Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Conclusions
E l e c t r o d e p o s i t e d films show a p a r t i a l r o t a t i o n a l
s w i t c h i n g b e h a v i o r s i m i l a r to t h a t r e p o r t e d for
v a c u u m deposited films as e v i d e n c e d b y (i) a c i r c u -
l a r flux path, a n d (it) r o t a t i o n a l thresholds. T h e
H c / H k ratio d e t e r m i n e s t h e m i n i m u m a n g l e b e -
t w e e n t h e easy axis a n d the a p p l i e d field for c o h e r -
e n t r o t a t i o n a l s w i t c h i n g . I n c r e a s i n g d i s p e r s i o n at a
fixed H c / H k ratio r e d u c e s t h e w a l l m o t i o n t h r e s -
hold. The w a l l m o t i o n a n d r o t a t i o n a l t h r e s h o l d
!' , , , ,
s e p a r a t i o n is p r i m a r i l y d e p e n d e n t on t h i c k n e s s .
Magnetization path and threshold measurements
c l e a r l y show t h a t two m e c h a n i s m s of s w i t c h i n g oc-
0
400
c u r d u r i n g flux r e v e r s a l , a r o t a t i o n a l s w i t c h fol-
6 0 8 0 IOOO 1200 1400
THICKNESS, A~ l o w e d b y a w a l l m o t i o n s w i t c h as the m a g n e t i z a t i o n
Fig. 4. Separation between rotational and wall motion thresholds moves through the hard direction.
at a fixed bias field.
Acknowledgment
The separation b et w een the wall motion and ro-
T h e a u t h o r s w o u l d like to e x p r e s s a p p r e c i a t i o n to
t a t i o n a l t h r e s h o l d s ( A h n ) at a fixed d - c bias field
T h o m a s S. C r o w t h e r for h e l p f u l c o m m e n t s o n this
a p p e a r s to be p r i m a r i l y d e p e n d e n t on the t h i c k n e s s
manuscript.
of the film. T h e r e does n o t a p p e a r to be a n y d i r e c t
c o r r e l a t i o n of w a l l m o t i o n a n d r o t a t i o n a l t h r e s h o l d Manuscript received May 13, 1963. This paper was
s e p a r a t i o n w i t h m a x i m u m d i s p e r s i o n or H c / H k presented at the P i t t s b u r g h Meeting, April 15-18, 1963.
ratio. A plot of w a l l m o t i o n a n d r o t a t i o n t h r e s h o l d A n y discussion of this paper will appear in a Discus-
s e p a r a t i o n (Ahl~) vs. t h i c k n e s s is s h o w n i n Fig. 4 sion Section to be published in the December 1964
JOURNAL.
at d - c bias fields of 0.4 H a n d at 0.7 H
These r e s u l t s show t h a t t h e m a x i m u m s e p a r a t i o n REFERENCES
occurs as the t h i c k n e s s is decreased o v e r the r a n g e 1. I. W. Wolf, This Journal, 108, 959 (1961).
of t h i c k n e s s m e a s u r e d ( 5 0 0 - 1 4 0 0 A ) . T h e effect of 2. R. D. Fisher and H. E. Haber, Letters J. Appl. Phys.,
Vo]. 2, No. 1, p. 11 (1963).
t h i c k n e s s on the s e p a r a t i o n ( A h n ) m a y be associ- 3. E. C. Stoner and E. P. Wohlfarth, Phil. Trans. Roy.
ated w i t h the t y p e of w a l l f o r m a t i o n . T h e w a l l m o - Sac. (London), A240, 599 (1948).
tion threshold may decrease with increasing thick- 4. T. S. Crowther, Lincoln Lab Report 51-2, F e b r u a r y
ness d u e to a c h a n g e f r o m Neel to C r o s s - T i e to Bloch 1959.
