Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 55

424

xxx


...,

, 2012

................................................................................................................... 3
1. ............. 6
1.1
. ............................................................................................ 6
1.2
................................................................................................................ 9
1.3 ............................................. 10
1.4 .......................... 17
1.5 ................. 23
1.6 .................................................... 24
1.7 .............................. 29
2.
PricewaterhouseCoopers..................................................................... 31
2.1 PricewaterhouseCoopers .......................... 31
2.2 ... 35
2.3 ............................................................ 39
3.
PricewaterhouseCoopers ............................ 42
3.1 ......................... 42
3.2 .................... 46
3.3 ............... 47
3.4
........................................................................................................ 50
............................................................................................................ 51
................................................................... 53

2


.
,
,

. ,

, ,
, .


.
,
.

,

,
,
,
(, , ).
,
.
,
,
.


-
PricewaterhouseCoopers,

3
,
.

,
.

,
,
, ,
,
.





PricewaterhouseCoopers


.

.

1.
;

2. ;

3. ;

4.
;

5. ;
4
6. ;

7.
PricewaterhouseCoopers;

8.
PricewaterhouseCoopers;

9. ;

10. ;

11. ;

12.
.

5
1.

1.1
.

, ,
.
- [2],
,
PMBoK [1]. , PMBoK
,
,

.


, ,
,
.


:
1.

,

.
,
,
6
.
.


, .

, . , ,

.

.

, ,
.
.

,
, :
, ;
, ,
. ,
,
,
.
,
.

, ,
.
.


.
,
7

.

.

.

.
,
. ,
,
. ,
,
.


.

. ,

, .

,
; ;
.
,
, .


. ,

.

8
1.2

[3] ,
,
,
.

,
,
- , ,

, ,
, ,
, .

B2B
,
.
, , .


-.
,
.

9
,
,
.

1.3
,
.
,
,
,
.
, ,
.


.
:
2.

10

, ,
.
, .


. , ,
,
.
.


,
. ,
,
, .

.
,
,
.


, ,

.
.

.


.
11

. ,
.

,

.
.


.


.


.

,
,
.
[4]
, [5] [6]
.




.
,
- .



12
. ,
,
.

,

,
. ,
,
.

, ,
,

, ,
.


-
, ,
.


,
.


.

, ,
.

,
, . ,
13
, [7]
:
.
, .
, ,

,
.


,
,
.

.


,
.


. -
. ,

,
, -
,
.


.


14
. ,
.


,
,

. ,
,
.

[8].



, ,

.


.
.
,
,
. ,
,
.

[9],
.

[10],

15
[11] [12],
.

,

,
.

,
, .
.
,

.


.
,
, ,

.
,

.
,
-.

, [13].


, ,
.
, ,
16
. ,
,

. , ,
.

-
, , [14]
.

.
, ,
,
,
.
.

,
,
.
,
,
.

1.4
,
, ,

,
.

17
[15]

:
3.



,
.
.


,
, .
,
.
[16].
, [17],

.
. ,

18
,
.
,
.


,
. - [18]
,

. ,

,
.

-

,
.
,
,
.
.

.


[19], ,
.

.

19
,
.

,
,
.

. ,
, ,
.

, ,
.
,
.


. ,
.
, [20],
,
: , c , ,
, .
,
,
.

, ,
:

, ,
,
, ;

20
;
,
;
, ;

, ,
, ;
,
.

, ,
[15],
, ,
:

,
.
,
.

,

.
.
.

21
,
, .
: ,
, ,
.



[21]. ,
, ,
,
.
,
,
.


- .
.
.
.


, ,
,
.


,

.
,

22
,
.

, ,

, .

,
,
.
,
, ,
.

1.5

, , ,
.
[22],
.

,
,
.

. ,

.

.
,
,

23
. ,
, .


.
, ,
,
.
,
, .

, ,
,
,
.

1.6

.


,
.

.

,
.
.

- [23]
,

24
:
, EVM, .
4.

