Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4
. Big REPUSIIC OF THE PHILZPHNES AN N £ REGIONAR TRIAL COURT NATIGNAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL GION . PASIG CITY SRANCH 154 hated. No. 6332 whan SE ERECU TION WHERERS, on December 11, 1992, this Cau vei a Deciaion in the aboverentitied casas, th “weReroORs, PCSMISES CONSIDERED, thie potion tor review of the Decree No, 116942 tssued by a then iiand Regisaiem Commission & hereby . Jeauement 1 hereby rendered secting aside one Court's pockton dated August 1, 1967,25 well Bs acrae Wo, 116942 issued ana entered Into the Registry Books on Movember 15, 1967, All certificates of titles oad a commection with (he August 1, 1967 decision’ in fever of the respondents — Adnano, _ Micolas, Candkte, Remedios and Augustiqg ail surmamed Robles ang their Nels, W ony, wre heredyc ancalied and lisclared to be of no force and elfrct, The Dacksho of dis Court dated June & 1968 In Lard Registration Case. oy gaat adjadicaling the lana +. favor af pofitioner: 2 Foge santos and genio Santos (now substituted by their heirs) and ordering the registration of titles in their Fiames in equal shares pro laivizo is hereby maintained. The Land Registration Authority is hereby ‘ordered [0 issue in fovor of the petitioners the corresponding decree.” EWHEREAS, on February 3, 1992, “Motion for Msideration” on the said Decision was filed by the © WHEREAS, on April 8, 1992, the sald Motion for ideration was denied by the Court, WHEREAS, on Apri! 24, 1992, Notice of Appeal Pe filed by the heirs of Adriano Robles and the same fasapproved on April 23, 1992; (WHEREAS, on October 4 1996, the Court of Js danied the Instant appeal and affirmed In toto Decision of the Court below; WHEREAS, on October 24, 1992, Entry of dgment was entered; WHEREAS, on Sepember 3, 2003, the Land tration Authority fled a "Manifastation” to the that it Is recormmending that the Court Issue an der directing the Register of Deeds of Pasig. City te cal original certificate of titles that was Issued In nection with the August 1, 1967 Decision and ting the Land Registration Authority to_cacncel the Geiously \ssued Decree No.N-116942 pursuant to the Islon dated August 1, 1967 before It can comply with Ge decision of the Court dated Decamber 11, 1991; WHEREAS, on July 20, 2004, after due hearing, Be Court granted the Manifestation of the LRA, the Eispositive portion reads: “WHEREFORE, premises: considered, fet an order ose! 1) Directing the Land Regtstraion Authority te cancel the previouly Issued Decree. No. N-116942 pursuant to the August 1, 1967 decision; 2) Directing the Register of Deeds of Pasky Ci5 to cancel Decree 9. 116942 which was issued pursuant to the Agusut i, 19678 decision of the Court ip TRC No. 5711 as well 4s the orlglnal certificate of tithe and all derivative titles sssued pursuant thereto, and directing alt persons in possession of any/or all those ind LAC CASE NO. N-76332 pegee - —— ines which were cancelled and invalidated pursuant to Vine December 11, 1991 decision, fo surrender the same to the concerned Register of Deeds of Pasig City.” EREAS, on Auust 19, 2004,8 “Motion for Jderation” of the Order dated July 20, 2004 was filed by Zolla Santos and the Helrs of Cirilo Santos; WHEREAS, on July 19, 2005, an Order was issued by the EI HK XK. i WHEREFORE, premises considered, the instant Motion EE for Reconsideration 's ENTED for lack of merit.” MEREAS, on June 26, 2007, “Motion for Issuance of we Executlon” was Mied by the substituted heir of Oppositors~ ners and Applicants-Respondents of LRC Case No. N-5711 No. N-6332; HEREAS, on October 9, 2097, Comment/exzposiis was filed by the substituted herls of Agplice ts in LRC No. N-5711 and Oppositor-Petitioner In Li Pe WHEREAS, on December 6, 2007, an Order 5 cution was issued, which reed d, the “Motion WHEREFORE, premises cons equtton® is: hereby for tssuence .of fhe” Writ of GRANTED. Accordingly, kit @ verit/or akiedtition Issue for the satisfaction of the jurigntent of -\the Court dated December 11, 1991 whic \became: fnafsan May 3, 1997." on iaoualy , 28; /2008, “Motion fer Ponsideration” was filed: by t Hye/subptituted helrs of aepascrt: ndants and oppositor-patitiyinér {h'LRC No. N-5711 and LR 6332,respéctively, and nhohy/comment” thereto was by Didnisia Santos,at al., diy Marsh 24, “2008 as well as & _goplamental CommentiOppesttion 13 ation for Reconsideration ihe granting of Writ of Execution, was filed on“March 25, ABBHEREAS, on July 10, 2008, the Court issued an Order Bi the Motion for Reconsideration and granted the motion Kutlon, dispositive portion ‘of which reads as follows: PK XK XK premises considered, order is hereby issued DENYING the movents-substituted Neirs- ‘oppositors-petitioners’ Motion” for merit. Accordingly, let @ writ tisfaction of the order of the 91 which became final on “WHEREFORE, Eeppikants = and EReconsidargtion for kack of lof execution Issue for the sat fcourt dated Decembér 11, 19! 3, 1997." NOW THEREFORE, you are hereby commanded to cause execution of the aforesaid: Decision dated, December 11, Bi including payment In full of your lawful fees for the service P pasig City, October 3, 2008. eRtgiNAL SIGNED ABRAHAM B. BORRETA judge

Вам также может понравиться