Mon 210 Kang

2009 PTI Technical Conference Lateral Analysis and Design of PT Slab-Column Frames Thomas Kang, Ph.D., P.E.
(CA)
Thomas Kang, Ph.D., P.E.(CA)

Assistant Professor
University of Oklahoma
Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 1 of 29

2009 PTI Technical Conference Lateral Analysis and Design of PT Slab-Column Frames Thomas Kang, Ph.D., P.E.(CA)
Introduction
Non-participating PT frames and lateral systems
Deformation compatibility checks for PT slabs
PT slab-column moment frames or dual systems
Summary

` OKC Airport Parking Lot

(Oklahoma City, OK)
` One-way beams

` Ulsan Park Polis

(Ulsan, Korea)
` T
Designedby:Dongyang
` Two-way slabs
Courtesy:K.Chung
Introduction
Summary

` PT frames: not to resist

lateral loads in high seismic
regions
` Lateral systems (SMRF or

walls) designed for all
lateral load resistance and
stiffness
` Deformation compatibility
should be met for PT
connections & frames
KangandWallace(2005)

` Four seasons bldg., CA
PunchingduringNorthridgeEQ
Kang&Wallace(2006)
Designstorydriftratio

NISEE NISEE
Ties@18spacing(1971SanFernandoEQ) Spiral@3pitch(1971SanFernandoEQ)
Minimumshearreinforcement
isrequiredperS21.13.6.
PTdriftlimit
(ACI352R,
Shearreinforcement Approved)
isnotrequired.
RCdriftlimit
(ACI31808,
S21.13.6)

` Lateral stiffness (linear model)

Shell-type plate element (ETABS)
ACI 318-08, S8.8 and 10.10
Ultimate
Members
state
Beams 0.35EcIg
Columns 0.70EcIg
Uncracked 0.70EcIg
Walls
Cracked 0.35EcIg

` Lateral stiffness (linear model) = (ei+1 ei)Cd / IE

as per ASCE 7-05
Ultimate (S12.8.6 & Fig. 12.8-2)
Members
state
Beams 0.35EcIg
Columns 0.70EcIg
Uncracked 0.70EcIg Upper7/8~5/6oftotalheight
Walls
Cracked 0.35EcIg Lower1/8~1/6oftotalheight
Based on past design experience

and verification by checking wall stresses (Shin et al, 2009)



Introduction
Summary

1. Obtain Mu,unb at from nonlinear analysis (S21.13.6(a))

x Also, use = 0.6 in Vn as per ACI 318-08, S9.3.4(b).
2. Drift capacity check (S21.13.6(b))
PT
x = 0.75 in Vc
3. Limit analysis (PTI Building Design Committee)

x Get probable Mu,unb based on slab probable moment capacities

Gravity loads Lateral loads

Interior Exterior Interior
M+u_L Mu_R Mu_R M+pr_L Mpr_R
Mu,unb 0 Mu,unb = Mu_R probable Mu,unb

= M+pr_L + Mpr_R
1.25(M+pr_L + Mpr_R)
Vu,direct = Design direct (gravity) shear

` Direct shear and unbalanced moment transfer

Direct shear transfer (Vg)
Eccentric shear transfer (v Mu,unb)
M+pr_L Mpr_R
Vg vMu,unbc
vu,direct = vu,ecc=
bo d Jc
probable Mu,unb = Mpr_L + Mpr_R
The 3rd option is to maximize Mu,unb
and use = 0.75 (per S9.3.4(a)).

` ACI 318-08, S21.13.6

If deformation compatibility is not satisfied, or without
checking it, minimum shear reinforcement is required.
As per ACI 352R

x (Avfy)/(sbo) 3.5fc
x s d/2
x First line at s/2
from the column
x Extend at least 3h
(note: 4h for RC)
x and so forth..

Introduction
Summary

` Dual systems of RC walls and slab-column frames

or MWFRS (main wind-force-resisting systems)
Use dual systems: if slab-column frames take

Designedby: more than 25% of design seismic forces (0.25E)
Rosenwasser/Grossman(notPT)
If not likely, design walls to resist 1.0E!

` A linear lateral model should be built to obtain design

force and moment demands.
` Reduced stiffnesses are used as per S8.8 and S10.10.4.1

of ACI 318 (at ultimate limit state).
Columns: 70% of EIg
PT slabs: ~50% of tributary slabs (vs. ~25% for RC slabs)
` Factored gravity moments, lateral load moments, and

secondary moments are compared with Mn.