EVM

,
,
.
, ,
[24].

. ,
,
.

,
,
.
,
.
[25].
. ,

25

.


,
-
. ,
.


- EVM.

.
.
- [23],

.


:
.

,
, , ,
.

26
,
, , .

,
,
.

EVM.
,
.

.

.

, EVM
,
, .
[26]
EVM
.
,
[27].

EVM .

.
, ,
.
,
.

27
. - ,
- ,
- ,
, .

, ,
.


. ,
,
.
,
.


. ,
, .

.
:
,
,
,
.

,
,
,
.

,
. , ,
28
,
,
,

.
,
,

.

1.7

,
.
[28] :


.
,
.


,
.
,
.

.
, ,
29
. , ,
,
.

30
2.
PricewaterhouseCoopers

2.1 PricewaterhouseCoopers
PricewaterhouseCoopers 1998
Price Waterhouse
Coopers & Lybrand. 150 : 1849
, 1854
, Cooper Brothers.
11 ( 1865 .) , ,
Price, Waterhouse & Co. 1957 Cooper Brothers & Co
(), McDonald, Currie and Co () Lybrand, Ross Bros &
Montgomery () , Coopers & Lybrand. 1982
Price Waterhouse.

: 1913 Coopers &


Lybrand Delloite -,
Price, Waterhouse & Co.
1989 , Price Waterhouse
. Coopers & Lybrand. 1998
Price Waterhouse Coopers & Lybrand,
PricewaterhouseCoopers [29].

PricewaterhouseCoopers
,
169 000
158 . Deloitte, Ernst&Young KPMG
" " [30].

PricewaterhouseCoopers

.
, , , -
31
: , -,
[30]. ,
,

,
, . ,
,

,
PricewaterhouseCoopers.
,
,
.

PricewaterhouseCoopers :
,
- (IBS)
[30].
PricewaterhouseCoopers
.


PricewaterhouseCoopers:

32
5. PricewaterhouseCoopers

.... ....

, -
. ( ,

) ,
.

, PricewaterhouseCoopers
, .

, ,
,
Soft Skills , , .,
. 1,5-2
. ,

33
Technical Update ,

, 3 ,
, ,
.
,
.

PricewaterhouseCoopers .
, ,
. ,
,
. ,
.

PricewaterhouseCoopers

Intern (), Consultant (), Senior
Consultant ( ),
Assistant Manager,
Manager (), Senior Manager ( ), Director ()
, , Partner (), ,
33 .
.

4
.
, .
, PricewaterhouseCoopers
on-the-job training,

. Secondments,
34

.


PricewaterhouseCoopers.
,
. , ,
,
, .
PricewaterhouseCoopers
,
.
, PricewaterhouseCoopers

[29].

2.2


PricewaterhouseCoopers. ,
,
,
, , .

,
.


PricewaterhouseCoopers . ,

,

35
,
.


,
. ,
,
,
.
,
.
.
.

,
,
.
,
, .

, ,
,
, ,
. ,
, .

,
, .


, ,
,
. ,
36

, ,
. , ,

,
, ,
. ,
,
PricewaterhouseCoopers
.


. :
,
,
,
.
,
. ,


.

, ,

. ,
, .
,
. ,

.

37
,
, ,
.

.

, ,
. ,
,
, .
,
, .

.

, ,
PricewaterhouseCoopers ,
.
- ,
.

,
, ,
.

, ,
,
.

38
2.3

,
.

, , PricewaterhouseCoopers
,

, .

,
. ,
,
20%,
.
.

,
. -,
, .
( 30%-
40%) ,
. -,
, .
10% 20%
, ,
, 80% .

.
39
, .
,
,
, .


,

.


. , ,

.
,
,
.
.

,
.


,
, ,
.

,
,
.
,
.
.
40
. ,
,
,
.
,

.



, ,
.

,
,
, .
,

PricewaterhouseCoopers.

41
3.

