24 views

Original Title: Prediction of Mass Transfer Columns With Dumped and Arranged Packings

Uploaded by hortalemos

- Laboratory 3.1
- Chemistry
- 0625_s12_qp_13
- CORP-0148-08
- Solution Report
- Essential Science PMR Question Bank Chapter 3 2010
- 21.5-Simple Kinetic Molecular Model of Matter-cie Igcse Physics Ext-Theory-qp 2 Files Merged
- Tension Superficial
- C3
- AULA-1
- matter.pptx
- Mid Semester Test Kapsel Ipa Terpadu 2012_muhamad Taufiq_ikip_pgri_semarang
- Lecture Jan12
- flow back
- Absorption Body
- John Dalton
- Soal Mid Smtr 2 Sbi
- kinetic particle theory and state of matter revision notes
- Three States of Matter
- Example 1.3-1.4

You are on page 1of 7

00

Institution of Chemical Engineers

Trans IChemE, Vol 77, Part A, September 1999

DUMPED AND ARRANGED PACKINGS

Updated Summary of the Calculation Method of

Billet and Schultes

R. BILLET and M. SCHULTES*

Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

*Raschig GmbH, Ludwigshafen, Germany

A

good knowledge of the relationship between the two-phase countercurrent ow of a

packed mass transfer column is essential for the design of rectication, absorption and

desorption columns. Based on a physical model the authors describe their updated

equations for calculating gas and liquid side mass transfer coefcients, pressure drop of dry or

irrigated random and structured packings, their loading and ooding points as well as their

liquid holdup. Based on one of the largest experimental databases in the world, the calculated

results give only small deviations from the database

Keywords: packings; mass transfer; mass transfer coefcients; pressure drop; loading point;

ooding point; liquid holdup

Until a few years ago, mass transfer columns with dumped or of the phases from the vertical ow channels in mass

arranged packings were designed on the basis of empirical transfer columns can be expressed by a packing-specic

calculation approaches which, although they were based on shape constant.

experimental data, could not be traced back to any physical

context. These relations always resulted in unproven designs

when applied outside of the experimental database. CALCULATION OF THE MASS TRANSFER

Modern calculation approaches are based, therefore, on EFFICIENCY

physically proven conditions of uid dynamics in mass For a given separation task, the height of a mass transfer

transfer columns and take into account the kinetic laws of column is calculated according to the HTU-NTU model.

mass transfer in owing media. The calculation model by According to this, in the case of systems with predominantly

Billet and Schultes is such a physically proven model for the gas-phase mass transfer resistance, the product is formed from

advanced calculation of mass transfer columns with dumped the overall height of a gas-phase mass transfer unit HTUOV

or arranged packings. It makes it possible to determine the and the number of gas-phase mass transfer units NTUOV for

mass transfer efciency, the pressure drop, the column holdup the calculation of the height H, see equation (1). The number

and the load limits on the basis of a uniform theory. The of mass transfer units is dened by the concentrations of the

results of this calculation method agree well with one of the incoming and outgoing ows of material and by the phase

largest experimental database for results of investigation on equilibrium and is therefore essentially dependent on the

mass transfer columns. This database was compiled under the separation task and the thermodynamic properties. On the

supervision of Prof Dr-Ing R. Billet of the Ruhr-Universitat other hand, the height of a mass transfer unit is determined by

Bochum and includes over 3500 measured data, more than 50 the actual design of the column and the load of the internals.

test systems and is based on measurements with over 70 types Therefore, the loading capacity of the dumped or arranged

of dumped and arranged packings, see Table 1. packing determines the column diameter and thus the ow

The basis of this calculation approach is a model which velocity and the residence time of the phases in the mass

assumes that the empty space of dumped or arranged transfer apparatus.

packings can be replaced for theoretical considerations by The geometric surface area of the column packing and its

vertical ow channels, through which the liquid trickles ability to create a turbulent ow of the phases also decides

evenly distributed downwards while the gas ows upwards the effectiveness of the mass transfer between the phases.

in the counterow. In reality, however, the ow channels If the mass transfer resistance is situated mainly in the

deviate from the vertical and are decisively determined by liquid phase, then the height of the separation column is

the shape of the dumped packings or of the arranged determined by the product of the overall height of a liquid-

packing. Since the geometrical shape, however, cannot be phase mass transfer unit HTUOL and the number of liquid-

only dened by the surface area or the void volume, the phase mass transfer units NTUOL in accordance with

498

PREDICTION OF MASS TRANSFER COLUMNS WITH DUMPED AND ARRANGED PACKINGS 499

Table 1. Range of material properties and column loads as well as number of the examined substance systems for the determination of uid-dynamic and

separation variables.

