water

Article
Evaluation of Peak Water Demand Factors in Puglia
(Southern Italy)
Gabriella Balacco 1, *, Antonio Carbonara 2 , Andrea Gioia 1 , Vito Iacobellis 1
and Alberto Ferruccio Piccinni 1
1 Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Del Territorio, Edile e di Chimica, Politecnico di Bari,
70125 Bari, Italy; andrea.gioia@poliba.it (A.G.); vito.iacobellis@poliba.it (V.I.);
albertoferruccio.piccinni@poliba.it (A.F.P.)
2 Acquedotto Pugliese S.p.A., 70121 Bari, Italy; a.carbonara@aqp.it
* Correspondence: gabriella.balacco@poliba.it; Tel.: +39-080-5963791

Academic Editor: Yung-Tse Hung

Received: 30 November 2016; Accepted: 6 February 2017; Published: 8 February 2017

Abstract: In the design of a water supply network, the use of traditional formulas of the peak factor
may lead to over-dimensioning the network pipelines, especially in small towns. This discrepancy
is probably due to changes in human habits as a consequence of a general improvement of living
conditions. Starting from these considerations, and given the availability of a wide random sample
data, an analysis of the water demand for several towns in Puglia was carried out, leading to the
definition of a relationship between the above mentioned peak factor and the number of inhabitants,
based on a stochastic approach. An interesting outcome of this study is that the design of water
supply network is possible without considering the use of monthly and weekly peak factors, since the
current water demands appear not specifically sensitive to these variations; moreover, the magnitude
of the peak factor, as shown by measured data, is considerably lower compared to literature values,
especially for small towns.

Keywords: peak factor; water demand; water distribution

1. Introduction
In the past century the improvement of living conditions and the large infrastructure investments
of industrialized countries has led to a significant increase in water consumption. This process
has started in Puglia (Southern Italy) in 1906 with the construction of the Acquedotto Pugliese
(Puglia Aqueduct, AQP in the following lines) that conveys water from the spring of the Sele River in
Campania to the most southeastern end of Italy (Figure 1).
AQP has the biggest water supply network in Italy and in Europe, and supplies the drinking
needs of towns in Puglia deriving water from the Sele spring (superficial water and groundwater),
located in the western hillslope of the Apennine watershed.
Actually, AQP manages a water network of 21,000 km (30 times the length of the Po River),
including urban distribution networks, about 11,000 km of sewerage networks and 184 treatment
plants. More than half of the network is rather old, built before 1970, and requires continuous
maintenance and modernization. The need of expanding and renewing such networks is today very
impelling and poses the problem of testing and/or updating with a critical approach, the design
criteria that were used for their construction or dimension (e.g., [1,2]).
One of the principal factors in designing water distribution systems is the peak water demand.
Water use is not constant in time; its variability can be observed at different time scales: yearly,
seasonally, monthly, weekly, daily, hourly, and instantaneously. The maximum consumption peaks
are usually higher in small communities than in large ones while in very large centers water demand

Water 2017, 9, 96; doi:10.3390/w9020096 www.mdpi.com/journal/water

Water 2017, 9, 96 2 of 14

tends to be constant in time and close to its average. Several deterministic relationships and tables are
available from technical literature for the design of water supply system accounting for the fluctuation
in water demand. However, most of these relationships were provided more than fifty years ago
and need to be updated by the light of different habits in social and economic contexts profoundly
developed since then.
Water2017,9,96 2of14

Figure1.TheAQPwatersupplynetwork.
Figure 1. The AQP water supply network.

