Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 10

Digitally signed

by Joseph Zernik
Human Rights Alert DN: cn=Joseph
Zernik, o, ou,
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 email=jz12345@e
Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net arthlink.net, c=US
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Date: 2010.08.09
16:28:22 +03'00'
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

10-08-09 Complaint for Public Corruption against Judge Jacqueline Connor and Others at both
the Civil and Criminal Divisions of the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles

Executive Summary 1
Los Angles, August 9 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert
(NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Judge Jacqueline Connor of the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles, for Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights at both the Civil and Criminal Divisions of the Court. The
complaint alleged that Judge Jacqueline Connor was a leader of racketeering at the Court. Moreover, the complaint
claimed unique public policy significance, since Judge Connor was a key figure in the Rampart scandal (1998-2000) –
the largest corruption scandal of the justice system in the history of the United States and a key event in history of the
Los Angeles justice system. Furthermore, such judge, alleged as key figure in racketeering, imposed, according to
media reports, capital punishments on criminal Defendants at the Court.
At the Civil Division - the complaint detailed the leading role of Judge Jacqueline Connor in conduct of pretense litigation
in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400), opined as real estate fraud by the Court, and alleged as perversion of justice and
racketeering from the bench.
Others named as perpetrators in the case included, but were not limited to:
Judge Allan Goodman, Judge John Segal, Judge Linda Hart-Cole, Judge Terry Friedman, Supervising Judge Gerald
Rosenberg, and Presiding Charles McCoy, Judge (ret) Gregory O'Brien Judge (ret) Patricia Collins, and Clerk John
Clarke - all of the Los Angeles Superior Court, and Attorney David Pasternak – former President of the Los Angeles
County Bar Association and also former President of Bet Tzedek (“The House of Justice”) – a prominent Los Angeles
Jewish charity.
Multiple judges of the Court colluded in the presiding in the case with no Assignment Orders, and the Clerk of the Court,
John A Clarke, refused to certify the case as litigation of the Superior Court of California.
Plaintiff never paid her filing fee in the case, but the Clerk refused to dismiss the complaint. All consequent fees
collected by the Clerk were designated in the Register of Actions (California civil docket) as “Journal Entry”, whereas in
other cases of the Court such fees were designated as “Filing Fees”, “Motion Fees”, “Stipulation Fees”, etc. Presiding
Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court John A Clarke refused to disclose the ultimate designation of the funds.
Accountancy texts consider misuse of “Journal Entry” as a cardinal sign of high-level financial management fraud.
No minutes, orders, or judgment were ever authenticated in the case. No judgment was ever entered in the case and no
writ of execution was ever issued. Regardless, Attorney David Pasternak forcibly took possession of real property on
behalf of the Superior Court. He then proceeded to issue on behalf of the Court Grant deeds, which were opined by
Fraud Expert as “fraud being committed”.
The complaint provided evidence of void, false on their faces, and deliberately misleading court minutes, orders, and
judgment, which were routinely issued by Judge Jacqueline Connor in the case, but which were nevertheless inserted in
the court file and acted upon by Judge Connor, as if they were valid court records.
Two events were listed as notable evidence of the alleged fraud and perversion of justice by Judge Jacqueline Connor in
the case:
a) On June 6, 2007, Judge Connor conducted an ex parte proceeding in a dark courtroom, where Countrywide
Financial Corporation was permitted to appear under false party designation of “Non Party” with a fraudulent request

1
For ease of access to the hyperlinks provided in instant complaint, an online copy was also posted online at:
http://inproperinla.com/10-08-09-complaint-filed-with-us-attorney-office-agaisnt-judge-jacqueline-connor-for-public-
corruption-racketeering-s.pdf
z Page 2/10 August 9, 2010 TOC