5. S. Methfessel, S. Middelhoek, and H. Thomas, J.
w a l l f o r m a t i o n . T h u s a Bloch w a l l w o u l d h a v e a
Appl. Phys., 32, 1959 (1961).
l o w e r w a l l m o t i o n t h r e s h o l d t h a n a Neel wall. 6. S. Middelhoek, I.B.M. Journal, p. 394 (October 1962).
ABSTRACT
A method has been developed which yields chemically deposited thin films
of lead selenide on a glass surface. These are u n i f o r m in appearance and elec-
trical resistance [1-4 meg/(0.635 cm)2]. The coating solution is made up of a
lead citrate complex and dimethylselenourea with sodium sulfite p r e s e n t as an
antioxidant. All of the p a r a m e t e r s involved in the coating process were studied,
i n c l u d i n g the p r e t r e a t m e n t of the glass surface, and the o p t i m u m conditions for
the coating reaction are described.
F D C B A
90
I
8r 80
_g ~c 70
:~ 6C ~ffl 6o
in
z
~ 5c
~ 4c
2C
I
o ' ' ~ ' 7' '~ ' ,'o ,'.... ', ,', ,~I o io 20 II 2'o 4'o I'
2
~; ,~o '
$
~'o ,~o I
4
REACTION TIME (MIN.)
REACTION TIME (MINUTES)
Fig. 1 Effect of aging of the DMS-sulfite solution on the rate Fig. 3. Reproducibility of homogeneous lead selenide pre-
of precipitation of lead selenide. Prereaction aging time: A, 6 rain; cipitation. Ideally, the five curves would be entirely superimposed.
B, 1 hr; C, 2 hr; D, 4 hr; E, 6 hr; F, 21 hr. Solution aging time, 1 hr.
1
I0
a n e x t r e m e l y u n i f o r m film, b u t it w a s v e r y thin.
Lead-citrate solutions were prepared that were
1 0 - 4 M in s i l v e r o r c o p p e r ( I I ) ion c o n c e n t r a t i o n .
2= M i r r o r s w e r e t h e n p r e p a r e d in e x a c t l y t h e s a m e w a y
t~J as a b o v e , u s i n g D M S - s u l f i t e s o l u t i o n s a g e d f o r 1.0 hr.
A f t e r 30.0 rain, t h e m i r r o r p r e p a r e d in p r e s e n c e of
~6 t h e s i l v e r ion h a d p e e l e d c o m p l e t e l y . A f t e r 66.0 rain,
2
t h e m i r r o r p r e p a r e d in t h e p r e s e n c e of C u ( I I ) ion
was very thin, uneven, and spotty.
#
M i r r o r s f o r m e d in t h e p r e s e n c e of 10 - 5 a n d 1 0 - 6 M
s i l v e r ion d i d n o t p e e l a f t e r a 3 0 . 0 - m i n d e p o s i t i o n
a n d w e r e v e r y even. R e s i s t a n c e s of t h e films p r e -
p a r e d f r o m l e a d s o l u t i o n s c o n t a i n i n g 10 - 5 a n d 10-6M
s i l v e r ion h a d r e s i s t a n c e s of 11 a n d 21 meg'ohms,
r e s p e c t i v e l y . A film f o r m e d u n d e r l i k e c o n d i t i o n s
N , N - D I M E T H Y L S E L E N O U R E A - S U L F I T E AGING, HOURS b u t w i t h s i l v e r ion a b s e n t h a d a r e s i s t a n c e o f 37
Fig. 4. Resistivity of chemically deposited lead selenide films megohms.
on glass as a function of the aging time of the DMS-sulfite G l a s s slides w e r e p l a c e d in t h e 7.9 m l s t a n d a r d
solution. l e a d c i t r a t e s o l u t i o n a n d 5.0 m l D M S - s u l f i t e ( a g i n g
t i m e , 5.0 r a i n ) w a s t h e n a d d e d . T h e r e a c t i o n w a s a l -
c o a t e d b y a d s o r p t i o n of l e a d s e l e n i d e p a r t i c l e s w h i l e l o w e d to p r o c e e d at 25 ~ for 7.0 min. T h e r e a c t i o n w a s
t h e u p p e r side c o u l d b e c o a t e d b y s e d i m e n t a t i o n as s t o p p e d b y p o u r i n g off t h e s o l u t i o n a n d r i n s i n g t h e
well. T h e film on t h e u n d e r side of t h e s l i d e w a s test tube containing the slide with distilled water.
