1160 1080 Bulk Pharmaceutical Excipients / General Information USP 39

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS TEMPLATE

[Plantilla de Certificado de Anlisis]
Listed below is a template for the content and format of a COA.
[A continuacin se muestra una plantilla para el formato y contenido de un Certificado de
Anlisis.]
Header [Encabezamiento]
o Titled Certificate of Analysis
o [Titulado "Certificado de Anlisis"]
o Company Name, Address, Phone Number, and Identity of Manufacturer and Manufacturing
Site
o [Nombre de la Compaa, Direccin, Nmero de Telfono e Identidad del Fabricante y Sitio de
Manufactura]
o Name (compendial/trade) of Excipient
o [Nombre (compendio / comercio) del Excipiente]
o Grade of Excipient
o [Grado del excipiente]
o Compendial Designation
o [Designacin del compendio usado]
Body [Cuerpo]
o Lot/Batch Number
o [Nmero de Lote]
o Date of Manufacture
o [Fecha de fabricacin]
o Product Code or Number
o [Cdigo o nmero del producto]
o Expiration Date (if required)
o [Fecha de caducidad (si es necesario)]
o Recommended Re-Evaluation Date (if required)
o [Fecha de reevaluacin recomendada (si es necesario)]
o Stability Statement (if required)
o [Declaracin de estabilidad (si es necesario)]
o Customer Required Information
o [Informacin requerida por el cliente]
Analysis [Anlisis]
o Test Name
o [Nombre de la prueba]
o Test Results
o [Resultados de la prueba]
o Acceptance Criteria (i.e., specifications)
o [Criterios de aceptacin (por ejemplo, especificaciones)]
o Reference to the Test Method
o [Referencia al Mtodo de Prueba]
o Reference to Skip-Lot Testing (if appropriate)
o [Referencias del Lote de Prueba. Puede omitirse (si procede)]
o Reference to Average or In-Process Test Results (if appropriate)
o [Referencias de Resultados Promedios o Pruebas en Proceso (si es apropiado)]
o Date Retested (if appropriate)
o [Fecha de Re-ensayo (si es apropiado)]
o Summary of Noncompendial Testing (if any)
o [Resumen de las pruebas no condicionales (si las hay)]
Certification and Compliance Statements [Declaraciones de certificacin y
cumplimiento]
o GMP Compliance
o [Cumplimiento de BPM]
o Additional Regulatory References
o [Referencias Regulatorias Adicionales]
o Potential to Meet Additional Compendial Standards
o [Potencial para cumplir con estndares adicionales de Compendio]
o Content Listing and Grade of Ingredients (if a mixture)
o [Listado del Grado y Contenido de Ingredientes (si es una mezcla)]
o Other Specific Compliance Statements [e.g., organic volatile impurities (OVI), residual solvents,
transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE), etc.]
o [Otros estados de cumplimiento especficos [por ejemplo, impurezas orgnicas voltiles (OVI),
disolventes residuales, encefalopata espongiforme transmisible (EET), etc.]]
Footer [Pie de pgina]
o Identity of Authorized Individual for Approval
o [Identidad de la Persona Autorizada para la Aprobacin]
o Date of Approval
o [Fecha de aprobacin]
o Page Number (i.e., 1 of __)
o [Nmero de pgina (es folio de pgina: 1 de 05; 2 de 05; hasta 05 de 05)]

COMPENDIAL DESIGNATION
For a supplier to claim a compendial grade on the COA for an excipient, two requirements should
be met. The first requirement is that the excipient be manufactured according to recognized
principles of GMPs (see General Notices and Requirements).
Adequate conformance to GMPs should also be demonstrated for subsequent steps in the
distribution of the excipient.
The second requirement is that the excipient meet all the specifications contained in the
appropriate compendial monograph, unless its difference is stated on its label, as defined under
General Notices and Requirements.
When an excipient is listed as compendial grade, it is understood that the above requirements
have been met for the material, and the user would be able to confirm this through an appropriate
audit of the supplier.
Compendial standards define what is considered an acceptable article and also give test
procedures that demonstrate that the article is in compliance. These standards apply at any time
in the life of the article from production to consumption. The supplier's release specifications and
compliance with GMPs are developed and followed to ensure that the article, when stored
according to recommended conditions, will comply with compendial standards until its expiration
or recommended re-evaluation date.
Every compendial article shall be so constituted that when examined in accordance with these
assay and test procedures, it meets all the requirements in the monograph defining it, as well as
meeting any provisions under General Notices and Requirements and in the general chapters, as
applicable. However, it is not to be inferred that application of every analytical procedure in the
monograph to samples from every production batch is necessarily a prerequisite for ensuring
compliance with compendial standards before the batch is released for distribution.
Data derived from manufacturing process validation studies and from in-process controls may
provide greater assurance that a batch meets a particular monograph requirement than analytical
data derived from examination of finished units drawn from the batch. On the basis of such
assurances, the analytical procedures in the monograph may be omitted by the supplier when
judging compliance of the batch with the compendial standards.