Oneoftheprincipalfactorsindesigningwaterdistributionsystemsisthepeakwaterdemand.
Based on data from an extensive field campaign carried out by AQP, we focus on the actual water
Water useinisparticular
usage and not constant inmagnitude
on the time; its variability
of peak flowcan be observed
factors at different
Cp , evaluated time scales:
as the ratio, yearly,
over a defined
seasonally,monthly,weekly,daily,hourly,andinstantaneously.Themaximumconsumptionpeaks
time period, between the maximum value and the average value of water consumption measured in
areusuallyhigherinsmallcommunitiesthaninlargeoneswhileinverylargecenterswaterdemand
several nodes of the AQP supply system.
tendstobeconstantintimeandclosetoitsaverage.Severaldeterministicrelationshipsandtables
are available from
2. Fluctuations technicalLiterature
in Demand: literatureReview
for the design of water supply system accounting for the
fluctuationinwaterdemand.However,mostoftheserelationshipswereprovidedmorethanfifty
The peak water demand has an important role in water distribution system design because
yearsagoand need to beupdated by the light of different habits in socialand economic contexts
it represents one of the most onerous operating states of a network. Studies on drinking water
profoundlydevelopedsincethen.
distribution and consumption assume a certain importance in the international bibliography from the
Based on data from an extensive field campaign carried out by AQP, we focus on the actual
1950s accordingly with the growth of urban distribution systems and the diffusion of more accurate
waterusageandinparticularonthemagnitudeofpeakflowfactorsCp,evaluatedastheratio,over
measurement equipment.
adefinedtimeperiod,betweenthemaximumvalueandtheaveragevalueofwaterconsumption
Water consumption today is definitely not comparable to that of the early 1990s; therefore,
measuredinseveralnodesoftheAQPsupplysystem.
the measures of water consumption and, consequently, the analysis about peak factors and discharge
formulas of that period are not comparable with current ones.
2.FluctuationsinDemand:LiteratureReview
Several recent studies have analyzed the influence of different parameters on water demand,
Thepeakwaterdemandhasanimportantroleinwaterdistributionsystemdesignbecauseit
for example Haque et al. [3] investigate how climate components and community intervention factors
represents one of
influence water the most
demand. onerous
Gurung operating
et al. [4] show states of a network.
that household Studies
peak water on drinking
demand water
has a strong
distributionandconsumptionassumeacertainimportanceintheinternationalbibliographyfrom
correlation with costly pipe network upgrades and this peak could be reduced through more efficient
the 1950s accordingly
substitution with the
strategies. Chang growth
et al. of urban
[5] conducted distribution
a statistical systems
analysis and thewater
of seasonal diffusion of more
consumption,
accuratemeasurementequipment.
Waterconsumptiontodayisdefinitelynotcomparabletothatoftheearly1990s;therefore,the
measuresofwaterconsumptionand,consequently,theanalysisaboutpeakfactorsanddischarge
formulasofthatperiodarenotcomparablewithcurrentones.
Severalrecentstudieshaveanalyzedtheinfluenceofdifferentparametersonwaterdemand,for
exampleHaqueetal.[3]investigatehowclimatecomponentsandcommunityinterventionfactors
influencewaterdemand.Gurungetal.[4]showthathouseholdpeakwaterdemandhasastrong
Water 2017, 9, 96 3 of 14

including irrigation, from 1960 to 2013 in Portland and observe that climate and weather factors are
the most influential parameters on water consumption.
Beal et al. [6], with the aim to identify hourly and daily peak demand for a range of water end-uses
in households located in South East Queensland carried out an analysis on 18 months of household
water consumption data obtained from high-resolution smart meters installed in 230 residential
properties. While many literature studies are deepening knowledge about different behavior observed
in climatic and societal types, still, in the absence of site-specific information, the main references
useful for engineers to design water distribution systems are provided by general purpose formulas.
Among these, Fair et al. [7], suggested, for the United States, a peak flow factor of about 2.0 for daily
peak and a value of about 4.5 for the hourly peak. Al-Layla et al. [8], based on field experiences, found
a peak flow value ranging from 1.2 to 2 for daily peak and a value ranging from 2 to 3 for the hourly
peak. Barnes et al. [9] provided typical values for the peak flow factor depending by climate (Table 1).
Adams [10] proposed the peak flow factors shown in Table 2 which are applicable to the UK and
were derived from an investigation of areas in Liverpool. Linaweaver et al. [11] found that the peak
hourly factor for domestic demand was about 2.62.8 for eastern states and 4.34.9 for western states
of US. Gomella and Guerre [12] suggested a peak factor constant value equal to 4 for the design of a
water network.