Loading and

ooding point Column holdup Pressure drop Mass transfer

Gas load factor FV Pa 0.47 4.59 0.10 2.78 0.21 5.09 0.003 2.77

Liquid load uL m 3 m 22 h 21 4.88 144 1.33 82.8 0.61 60.1 0.256 118

Liquid density rL kg m 23 750 1026 800 1810 361 1115 361 1237

Liquid viscosity nL m 2 s 21 3 10 6 0.40 104 0.74 142 0.14 99.0 0.14 1.66

Surface tension sL kg s 22 3 10 3 20.8 86.3 0.7 74.0

Diffusion coefcient DL m 2 s 21 3 10 9 0.29 6.50

Gas density rV kg m 23 0.30 1.37 0.06 28 0.07 97

Gas viscosity nV m 2 s 21 3 10 6 8.15 41.5 0.14 106 0.14 126

Diffusion coefcient DV m 2 s 21 3 10 6 0.29 87.4

Number of systems examined 13 20 25 46

( ) ( ) ( )

equation (2). The variables of equations (1) and (2) are aPh uL dh 20 .2

u2L rL dh

0. 75

u2L 20. 45

a

= 1.5(adh ) 20.5 nL sL gdh

equations (3) and (4). The stripping factor is described by

the quotient formed by the gradient of the equilibrium curve ( 9)

d Vd .

myx and the molar phase ratio L/ e

dh =4a ( 10 )

H = HTUOV NTUOV (1)

( )

H = HTUOL NTUOL (2) 1 gL

1 /3

hL = 12

g rL

uL a2 for uV # uV,S ( 11 )

HTUOL = HTUOV/ l (3)

NTUOL = l NTUOV (4) The relations apply to load conditions up to the loading

point of a two-phase countercurrent ow, i.e. uV # uV,S .

The following statements apply to systems with predominantly

Above the loading point, the shear stress of the gas

gas-phase mass transfer resistance; the results can, however, be

countercurrent is large enough to dam up the falling lm

applied also to systems with predominantly liquid-phase mass

so that the column holdup and the size of the interface

transfer resistance by means of equation (3).

increase and the effective ow velocity of the falling lm

The overall height of a gas-phase mass transfer unit

decreases. This condition can be taken into account by the

HTUOV is subdivided into the height of a gas-phase mass

equations (12) (16). For vapour loads less than uV,S the

transfer unit HTUV and the height of a liquid-phase mass

liquid hold-up is according to equation (12) practically hL,S .

transfer unit HTUL , which for their part are dened by the

( )

13

gas- and liquid velocities uV and uL with reference to the uV

empty column cross-sections and the volumetric mass hL = hL,S + (hL,Fl 2 hL,S ) uV ,Fl

( 12 )

transfer coefcients b V aPh and b L aPh , see equation (5).

g Lr

The volumetric mass transfer coefcients are calculated h3L,Fl ( 3 hL,Fl 2 e) = 6g a2 e rL V rV uV ,Fl

by means of equations (6) (11) and are dependent on the L L

densities of the phases rV , rL , dynam ic viscosities gV , gL and e

the surface tension sL , the ow velocities uV, uL, the specic with # hL,Fl # e ( 13 )

3

surface area a of the packing and the void fraction e as well

)( )

13

aPh aPh,S aPh,Fl aPh,S uV

(

as the packing-specic constants CL and CV , which can be

found in Table 2. The effective liquid velocity uL is a

= a

+ a

2

a uV,Fl

( 14 )

calculated from the velocity uL with reference to the column

( ) ( ) ( )

0. 56 20.2 0. 75

cross-section and the column holdup hL . aPh,Fl sL uL dh u2L rL dh

Furtherm ore, aPh describes the specic interface area a

= 10 .5 sW

(adh ) 20 .5

nL sL

between the phases and dh the hydraulic diameter of the

( )

20. 45

dumped packings. u2L

3 ( 15 )

u m u gdh

HTUOV = HTUV + l HTUL = b aV + d yxd b aL ( 5)

=( )()[ ( )]

1 /3 2/ 3 2

V Ph L/V L Ph gr2V u2V L uV 2 uV,S

uL 12

( )

1 /2

DL aPh 12gL a2 rL V uV,Fl 2 uV ,S

b L aPh = CL 12 1/6 u1L/2 dh

a

( )

a

( 6)

for uV,S # uV # uV ,Fl ( 16 )

uL These relations reect well the results of the experiments if

uL = ( 7)

hL the surface tension along the rectifying column does not

( )( )

a 3 /2 uV

3 /4 1 /3

aPh change or if it increases. These systems are termed neutral

( )

1 nV

b V aPh = CV ( e 1 /2 DV or positive.