DATES ON A CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Part of the overall goal to standardize COA for excipients includes a provision for the consistent
reporting of appropriate, meaningful, and well-defined dates. The discussion below indicates
specific dates that are expected on the COA, along with definitions of the dates, in order to provide
suppliers and users of excipients with a mutual understanding of their meaning.
Use of the recommended terminology will be helpful in reducing the number of questions on
dating information reported for excipients. Use of terminology other than that discussed below is
discouraged, because the terms may be ill-defined and have different meanings for the excipient
supplier and user. Examples of such terms that should not be used include shelf life, use-by
date, warranty date, and expiration period.
In reporting dates on COA for excipients, it is important that a clear and unambiguous format be
used to prevent posible misinterpretation. To accomplish this, it is recommended that an alpha
designation be used for the month (may be abbreviated), rather than a numerical representation.
It is also recommended that the year include all 4 digits (e.g., Jan. 1, 2005, or 1 Jan. 2005).

Date of ManufactureThe date of manufacture should be included on the COA for each excipient
lot and should be assigned by the suppliers on the basis of their established policies and
procedures. It is recognized that excipients may be manufactured using a variety of processes
(e.g., continuous or batch) that may require a period of several days or more to complete.
In addition, some excipients may be mixtures or blends of other excipients, and excipient
production may include reprocessing steps. Because of this diversity, the date of manufacture
should be clearly defined by the supplier and consistently applied for the particular excipient and
process. In reporting the date of manufacture, the excipient supplier should indicate the date of
completion of the final manufacturing process (as defined by the supplier).
It is important to note that repackaging alone is not considered a processing step to be used in
determining the date of manufacture. To provide traceability for a specific excipient lot, other
dates may be required in addition to the date of manufacture in order to reflect additional steps
such as repackaging.

Expiration Date and Recommended Re-Evaluation DateThe stability of excipients may be an

important factor in the stability of the finished pharmaceutical dosage forms that contain them.
Many excipients are very stable and may not require extensive testing to demonstrate continued
conformance to appropriate specifications. Other excipients may undergo chemical, physical, and
microbiological changes over time that cause the material to fall outside established
specifications.
Appropriate expiration and/or recommended re-evaluation dates for excipients should be
established from the results of a documented stability-testing program or from historical data.
The testing program should include defined and controlled storage conditions (e.g., temperature
and humidity), a consideration of different packaging types that may be used as market containers,
and meaningful, specific test methods to adequately assess the stability characteristics of the
excipient. Stability testing should determine whether possible degradation, moisture gain or loss,
viscosity changes, or other possible changes occur to make the excipient unacceptable for use
(e.g., unstable or hygroscopic materials). For additional information on excipient stability, see
Good Manufacturing Practices for Bulk Pharmaceutical Excipients 1078.
The expiration date for an excipient is defined as the date after which the supplier recommends
that the material should not be used. Prior to the assigned expiration date, the excipient is
expected to remain within established specifications, if stored according to the supplier's
recommended conditions.
The recommended re-evaluation date for an excipient is the date suggested by the supplier after
which the material should be re-evaluated to ensure continued compliance with specifications.
Re-evaluation of the excipient may include physical inspection and appropriate chemical, physical,
and microbiological testing. Prior to the re-evaluation date, the excipient is expected to remain
within established specifications, provided it has been stored according to the supplier's
recommended conditions.
But beyond the recommended re-evaluation date, the excipient should not be used without
adequate evaluation at appropriate intervals, to determine whether the material continues to be
acceptable for use. The recommended re-evaluation date differs from the expiration date in that
the excipient may be re-evaluated to extend the length of time the material may be used, if
supported by the results of the evaluation and appropriate stability data.
In reporting the expiration and recommended re-evaluation dates, the excipient supplier is
providing important information to the user about the stability of the material. As discussed
previously, the assignment of an expiration date and a recommended re-evaluation date should
be based on appropriate evaluation of potential changes that may occur in the material's
properties.
It is acceptable to report both an expiration date and a recommended re-evaluation date on the
COA for excipients, if applicable, but both dates may not always be required. Expiration and
recommended re-evaluation dates should not be reported by a supplier without sufficient stability
data or product history to support the assigned dates.
For excipients determined to be very stable (greater than 2 years), either the specific expiration
date and/or the recommended re-evaluation date should be reported on the COA for the material,
or a general stability statement may be included (e.g., stability greater than 2 years). If available
data indicate that an excipient has limited stability (2 years or less) under anticipated storage
conditions, a specific expiration date and/or recommended re-evaluation date should be reported
on the COA for the material.
If data from formalized stability studies are not available for an excipient, an appropriate
statement should be included on the COA to indicate what is known about the stability of the
material and whether stability studies are in progress.

Date RetestedIf retesting is performed by an excipient supplier and the results are used to extend
the length of time that the material may be used, the date retested should also be reported on the
COA. The specific tests that were subject to retesting should be clearly identified, and the results
obtained upon retesting should be reported. After retesting, a new recommended re-evaluation
date should be reported on the COA.
Additional DatesOther dates may appear on a COA, if desired by the excipient supplier or
requested by the user. Examples include the release date, shipping date, date of testing, and date
the COA was printed or approved. Any additional dates that appear on a COA for excipients should
include a clear indication of what the date represents or means.