2Dequivalent
frame
modeling

Shinetal.(2009) ` RC walls: Shell-type plate element

0.35EIg (lower stories - cracked)
0.7EIg (upper stories)
` Link-beams, columns: Frame element

0.35EIg (link beams - cracked)
0.7EIg (columns - cracked)
` PT slabs: Frame element

0.5EIg (cracked - based on
research; Kang & Wallace, 2005)
` Within frame elements:

Membrane element with trivial
stiffness (just to distribute tributary
gravity loads to vertical elements)

` Based on various
calibrations,
Core wall dual systems:
efficient in lateral resist.
esp. for irregular shapes
Adjust wall thickness (t)
(as height up, t down)
Stiffness modeling is
appropriate
Shin,Kang&Grossman(2009)

` Should be determined separately.

` Msec = Balanced loading induced moment Mp
where Mp is the primary moment = P x e
P is the effective post-tensioning force
e is the eccentricity; positive above c.g.c.
` Then check Mu,grav + Mu,lat + Msec Mn per S18.10.3

Balanced loads bal_2
P P
bal_1 bal_3
` If nonlinear PBEE analysis methods are used, dual system is allowed

(SEAONC, 2007; LATBSDC, 2008)
` Fiber wall elements (RC & CIP-PT), equivalent frame models (PT
slabs), and lumped-plasticity at slab-beam ends, etc. [working using
PERFORM-3D in collaboration with TippingMar and Arup-Los Angeles]
(PERFORM3D)modeledbyKang

Introduction
Summary

` Non-participating PT slab-column frames

Only deformation compatibility should be checked.
Design story drift of lateral systems is used.
` Lateral-force-resisting PT slab-column frames

Linear lateral model should be built for design demands.
Reduced stiffness (considering cracking at ultimate states)
Mu,grav + Mu,lat + Msec Mn per S18.10.3
Msec is determined separately, or may be neglected if you
think its minor [and you know youre neglecting].

Punchingduringstatictests
Punchingduringshaketabletests
Kangetal.(2006) KangandWallace(2005)

Mon 210 Kang

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Mon 210 Kang

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

2009 PTI Technical Conference Lateral Analysis and Design of PT Slab-Column Frames Thomas Kang, Ph.D., P.E.

Thomas Kang, Ph.D., P.E.(CA)

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 1 of 29

Non-participating PT frames and lateral systems

Deformation compatibility checks for PT slabs

PT slab-column moment frames or dual systems

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 2 of 29

` OKC Airport Parking Lot

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 3 of 29

` Ulsan Park Polis

Non-participating PT frames and lateral systems

Deformation compatibility checks for PT slabs

PT slab-column moment frames or dual systems

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 5 of 29

` PT frames: not to resist

` Lateral systems (SMRF or

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 6 of 29

` Four seasons bldg., CA

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 9 of 29

` Lateral stiffness (linear model)

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 10 of 29

` Lateral stiffness (linear model) = (ei+1 ei)Cd / IE

Based on past design experience

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 11 of 29

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 12 of 29

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 13 of 29

Non-participating PT frames and lateral systems

Deformation compatibility checks for PT slabs

PT slab-column moment frames or dual systems

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 14 of 29

1. Obtain Mu,unb at from nonlinear analysis (S21.13.6(a))

3. Limit analysis (PTI Building Design Committee)

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 15 of 29

Gravity loads Lateral loads

M+u_L Mu_R Mu_R M+pr_L Mpr_R

Mu,unb 0 Mu,unb = Mu_R probable Mu,unb

Vu,direct = Design direct (gravity) shear

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 16 of 29

` Direct shear and unbalanced moment transfer

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 17 of 29

` ACI 318-08, S21.13.6

As per ACI 352R

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 18 of 29

Non-participating PT frames and lateral systems

Deformation compatibility checks for PT slabs

PT slab-column moment frames or dual systems

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 19 of 29

` Dual systems of RC walls and slab-column frames

Use dual systems: if slab-column frames take

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 20 of 29

` A linear lateral model should be built to obtain design

` Reduced stiffnesses are used as per S8.8 and S10.10.4.1

` Factored gravity moments, lateral load moments, and

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 21 of 29

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 22 of 29

Shinetal.(2009) ` RC walls: Shell-type plate element

` Link-beams, columns: Frame element

` PT slabs: Frame element

` Within frame elements:

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 23 of 29

Copyright Post-Tensioning Institute all rights reserved. Page 24 of 29

` Should be determined separately.

` Then check Mu,grav + Mu,lat + Msec Mn per S18.10.3

` If nonlinear PBEE analysis methods are used, dual system is allowed