Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ARANETA
In the light of Mr. Aranetas observation that the Company does not induce creativity due to its
overly structured nature, what should be done in order to promote positive change within the
Company?
Objectives
The goal of this brief analysis is to provide a recommendation that is in the best interests of the
parties (i.e. Mr. Araneta and the Company). Particularly, this analysis wants to provide an avenue
for Mr. Araneta and the Company to discuss what Mr. Araneta has observed and come up with a
Areas of Consideration
Mr. Aranetas passion in improving the Company his passion to cause positive impact
within the organization is both admirable and exceptional. The question is could it be that
he crossed the line with declaiming the lack of creativity given that he has been with the
Due to the limited information in the case, it is difficult to determine whether the
creativity which Mr. Araneta wants to promote is necessary in the context of the
The Companys culture and ideology, specifically the top management the
Companys state of being overly structured as perceived by Mr. Araneta may be a product
of the formers long-term culture. This is something that is difficult to penetrate or alter
overnight, let alone by someone who has been with the Company for a short period of time.
Recommendation:
Advice Mr. Araneta to invest more time in understanding further the characteristics of the
organization through interviewing personnel and observing daily operation, then prepare a
formal presentation to the Board that shows how the necessary changes he wishes to forward
organization where he is employed about his ideals for improvement. However, it could also be
possible that he is overly imposing the same which could cause management to either be indifferent
or resistant with the proposed changes. Both of these are particularly normal. Another lens that the
proponent considers is the fact that Mr. Araneta has been with the Company for a short period of
time. Not only that, his position is presumably new among the employees. With this, two things
are most likely in effect. First, top management may not yet fully appreciate his role within the
firm; and secondly, Mr. Aranetas observation may be a result of him being in the initial process
The approach the proponent wants to take aims to cater both sides of the coin. To further improve
the conclusiveness of Mr. Aranetas observation, he should conduct further research within the
Company and understand how exactly the organization is expected to function for both internal
and external stakeholders. Since the organization is perceived to be structured, preparing a formal
presentation that discusses his observations and the changes he deems to be necessary over simply
verbalizing these over-the-counter will most likely be more entertained. Mr. Araneta has to
understand that initially, his initiative will not be immediately supported and he has to take the
management to listen to him. Perhaps a formal meeting has to be requested by him for this matter,
and if approved, management (including himself) can work out whether the move to be more
creative is necessary and the manner on how the changes will be implemented in both the short