for a gag/protective order. In such off the record, off the calendar proceeding Judge Jacqueline Connor issued a
ruling, which was represented in court as a valid court ruling, and was later acted upon by Judge Connor as such.
However, in the Register of Actions (California civil docket) Judge Connor recorded the proceeding as “Proceeding
not recorded”, Countrywide’s paper, which was filed on that date was eliminated from the paper court file, and no
minutes were ever entered in the paper court file either.
b) On September 10, 2007, Judge Connor recorded in the Register of Actions a hearing that was never heard, and a
ruling that was never ruled – after she consented to be removed from the case following Disqualification for a
Cause. In such alleged fraud, Judge Connor recorded a fictitious hearing and fictitious ruling pertaining to fraud in
Countrywide’s banking records, which she had previously falsely admitted as evidence in the case.
The complaint alleged that Judge Jacqueline Connor’s routine fraud technique in Samaan v Zernik involved issuing void,
not voidable records, which could appear to a naïve reviewer as merely “inadvertent errors”. Judge Connor,
nevertheless, treated such void, false on their faces records, as honest, valid, and effectual court records.
At the Criminal Division - the complaint alleged that Judge Jacqueline Connor engaged in fraud and perversion of justice,
while presiding with no authority at all in the First Rampart Trial (2000) – the People v People v Edward Ortiz, Brian
Liddy, Michael Buchanan, et al. The litigation originated from Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) - the largest
corruption scandal of the justice system in the history of United States. Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, founding Dean of the
University of California, Irvine Law School, opined in 2001: “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators
and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”
As noted by media already in 2000, Judge Connor had been directly involved in conduct of LAPD officers and district
prosecutors - the subject matter, which was purportedly reviewed in the prosecution. She was also reported to have
been unusually close to the Defendants and a key witness – Rafael Perez, prior to eruption of the scandal. Furthermore,
she had also made discriminatory public comments pertaining to the subject matter prior to the onset of the prosecution.
Nevertheless, Judge Jacqueline Connor failed to recuse from the case.
Judge Connor consequently ruled to exclude much of the prosecution’s evidence in the case. After jury nevertheless
convicted three of the Defendants, she issued from home a ruling, claiming that her inadvertent errors in the case “fatally
biased” the jury. Therefore, she reversed jury convictions. Her conduct in the case was described by media as
“unprecedented”.
Through such conduct in the First Rampart Trial it was alleged that Judge Jacqueline Connor undermined judicial review
of criminalities that were part of the Rampart corruption scandal, and that she was central to the ongoing false
imprisonment of thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - victims of the Rampart scandal, who have
never been released to this date. The official Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) documented judges of the Court
as central to the continued false imprisonment of the Rampart-FIPs, and called for “external investigation” of the Court,
which has never been instituted to this date.
The complaint also alleged, based on anonymous accounts by criminal defense attorneys, pertaining to other criminal
prosecutions, that competent investigation would discover plenty of additional evidence of Judge Jacqueline Connor’s
alleged corruption in other prosecutions at the Criminal Division of the Court.
Overall, the complaint alleged that only through combined review of Judge Connor’s conduct at both the Civil and the
Criminal Divisions, the full scope of her alleged corruption and her leading role in racketeering at the Court would be
discovered.
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the
justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special
emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of
integrity of the justice system in the United States.
_______________

Andre Birotte Jr., US Attorney, Central District of California.


221 N Figueroa St, Los Angeles, CA 90012
By certified mail.
By fax: 213-894-6269

TO US ATTORNEY, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: Please accept instant Citizen’s


Complaint by Joseph Zernik, PhD, and Human Rights Alert (NGO) against Judge Jacqueline Connor and the
Los Angeles Superior Court – for public corruption and deprivation of rights, relative to her conduct at both
z Page 3/10 August 9, 2010 TOC

