
when
(kpa)
50.
+
0 following the streLi paths UXY and WXY
d0 (see Hynzn 4n) ancl illustrates how the
0 surfaces translate duzing loading. In
0 lVyzzzn 8computer predictions using this
"00 model are compared with the
Ci
0 experimental cuzves from Hynze 4.
I I I I I I I
0.01 0.05 0.1 0.5 1.0 5.0 These data illustrate how the model
CS (%)
successfully predicts the two major
characteristics of the behaviour i.e. non-
(c) linearity and the effect of recent stress-
history.
ic region
Ct
0 I
<s (K)
29
GROUND ENGINEERING . JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1990