Table 1. Peak flow factors computed at different time scales [9].

Climate
Peak Flow Factor Temperate Warm, Dry
Range Typical Range Typical
Max hourly/average day * 2.04.0 2.5 3.06.0 3.5
Max daily/average day * 1.32.0 1.5 2.04.0 2.5
Max weekly/average day * 1.11.3 1.2 1.72.3 2.0
Notes: * Where the average day is the average annual consumption.

Table 2. Ratio of peak hourly flow to annual average flow [10].

Population Cp
<500 2.9
5005000 2.92.5
500050,000 2.52.1
50,000500,000 2.11.9

The first relationships to recognize a dependence of the peak factor from population were
proposed by Harmon [13]:
18 + P/1000
Cp = (1)
4 + P/1000
and Babbit [14]:
Cp = 20 P0.2 (2)

where P is population.
Both were originally developed to explain the variability of flow observation in sewer systems.
In principle they can be used to calculate peak water flow rates in distribution systems assuming that
all water used in the community is drained to the wastewater collection system.
Despite its age, the Harmon formula has been adopted in 2005 by the Australian ENVC
(Department of Environment and Conservation) [15] in order to calculate peak flow rates for
communities that do not have adequate measures of water consumption useful to calculate average
day, maximum day and peak flow.
Water 2017, 9, 96 4 of 14

Also other relationships exploit a dependence of peak rates on population. Among these, Metcalf
and Eddy [16] assume the peak factor is a constant value when the population is less than a fixed
threshold, and decreases logarithmically when the population exceeds the same threshold:
(
4 N5
Cp = 4.8 (3)
N 0.113
N>5

where N is population in thousands.

Johnson [17] proposed the following expression:

5.2
Cp = (4)
N 0.15
Using data from Metcalf and Eddy [16] and Johnson [17], Gifft [18] revised the Babbitt equation,
suggesting the following expression:
5
Cp = 0.167 (5)
N
Based on the Babbitt formula and exploiting daily water consumption observed for several Italian
towns, Ippolito [19] proposed to adopt the values of hourly peak factor Cp reported in Table 3.

Table 3. Peak flow factor [19].

Population Cp
<10,000 53
10,00050,000 32.5
50,000100,000 2.52
100,000200,000 21.5

Within the Italian technical literature, after Ippolito [19], Milano [20], analyzing several studies
conducted for Italian and German towns, provided an estimation of the peak flow factor, calculated as
ratio between maximum hourly flow and average daily flow as a function of the population, as reported
in Table 4.

Table 4. Peak flow factor [20].

Population Cp
50,000200,000 2.50
200,000500,000 2.00
>1,000,000 1.70

Analyzing and comparing different values of peak factor extracted from the technical literature,
it appears that conventional methods used for decades for estimating the peak factor are based on
empirical deterministic expressions and engineering judgment [21].
A more recent literature proposes the use of a statistical approach to the definition of the peak
factor. In particular De Marinis et al. [22] analyzed the water demand for a small town near Frosinone
by monitoring continuously its system network. They agree that the classical literature relationships
for estimating the peak factor lead to a significant overestimation compared to the real maximum
water demand and proposed the use of a Gumbel distribution to describe the population of peak
factors. Thus, starting from the relationship suggested by Babbitt [10], they found a relationship for
the estimation of the peak flow factor, valid for a small town of about 6500 inhabitants, Piedimonte
San Germano (Frosinone, Italy), characterized by the following expression:

CP = 11 P0.2 (6)
Water 2017, 9, 96 5 of 14

Zhang et al. [21], proposed the application of a Poisson rectangular pulse (PRP) model
for residential water use with principles from extreme value analysis to develop a theoretical
reliability-based estimate of the peak factor. This kind of approach allows to incorporate in the peak
factor evaluation several characteristics of the network system other than population. We followed
their approach exploiting a theoretical expression of the instantaneous peak factor (PF) which is
reported in Section 5, Equation (7).
So far, a few other studies have been developed starting from the consideration that the water
demand pattern can be described by a PRP model [23]. Among these Blokker et al. [24] presented a
water demand end-use model developed to predict water demand patterns with a small time scale
(1 s) and residence spatial scale.

