Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2129
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
3. PROBLEM DEFINATION From table no.-2, we get that the density of Grey
Cast Iron is very high compared to other material from
1. Compare the weight, Strength & stresses induced in which we were observed that the GCI having the more
Disc brake rotor for all material according to criteria weight other than all tested materials as observed in
minimum weight, high compressive strength & actual weight measurement.
minimum induced stresses.
5. TRANSIENT STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
2. Find the best alternative possible material for disc
brake rotor by comparing all experimental In transient structural analysis we have analyzed
investigated parameters & analysed parameters. all the material for Von-Mises Stress, Max Principal Stress,
Shear Stress & total Deformation of rotor in transient
4. EXPERIMENTATION state. The boundary condition were considered as a fixed
bolt support on all wheel hub and the pressure applied on
1. Grey Cast Iron (GCI) a friction area. After analyzing the disc rotor for every
2. Aluminium Alloy (Al) material, the obtain results were shown in below.
3. Titanium Alloy (Ti-2) The figure 1 to 6 shows the transient structural
4. Titanium Alloy (Ti-5) analysis of Grey Cast Iron material were the max principal
5. Aluminium-Copper alloy (Al-Cu) stress induced at contraption area and value is 1.762 Mpa.
The von-Mises Stress Induced at the bolting points of Disc
Table-1: Standard Properties of Material [03] Rotor and max value of it is 1.8585 Mpa. The total
deformation of rotor is 0.001688 mm and is were
Material GCI Al Ti-2 Ti-5 Al-Cu observed at the outer periphery of rotor and minimum at
Thermal centre of rotor.
Conductivity 58 237 16.3 7.3 399
)
Mass Density
7800 3020 4510 4420 2840
Specific Heat
460 910 540 570 390
(KJ/KgK)
Coefficient of
0.4 1.10 0.32 0.28 0.29
Friction ( )
Compressive
1293 406 1070 1300 761
Strength (Mpa)
Specific Gravity
7200 2660 4420 4680 2800
(Kg/m3)
Ultimate
320 240 870 1020 515 Figure-1: Maximum Principal Stress in GCI (Side
Strength (Mpa)
Yield Strength View)
210 200 752 950 276
(Mpa)
Wear Rate (10-
6mm3/N/m)
2.36 3.25 8.19 24.6 2.91
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2130
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Figure-3: Shear Stress (XY Plane) in GCI Figure-7: Maximum Principal Stress in Al (Side
View)
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2131
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2132
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Figure-17: Total Deformation in Al-Cu Alloy (Side Figure-21: Shear Stress (XY Plane) in Ti-2
View)
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2133
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Figure-25: Maximum Principal Stress in Ti-5 Figure-29: Total Deformation in Ti-5 (Side View)
(Side View)
Figure-28: Equivalent (Von-Mises) Stress in Ti-5 So from all above experimentation and analysis, it
is observed that Al-Cu alloy is best suitable alternative
option for grey cast iron disc brake rotor.
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2134
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2135