u s e d f o r r e s i s t a n c e m e a s u r e m e n t s . T h i s side w a s T h e slide, a f t e r r i n s i n g , w a s c o a t e d w i t h a v e r y l i g h t
e a s i l y d i s t i n g u i s h e d f o r it p o s s e s s e d a v e r y b r i g h t , film of l e a d s e l e n i d e . T h e l i g h t l y c o a t e d s l i d e w a s
even, r e f l e c t i n g s u r f a c e w h i l e t h e u p p e r s i d e w a s t h e n p l a c e d in a n o t h e r s t a n d a r d l e a d c i t r a t e s o l u t i o n
d u l l a n d s o o t y in a p p e a r a n c e . a n d 5.0 m l of a s e c o n d D M S - s u l f i t e s o l u t i o n ( a g i n g
T h e l e a d s e l e n i d e on t h e b a c k s i d e of t h e s l i d e w a s t i m e , 16.0 h r ) w a s t h e n a d d e d . A f t e r 30.0 m i n at 25 ~
removed by rubbing with a cotton swab moistened the reaction was stopped. The slide was rinsed and
in 10% n i t r i c acid, a n d t h e film a l o n g t h e e d g e s w a s d r i e d a t 110 ~ for 10 m i n . T h e s l i d e s w e r e p r e p a r e d
r e m o v e d b y r u b b i n g w i t h e m e r y cloth. A q u a d a g f o r r e s i s t a n c e m e a s u r e m e n t s as d e s c r i b e d p r e v i o u s l y .
e l e c t r o d e s w e r e t h e n p a i n t e d at t h e e d g e s of t h e l e a d R e s i s t a n c e s o b t a i n e d on s i x t e e n slides p r e p a r e d in
selenide surface while masking the center portion t h i s m a n n e r w e r e as f o l l o w s : 3.0, 4.0, 1.8", 0.7*, 1.1,
w i t h s m o o t h p a p e r s t r i p e x a c t l y 0.635 c m in w i d t h . 2.0, 2.2, 1.9, 2.8, 3.2, 2.0", 1.4", 2.2, 4.0, 3.8, a n d 3.7
T h e r e s i s t a n c e of films p r e p a r e d in t h e m a n n e r d e - m e g / ( 0 . 6 3 5 c m ) 2, w h e r e t h e figures m a r k e d w i t h a n
s c r i b e d in t h e s e c t i o n i m m e d i a t e l y p r e c e d i n g , b u t in a s t e r i s k i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e l e a d s e l e n i d e film h a d
w h i c h D M S - s u l f i t e s o l u t i o n s h a d a g e d f r o m 2-16 h r p e e l e d . This m e t h o d p r o d u c e d slides w i t h c o n s i d e r -
is s h o w n in Fig. 4. T h e s h a p e of t h i s c u r v e c l o s e l y a b l e less v a r i a t i o n in r e s i s t a n c e a n d of g r e a t e r u n i -
r e s e m b l e s t h a t of Fig. 2. A g a i n it is s h o w n t h a t f o r m i t y a n d a d h e s i o n t h a n w i t h a n y o t h e r set of
a f t e r 10 h r t h e a g e of t h e D M S - s u l f i t e is no l o n g e r a conditions investigated.
