The argument that <restate argument> omits some very important considerations

that are necessary to get a full 360-degree view of the described scenario. The
argument does not provide substantive evidence to be able to prove or even support
the main conclusion from the given premises.

First, the argument readily assumes that

Second, the argument claims that

Lastly, the argument fails to account for the fact that

In summary, the argument is extremely flawed because of the above-mentioned

reasons and hence comes across as weak and unconvincing to the reader. If the
author had mentioned all the relevant facts that are essential to objectively assess
the situation under consideration, the argument would have been much stronger.
Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.

The argument that <Restate argument> omits some very important considerations that are necessary
to get full 360 degree view of the described scenario. The argument does not provide any
substantive evidence to be able to prove or even support the main conclusion from the given
premises.

Firstly, the argument readily assumes that

Secondly, the argument claims that.

Lastly, the argument fails to account for the fact that

In summary, the argument is extremely flawed because of the above mentioned reasons and hence
come across to reader as weak and unconvincing. If the author had mentioned all the relevant facts
that are essential to objectively assess the situation under consideration, the argument would have
been much stronger . Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to
debate
The argument that <Argument> omits some of the very important considerations that are necessary
to get full 360 degree view of the above mentioned scenario. The argument does not provide any
substantive evidence to be able to prove or support the conclusion from the given premises.

Firstly the argument readily assumes that

Secondly it claims that

Finally, argument fails to account for the fact that

In summary the argument is very extremely flawed because of the reasons mentioned in the above
paragraphs and hence came across to the readers as weak and unconvincing. If the author had
mentioned all the relevant facts that are essential to objectively assess the argument, the argument
would have been much better and stronger. Without this information, the argument remain
unsubstantiated and open to debate.