Re: DataStage Parallel jobs Vs DataStage Server jobs

Hi,

I found the difference between Server and PX in one site. I hope this might help you
guys.

The basic difference between server and parallel jobs is the degree of parallelism that PX
offers.

Server job stages do not have in built partitoning and parallelism mechanism for
extracting and loading data between different stages. All you can do to enhance the speed
and perormance in server jobs is to enable inter process row buffering through the
administrator. This helps stagesto exchange data as soon as it is available in the link. You
could use IPC stage too which helps one passive stage read data from another as soon as
data is available. In other words, stages do not have to wait for the entire set of records to
be read first and then transferred to the next stage. Link partitioner and link collector
stages can be used to achieve a certain degree of partitioning paralellism.

All of the above features which have to be explored in server jobs are built in datastage
Px. The Px engine runs on a multiprocessor sytem and takes full advantage of the
processing nodes defined in the configuration file. Both SMP and MMP architecture is
supported by datastage Px.
Px takes advantage of both pipeline parallelism and partitoning paralellism. Pipeline
parallelism means that as soon as data is available between stages( in pipes or links), it
can be exchanged between them without waiting for the entire record set to be read.
Partitioning parallelism means that entire record set is partitioned into small sets and
processed on different nodes(logical processors). For example if there are 100 records,
then if there are 4 logical nodes then each node would process 25 records each. This
enhances the speed at which loading takes place to an amazing degree. Imagine situations
where billions of records have to be loaded daily. This is where datastage PX comes as a
boon for ETL process and surpasses all other ETL tools in the market.

07-16-2008
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 2
giridatastage Thanks: 1
Junior Member Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Re: DataStage Parallel jobs Vs DataStage Server jobs

congratulations for sending good answer with suitable example
 07-18-2008
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: hyderabad
Posts: 2
mallikharjuna Thanks: 0
Junior Member Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

Re: DataStage Parallel jobs Vs DataStage Server jobs

what are roles and responsibilities of an ETL developers/designer?

07-22-2008
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
dsamar Thanks: 0
Junior Member Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

Re: DataStage Parallel jobs Vs DataStage Server jobs

1) The basic difference between server and parallel jobs is the degree of parallelism
Server job stages do not have in built partitoning and parallelism mechanism for
extracting and loading data between different stages.

• All you can do to enhance the speed and perormance in server jobs is to enable inter
process row buffering through the administrator. This helps stages to exchange data as
soon as it is available in the link.
• You could use IPC stage too which helps one passive stage read data from another as
soon as data is available. In other words, stages do not have to wait for the entire set of
records to be read first and then transferred to the next stage. Link partitioner and link
collector stages can be used to achieve a certain degree of partitioning paralellism.
• All of the above features which have to be explored in server jobs are built in datastage
Px.

2) The Px engine runs on a multiprocessor system and takes full advantage of the
processing nodes defined in the configuration file. Both SMP and MMP architecture is
supported by datastage Px.

3) Px takes advantage of both pipeline parallelism and partitoning paralellism. Pipeline

parallelism means that as soon as data is available between stages( in pipes or links), it
can be exchanged between them without waiting for the entire record set to be read.
Partitioning parallelism means that entire record set is partitioned into small sets and
processed on different nodes(logical processors). For example if there are 100 records,
then if there are 4 logical nodes then each node would process 25 records each. This
enhances the speed at which loading takes place to an amazing degree. Imagine situations
where billions of records have to be loaded daily. This is where datastage PX comes as a
boon for ETL process and surpasses all other ETL tools in the market.

4) In parallel we have Dataset which acts as the intermediate data storage in the linked
list, it is the best storage option it stores the data in datastage internal format.

5) In parallel we can choose to display OSH , which gives information about the how job
works.

6) In Parallel Transformer there is no reference link possibility, in server stage reference

could be given to transformer. Parallel stage can use both basic and parallel oriented
functions.

7) Datastage server executed by datastage server environment but parallel executed under
control of datastage runtime environment

8) Datastage compiled in to BASIC(interpreted pseudo code) and Parallel compiled to

OSH(Orchestrate Scripting Language).

9) Debugging and Testing Stages are available only in the Parallel Extender.

10) More Processing stages are not included in Server example, Join, CDC, Lookup
etc…..

11) In File stages, Hash file available only in Server and Complex falat file , dataset ,
lookup file set avail in parallel only.

12) Server Transformer supports basic transforms only, but in parallel both basic
and parallel transforms.

13) Server transformer is basic language compatability, pararllel transformer is c++

language compatabillity

14) Look up of sequntial file is possible in parallel jobs

15) . In parallel we can specify more file paths to fetch data from using
file pattern similar to Folder stage in Server, while in server we can
specify one file name in one O/P link.

16). We can simulteneously give input as well as output link to a seq. file
stage in Server. But an output link in parallel means a reject link, that
is a link that collects records that fail to load into the sequential file
for some reasons.
17). The difference is file size Restriction.
Sequential file size in server is : 2GB
Sequential file size in parallel is : No Limitation..

18). Parallel sequential file has filter options too. Where you can specify the file pattern.