0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
17 просмотров2 страницы
This document provides a grading rubric for evaluating 3D cardboard sculpture projects. It assesses student work on preliminary design planning, quality of construction, effectiveness of design, and understanding of the project. Student work is graded on a scale from poor to exceptional in each category, with point values assigned from 1 to 4 points. An overall grade is calculated based on the total points earned out of 16 possible points.
This document provides a grading rubric for evaluating 3D cardboard sculpture projects. It assesses student work on preliminary design planning, quality of construction, effectiveness of design, and understanding of the project. Student work is graded on a scale from poor to exceptional in each category, with point values assigned from 1 to 4 points. An overall grade is calculated based on the total points earned out of 16 possible points.
This document provides a grading rubric for evaluating 3D cardboard sculpture projects. It assesses student work on preliminary design planning, quality of construction, effectiveness of design, and understanding of the project. Student work is graded on a scale from poor to exceptional in each category, with point values assigned from 1 to 4 points. An overall grade is calculated based on the total points earned out of 16 possible points.
1 pts 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts Preliminary Poor Fair Good Exceptional GRADING KEY Design Planning +Student made half-hearted +Student created adequate +Student created thoughtful and +Student created thoughtful, 14 - 16= A- to A+ attempt at making preliminary sketches for project useful sketches for project accurate and useful sketches for sketches project 11 - 13= B- to B+ +No significant evidence of +Can see some evidence of +No evidence of sketch ideas in preliminary sketch ideas in preliminary sketch ideas in +Student followed preliminary 8 - 10= C- to C+ finished work finished work finished work designs to create project 5 - 7= D- to D+
4= 0
Quality of Poor Fair Good Exceptional
Construction +Sculpture poorly put together. Sculpture stands up and is +Sculpture stands up and is put Sculpture is put together well Does not stand up well. mostly put together well together well and in a creative manner that shows originality +Paint is applied sloppily or not at +Paint is applied adequately +Paint is applied using some all. Color seems arbitrarily chosen but with little evidence of concepts of Color Theory +Student put a lot of thought in students knowledge of Color to the colors, patterns and Theory application of paint
Effectiveness of Poor Fair Good Exceptional
Design +Sculpture is not effective visually- +Sculpture has some +Sculpture has many interesting +Sculpture is very strong visually, The Principles of Art have not been interesting areas and areas and incorporates many of uses many of the Principles of addressed: balance, unity, rhythm, incorporates some of the the Principles of Art Art pattern, contrast Principles of Art +Sculpture has many interesting +Sculpture is original and unique +Sculpture has some parts when viewed from different from all view points interesting parts from all view angles points
Student Poor Fair Good Exceptional
Understanding of Project +Student did not seem to +Student got the ideas of +Student got the ideas of +Student got the ideas of understand the ideas of abstracting abstracting a shape and of 3 abstracting a shape and creating it abstracting a shape and creating a shape and of 3 dimensional art dimensional art but was not in 3 dimensions and did an it in 3 dimensions and did so and the importance of being able able to express it in this work adequate job in creating their with a unique and original vision to view it from all angles idea