Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Student A
Mr. Soeldner
28 October 2016
How does the Thirty Years War compare and contrast with World War One?
In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity. Sun Tzu. Sun Tzu was a Chinese
general, military strategist and philosopher, who lived during the Spring and Autumn Period of
ancient China, from 770 B.C. until 476 B.C. Sun Tzu was making a statement about how wars
can be chaotic, yet, can settle disputes and create opportunity for countries. There are many
similarities and differences between the Thirty Years War, which took place between 1618 and
1648, and World War One, which took place between 1914 and 1918. How did the strong beliefs
and practices in religion lead to one of the most destructive conflicts in European history? And
how do the causes of these two very different wars compare and contrast? In the following essay,
I will talk about the differences and similarities between the Thirty Years War and World War
Although religion played no role in the cause of World War One, it was the sole cause of
the Thirty Years War. The Holy Roman Emperor and king of Bohemia, Ferdinand II, decided to
disallow his Bohemian subjects, who were mostly Protestant, to be Protestant. Instead, he wanted
them all to convert to Catholicism, the religion he was devoted to. When his subjects heard the
news spread by the kings messengers, they became outraged. The Defenestration of Prague then
happened in result of the uproar. The Protestants threw the messengers of the king out of
windows which resulted in most of them falling over 20 meters to the ground. This caused the
Student 2
Battle of White Mountain where the Bohemia army faced the Protestants in an unfair battle,
where the Holy Roman Empire won. The Danish king, Christian IV, who was a Protestant
himself, wanted to support his fellow Protestants, and so he sent troops to Bohemia to help
strengthen the Bohemians. The soldiers Christian IV sent were immediately stopped, and sent
back to Denmark by Wallenstein, a mercenary working for the Habsburgs, the royal family
controlling the Holy Roman Emperor at the time. When Gustav Adolf, the king of Sweden, saw
how Protestantism was being rejected in Bohemia, he used the land in the Holy Roman Empire
he ruled over to launch an attack at them. The battle was known as the Battle of Breitenfeld, in
which the Swedes won. Religion played absolutely no part in World War One and cannot be
Both of the wars started off as two opposing sides, which gradually expanded. After the
wars began, powers began to choose sides. During the Thirty Years War, the two opposing sides
were the Protestants of Bohemia and the Catholic King of Bohemia, Ferdinand II, who denied
his subjects the right to choose their religion, sparking rebellion among the mostly Protestant
population of Bohemia at the time. Hereafter, the rebellious and furious Protestants of Bohemia
took place in the Defenestration of Prague. The Protestants threw the messengers King Ferdinand
II had sent to communicate with them out of windows. This caused the king to become outraged,
so he took action during the battle of White Mountain, where the kings army won. Denmark and
Sweden supported the Protestants of Bohemia because their kings, Christian IV and Gustav
Adolf, were both protestant. Although France was a Catholic country and had a Catholic leader,
they decided to fund Sweden, who were supporting the Protestants of Bohemia because France
believed that politics were more important than religion. France wanted to balance the power in
Europe and did not want the Habsburgs, the royal family that ruled over the Holy Roman Empire
Student 3
at the time, who were already the most influential and powerful royal house in Europe at the
time, to become even more powerful and influential. Religion bonded the allies throughout the
war which led the war to become one of the most destructive wars in European history. On the
other hand, during World War One, after Franz Ferdinand was assassinated and Austria-Hungary
delivered an ultimatum to the Kingdom of Serbia, which they rejected, the two opposing sides
were Austria-Hungary and the Kingdom of Serbia. After Austria-Hungary declared war on
Serbia, Russia began mobilizing in support of Serbia, while Germany, an ally of Austria-
Hungary in the Triple Alliance, invaded Belgium and Luxembourg before moving towards
France. This led the United Kingdom, an ally of Russia and France in the Triple Entente, to
declare war on Germany. Both wars began as a conflict between two opposing sides, and then
each side began gradually gaining allies. However, during the Thirty Years War, alliances began
forming after the war started, whereas during World War One, alliances were already formed
with the Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance. Though allies began getting involved only after
the war began. The reason the war became so big was because of all of alliances. Once Austria-
Hungary declared war on the Kingdom of Serbia, the allies of both of these countries got
Before World War One started, Germany was the main culprit of imperialism.
Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use
of military force, or other means. Germany wanted to have colonies like England and France
had. Although Morocco wanted their independence, they were given as a gift from Britain to
France in 1904. Germany, who were supporting Morocco in their pleas for independence,
protested against how Moroccos bids were being rejected in 1911. This caused a lot of tension
between France, being supported and allied with Britain, and Germany. This tension carried over
Student 4
until Britain declared war on Germany in 1914. The tension could have been one of the key
reason why Britain hastily declared war on Germany after they invaded Belgium and
Luxembourg. During the Thirty Years War, imperialism could arguably been one of the reason
why France supported Sweden, and fought for the protestants. Although France was ruled by a
Catholic King, Louis XIII, and his chief minister, Cardinal Richelieu, they considered the
Habsburgs too powerful, due to the fact that they ruled over multiple territories on Frances
eastern border, including the Netherlands. This frightened the French because the Holy Roman
Empire already ruled The French decided to support the Swedes in the hopes of weakening the
Nationalism played a role in the cause of both wars. Nationalism is a patriotic feeling,
principles, or efforts. During the Thirty Years War, a different type of nationalism can be
observed, known as religious nationalism. This nationalism was the main cause of the Thirty
particular religious belief, dogma, or affiliation. Ferdinand II, as well as most Europeans at the
time, can be considered religious nationalists. Ferdinand II was such a devoted believer of
Roman Catholicism, which he decided to enforce among his subjects, sparking rebellion amongst
them. This led to the involvement of other rulers, also showing religious nationalism. Christian
IV and Gustav Adolf decided to support fellow believers of their religion, the Protestants of
Bohemia, purely because they believed in the same religion. Nationalism can be classified as of
the major causes of World War One. It led Europes powers to develop an extreme belief in its
own cultural, economic and military supremacy. This caused arrogance, which was promoted by
the media of the countries involved in the war. The nationalists wanted to prove that their
country was better than everyone elses. When war broke out between Austria-Hungary and the
Student 5
Kingdom of Serbia, the allies of those countries were already eager to go to war, to prove that
The Thirty Years Wars main causes were religion and religious nationalism. The Thirty
Years war had very different causes compared to World War One. Despite both taking place in
Europe, and both taking place within 300 years, it is fair to say that a lot has changed in that
time, regarding the causes of conflict. World War Ones main causes were nationalism and
imperialism. Although both wars had a lot of different causes, they did have one major cause that
they shared, namely nationalism. In conclusion, these two wars have mainly different causes,
however, the wars do share a couple of causes, most importantly nationalism. Otherwise, they