critical factor. It was noted, when precoated slides were used,
Pretreatment of the glass surface.--Pick (3) o b - t h a t l e a d s e l e n i d e p a r t i c l e s s t a r t e d to g r o w at t h e
s e r v e d t h a t t h e c o n d i t i o n of t h e glass s u r f a c e p r o - u n d e r s u r f a c e of t h e s l i d e a l m o s t i m m e d i a t e l y a f t e r
f o u n d l y affected t h e q u a l i t y of l e a d sulfide m i r r o r t h e c o a t i n g s o l u t i o n s w e r e m i x e d . T h e a t t r a c t i o n of
deposition. Seeding nuclei play a very important colloidal lead selenide for the treated surface was
r o l e in d e t e r m i n i n g b o t h t h e t y p e a n d a m o u n t of such that the coating on the slide appeared opaque
mirror deposited. b e f o r e a n y m i r r o r i n g t o o k p l a c e on t h e u n t r e a t e d
A s a m e a n s of o b t a i n i n g a m o r e u n i f o r m a n d r e - w a l l s of t h e c o n t a i n e r .
p r o d u c i b l e d e p o s i t i o n , t h r e e m e t h o d s of i n t r o d u c i n g
s e e d i n g n u c l e i on t h e g l a s s s u r f a c e w e r e u s e d : b a t h - Discussion
ing t h e s l i d e in a c o l l o i d a l solution, i n t r o d u c t i o n of a T h e r a t e of h o m o g e n e o u s p r e c i p i t a t i o n of l e a d
c a t i o n w h i c h f o r m s a n i n s o l u b l e s e l e n i d e in t h e r e - s e l e n i d e in t h e s y s t e m j u s t d e s c r i b e d w i l l b e d e t e r -
a c t i o n m e d i u m , a n d p r e e o a t i n g t h e glass s u r f a c e w i t h mined largely by the lead ion concentration. The
a v e r y l i g h t film of l e a d s e l e n i d e . l e a d i o n c o n c e n t r a t i o n will, at t h e p H e m p l o y e d in
P r i o r to m i r r o r i n g , t h e s l i d e s w e r e p l a c e d in c o l - the reaction, be governed by the following equilib-
l o i d a l s o l u t i o n s of s i l v e r i o d i d e ( 7 ) , g o l d ( 8 ) , a n d r i u m (10)
l e a d sulfide (9) f o r 10 rain. T h e s l i d e s w e r e t h e n Pb+2 + Ci-3 + OH- ~ PbCi*-2 + H20 [1]
t r a n s f e r r e d d i r e c t l y to t h e l e a d - c i t r a t e solution. M i r -
r o r s w e r e t h e n o b t a i n e d in e x a c t l y t h e s a m e m a n n e r w h e r e t h e Ci* is t h e c o m p l e t e l y i o n i z e d t e t r a v a l e n t
as d e s c r i b e d u s i n g D M S - s u l f i t e s o u t i o n s t h a t w e r e c i t r a t e ion. T h e u s e of s o d i u m p l u m b i t e , w h o s e f o r -
a g e d for 1.0 h r in a l l cases. T h i s t y p e of p r e t r e a t - m a t i o n r e q u i r e s a v e r y l a r g e e x c e s s of h y d r o x y l ion,
m e n t in s i l v e r i o d i d e a n d l e a d sulfide sols a d v e r s e l y Was f o u n d to b e q u i t e u n d e s i r a b l e since it l e a d s to
a f f e c t e d t h e q u a l i t y of t h e m i r r o r deposit. I n a l l cases a gross, b u l k , p r e c i p i t a t i o n of l e a d s e l e n i d e . T h i s
46 JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY January 1964
ABSTRACT
The absorption, excitation, and fluorescence spectra of Y203:Eu a r e p r e -
sented and i n t e r p r e t e d . The high l u m i n e s c e n t efficiency of this m a t e r i a l and
its u n u s u a l p e r f o r m a n c e at e l e v a t e d t e m p e r a t u r e s are discussed. The c o m p a r a -
tive b e h a v i o r of o t h e r r a r e e a r t h s in y t t r i u m oxide and of the r a r e e a r t h s in
certain other oxides of y t t r i u m and l a n t h a n u m are also discussed briefly.