Deep Dynamic Compaction (DDC) densifies marginal ma- Loose pervious and semi-pervious soils with fines con- terials using high levels of impact energy at the surface. tents less than 15% Materials containing large voids Advantages: Soil improvement to a maximum depth of about 30 to 35 Suitable for many types of soils with less than 15% fines feet Low cost for large area of improvement Not recommended for silty or clayey soils Ability to measure improvement Effective in soils above or below the groundwater table Many available contractors (Note: Water table should be 6 feet below grade; fill can be placed above a high groundwater site to achieve this Simple equipment distance.) Produces relatively uniform compressibility Construction Methods: General Description: A tamper with a weight of 5 to 40 tons is dropped using DDC applies energy by raising and dropping a tamper a crane from a height of 30 to 120 feet. The tamper is (weight) repeatedly from a height of 30 to 120 feet. The dropped in a systematically controlled pattern on a coor- energy densifies the soil to depths that increase with dinate grid layout. The impacts are spaced at a distance the magnitude of the energy. The ground surface is then depending on the depth of the compressible layer, the compacted with a smaller, broader tamper or conventional depth to the groundwater, and grain size distribution. Five compaction equipment. to 15 blows per grid point are applied. The first phase is the high-energy phase to improve the deeper layers. This is
R02 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS FOR SOIL IMPROVEMENT,
RAPID EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION, AND STABILIZATION OF PAVEMENT WORKING PLATFORM followed by a low-energy phase to densify the upper layers. Alternate Technologies: In the low-energy phase, the tamper is only raised 15 to 20 Excavation and replacement, sand compaction columns, feet. Backfilling the craters and additional passes may be vibrocompaction, blasting densification, aggregate col- required. umns, and deep foundation systems.
Additional Information: Potential Disadvantages:
Proximity of groundwater or excessive crater depths limit Mobilization costs the number of blows at each grid point. In saturated soils Large ground vibrations and lateral displacements with some fines (less than 15% fines), the compaction may create excess pore water pressure that reduces the effec- Limited effective treatment depth tiveness of compaction unless the pressure is dissipated. Some safety concerns DDC is more economical than other technologies for large area ground improvements. Key References for this Fact Sheet: Elias, V., Welsh, J., Warren, J., Lukas, R., Collin, J. G., and SHRP2 Applications: Berg, R. R. (2006). Ground Improvement Methods-Volume Embankment and roadway construction over unstable I. Federal Highway Administration Publication No. NHI-06- soils 020. Roadway and embankment widening Lukas, R.G. (1986). Dynamic Compaction for Highway Example Successful Applications: Construction Volume I: Design and Construction Guide- lines. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Densification of Loose Pockets & Voids FL Admin., Washington, D.C., FHWA/RD-86/133. Study Site Charleston, SC Lukas, R.G. (1995). Dynamic Compaction Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 1, U.S. Department of Transporta- tion, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Complementary Technologies: FHWA-SA-95-037. Prefabricated vertical drains (without fill preloading) to dissipate pore water pressures and permit densification of soils with higher fines content
R02 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS FOR SOIL IMPROVEMENT,
RAPID EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION, AND STABILIZATION OF PAVEMENT WORKING PLATFORM