Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
________________
* SECOND DIVISION.
739
is liable for the entire amount, and not merely for his
proportionate share.
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015df48c8bbd4094cc26003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 2/13
8/18/2017 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 216
740
________________
741
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015df48c8bbd4094cc26003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 4/13
8/18/2017 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 216
________________
742
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015df48c8bbd4094cc26003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 5/13
8/18/2017 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 216
743
________________
744
________________
6 Ibid.,Section 17 (g).
7 Powell vs. Mobley, 142 S.E. 678 (1928); Keenig vs. Currans
Restaurant, 159 Atl. 553 (1932).
8 Rice vs. Gove, 22 Pick Mass 158; 33 AM Dec. 724.
9 Blacks Law Dictionary, p. 1249 (5th ed., 1979).
745
________________
746
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015df48c8bbd4094cc26003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 9/13
8/18/2017 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 216
________________
13 Crocker National Bank vs. Say, 209 Cal. 436; 288 P. 69 (1930); Dayries vs.
Lindsly, 54 So. 791 (1911); Granada vs. PNB, 18 SCRA 1 (1966).
747
Proof that the notes were signed in blank was only the self
serving testimony of private respondent Fermin Canlas, as
determined by the trial court, so that the trial court
doubts that the defendant (Canlas) signed in blank the
promissory notes. We chose to believe the banks
testimony that the notes were filled up before they were
given to private respondent Fermin Canlas and defendant
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015df48c8bbd4094cc26003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 10/13
8/18/2017 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 216
________________
748
________________
749
o0o
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015df48c8bbd4094cc26003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 13/13