Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
STAAD Pro works on the basis of Global Stiffness Matrix. For the Plane Frame Beam Shown Below, with four Degree
of Freedom, allowed,a Global Stiffness Matrix will be as Below
How does a Stiffness Matrix arrived at, by allowing unit translation and Rotation along or about the axes available i.e
available degree of Freedom(d.o.f).
When a Joint has No Member to take rotation or Translation, it will give Zero Stiffness Warning, For Example for the
Plane Frame Below , the It will Give
*WARNING- ZERO STIFFNESS IN DIRECTION 6 AT JOINT 7 EQN.NO. 12
LOADS APPLIED OR DISTRIBUTED HERE FROM ELEMENTS WILL BE IGNORED.
THIS MAY BE DUE TO ALL MEMBERS AT THIS JOINT BEING RELEASED OR
EFFECTIVELY RELEASED IN THIS DIRECTION.
Removal of Truss Spec from Any on of the Above Three Member will allow a Rotational Freedom, the warning will disappear. In
The Figure Below, Insertion of Joint within Truss Member will cause warning as follow
*WARNING- ZERO STIFFNESS IN DIRECTION 2 AT JOINT 10 EQN.NO. 17
LOADS APPLIED OR DISTRIBUTED HERE FROM ELEMENTS WILL BE IGNORED.
THIS MAY BE DUE TO ALL MEMBERS AT THIS JOINT BEING RELEASED OR
EFFECTIVELY RELEASED IN THIS DIRECTION.
*WARNING- ZERO STIFFNESS IN DIRECTION 6 AT JOINT 10 EQN.NO. 18
Making Either Member 7 OR 12 as Axial- Flexural Member will make a Path for Translation along Y and Rotation about Z Axis(
Since its a Plane Frame in X Y Plane, hence Translation along Z is not required and Rotation about X and Y is not required),The
Warnings will Disappear.
Defining the Member as Space Frame will cause Zero Stiffness in 5 Directions. Since Both Member 7 and 8 are Axial Member,
Hence Cannot Translate in Z Direction, Cannot Translate in Y Direction and Cannot rotate in
About X, Y, Z Direction. Since Axial Member, it can Move around X Direction.
The above warning may also appear when member releases or element releases deprive the structure of stiffness at associated
node along global translation or rotational direction. For the Figure 3 shown for a Plane Frame, beam 7 and 12 are released at
Node 10,the Warning appears as follow
What could be the use of Zero Stiffness warning? It could an indication of absence of Load path to foundation, causing
instability in the structure.
A duplicate Node Number (say node 13 and 14 have same coordinates) causes Message as Follow
STABILITY ERROR
Consider the Plane Frame Truss shown in the Figure 4. Although all of the Nodes creates stiffness warning, the Load 10 KN is
able to find path to reach the support thru the inclined member, as the inclined members axial stiffness supports vertical load ,
which is transferred to this member as shear force for the Truss as a whole.
The alignment of the Members does not remain as before, the axial force from vertical member cannot
find any path( Thru Force Resolution into component, thus thru diagonal members) to the Support. If the
members were Axial Flexural, than Flexural Shear would have taken care of the load transfer.
One way to avoid these instability, to partially release Moment of the members at ends.
All warning messages and stability error messages disappear. However we must be careful about using this
method to remove error and warnings as structure may be stable in the Programme, but is not actually.
We must be careful about support releases as well, a Plane Frame with pinned support analysed as space
frame, we generate following error messages
A Space frame with all support having FX, FY , FZ released will generate following Error messages
Increasing Stiffness of Shaded part by 100,000, 000 times causes Error Messages for all the 6 Degree of
Freedom for the Joints under consideration.
This is due to numerical instability in matrix decomposition, at joint one of the Term becomes, Term= 1/(1-
F), where F= EI1/(EI1+EI2), resulting F=1, Term =1/(1-1)=1/0.
These Types of Error may also results from the mistakes done in unit , say same Numerical value of one
beam Witten as MMS Newton as 1000, an other beam in M KN witten as 10,000( which actually 10, 000
mm). Also may arise when very stiff properties are Assigned to member connecting to a another
member( Flexible Member).