2 hL ) dh1 /2

anV DV a In the case of rectication of negative systems, however,

( 8) which are characterized by the fact that the surface tension

500 BILLET and SCHULTES

difference (x 2 x ) from equilibrium- and operating lines for determination Figure 2. Overall height of a transfer unit HTUO,V as function of the liquid-

of the Marongoni number. gas molar ow ratio for Ralu-Flow rings and Hiow rings at various liquid

loads uL (ammonia-air/water, 293 K, 10 5 Pa).

along the column decreases from the top to the bottom, the

Marangoni effect must be taken into account, since were included in the experimental database. The compar-

additional surface turbulences in the liquid-phase boundary ison with the calculation approaches showed that the

layer reduce the size of the gas-liquid interface. This is taken extremely low surface tension of the liquid phase at high

into account by the Marangoni number according to pressures leads to a large calculated interface for mass

equation (17) and the interface of negative systems is transfer. If, however, one takes into account the

determined by equation (20). The rst term of the experimentally conrmed fact that, below a lower limit

Marangoni number describes the change in the surface for the surface tension of 0.03 kg s 2, the surface of metals,

tension with the concentration along the column while the plastics or ceramic is completely wet, the inuence of the

expression x 2 x takes into account the ctitious concen- surface tension on the wettability of dumped or arranged

tration difference shifted into the liquid-phase boundary packings is lost. This was conrmed by the measurements

layer, see Figure 1. The liquid-phase mass transfer at high pressures of up to 30 bar. The results of the

resistance HTUL/HTUOL can be calculated by means of measurements agreed with the calculated results well if

equations (18) and (19). a minimum value of 0.03 kg s 2 is used for the surface

tension in equations (9) and (15), see Figure 3. The

d sL x 2 x HTUL deviations of the calculation to the experimental results

MaL = dx DL gL a HTUOL

( 17 )

are shown in Table 3.

HTUL X

= ( 18 ) CALCULATION OF THE PRESSURE DROP

HTUOL 1 +X

On the basis of the theoretical model already mentioned,

C M r n1/6 D2/3 a1 /12 1 u3V/4

X = CV myx M L rV n 5L/12 DV1/2 1 /2

the pressure drop of an untrickled packing can also be

L V L V L g ( e 2 hL ) ( uL hL ) 1 /3

1 /6

precalculated according to equation (23). It is dependent on

( 19 ) the geometric surface and the void volume of the column

packings, the gas load factor FV = uV rV which is

WW

WWW

aPh aPh

( a) =(

a Eq.( 6)

neg.Sys. )

( 1 2 2 .43 10 24 | MaL |0.5 ) ( 20 ) calculated from the gas velocity and the square root of the

gas density and the wall factor K which, according to

In the case of extremely large liquid loads, the thickness equation (24), takes into account the increased void fraction

of the liquid lm increases to such large values that voids of at the column wall. The resistance coefcient y0 , see

the dumped packings or arranged packings are lled up with equation (25), is dependent on the Reynolds number ReV of

liquid. The column then operates in a uid-dynam ic range in the gas stream, which depends, in accordance with equation

which the liquid ows as a continuous phase while the gas (26), on the particle diameter dP , see equation (27), and the

phase bubbles in a disperse form through the liquid layer. variables mentioned above.

The limiting load, at which one reaches this load range, is

termed the inversion point and can be calculated according D p0 a FV2 1

to extensive studies by means of equation (21). The mass H

= y0 e3 ( 23 )

2 K

transfer at such high column loads can still be calculated 1 2 1 dP

according to the above equations if the liquid load is

K

=1 +31 ed ( 24 )

determined according to equation (22), see Figure 2. 2 S

L

V !

W

W

rW

V

rL

W

W

= 0. 4 for uL > 80 m m

3 22

h 21

( 21 )

y0 = CP,0 (

ReV

64

+ Re1.08.08

V ) ( 25 )

uV dP

ReV = K ( 26 )

!

W

WWWW

r ( 1 2 e) nV

uL = uL hL = 0.4uV rL

V

( 22 )

1 2e

dP = 6 ( 27 )

Only recently, mass transfer measurements at high pressures a

PREDICTION OF MASS TRANSFER COLUMNS WITH DUMPED AND ARRANGED PACKINGS 501

Size N a e

Dumped Packings mm 1 m 23 m 2 m 23 m 3 m 23 CS CFl Ch CP,0 CL CV

Raschig Super-Ring Metal 0.3 180000 315 0.960 3.560 2.340 0.750 0.760 1.500 0.450