the Civil and Criminal Divisions of the Court. Judge Jacqueline Connor is alleged as key figure in
racketeering at the Court.
COMPLAINT
A. General
1. What did the experts say about the justice system in Los Angeles County, California?
• "Innocent people remain in prison"
• "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice
system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to
the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) i
• "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did
not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) ii
• "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states...
and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) iii
2. Complainants
Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, resident of Los Angeles County, California
Mailing Address: PO Box 526, La Verne, California 91750
Tel: 323-515-4583
Fax: (preferred) 323-488-9697
Email: (preferred) jz12345@earthlink.net
3. Complainants are not attorneys, neither are they represented by counsel in matters, which are
subject of instant complaint.
Therefore, in most case, no sections of the code were cited. Instead, the US Attorney is requested to
apply the correct sections of the code. In case errors were made, where sections of the code were cited,
the US Attorney is requested to disregard such citations of the code, and instead - review the facts alone
and apply to them the correct sections of the code.
4. Public Policy Significance
The complaint holds unique public policy significance, since it documents the leading role of Judge
Jacqueline Connor in alleged racketeering at the Court. At the Civil Division, such conduct is detailed
pertaining to Samaan v Zernik, a case that was opined as real estate fraud by the Court. Similar conduct is
detailed in the Criminal Division, pertaining to the First Rampart Trial (2000). In the latter trial, Judge
Jacqueline Connor allegedly perverted justice to prevent honest, valid, and effectual judicial review of alleged
criminalities that were the subject of the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) – a key event in the
history of the justice system. Through such conduct, Judge Jacqueline Connor is alleged as central to the
ongoing large-scale false imprisonment of thousands of Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) – victims
of the Rampart scandal, as detailed in a separate complaint, previously filed with the US Attorneys Office. iv
The complaint holds unique public policy significance also since Judge Jacqueline Connor, alleged as key
figure in racketeering, imposed, according to media reports, capital punishments on criminal Defendants at the
Court.
Therefore, the complaint claims that only through combined review of Judge Jacqueline Connor’s conduct in
both the Civil and Criminal Divisions of the Court, the full scope of her alleged corruption and racketeering at
the Court would be discovered.
B. At the Civil Division – complaint pertaining to conduct of Judge Jacqueline Connor and others in
Samaan v Zernik (SC087400)
1. The Accused
z Page 4/10 August 9, 2010 TOC

a) Judge Jacqueline Connor,


b) Judge Allan Goodman,
c) Judge John Segal,
d) Judge Linda Hart-Cole,
e) Judge Terry Friedman,
f) Supervising Judge Gerald Rosenberg,
g) Presiding Charles McCoy,
h) Judge (ret) Gregory O'Brien
i) Judge (ret) Patricia Collins,
j) Clerk John Clarke,
k) Deputy Clerk Debbie Witts,
l) Courtroom Clerk Vivian Jaime, and
m) Attorney David Pasternak – former President of the Los Angeles County Bar
2. General Claims
Conduct of the accused at the Civil Division of the Court in the caption, referenced above, is alleged as
including, but not limited to:
a) Public Corruption;
b) Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law;
c) Honest Services Fraud;
d) Fraud;
e) Mail Fraud;
f) Falsification of Court Records;
g) Conspiracy,
h) Denial of due process of law, and
i) Racketeering.
It should be emphasized that conduct in the civil courts, which is detailed in instant complaint, is not unique at
all. Other pretense litigations at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, were detailed in
previous complaints pertaining to Galdjie v Darwish – a prototype of real estate fraud by the Court, v Marina
v Los Angeles County – a prime example of false imprisonment by the Court, vi and Sturgeon v Los Angeles
County – which undermines any prospect of future honest services at the Court. vii
3. Additional evidence and records are provided in records linked below, in respective court files,
and in complaints previously filed with the office of US Attorney, Los Angeles.
For the sake of brevity, only a small part of the evidence was described and linked below. Please do not
hesitate to contact Dr Zernik for additional evidence in this matter.
Please consider the records (linked below), as integral part of instant complaint, including, but not
limited to the First Amended Complaint filed in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District
Court, Central District of California. viii
Additional evidence pertaining to instant complaint, which further supports the allegations is held in:
a) Records in paper court file of Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) at the Superior Court of California,
County of Los Angeles
b) Records in the electronic court files under the same caption;
c) Complaints, which were separately filed with the office of US Attorney, Central District of
California, pertaining to conduct the courts in Los Angeles County in other cases, all alleged as
pretense litigations of the Court, referenced above and linked below.
4. Related court actions at the US District Court entailed pretense litigations as well.
Dr Joseph Zernik filed a complain at the US District Court, Central District of California, in Zernik v Connor
et al (2:08-cv-01550), under cause of action of Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law. However, the
z Page 5/10 August 9, 2010 TOC

