Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Home Forums Structural Engineers Activities Seismology engineering Forum

Use of Deflection Amplification Factor Cd on vertical seismic


thread487-293530

I know that Cd is used to factor up the "elastic" lateral story drifts to provide a more realistic lateral drift under a seismic
event. The IBC indicates the use of Cd with xe in section 12.8.6 of the ASCE 7.

However, there is also a vertical component to seismic effects required using 0.2SDS to be added to the dead loads of a member.

The question is raised as to whether the Cd factor can be or should be applied to this vertical seismic load to get a more accurate
measure of vertical deflection under dead and seismic loads.

I can't think of a significant reason to be concerned with vertical DL deflection plus vertical magnified seismic deflection except
under some cases where a vertical sag might be a concern for clearances etc.

Also, ASCE 7 only speaks of Cd in the context of story drifts, not vertical beam deflections.

So the question is - do we ever include the Cd factor on the 0.2SDS?

Replies continue below

FanQuakes Give Insight into Energy Generated by CD-Adapco Releases v4.22 of es-ice and STAR-
Large Groups CD

SOLIDWORKS Simulation 2017 Focuses on Ease The application of ABAQUS in seismic analysis of
SOLIDWORKS Simulation 2017 Focuses on Ease The application of ABAQUS in seismic analysis of
of Use connected structures

Yes.

WillisV.
Thanks for the reply. Do you have some reference or article that discusses this?

The reason I'm suspect that you do this is that the 0.2SDS factor doesn't have "R" in it. It appears to be somewhat empirical.

I think that it isn't appropiate to include the Cd factor for vertical deflections.

The Cd factor takes into account the fact that we are reducing the seismic force assuming damage, which means that the
structure doesn't remain elastic and the deflections are bigger. We don't reduce the vertical seismic forces with R o other factor,
so we don't need to account Cd. Regards,

Sebastian

vaquers - that is what I was thinking. The behavior of a flexural beam vertically is nothing like the behavior of a frame system
laterally using the R's.

I just don't know where the 0.2SDS comes from.

Dear JAE,
assuming that the vertical PGA is 2/3 (experimental) of the horizontal PGA and using the SRSS (squareroot of the sum of
the squares) we have SQRT(1^2+(2/3)^2)=1.20. Regards,

Sebastian

No, Cd for vert. seismic is meaningless

Four series of portable and stationary asphalt plants


Asphalt Plants For Sale ranging from 60-400 tph, en.n g.com
Leading Rail Producer. Supplying Rails for Railways, Tram,
ArcelorMittal Rails Light Tracks and Crane rails rails.arcelormittal.com

Join | Advertise

Copyright 1998-2017 ENGINEERING.com, Inc. All rights reserved.


Unauthorized reproduction or linking forbidden without expressed written permission. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Privacy Policy.