PricewaterhouseCoopers
3.1
,
PricewaterhouseCoopers:
,
, ,
,

.

. ,
PricewaterhouseCoopers
:
,
.
, ,
,

.


PricewaterhouseCoopers -
.

, ,


,

42
,
, ,

.
:
1.


(1 - ,2 -
) X1


,
X2
,

3

(1-5) 4

(1-5) 5

6

(1,2) 7

8


(1-5) 9


(1-5) 10


(1-5) 11

(1-5) 12

(1,2) 13

14

43

, ,

,
.


PricewaterhouseCoopers. -
,
.
51 , 01.01.2011
06.06.2011. ,
, .

,
, .
,
, . ,
,
,
.

, ,
.
.

,
,
, .
,
.

44

:

2.

R 0,926219438
R- 0,857882447
R-
0,780922226
0,060030956
51

3.

t- P-
X 1 -0,039849603 0,026830089 -1,485257957 0,145946546
X 2 0,003774169 0,015450247 0,244278879 0,808364409
X 3 -0,004464059 0,004581854 -0,974290797 0,336239218
X 4 0,019473568 0,013220516 1,472980931 0,149212948
X 5 0,057790315 0,008836885 6,539670511 1,17236E-07
X 6 -0,010658932 0,01146147 -0,929979484 0,358409868
X 7 -0,023927153 0,011537877 -2,07379175 0,045113315
X 8 -0,015596946 0,026744029 -0,583193563 0,563301096
X 9 0,002675535 0,010197897 0,26236146 0,794498064
X 10 -0,021573848 0,008960319 -2,407709934 0,021154537
X 11 0,010299042 0,007357666 1,399770343 0,169911232
X 12 -0,00385122 0,016289817 -0,236418875 0,814411612
X 13 0,011682253 0,033219653 0,351666927 0,727082995
X 14 -0,007741123 0,010824997 -0,715115488 0,479026043

, R- 0,86,
.

, , 95%

,
45
.
,

6%.
2%.
2%.

,
,

,

.


,
.
.

3.2


, .


.
:

46

.

,


.


,
. ,
.


,
.
.

3.3
, ,
,
. ,
:


,
.
47


,
,
.
, .

,
.
,
.


, ,

.

,
,
,
.

,
,


,

.

48
,
,
.


,
, ,

.
,
.



.
:

o ,
;
o ,
;
o ,

;
o

.

49



,
,
, ,
.

3.4

PricewaterhouseCoopers
,
:
,
,
, .




,
. ,

, .
,
. : 1)
,
; 2)
.

50
, ,
,
.


,

PricewaterhouseCoopers .
,
.


, .
,


, , ,
.


PricewaterhouseCoopers,
, .
,

. ,
,
51
.
.

PricewaterhouseCoopers
,


.

, ,
.

, ,
, , .

52

[1] A guide to the project management body of knowledge : (PMBOK guide)


Newtown Square, PA : Project Management Institute, Inc., 2004, 388 p.

[2] Liu Ying-min, 2007 About the project item cost management// Shanxi
Architecture, 2007-11.

[3] Young Jang and Jinjoo Lee, 1998. Factors influencing the success of
management consulting projects// International Journal of Project Management
Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 67-72.

[4] Camargo, M., Rabenasolo, B., Jolly Desoldt, A.-M., Castelain, J.-M., 2003.

Application of the parametric cost estimation in the textile supply chain.// Journal
of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management 3 (1), 1.

[5] Burgan, S.C., 2002. Implementing estimating software. //AACE International


Transactions IT.05, IT51.

[6] Gu, Q (2003). Parametric cost estimating of new products and new technology
applications in electronic manufacturing. PhD Dissertation Proposal. North Dakota
State University.

[7] Orlando Duran, Juan Maciel, Nibaldo Rodriguez, 2012. Comparisons between
two types of neural networks for manufacturing cost estimation of piping
elements// Expert Systems with Applications 39 (2012) 77887795.