US Court mimicked conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court, and conducted pretense litigation in Zernik v
Connor et al as well. No minutes, orders, or judgment of the US District Court were ever authenticated by the
Clerk of the US District Court, and the Clerk of the US District Court refuses to certify the PACER docket in
the case as one that was constructed pursuant to the law and by authority of the Clerk, as detailed in complaint
filed with the US Attorneys Office against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle, Judge Virginia Phillips, and Clerk
Terri Nafisi. ix
5. At the Civil Division of the Court Judge Jacqueline Connor led a group of judges, clerks, and
attorneys in the enactment of pretense litigation in Samaan v Zernik.
Detailed evidence is provided in the First Amended Complaint in Zernik v Connor et al, linked below.
Two particularly notable events of alleged fraud and perversion of justice by Judge Jacqueline Connor in the
case are:
a) On July 6, 2007, Judge Connor conducted an ex parte proceeding in a dark courtroom, where
Countrywide Financial Corporation was permitted to appear under false party designation of “Non Party”
with a fraudulent request for a gag/protective order. In such off the record, off the calendar proceeding
Judge Jacqueline Connor issued a ruling, which was represented in court as a valid court ruling, and was
later acted upon by Judge Connor as such. However, in the Register of Actions (California civil docket)
Judge Connor recorded the proceeding as “Proceeding not recorded”, x Countrywide’s paper, xi which
was filed in Court on that date, was eliminated from the court file, and no Minutes were ever entered in
the paper court file either.
b) On September 10, 2007, Judge Connor recorded in the Register of Actions and in unauthenticated
Minutes, xii a hearing that was never heard, and a ruling that was never ruled, as noted on Court Reporter’s
transcript xiii – after she consented to be removed from the case following Disqualification for a Cause,
which detailed her alleged willful misconduct. In such alleged fraud, Judge Connor recorded a September
10, 2007 fictitious hearing and fictitious ruling pertaining to fraud in Countrywide’s banking records,
which she had previously falsely admitted as evidence in the case.
Therefore, it is alleged that Judge Jacqueline Connor’s fraud technique in Samaan v Zernik, further detailed in
the First Amended Complaint, linked below, involved the routine issuing void, not voidable records, which
could appear to a naïve reviewer as merely “inadvertent errors”. Judge Connor and others at the Court,
nevertheless, treated such void, false on their faces records, as honest, valid, and effectual court records.
Alleged perversion of justice, which was initiated by Judge Jacqueline Connor in Samaan v Zernik,
culminated in the issuance of Grant Deeds by Attorney David Pasternak on property of Dr Joseph Zernik with
no entered judgment and with no writ of execution. Such Grant Deeds were opined as fraud by a Fraud
Expert second to none. xiv
It is only through the collusion of judges, clerks, and counsel, who were led by Judge Jacqueline Connor, that
such conduct at the Court was made possible.
As documented in other complaints filed with the office of the US Attorney, conduct of pretense litigation at
the civil courts at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, was not an isolated case at all.
Therefore, it is alleged that conduct of the Court, where Judge Jacqueline Connor was a leading figure,
amounted to a long-term conspiracy to deprive the 10 million residents of Los Angeles of honest courts and
fair hearings, and amounted to a well-established racketeering enterprise.
C. At the Criminal Division - complaint pertaining to conduct of Judge Jacqueline Connor and others
in the First Rampart Trial (2000) – People v Edward Ortiz, Brian Liddy, Michael Buchanan et al.
1. The Accused
a) Judge Jacqueline Connor,
b) Others – to be identified upon investigation and discovery.
2. General Claims
Conduct of the accused at the Criminal Division of the Court in the caption, referenced above, is alleged as
including, but not limited to:
a) Public Corruption;
b) Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law;
c) Honest Services Fraud;
z Page 6/10 August 9, 2010 TOC

d) Fraud,
e) Falsification of Court Records
f) Conspiracy, and
g) Racketeering.
6. Additional evidence would be discovered upon investigation of criminal defense attorneys.
An anonymous letter by a criminal defense attorney, pertaining to Judge Jacqueline Connor’s conduct at the
Criminal Division is linked below. xv The letter stated: “My opinion is that she belongs in prison, not on the
bench”.
Another anonymous account by a criminal defense attorney is also provided, detailing alleged collusion by
prosecutors and Judge Connor in intimidation of a witness. xvi
The account stated:
I was a material witness in criminal case over which Judge Connor presided. The District Attorney tried
to coerce me to commit perjury and when I refused, he said that “some judge” would get me and the DA
would criminally prosecute me unless I testified "exactly the way" the DA wanted. Shortly thereafter,
Judge Connor knowingly made false accusations against me to the State Bar. (I happen to be an
attorney, but was a witness in this case.) Judge Connor made her bogus complaint anonymously, and
she structured the complaint to sound as if the defendant had made the complaint to the State Bar.
Such records are not provided as evidence per se. However, such records demonstrate that upon competent
investigation of criminal defense attorneys, plenty of additional evidence would be discovered, which would
expose the full scope of Judge Jacqueline Connor’s alleged corruption at the Criminal Division. Furthermore,
such records document the level of intimidation of counsel by Judge Connor, who was described by media as
“eviscerating” counsel from the bench.

