National Workshop

A Decade of the
Total Sanitation Campaign:
Lessons Learnt and Way Forward

22-23 April 2010, New Delhi

Organized by
Department of Drinking Water Supply,
Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India
and
Water and Sanitation Program-South Asia
A Decade of the TSC
Progress Achieved and Lessons
Learnt

National Workshop
22-23 April 2010, New Delhi
 Overview

 Background

 Analysis of TSC Status

 Progress Towards TSC Goal

3
 Background – 1999, Year of TSC
Launch
 Coverage
 When TSC was launched, rural sanitation coverage was <20%
 Open Defecation Free Gram Panchayat was just a concept
 Poverty
 The TSC baseline survey found that at national level, 47% of the
population was classified as BPL
 Out of 28 states, 14 states had >50% BPL population

4
 TSC: Goal and Resources

 Goal: Universal rural sanitation coverage by 2012

 Generous allocation

5
 Overview

 Background

 Analysis of TSC Status

 Progress Towards TSC Goal

6
 Financial
Investme
nt

7
Inputs: Expenditure against
Allocation

8
 Inputs: What is the average cost
per district at State-level?
 Average cost/ district = Rs 30 crores

9
 Inputs: What is the average cost
per HH at State-level?
 National Average per capita spend = Rs. 1134
 At state level, ranges from just Rs 148 to Rs 5800+

10
 Inputs: What is the average cost per
School toilet at State-level?
 National Average Cost per School = Rs 17,320
 At state level, ranges from <Rs 5k+ to Rs 25,000+

11
 Inputs: What is the average cost per
Anganwadi toilet at State-level?
 National Average Cost per Anganwadi = Rs 4684
 At state level, ranges from <Rs 500 to Rs 25,000+

<Rs 5000

12
 Inputs: What is the average cost
per RSM at State-level?
 National Average Cost per RSM = Rs 120,850
 At state level, ranges from Rs 13k to Rs 4 lakh+

13
 Inputs: % expenditure on SLWM

 This component is yet to scale up

 National average exp = 6%

14
 Overview

 Background

 Analysis of TSC Status

 Progress Towards TSC Goal

15
 Outputs: % IHHL Target Achieved

 16 out of 28 states have <50% IHHL Coverage

 Only 2 states have achieved 100% Coverage

16
 Outputs: % School San Target
Achieved
 23 out of 28 states have achieved > 50%
 4 out of 28 states have achieved 100%

17
 Overview

 Background

 Analysis of TSC Status

 Progress Towards TSC Goal

18
 Process: Acceleration of
Coverage
Acceleration Rate Scale (0-10) : HH Coverage Achieved under TSC X 10
Average Time Taken ( from sanction date)

19
 Process: Effectiveness of IEC
Expenditure
Effectiveness of IEC Spend = % IEC Expenditure
% HH Toilet Coverage

20
 Process: Prioritisation of
Coverage – IHHL vs NGP
Prioritisation: %IHHL Coverage Achieved under TSC
% NGP Coverage
120%

% N GP GP s a ga ins t Tota lN o. of GP s
100%
99% 98% 99%
100% 97%
96% % S a nita tion C overa ge
90%
86%
79% 81%
80% 76%
73%
64% 66%
61% 61% 60% 61%
60% 56% 56%58%
53%54% 51%
48%
45% 44%
41%
38%
40% 34%
33%
30% 28%

20% 17%16%16%15%
12%11%
9%
7% 6% 6% 6% 5% 4%
3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0%
0%
0%

21
 Process: Prioritisation of Coverage –
IHHL vs School Sanitation
Prioritisation: %IHHL Coverage Achieved under TSC
% School San Coverage

120
109 108
100102 100
99 98 99 98
100 97 9798 94 95
91 91 94 91 93
90 90
87 87
81 80
78
80 73 72
66
62 60 59 59 59
60 53 54 54 55 55
51 49
48 46 46
45
38 36
40 32 31 31
26 26
23
20
20 15
9

IHHL Coverage School Sanitation Coverage

22
 Processes: NGP Success Rate

NGP Success Rate (%) __# of NGP won X 100

# of NGP Applied

23
 Process: Financial Efficiency (INR
Lakhs)
Financial Efficiency = % TSC Budget Spent
# of NGP won

National Avg Rs 32 lakhs

24
 Overview

 Background

 Analysis of TSC Status

 Progress Towards TSC Goal

25
 Outcomes: # of NGP

 1 State, 165 blocks and 22,604 GPs have won NGP

 This constitutes 9% of PRIs at National level

26
 Outcomes: % of NGP

 Sikkim is the first state to achieve Nirmal Rajya status

27
 Overview

 Background

 Analysis of TSC Status

 Progress Towards TSC Goal

28
 Methodology

 8 performance indicators, each assigned a weighted score such that

outcomes score higher than outputs or inputs
# Performance Indicator Type Weighted Score
Max Min

1 % TSC Budget Spent Input 5 0

2 % Household Toilets Target Achieved Output 15 0
3 % School Sanitation Target Achieved Output 10 0
4 Financial Efficiency (cost per NGP community) Process 10 0
5 Average Population per GP Process 10 0
6 Success Rate of NGP Applications Process 10 0
7 No. of NGP Panchayats Outcome 30 0
8 % NGP Panchayats Outcome 10 0
CUMULATIVE PERFORMANCE SCORE 100 0

 Districts
<25 divided into 4 color-coded performance
26-49 50-74 bands >75
Below Average Average Above Average Superior

29
 State Scores

100 88
90 79 76
National Avg 55
80 70 70
70 65 64 63 62 60 60 59
60 48 47 46 45 44 41
50 41 39 39
40 35
29 25
30 23 22 21 19
20 15 15
10
0

30
 State Performance at a Glance

<25 26-49 50-74 >75

31
Below Average Average Above Average Superior
 Overview

 Background

 Analysis of TSC Status

 Progress Towards TSC Goal

32
 Goal

 India achieved its MDG Target in 2009, which was 56% coverage
taking the base coverage as 11% in 1990

33
 Thank you
Open for Questions, Comments

34