**NOTE - NEAR INSTABILITY AT JOINT 7 DIRECTION = FX
PROBABLE CAUSE - NEAR SINGULAR K-MATRIX
K-MATRIX DIAG= 9.9134905E+11 L-MATRIX DIAG= 5.9138909E+03 EQN NO 13
**NOTE** STAAD DETECTS INSTABILITIES AS EXCESSIVE LOSS OF SIGNIFICANT DIGITS
DURING DECOMPOSITION. WHEN A DECOMPOSED DIAGONAL IS LESS THAN THE
BUILT-IN REDUCTION FACTOR TIMES THE ORIGINAL STIFFNESS MATRIX DIAGONAL,
STAAD PRINTS A SINGULARITY NOTICE. THE BUILT-IN REDUCTION FACTOR
IS 1.000E-09
THE ABOVE CONDITIONS COULD ALSO BE CAUSED BY VERY STIFF OR VERY WEAK
ELEMENTS AS WELL AS TRUE SINGULARITIES.
Consider the Space Frame Shown in Figure 9. The Perform Analysis would results in following Error Messages
***WARNING - INSTABILITY AT JOINT 6 DIRECTION = MY
PROBABLE CAUSE SINGULAR-ADDING WEAK SPRING
K-MATRIX DIAG= 4.2638473E+03 L-MATRIX DIAG= 0.0000000E+00 EQN NO 20
***NOTE - VERY WEAK SPRING ADDED FOR STABILITY
**NOTE** STAAD DETECTS INSTABILITIES AS EXCESSIVE LOSS OF SIGNIFICANT DIGITS
DURING DECOMPOSITION. WHEN A DECOMPOSED DIAGONAL IS LESS THAN THE
BUILT-IN REDUCTION FACTOR TIMES THE ORIGINAL STIFFNESS MATRIX DIAGONAL,
STAAD PRINTS A SINGULARITY NOTICE. THE BUILT-IN REDUCTION FACTOR
IS 1.000E-09
THE ABOVE CONDITIONS COULD ALSO BE CAUSED BY VERY STIFF OR VERY WEAK
ELEMENTS AS WELL AS TRUE SINGULARITIES.
***WARNING - INSTABILITY AT JOINT 7 DIRECTION = MY
PROBABLE CAUSE SINGULAR-ADDING WEAK SPRING
K-MATRIX DIAG= 4.2638473E+03 L-MATRIX DIAG= 0.0000000E+00 EQN NO 26
***NOTE - VERY WEAK SPRING ADDED FOR STABILITY
***WARNING - INSTABILITY AT JOINT 8 DIRECTION = MX
PROBABLE CAUSE SINGULAR-ADDING WEAK SPRING
K-MATRIX DIAG= 2.7275058E+04 L-MATRIX DIAG= -8.5856300E-10 EQN NO 31
***NOTE - VERY WEAK SPRING ADDED FOR STABILITY
***WARNING - INSTABILITY AT JOINT 8 DIRECTION = MY
PROBABLE CAUSE SINGULAR-ADDING WEAK SPRING
K-MATRIX DIAG= 4.2638473E+03 L-MATRIX DIAG= 0.0000000E+00 EQN NO 32
***NOTE - VERY WEAK SPRING ADDED FOR STABILITY
***WARNING - INSTABILITY AT JOINT 8 DIRECTION = MZ
PROBABLE CAUSE SINGULAR-ADDING WEAK SPRING
K-MATRIX DIAG= 2.7275058E+04 L-MATRIX DIAG= -8.5856300E-10 EQN NO 33
***NOTE - VERY WEAK SPRING ADDED FOR STABILITY
The Joint 5 which has fixed base at 1, is able to take both MX and MZ. In Joint 6 and 7, MX and MZ is
being catered by Joint 5 (Via Fixed base at Joint 1). But joint 8 is Not able to take all three d.o.f MX, MY,
MZ.
Consider the Figure Below.
Making it as shown below, remove Problem with a degree of Freedom at joint 9 and 10 but not 8. This is because plates out
considered pined at both top and Bottom. Adding Two Beams at Top connecting the loaded beam will solve the problem. The
Beam may be defined as E having 1/100 of Actual and Density=0. However , warning will persist as
** WARNING ** A SOFT MATERIAL WITH (1.0 / 1.000E+02) TIMES THE STIFFNESS OF CONCRETE ENTERED. PLEASE CHECK.