7. At the Criminal Division Judge Jacqueline Connor led efforts to pervert justice in prosecution of
alleged criminalities that were exposed in the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000).
As documented in the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) alleged racketeering was pervasive also at
the Criminal Division of the Court.
The investigation and events surrounding the Rampart scandal also exposed the unique central role that Judge
Jacqueline Connor had in affecting the false imprisonments in collusion with Rampart police officers, and
prosecutors and her unusual close relationship with Rafael Perez and other Rampart Division LAPD officers,
who were at the center of the corruption. Media also recorded her discriminatory public comments regarding
key witness in the case – former LAPD officer Rafael Perez, xvii who was reported as particularly close to her
prior to eruption of the scandal.
In disregard of such facts, and in disregard of the law, Judge Jacqueline Connor then appeared as a Judge and
presided in the First Rampart Trial (2000). Her conduct in that case raised objections already during that
prosecution. xviii
Judge Connor excluded much of the prosecution’s evidence in the case, in a ruling that raised questions by
media and legal experts already at that time.
Following jury conviction of three of the four Defendants in the case, Judge Jacqueline Connor issued from
home, on December 22, 2000, a ruling reversing jury convictions. The ruling was called by media
“unprecedented”. In such ruling Judge Jacqueline Connor falsely represented that her inadvertent errors in
jury instructions had “fatally biased” the jury in the case. xix , xx
D. Overall Conduct of Judge Jacqueline Connor at both the Civil and the Criminal Courts
1. Therefore, it is alleged that only combined investigation of Judge Jacqueline Connor’s conduct at
both the Civil and Criminal Divisions would expose the full scope of the alleged corruption.
It is claimed that following investigation and discovery of the scope of Judge Jacqueline Connor’s conduct in
alleged perversion of justice in Samaan v Zernik, any reasonable person would conclude that her conduct in
the First Rampart Trial involved no inadvertent errors. Instead, it amounted to concerted efforts to allegedly
pervert justice in that prosecution as well.
z Page 7/10 August 9, 2010 TOC

Furthermore, it is alleged that full investigation of Judge Jacqueline Connor’s conduct at both the Civil and
Criminal Divisions of the Court would find her to be a central figure in perversion of justice and racketeering
at the Court.
2. The cases related to conduct of Judge Jacqueline Connor at both the Civil and Criminal Divisions
of the Court hold unique public policy significance, since they provide unique evidence of refusal of
FBI and California Attorney General and gubernatorial aspirant Jerry Brown to provide equal
protection.
Complaints regarding conduct of the Superior Court, including, but not limited to Samaan v Zernik and the
ongoing large-scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, were previously filed with California
Attorney General and gubernatorial aspirant Jerry Brown.
California Attorney General Jerry Brown, was recently quoted by media a “appalled by corruption”.
However, Jerry Brown refused to provide equal protection for the 10 million residents of Los Angeles County
against alleged widespread public corruption and racketeering by the Courts in Los Angeles County,
California.
FBI, likewise, has refused so far to investigate complaints in this matter.
It was therefore claimed in the April 2010 Human Rights Alert report to the United Nations, that refusal of US
officers to provide equal protection to the 10 million residents of Los Angeles County, California, in view of
racketeering by the Courts, amounted to serious violations of Human Rights in ratified international law. xxi
3. Conduct, documented in instant complaint, is the culmination of efforts by the Courts, lasting
several decades, to ambiguate procedures related to Judgment Books and Entry of Judgments –
fundamentals of Due Process of Law.
As detailed in previous complaints, the Court has published for decades false and deliberately misleading
Local Rules of Court pertaining to entry of judgment and the maintenance of Judgement Books. Moreover,
Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court refuse to disclose the true Local Rules of Court
pertaining to such procedures, and to correct the false published Rules.
4. Alleged widespread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles is drawing both national and
international awareness.
As part of the first ever review by the United Nations (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, report was
filed by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Dr Joseph Zernik, xxii alleging widespread corruption of the justice
system in Los Angeles County, California. The report further documented the refusal of senior officers of the
US government to abide by its duties and responsibilities pursuant to ratified international law – in failure to
accord equal protection to the 10 million residents of Los Angeles County.
As part of the UPR process, US, UK, Germany, and France based blogs were created,xxiii where over 17,000
readers from some 85 nations were recorded so far.
A Scribd site was created for Human Rights Alert in January 2010, which has recorded over 100,000 reads,
with over 500 reads a day in recent months.xxiv
Additional news sites, where Dr Zernik and Human Rights Alert routinely issue press releases, attracted tens
of thousands of additional readers. xxv
Furthermore, an online archive was established, xxvi documenting the alleged abuses of rights. The archive,
not a user’s friendly site by any stretch of imagination, has attracted thousands of visits per month from
nations worldwide, totaling of close to 90,000 visits in 2010 alone. xxvii
5. Remedies are requested by the US Attorney, Central District of California, including, but not
limited to equal protection of all 10 millions who reside in Los Angeles County.
US Attorney, Central District of California, is herein requested to provide the following remedies:
a) Equal protection of the Constitutional, Civil, and Human Rights of all 10 millions who reside in Los
Angeles County under US and ratified international law, by putting an end to pretend litigations at the Los
z Page 8/10 August 9, 2010 TOC

