Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
High-potential Talent
A View from Inside the Leadership Pipeline
By: Michael Campbell and Roland Smith
Contents
Executive Summary 2
Background 4
Who is a High potential? 5
An Organizational Perspective 6
An Individual Perspective 9
The Impact of High-potential Identification 10
Formal vs. InformalDifferences in Developmental Experiences 11
Formal vs. InformalA Mixed Reaction 12
Engaging High potentials 16
Formal vs. InformalDifferences in Commitment and Engagement 17
Increasing High potential Commitment and Engagement 18
Shifting Roles: High potentials as Talent Developers 20
Formal vs. InformalDifferences in Developing Others 21
Leveraging the View from the PipeRecommendations and Next Steps 22
Conclusion 26
Resources 27
References 27
About the Authors and Contributors 28
About the Research 29
1
Executive Summary
Talent management represents an orga- But talent management has another,
nizations efforts to attract, develop, and overlooked perspective: The view from
retain skilled and valuable employees. Its the pipe.
goal is to have people with the capabili-
The employees and managers who are in-
ties and commitment needed for current
side the leadership pipeline do not oper-
and future organizational success. An
ate solely as a stream of talent to be fun-
organizations talent pool, particularly
neled and directed by the organization.
its managerial talent, is often referred
They bring their perspectives and experi-
to as the leadership pipeline.1
ences to the process, too. CCLs research
The leadership pipeline is managed team decided to factor in the views of
through various systems and processes high-potential managers to deepen our
to help the organization source, reward, talent management knowledge and that
evaluate, develop, and move employees of executives and talent professionals.
into various functions and roles. The
pipeline bends, turns, and sometimes
breaks as organizations identify who
is ready now and who is on track
for larger leadership roles. From this
perspective, talent management is some-
thing done to and for an organizations
high-potential employees, in service of
the organizations needs.
8%
Yes
37% 56% No
Not Sure
9%
Yes
31% 53% No
Not Sure
Not Formally (but I have
been told I am considered
a high potential)
7%
The view from the pipe recognizes that organizations treat high potentials
differently in the following ways (see also Figure 3):
16% Training
6% Freedom/Flexibility
5% Miscellaneous
0 5 10 15 20 25
18% 10%
80%
The difference in perception between F1 and I1 talent has implications for organizations expecting to
retain a large percentage of their high potentials. If employees are not formally recognized by the
organization as a high potential, they may be less likely to see themselves as a future leader in
the organization. Informal recognition alone may not be enough to convince employees that they
are part of the organizations long-term plans.
*Any analysis that compares formal to informal only includes those survey participants who indicated they were either for-
mally or informally identified has high potentials, n=161 high potential leaders.
20%
0%
I am provided more I am mentored I am given special I am coached
developmental by more senior developmental by my boss.
opportunities managers. assignments.
than others in my
organization.
Figure 7
Figure 8
80%
80
96% 95%
60%
60 I am motivated by my job.
I am committed to my organization.
I am actively seeking other employment.
40%
40
20%
20
21%
0%
0
60%
40%
20%
33%
14%
0%
I am motivated by my job. I am committed to my organization. I am actively seeking
other employment.
2014 Center for Creative Leadership. All rights reserved. 17
Increasing High-potential
Commitment and Engagement
To better understand the investment-commitment dynamic between organiza-
tions and high potentials, we asked survey participants to identify the ways in
which their organization could increase their commitment and engagement.
Career pathing
Greater authority
Increased feedback and communication
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
90%
80%
78%
60%
In my current role, I actively identify and develop high potentials.
Examining talent management from the perspective of those in the pipeline suggests three key strategies
for organizations to consider:
References
1
Charan, R., Drodder, S., & Noel, J.L. (2000). The leadership 3
See for example: APQC. (2004). Talent Management: From
pipeline: How to build the leadership powered company. Competencies to Organizational Performance. Houston, TX:
Jossey-Bass. Authors. Benchmarking study of five organizations with
reputations for effective talent management practices and
Conger, J. A. & Fulmer, R. M. (December 2003). Developing who also passed a screening survey: Capital One, Celanese,
your leadership pipeline. Harvard Business Review. Coca-Cola HBC, IRS, Johnson & Johnson.
2
Corporate Leadership Council. (2005). Realizing the Full 4
See for example: Bakker, A., Schaufeli, W., Leiter, M.,
Potential of Rising Talent (Volume I): A Quantitative Analysis & Taris, T. (2008, July). Work engagement: An emerging
of the Identification and Development of High-potential concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress,
Employees. Washington, DC: Corporate Executive Board. 22(3), 187-200. A position paper that summarizes and
reviews the concept of work engagement.
Corporate Leadership Council. (2005). Realizing the
Full Potential of Rising Talent (Volume II): Strategies for
Supporting the Development of High potential Employees.
Washington, DC: Corporate Executive Board.
Contributors
Cindy McCauley, Senior Enterprise Associate
and Senior Fellow (CCL)
Doug Ryden, Research Analyst (CCL)
Kyle Meddings, Ideas2Action project team
member and Chancellors Leadership Scholar
(University of Colorado at Colorado Springs)
CCL - Americas CCL - Europe, Middle East, Africa CCL - Asia Pacific
www.ccl.org www.ccl.org/emea www.ccl.org/apac
+1 800 780 1031 (U.S. or Canada)
+1 336 545 2810 (Worldwide) Brussels, Belgium Singapore
info@ccl.org +32 (0) 2 679 09 10 +65 6854 6000
ccl.emea@ccl.org ccl.apac@ccl.org
Greensboro, North Carolina
+1 336 545 2810 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Gurgaon, India
+251 118 957086 +91 124 676 9200
Colorado Springs, Colorado LBB.Africa@ccl.org cclindia@ccl.org
+1 719 633 3891
Johannesburg, South Africa Shanghai, China
San Diego, California +27 (11) 783 4963 +86 182 0199 8600
+1 858 638 8000 southafrica.office@ccl.org ccl.china@ccl.org
Moscow, Russia
+7 495 662 31 39
ccl.cis@ccl.org
Affiliate Locations: Seattle, Washington Seoul, Korea College Park, Maryland Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Ft. Belvoir, Virginia Kettering, Ohio Huntsville, Alabama San Diego, California St. Petersburg, Florida
Peoria, Illinois Omaha, Nebraska Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan Mt. Eliza, Victoria, Australia
Center for Creative Leadership and CCL are registered trademarks owned by the Center for Creative Leadership.
2014 Center for Creative Leadership. All rights reserved. 9.11/3.14