0.5 145000 250 0.975 3.350 2.200 0.620 0.780 1.450 0.430

1 32000 160 0.980 3.491 2.200 0.750 0.500 1.290 0.440

2 9500 97.6 0.985 3.326 2.096 0.720 0.464 1.323 0.400

3 4300 80 0.982 3.260 2.100 0.620 0.430 0.850 0.300

Plastic 2 9000 100 0.960 3.326 2.096 0.720 0.377 1.250 0.337

Ralu Flow Plastic 1 33000 165 0.940 3.612 2.401 0.640 0.485 1.486 0.360

2 4600 100 0.945 3.412 2.174 0.640 0.350 1.270 0.320

Pall ring Metal 50 6242 112.6 0.951 2.725 1.580 0.784 0.763 1.192 0.410

35 19517 139.4 0.965 2.629 1.679 0.644 0.967 1.012 0.341

25 53900 223.5 0.954 2.627 2.083 0.719 0.957 1.440 0.336

Plastic 50 6765 111.1 0.919 2.816 1.757 0.593 0.698 1.239 0.368

35 17000 151.1 0.906 2.654 1.742 0.718 0.927 0.856 0.380

25 52300 225.0 0.887 2.696 2.064 0.528 0.865 0.905 0.446

Ralu ring Metal 50 6300 105 0.975 2.725 1.580 0.784 0.763 1.192 0.345

38 14500 135 0.965 2.629 1.679 0.644 1.003 1.277 0.341

25 51000 215 0.960 2.627 2.083 0.714 0.957 1.440 0.336

Plastic 50 5770 95.2 0.983 2.843 1.812 0.640 0.468 1.520 0.303

38 13500 150 0.930 2.843 1.812 0.640 0.672 1.320 0.333

25 36000 190 0.940 2.841 1.989 0.719 0.800 1.320 0.333

NOR PAC ring Plastic 50 7330 86.8 0.947 2.959 1.786 0.651 0.350 1.080 0.322

35 17450 141.8 0.944 3.179 2.242 0.587 0.371 0.756 0.425

25 6 50000 202.0 0.953 3.277 2.472 0.601 0.397 0.883 0.366

10

25 48920 197.9 0.920 2.865 2.083 0.383 0.976 0.410

Hiow-ring Metal 50 5000 92.3 0.977 2.702 1.626 0.876 0.421 1.168 0.408

25 40790 202.9 0.962 2.918 2.177 0.799 0.689 1.641 0.402

50 6815 117.1 0.925 2.894 1.871 1.038 0.327 1.478 0.345

Plastic 50 hydr. 6890 118.4 0.925 2.894 1.871 0.311 1.553 0.369

50 S 6050 82.0 0.942 2.866 1.702 0.881 0.414 1.219 0.342

25 46100 194.5 0.918 2.841 1.989 0.741 1.577 0.390

Ceramic 50 5120 89.7 0.809 2.819 1.694 0.538 1.377 0.379

38 13241 111.8 0.788 2.840 1.930 0.621 1.659 0.464

20 121314 286.2 0.758 2.875 2.410 1.167 0.628 1.744 0.465

Glitsch ring Metal 30 PMK 29200 180.5 0.975 2.694 1.900 0.930 0.851 1.920 0.450

30 P 31100 164.0 0.959 2.564 1.760 0.851 1.056 1.577 0.398

Glitsch CMR ring Metal 1.5" 60744 174.9 0.974 2.697 1.841 0.935 0.632

1.5" T 63547 188.0 0.972 2.790 1.870 0.870 0.627

1.0" 158467 232.5 0.971 2.703 1.996 1.040 0.641

0.5" 560811 356.0 0.952 2.644 2.178 0.882 2.038 0.495

TOP Pak ring Alu 50 6871 105.5 0.956 2.528 1.579 0.881 0.604 1.326 0.389

Raschig ring Ceramic 50 5990 95.0 0.830 2.482 1.547 1.416 0.210

25 47700 190.0 0.680 2.454 1.899 0.577 1.329 1.361 0.412

VSP ring Metal 50 7841 104.6 0.980 2.806 1.689 1.135 0.773 1.222 0.420

25 33434 199.6 0.975 2.755 1.970 1.369 0.782 1.376 0.405

Envi Pac ring Plastic 80 2000 60.0 0.955 2.846 1.522 0.641 0.358 1.603 0.257

60 6800 98.4 0.961 2.987 1.864 0.794 0.338 1.522 0.296

32 53000 138.9 0.936 2.944 2.012 1.039 0.549 1.517 0.459

Bialecki ring Metal 50 6278 121.0 0.966 2.916 1.896 0.798 0.719 1.721 0.302

35 18200 155.0 0.967 2.753 1.885 0.787 1.011 1.412 0.390

25 48533 210.0 0.956 2.521 1.856 0.692 0.891 1.461 0.331

Tellerette Plastic 25 37037 190.0 0.930 2.913 2.132 0.588 0.538 0.899

Raux ring Plastic 15 193522 307.9 0.894 2.825 2.400 0.491 0.595 1.913 0.370

13 691505 545.0 0.650 0.833 1.364 0.232

