Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Construction
110
Jonell mist eliminators are made of layered or coiled socks of knitted mesh which are 100
individually crimped to the proper height to maintain density and specific surface area 90
Removal Efficiency %
requirements. In alloys, standard 0.011 and 0.006 wire is used, while co-knits of vari- 80 JCI Style
ous materials are also available.
70 45
Mesh pads are made in one piece for pipe-sized flanged vessels or segmented in nu- 60 85
merous sections to facilitate handling and passage through a vessel manway. 50 115
40
Standard grids using 1 x 1/8 flatbar and nominal 1/4 rod are typically used. Grating 200
30
or expanded metal grids are also offered. For smaller mesh pads or in cases in which
overall mist eliminator height is limited, rod-only grids may be used on top and/or bot- 20
tom faces. 10
0
Intermediate Rod-only grids are sometimes used for mesh pads of thickness 10 or 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
greater. Droplet Size - Microns
Mesh-Pad Nomenclature
Typically the mesh density is specified, and all too often what is used is 9-lb density
mesh of 0.011 diameter wire. Removal efficiency however is not affected by mass
Common mesh pad styles correlate with those of most other vendors. For instance, density per se, but rather by the diameter of wire used and the specific surface area.
JCI equivalent to industry standard 9-lb density mesh (ACS 4CA or Otto-York 431) is The chart above lists several common mesh densities along with key parameters. Note
style 85, which happens to be the specific surface area of 0.011 wire crimped to 9-lb that 12-lb density mesh exhibits 115 sq-ft/cu-ft if made of 0.011 diameter wire, or 200
density if made of 0.006 wire. For this reason, Jonell Canada styles correspond not to mass
JCI Style Mass Wire Void
density of mesh, but rather to specific surface area of wire in the mesh.
(or Specific Surface Density Diameter Space
Area in ft2/ft3) (lb/ft3) (inches) (%)
In the graph above, from front to back, are compared the removal efficiency in a natu-
235 14 0.006 97.2
200 12 0.006 97.6
ral gas application at 350 psia of style 45, 85 115 and 200. The higher the specific sur-
120 7 0.006 98.5 face area, the better the performance. This affect is accentuated at elevated pres-
115 12 0.011 97.5 sures.
95 10 0.011 97.2
85 9 0.011 98.2 For example, at 950 psia, standard 9-lb density mesh removes 99.9% or droplets only
65 7 0.011 98.5 at ~25 m, where as 12-lb density mesh style 200 (with 0.006 wire) achieves this at
45 5 0.001 99 only 9-10 m.