Angeles Superior Court by compelling the Courts to comply with California, US, and ratified international
law.
b) Enforcement of First Amendment rights and US Supreme Court decision in Nixon v Warner
Communications, Inc (1978) in Los Angeles County, California, by compelling the Los Angeles Superior
Court to permit public access – to inspect and to copy court records - including, but not limited to the
Register of Actions, Audit Data in the Registers, and paper court files.
c) Enforcement of Fair Hearings and Due Process rights in Los Angeles County, California, by compelling
the Los Angeles Superior Court to publish honest, valid, and effectual Local Rules of Court, including, but
not limited to rules pertaining to entry of judgment and maintenance of Books of Judgments, as required
by California Civil Code.
d) Investigation and, if necessary, prosecution of the accused, in particular Judge Jacqueline Connor in re:
allegations of public corruption and deprivation of rights under the color of law. It should be noted that the
request in instant complaint for US investigation of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California,
is a repeat of the recommendations of the official report of the Blue Ribbon Review Panel (2006). xxviii

6. Request for due process in acceptance, acknowledgement, and review of complaints at the US
Attorney Office, Central District of California.
As previously noted, the web pages of the US Attorney Office and information received from staff of the
Office, would lead a reasonable person to conclude that at best a vague and ambiguous procedures were
established at the US Attorney’s Office for acceptance, acknowledgment, and review of complaints at the
newly re-established Public Corruption and Civil Rights unit. It is therefore explicitly requested that the US
Attorney Office, Central District of California, accord due process to instant complaint:
a) That the complaint be accepted as such;
b) That the US Attorney Office acknowledge receipt of the complaint and issue a reference number for the
complaint;
c) That the complaint be duly reviewed, and
d) That following review, a response be provided, verified by an authorized person.

Respectfully,
Dated: August 9, 2010
Joseph Zernik, PhD

By: ______________
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750
Phone: 323.515.4583
Fax: 323.488.9697
Email <jz12345@earthlink.net>

CC:
1) Prof David Burcham – former Dean, Loyola Law School
<david.burcham@lmu.edu>
2) Prof Erwin Chemerinsky – Dean, Irvine Law School
<EChemerinsky@law.uci.edu>
3) Attorney Connie Rice – Los Angeles Advancement Project
<dmcmorris@advanceproj.org>
4) UPR Office of the United Nations
<UPRsubmissions@ohchr.org>
z Page 9/10 August 9, 2010 TOC

5) UPR Office of the US State Department:


<upr_info@state.gov>
6) The Honorable Dianne Feinstein – Senator from California
7) US Senate and House of Representatives – Judiciary Committees