[8] Avraham Shtub, 1989. Estimating the effect of conversion to a group


technology layout on the cost of material handling// Engineering Costs and
Production Economics, Volume 16, Issue 2, April 1989, Pages 103-109.

[9] Shepperd, M., & Schoeld, C, 1997. Estimating software project effort using

Analogies// IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 23, 736743.

[10] Ahn, H., & Kim, K. J., 2009. Global optimization of case-based reasoning for
breast cytology diagnosis// Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 36, Issue 1,
January 2009, Pages 724734.
53
[11] Li, S. T. & Ho, H. F, 2009. Predicting nancial activity with evolutionary
fuzzy case-based reasoning.// Expert Systems with Applications. Volume 36, Issue

1, January 2009, Pages 411422.

[12] Chang, P. C., Liu, C. H., & Lai, R. K.,2008. A fuzzy case-based reasoning
model for sales forecasting in print circuit board industries// Expert Systems with

Applications, 34(3), 20492058.

[13] I.F Weustink, E ten Brinke, A.H Streppel, H.J.J Kals, 2000. A generic
framework for cost estimation and cost control in product design// Journal of
Materials Processing Technology, Volume 103, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 141-148.
[14] Sheryl Staub-French, Martin Fischer, John Kunz, Boyd Paulson, 2003. A
generic feature-driven activity-based cost estimation process// Advanced
Engineering Informatics, Volume 17, Issue 1, January 2003, Pages 23-39.
[15] Scott E. Burroughs and Gob Juntima, 2004, Exploring Techniques for
Contingency Setting// AACE 2004 Annual Conference, Washington, D.C., June
2004.

[16] Mills, A., 2001. A systematic approach to risk management for construction.//
Structural Survey, 19, 245252.

[17] Baccarini, D., 2006. The maturing concept of estimating project cost
contingency// Technology, 18, 134-142.

[18] Al-Bahar, J. F., 1988. Risk management in construction project: A systematic


analytical approach for contractors.

[19] Chen, D., & Hartman, F. T., 2000. A neural network approach to risk
assessment and contingency allocation// AACE International Transactions.

[20] Rifat Sonmez; Arif Ergin; and M. Talat Birgonul, 2007. Quantitative
Methodology for Determination of Cost Contingency in International Projects//
Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 23, no. 1, 2007.

54
[21] Young Hoon Kwak, Rudy J. Watson , 2005. Conceptual estimating tool for
technology-driven projects: exploring parametric estimating technique //
Technovation, Volume 25, Issue 12, December 2005, Pages 1430-1436.

[22] John M. Nicholas, Herman Steyn, 2012. Cost Estimating and Budgeting,
Project Management for Engineering, Business, and Technology (Fourth Edition),
Pages 281-319

[23] Saad H. Al-Jibouri, 2003. Monitoring systems and their effectiveness for
project cost control in construction// International Journal of Project Management,
21, 145154.

[24] Gobourne J., 1973. Cost control in construction industry. London: Newnes,
Butterworths,

[25] Pilcher R., 1992. Principles of construction management, McGraw- Hill, UK

[26] Kim, B. C., & Reinschmidt, K. F., 2011. Combination of Project Cost
Forecasts in Earned Value Management//Journal Of Construction Engineering And
Management, 137(11), 958-966.

[27] Lipke, W., Zwikael, O., Henderson, K., Anbari, F., 2009. Prediction of project
outcome: the application of statistical methods to earned value management and
earned schedule performance indexes// International Journal of Project
Management 27 (4), 400407.

[28] Vladimir Voropajev, 1998. Change management - -A key integrative function


of PM in transition economies// International Journal of Project Management Vol.
16, No. 1, pp. 15-19.

[29] .// PricewaterhouseCoopers.


[ ]. URL: http://www.pwc.ru/ru/about/history.jhtml.

[30] .// PricewaterhouseCoopers. [


]. URL: http://www.pwc.ru/ru/about/index.jhtml.

55