DIN-PAK Plastic 70 9763 110.7 0.938 2.970 1.912 0.991 0.378 1.527 0.326

47 28168 131.2 0.923 2.929 1.991 1.173 0.514 1.690 0.354

502 BILLET and SCHULTES

Size N a e

Dumped Packings mm 1 m 23 m 2 m 23 m 3 m 23 CS CFl Ch CP,0 CL CV

Pall ring Ceramic 50 7502 155.2 0.754 3.793 3.024 1.066 0.233 1.278 0.333

Bialecki ring Metal 35 20736 176.6 0.945 0.690 0.460 1.405 0.377

Ralu pak Metal YC-250 250.0 0.945 3.178 2.558 0.191 1.334 0.385

Impulse packing Metal 250 250.0 0.975 2.610 1.996 0.431 0.262 0.983 0.270

Ceramic 100 91.4 0.838 2.664 1.655 1.900 0.417 1.317 0.327

Montz packing Metal B1-200 200.0 0.979 3.116 2.339 0.547 0.355 0.971 0.390

B2-300 300.0 0.930 3.098 2.464 0.482 0.295 1.165 0.422

Plastic C1-200 200.0 0.954 0.453 1.006 0.412

C2-200 200.0 0.900 2.653 1.973 0.481 0.739

Euroform Plastic PN-110 110.0 0.936 3.075 1.975 0.511 0.250 0.973 0.167

irrigated, the free cross-section for the gas ow is reduced

by the column holdup, and the surface structure is changed

as the result of the coating with the liquid lm. Thus the

column holdup hL according to equation (11) must be taken

into account by equation (28) and the resistance coefcient

of the two-phase ow yL dened by equation (29). It is

dependent on the Froude number of the ow of liquid and on

system: water/air; Number of driplet points: 951 l m 22 ; Packing height:

Figure 3. Comparison of the load-efciency relationship calculated from H = 3 , 0 m; Temperature of gas: T = 6C; Column diameter: d = 0.75 m;

the model correlations with that determined in rectication, absorption and Operating pressure: 1 bar; Specic surface area: a = 98 m 2 m 23 ; Void

desorption experiments. fraction: e = 0 .98 m 3 m 23 .

PREDICTION OF MASS TRANSFER COLUMNS WITH DUMPED AND ARRANGED PACKINGS 503

Table 3. Average relative deviations for calculating loading and ooding point, holdup, pressure drop and mass transfer efciency with

the model equations.

Loading and Column holdup Pressure drop

ooding point hL D p/H Absorption and Desorption Rectication

the liquid holdup. The packing-specic constant CP,0 can be spaces within the bed close up and the liquid ows

found in Table 2. This relation applies throughout the load downwards as a continuous phase. The gas phase then

range of a mass transfer column, i.e. up to the ooding point rises up through the liquid layer in the form of bubbles. The

of the two-phase countercurrent ow, see Figure 4. packing-specic constant CS can be found in Table 2.

! [ ( )]

1 /3

Dp a FV2 1 W

WW

gW

W

e 1 gL

H

= yL ( e 3 ( 28 ) uV,S = 2a

1 /2

12 uL,S

2 hL ) 2 K y S a 1 /6 g rL

( )( )( ) ( ) !

1 .5 0. 3

e 2 hL hL

64

+ Re1.08.08

1 /6 W

WWW

W

yL = CP,0 1 gL rL

ReV e hL,S 3 12 uL,S ( 31 )

V g rL rV

( ) = 13300

[!( )]

0.4 22n S

g L WrWWWW g

Fr

W

WWW

WWW

3 exp C1 L with C1 ( 29 ) yS = C2 V rV gL ( 32 )

a3 /2

S L V

u2L a rV L

FrL = g

( 30 ) uL,S = uV,S ( 33 )

rL V

!

In the previous publications by Billet and Schultes, the L WrWWVWW

dependency of the resistance coefcient yL on the liquid load for

V rL

# 0 .4 : nS = 20.326; CS from Table 2

uL was expressed by the Reynolds number in the exponential

function of equation (29). The measurements at high pressures

( 34 )

!