LINKS
i
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
ii
Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
iii
Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
iv
10-06-28-Human-Rights-Alert-Complaint-filed-with-US-Attorney-Office-Los-Angeles-Re-Large-Scale-False-
Imprisonments-in-Los-Angeles-County-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33647477/
v
Complaints filed with US Attorneys Office pertaining to Galdjie v Darwish:
10-07-19-Complaint-filed-with-US-Attorney-Office-against-Judge-John-Segal-Clerk-John-Clarke-Attorney-David-
Pasternak-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-in Galdjie v Darwish
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34504304/
10-07-22-Complaint-filed-with-US-Attorney-Office-against-the-California-Court-of-Appeal-2nd-District-in-Re-Public-
Corruption-racketeering-in-Galdjie-v-Darwish
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34725529/
vi
Complaint filed with US Attorneys Office pertaining to Marina v Los Angeles County:
10-07-08-Complaint-Filed-with-US-Attorney-Office-Los-Angeles-against-Judge-David-Yaffe-and-Sheriff-Lee-Baca-for-Public-
Corruption-and-Deprivation of Rights
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34057033/
vii
Complaint filed with US Attorneys Office pertaining to Sturgeon v Los Angeles County:
10-07-15-Complaint-filed-with-US-Attorney-Office-Central-District-of-California-against-Justice-James-A-Richman-Presiding-
Judge-Charles-McCoy-Clerk John Clarke:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34408770/
viii
First Amended Complaint filed in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of
California
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30766354/
ix
10-07-12-Complaint-for-public-corruption-against-US-Magistrate-Carla-Woehrle-and-others-at-the-US-District-Court-Central-
District-of-California-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34194403/
x
07-06-06 Alleged fraud and perversion of justice pertaining to records of “Proceeding not recorded” in the Register of Actions of
Samaan v Zernik for ex parte application by “Non Party” Countrywide Financial Corporation:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35589304/
xi
07-07-06 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) - “Non-Party” Countrywide’s ex parte application for a gag/protective order, in an off the
record proceeding, which was eliminated from Court file:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25002347/
xii
07-09-10 Alleged fraud by Judge Jacqueline Connor, in recording Disqualification for a Cause as a hearing, which was never
heard, and a ruling, which was never ruled:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35571159/
xiii
07-09-10 Alleged fraud by Judge Jacqueline Connor, in recording Disqualification for a Cause as a hearing, which was never
heard, and a ruling, which was never ruled:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35571159/
xiv
07-12-17 Grant Deeds issued by Attorney David Pasternak, opined as fraud by Fraud Expert James Wedick:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24991238/
xv
08-08-19-Samaan-v-Zernik-SC087400-Anonymous-Letter-from-a-Criminal-Defense-Attorney-Re-Judge-Jacqueline-Connor-and-
the-Rampart-scandal-1998-2000-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31670169/
xvi
09-10-03-Judge-Jacqueine-Connor-Conduct-at-the-Criminal-Divison-Anonymous-Account-in-re-Intimidation-of-witness-
Courthouse-Forum
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35588507/
xvii
00-10-08-First-Rampart-Trial-2000-Comments-by-Judge-Jacqueline-Connor-Raise-Eyebrows-LA-Times
z Page 10/10 August 9, 2010 TOC

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35587833/
xviii
00-11-17-Los-Angeles-Times-on-Rampart-Judge-Jacqueline-Connor
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35588136/
xix
00-12-24-First-Rampart-Trial-2000-Judge-Jacqueline-Connor-s-Decision-Los-Angeles-Times
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35566004/
xx
00-12-24-First-Rampart-Trial-2000-Judge-Jacqueline-Connor-Overturns-Convictions-of-Police-in-Scandal-Nyt
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35565999/
xxi
April 2010 Human Rights Alert (NGO) report to the UN for the 2010 UPR:
1) Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/
2) Submission:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/
3) Appendix:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/
xxii
April 2010 Human Rights Alert (NGO) report to the UN for the 2010 UPR:
1) Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/
2) Submission:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/
3) Appendix:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/
xxiii
Blog associated with Human Rights Alert (NGO)
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/
http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/
xxiv
Scribd site of Human Rights Alert (NGO)
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
xxv
News sites where Human Rights Alert posts routine releases:
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/
xxvi
Online archive documenting corruption of the courts in Los Angeles County and beyond:
http://inproperinla.com/
xxvii
Intense interest by the Russian Republic in corruption of US courts and banking regulation:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33910548/
xxviii
Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) – see (i), above.

Похожие интересы