iv Service of judgments, final orders or resolutions

v Priorities in modes of service and filing

vi When service is deemed complete

vii Proof of filing and service

e) Notice of lis pendens

i Gagoomal vs. Spouses Villacorta, G.R. No. 192813, January 18, 2012

6. Summons (Rule 14)

a) Nature and purpose of summons

i Nation Petroleum Gas, Incorporated vs. Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation, G.R. No.
183370, August 17, 2015

b) In relation to:

i Actions in personam

A) Planters Development Bank vs. Chandumal, G.R. No. 95619, September 5, 2012

B) NM Rothschild and Sons [Australia] Limited vs. Lepanto Consolidated Mining

Company, G.R. No. 175799, November 28, 2011

ii Actions in rem

A) Lucas vs. Lucas, G.R. No. 190710, June 6, 2011

iii Actions quasi in rem

c) Personal service

d) Substituted service

i Planters Development Bank vs. Chandumal, G.R. No. 195619, September 5, 2012

ii Nation Petroleum Gas, Incorporated vs. Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation, G.R. No.
183370, August 17, 2015

e) Constructive service

i Service upon a defendant (where identity or whereabouts is unknown)

A) Pua vs. Deyto, G.R. No. 173336, November 26, 2012

ii Service upon residents temporarily outside the Philippines

f) Extra-territorial service

g) Service upon prisoners and minors

h) Service upon domestic private juridical entity

i Nation Petroleum Gas, Incorporated vs. Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation, G.R. No.
183370, August 17, 2015

i) Proof of service
7. Motions

a) Motions in general (Rule 15)

i Motions distinguished from pleadings

ii Contents and form

iii Notice of hearing

A) J.O.S. Managing Builders, Inc. vs. United Overseas Bank Philippines, G.R. No.
219815, September 14, 2016

iv Omnibus motion rule

A) Tung Ho Steel Enterprises Corporation vs. Ting Guan Trading Corporation, G.R.
No. 182153, April 7, 2014

b) Motions for bill of particulars (Rule 12)

i Purpose

ii When applied for

iii Actions of the court

iv Compliance with the order and effect of noncompliance

v Effect on the period to file responsive pleading

c) Motion to Dismiss (Rule 16)

i Grounds

A) Umale vs. Canoga Park Development Corporation, G.R. No. 167246, July 20,
2011

B) Sanchez vs. Sanchez, G.R. No. 187661, December 4, 2013

ii Resolution on motion

iii Remedies of the plaintiff when complaint is dismissed

iv Remedies of the defendant when motion is denied

A) Tung Ho Steel Enterprises corporation vs. Ting Guan Trading Corporation, G.R.
No. 182153, April 7, 2014

v Effect of dismissal of complaint on certain grounds

vi When grounds pleaded as affirmative defenses

vii Bar by dismissal

viii Distinguished from demurrer to evidence

d) Dismissal of actions (Rule 17)

i Upon notice of plaintiff

 A) Aboitiz Transport System Corporation vs. Carlos Gothong Lines, Inc., G.R. No.
198226, July 18, 2014

ii Upon motion by plaintiff

iii Due to fault of plaintiff

A) Systems and Plan Integrator and Development Corporation vs. Municipal

Government, G.R. No. 217121, March 16, 2016

B) Eloisa Merchandising, Inc. vs. Banco De Oro Universal Bank, G.R. No. 192716,
June 13, 2012

C) Roasters Philippines, Inc. vs. Gaviola, G.R. No. 191874, September 2, 2015

iv Dismissal of counterclaim, cross-claim, third party claim

8. Pre-Trial (Rule 18)

a) Concept, nature and purpose

i Madrid vs. Spouses Mapoy, G.R. No. 150887, August 14, 2009

b) Notice of pre-trial

i Eloisa Merchandising, Inc. vs. Banco De Oro Universal Bank, G.R. No. 192716, June 13,
2012

c) Appearance of parties

i Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company vs. Fadcor, Inc., G.R. No. 197970, January 25,
2016

ii Absolute Management Corporation vs. Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company, G.R. No.
190277, July 23, 2014

d) Pre-trial brief

i Bank of the Philippine Islands vs. Dando, GR. No. 177456, September 4, 2009

9. Intervention (Rule 19)

a) Requisites

i Neptune Metal Scrap Recycling, Inc. vs. Manila Electric Company, G.R. No. 204222, July
4, 2016

b) Time to intervene

i Quinto vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 189698, February 22, 2010