W

WWW

W

already mentioned and at extremely low liquid viscosities, L rV

however, showed with reference to the pressure drops that

for

V rL

$ 0 .4 : nS = 20.723;

such systems can be taken into account better in the pressure

( )

0.1588

drop calculation if, instead of the Reynolds number, the gL

Froude number describes the dependency on the liquid load,

CS = 0.695 CS,Tab.2 gV

( 35 )

see equation (30). The deviations of the calculation to the

If the gas velocity rises above the loading point, the ow of

experimental results are shown in Table 3.

liquid is impeded and the column holdup increases. If the

shear stress of the gas counterow is sufcient to entrain the

CALCULATION OF THE LOAD LIMITS entire liquid to the top of the column, then the ooding point

The above explanations show clearly that the loading point of the mass transfer column is reached. This means

and the ooding point represent two characteristic load mathematically that the velocity gradient of the liquid lm

conditions of dumped- or arranged-type packed columns. becomes zero at the interface to the dumped packing.

Below the loading point, the liquid lm trickles from the top equations (36) (40) can be derived from this condition for

of the column to the bottom of the column, not inuenced by the calculation of the ooding point of dumped- and

the gas countercurrent ow. The column holdup is then arranged-type columns.

merely a function of the liquid load. With increasing gas

! !

W

WWW

WWW

W

!

velocity, the shearing stress at the surface of the liquid g ( e 2 hL,Fl ) 3/2

W

WWW

WW

hL,Fl W

WW

rLW

W

= 2

W

WW

yFl e 1 /2 a rV

boundary layer drops. At the loading point, the velocity at the

[!( )]

W

WWW

W 0 .2 22n Fl

interface is zero, and thus the calculation equation for the g L rV gL

loading point is derived according to equation (31). yFl = C2 ( 37 )

Fl V rL gV

The resistance coefcient at the loading point yS is

rV L

determined by means of equation (32) and is dependent on uL,Fl = uV,Fl ( 38 )

the L/V mass ow ratio. The latter also links the phase rL V

velocities to the loading point in accordance with equation

!

L WrWWVWW

(33) so that the relations for a given L/V ratio can only be for # 0 .4 : nFl = 20 .194; CFl from Table 2

V rL

solved by iteration. The exponent nS is dependent according

to equations (34) and (35) on the given ow parameter ( 39 )

which characterizes the load condition for the phase

!

W

WWW

W

L rV

inversion in the column. If the ow parameter is smaller for

V rL

$ 0 .4 : nFl = 20.708;

than 0.4, the liquid trickles downwards over the internals

( )

towards the gas ow as a disperse phase, while if the ow 0. 1028

gL

parameter is greater than 0.4, the liquid load and thus the CFl = 0.6244 CFl,Tab.2 gV

( 40 )

column holdup reach such large values that the empty

504 BILLET and SCHULTES

substituted in equation (36), is calculated from equation D diffusion coefcient, m 2 s 21

FV gas or vapour capacity factor, Pa

(13). The constants CFL can be found in Table 2. g gravitational acceleration, m s 22

The design of dumped- and arranged-type columns H height, m

generally takes place for column loads of 70 80% of the HTU height of a transfer unit, m

ooding load. Above the loading point, which is at about hL column holdup, m 3 m 23

K wall factor

70% of the ooding load, the mass transfer efciency KO overall mass transfer coefcient

initially increases, since the interface becomes larger. In the L mass ow of the liquid, kg h 21

vicinity of the ooding point the efciency of the column Ld molar ow of the liquid, kmol h21

packings, however, drops again drastically since the back M molecular weight, kg kmol 21

mixing in the liquid phase increases in such a way that the myx slope of the equilibrium curve, kmol kmol 21

N packing density l, m23

positive effect of the enlarged interface is overcompensated. NTU number of transfer units

Furthermore, the pressure drop in the vicinity of the ooding n exponent

point becomes extremely high. Therefore, the operation of Dp pressure drop, Pa

absorption, desorption and rectication columns with loads u velocity with reference to the free column cross-section, m 3 m 22

u mean effective velocity, m s 21

over 80% of the ooding load is uneconom ical. The V mass ow of the gas or vapour, kg h 21

deviations of the calculation to the experimental results Vd molar ow of the gas or vapour, kmol h 21

are shown in Table 3. x molar concentration in the liquid, kmol h21

Greek letters

CALCULATION OF THE REAL COLUMN HOLDUP b mass transfer coefcient, m s 21

The column holdup used in the calculation approaches e void fraction, m 3 m 23

above resulted from the physical model which approximates g dynamic viscosity, kg ms21

l stripping factor

the void volume of dumped packings or of an arranged packing n kinematic viscosity, m 2 s 21

by vertical, parallel ow channels. A real dumped- or arranged- r density, kg m23

type packing consists of ow channels through which the s surface tension, kg s22

phases ow only with permanent changes in direction and y resistance coefcient

whose surface often is only partly covered by the liquid. As a

result of this, the theoretical column holdup substituted in the Indices

previous relations deviates from the real column holdup. Fl ooding point

h hydraulic

Numerous measurements on the column holdup with L liquid

different systems document that the deviation between the O total

theoretical and the real column holdup can be expressed by P particles

means of a hydraulic surface area of the packing. The real Ph interface

column holdup can be described by equation (41) as a S loading point

S column

function of the liquid load and the previously mentioned V gas or vapour

material properties and the hydraulic surface area ah . W water

Equations (42) and (43) show that the hydraulic surface area

increases less in the range of low Reynolds numbers than with

large Reynolds numbers, if the liquid load becomes higher. REFERENCES

( )

