Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Community Participation is one of the main topics evaluated in the Pollen project. Here
is the list of the indicators of quality that correspond to that issue: Level of
- Active role of stakeholders.
- Active childrens role.
- Non-institutional stakeholders involvement (parents and others).
- Shared decisions.
- Liaison between stakeholders.
- Support of community to schools work.
- Link between some activities and citys needs.
To evaluate these items, we will use the following instruments and activities:
- State of the art report for each seed city.
- Questionnaire on Projects implementation in the community (this document).
- Coordinators progress sheet in each seed city
- Field visits and qualitative evaluation in three seed cities.
- Final questionnaire in each seed city.
________________________
Dear Colleague,
The purpose of this questionnaire is to find out about local partners feelings about Science
Education. The questions are designed to find out about your views as a person involved in the
Project. The questionnaire will be completed by Pollens local partners in the twelve European
countries in the project.
Date
Name..
City
2. Formalisation
o Only bilateral meetings
o Only informal meetings (all parties together)
o A formal agreement is signed/planned to be signed between parties: Yes/No
If yes, date of signature: ______________
11. What has been your main difficulty in this setting-up the CB?
12. For those of you who have started managing CBs, where have been the
main difficulties?
20. Sector
o Retail. Culture. Utilities. Transport. Construction. _____________
21. Approach
o Workshop and presentations
o Visits and meetings
o Other:___________________________________________
Impact
25. Impact achieved or expected
o DATE:
o ACTIVITY TITLE
o TARGET AUDIENCE
o N. OF CHILDS INVOLVED
o EXPECTED IMPACT
o MEDIA COVERAGE
o DATE:
o ACTIVITY TITLE
o TARGET AUDIENCE
o N. OF CHILDS INVOLVED
o EXPECTED IMPACT
o MEDIA COVERAGE
Critical Assessment
28. Which were the main difficulties and/or barriers to your community
approach implementation?