1 /3 1. Billet, R., 1983, Festschrift [commemorative publication] (Fakultat fur

ah

( )

1 gL 2 /3

hL = 12

g rL

uL a2

a

( 41 ) Maschinenbau, Ruhr-Universitat Bochum), p. 24 31.

2. Billet, R., 1987, IChemE Symp Ser No. 104, p. A171 A182.

3. Billet, R. and Schultes, M., 1987, IChemE Symp Ser No. 104, p. B255

( ) ( )

0.15 0 .1 B266.

uL rL ah uL rL u2L a

ReL = agL

<5:

a

= Ch agL g

( 42 ) 4. Billet, R. and Schultes, M., 1991, In Beitrage zur Verfahrens- und

Umwelttechnik, (Ruhr-Universitat Bochum), p. 88 107 and 108 122.

( ) ( )

0. 25 0.1 5. Billet, R. and Schultes, M., 1991, Chem Eng Technol, 14: 89 95.

uL r L ah uL r L u2L a 6. Billet, R. and Schultes, M., 1992, I ChemE Symp Ser No. 128, p. B129

ReL = agL

$5 :

a

= Ch 0.85 agL g

( 43 ) B139.

7. Schultes, M., 1990, Doctoral dissertation, (Ruhr-Universitat Bochum,

( ) gL rW

0.05 Fortschritt-Be richte VDI Series 3 No. 230, VDI-Verlag, Dusseldorf).

hL,Fl = 2.2hL gW rL

( 44 ) 8. Billet, R., 1992, Chem-Ing-Technol, 64: 401 410.

9. Billet, R. and Schultes, M., 1993, Chem Eng Technol, 16: 1 9.

10. Billet, R. and Schultes, M., 1993, Chem Eng Technol, 16: 370 375.

The prediction of the real column holdup above the loading 11. Billet, R. and Schultes, M., 1995, Chem Eng Technol, 18: 371 379.

point is made by using equation (12) with the column holdup 12. Billet, R., 1995, Packed Towers in Processing and Environmental

hL,S calculated by equation (41) and hL,Fl calculated by Technology, (VCH).

equation (44).

The averages of the absolute deviations of the calculated

ADDRESS

values from the experimental results are shown in Table 3.

Correspondence concerning this paper should be addressed to Dr.-Ing.

M. Schultes, Raschig GmbH, Mundenheimers trasse100, D-67061 Ludwig-

shafen, Germany.

NOMENCLATURE

a specied surface area of the dumped packing, m 2 m 23 The manuscript was received 11 February 1999 and accepted for

C constant publication after revision 10 June 1999.

- Laboratory 3.1Uploaded byirishtail12
- ChemistryUploaded byteachernuur
- 0625_s12_qp_13Uploaded byAhmed Hany ElGezawy
- CORP-0148-08Uploaded byEnrique L Blanco
- Solution ReportUploaded bySarvesh Mehta
- Essential Science PMR Question Bank Chapter 3 2010Uploaded byKumaran Ragunathan
- 21.5-Simple Kinetic Molecular Model of Matter-cie Igcse Physics Ext-Theory-qp 2 Files MergedUploaded bymrstalib
- Tension SuperficialUploaded byAngel Paguay
- C3Uploaded byNick Lee
- AULA-1Uploaded byeduardo_um
- matter.pptxUploaded byMaria Kristelle Alejandro Paltao
- Mid Semester Test Kapsel Ipa Terpadu 2012_muhamad Taufiq_ikip_pgri_semarangUploaded byMuhamad Taufiq
- Lecture Jan12Uploaded byT uohz
- flow backUploaded byNehomar Jose Brito Guerra
- Absorption BodyUploaded byMAJOR
- John DaltonUploaded byjohanjojoo
- Soal Mid Smtr 2 SbiUploaded bypak teo
- kinetic particle theory and state of matter revision notesUploaded byapi-271128265
- Three States of MatterUploaded byBajwa Qasim
- Example 1.3-1.4Uploaded byShella Imarizeta Shinta Jody
- g484 module 3 4 3 1 solid liquid and gasUploaded byapi-236179294
- u1535355523f9789386339492.pdfUploaded byLatha Gowda
- FINALUploaded byRoldan Ormilla
- 11 and 12 Physics Answers QuestionsUploaded bynik
- KInetic Model of Matter WorksheetUploaded byNudrat
- Textbook Question SolutionUploaded byshashi kumar sinha
- 1.Ch-1Uploaded byKhadeeja Salva
- Sol Liq Gas 3-4 Unit GuideUploaded byRubzhanearry Noclafetnom
- Revision AssignmentUploaded bysangops
- Test 2 ScienceUploaded bycimok85

- GwaderaM_AdsorptionWaterUploaded byhortalemos
- GwaderaM_AdsorptionWaterUploaded byhortalemos
- GwaderaM_AdsorptionWaterUploaded byhortalemos
- MT-I NotesUploaded byPrakhar Aggarwal
- Tut.13Uploaded byhortalemos
- Absorption S 141016Uploaded byhortalemos
- Talison Lithium Overview of Chemicals PlantUploaded byhortalemos
- EGN3365 Mechanical PropertiesUploaded byChristopher Garcia
- 1. Lithium Ore ProcessingUploaded bynaren_013
- tut11Q5cUploaded byhortalemos
- 6A798009_MCTUploaded byhortalemos
- 6-PVTsim-4-OLGA-updUploaded byosecul
- Packing FactorUploaded byRabya Sana
- Natural Gas Processing Principles and Technology - Part I.pdfUploaded byAdenuga Adebisi
- GwaderaM_AdsorptionWaterUploaded byhortalemos
- ag04_160913_syllabusUploaded byhortalemos
- ag04_160913_syllabusUploaded byhortalemos
- CHPR4404 Tut 9 Gas Hydrates - SolutionsUploaded byhortalemos
- Art of Presentation Adrian Keating2017Uploaded byhortalemos
- CHPR4404 Tut 8 SLE - SolutionsUploaded byhortalemos
- Project ReportUploaded byhortalemos
- Gas Supply (Gas Quality Specifications) Regulations 2010 - [01-b0-01]Uploaded byhortalemos
- xs10.docUploaded byhortalemos
- Unit Operation of Chemical Engineering - Solutions ManualUploaded bymickey_54db
- 6-PVTsim-4-OLGA-updUploaded byosecul
- Unit ProfileUploaded byhortalemos
- ProQuestDocuments 2017-06-01Uploaded byhortalemos
- GAS-ABSORPTION.pdfUploaded byKim GojoCruz
- Packing FactorUploaded byRabya Sana
- Shell&Tube Exchanger DesignUploaded byabhmars

- Module 7 (Maintenance Practices) Sub Module 7.6 (Fits and ClUploaded byAhsan Malik
- Activating Deactivating GroupsUploaded byPhuong Le
- Vcable Tronic CyUploaded byEugenio
- Ref 07 - ION7330 Power Meters SpecificationsUploaded byCristian Fernandez
- Data Sheet_MiragridR GX (100 603-Td-04-12)Uploaded byAnto Destianto
- Fiber Marking Machine User ManualUploaded byBoban Stevanovski
- Australian Flying Saucer Review - Volume 1, Number 3 - September 1960Uploaded byUFO Research (NSW) Incorporated, Australia
- Arv DesignUploaded byshan07011984
- Distributed Generation in IndiaUploaded byjpsridhar
- SpacerUploaded byAnonymous T32l1R
- Measuring the Elastic Properties of Anisotropic Materials by Indentation ExperimentsUploaded byArun Kumar
- Lecture 1 Data Structure.pptUploaded bySello Hlabeli
- 87_Concrete building blocks made with recycled demolition aggregate.pdfUploaded byjcaldanab
- Indian Electricity Rule 1956Uploaded byAswin Poomangalath
- chem 162 lab 2Uploaded byapi-245391028
- Notes 09Uploaded bymahesh
- Wheatston BridgeUploaded byZaid Al-Ali
- Asme Material Specs.pdfUploaded byJulio Cesar Morales Cruz
- ESD 75-160Uploaded byproma13
- Lecture 1Uploaded bynggggg
- 03.00.08.14. Menghitung Pressure Blower Silo.pdfUploaded byRachmat Cahaya Putra
- Chapter 02 HomeworkUploaded byFatboy91
- SepracorUploaded byjuanescribd
- BDA Exercises 2016Uploaded byLucía Rodríguez Vázquez
- Rigid Pavement DesignUploaded byashoknr
- Earthquake resistant architectureUploaded byniki niks
- MODU_Part_6_eUploaded byhmthant
- Dielectric Properties of CoalUploaded byEsther Barrachina
- TP_BEKA2333_2014_2015Uploaded byAzrul Nizar
- Numerical Studies on Sprinkler and Smoke Layer Interaction (Zhang 2013)Uploaded byclubberlangPCF