3. Field Campaign

3.1. Dataset Analysed

In this study sample measures of water consumption in 150 towns located in Puglia (Southern Italy)
were exploited, a number representing about half of the municipalities served by AQP in the entire
region. The towns population ranges between 1900 and 190,000 inhabitants, although, 85% have
less than 40,000 inhabitants. The flow data are related only to drinking water demand and to urban
water consumption.
The flow data were collected during an extensive campaign aimed to the recovery and
rationalization of distribution networks and reduction of water losses. The campaign lasted from 2008
to 2010 and provided sample measurements of flow and pressure, collected downstream of reservoirs
at time steps of 3, 5, or 10 min. In each site measures were recorded continuously for a minimum
period of about 14 days, lasting seven days before and seven days after some repair intervention in the
downstream network.

3.2. Flow Data Definition

Data collected in the measurement campaign required some preliminary selection. In particular,
only data collected after the repair intervention were used. Additionally, towns with significant
touristic fluctuation and data characterized by abnormal water supply probably due to special
regulation carried out by the managing authority or affected by instrumental measuring errors were
excluded from these first analyses.
Thus the time series available after this pre-selection consist of continuous measurements sampled
at 3, 5, or 10 min, recorded for about seven days, in 129 towns. The time series are recorded in a
different month for each town. The total dataset includes measurements for each month of the year,
except August, that, however, is a month considered not significant for the peak flow definition for
residential water demand.

3.3. Effect of the Sampling Time Interval on the Peak Factor

In the technical literature the maximum water demand is usually related to the hour of the
maximum demand. The peak coefficient is obtained as the volume of the water required at the peak
hour over the average, hourly flow demand volume [25].
Adopting a time scale equal to 1 h the analysis of the sampling data could provide a lower
estimation of water demand. The increase of the time scale leads to neglect major peaks that could
arise during the time interval adopted. The effect of sampling interval has been investigated by
Tricarico et al. [25] and de Marinis et al. [26] showing that 1 minute intervals can be considered to
be a good compromise between 1 h and 1 s of sampling resolution, obtaining in this way a 20%30%
reduction of the peak factor. Gato et al. [27] using one set of flow data collected at 5 min intervals
confirm this estimate even if, in some cases, with smaller reduction.
Water2017,9,96 6of14

Theeffectofsamplingresolutionhasbeeninvestigatedinthepresentstudy.Fromadatasetof
Water 2017, 9, 96 6 of 14
measurescollectedat3,5,or10minintervals,severalfurtherdatasetshavebeenderivedliketheir
multiplesupto1h.ForeachofthesethecorrespondingmaximumCpvalueshavebeenestimated
The effect of sampling resolution has been investigated in the present study. From a dataset of
andresultsareshowninFigure2where,consideringa1htimeinterval,insteadofthesmaller(3,5,
measures collected at 3, 5, or 10 min intervals, several further data sets have been derived like their
or10min),leadstoanunderestimationrangingfromabout5%to11%,smallerthanthoseobserved
multiples up to 1 h. For each of these the corresponding
bydeMarinisetal.[26]andTricaricoetal.[25]. maximum Cp values have been estimated
and results are shown in Figure 2 where, considering a 1-h time interval, instead of the smaller (3, 5,
Theanalysesherepresentedarefocusedonthepeakflowfactorevaluatedastheratiobetween
or 10 min), leads to an underestimation ranging from about 5% to 11%, smaller than those observed by
themaximumvalue(evaluatedusingoftheminimumavailabletimeofaggregation)andtheaverage
de Marinis et al. [26] and Tricarico et al. [25].
valueofwaterdailyconsumption.

1.700

data collected at 3 min

1.650 data collected at 5 min
data collected at 10 min

1.600
Cp

1.550

1.500

1.450

1.400
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Time (min)

Figure2.Effectofsamplinginterval(time)onpeakfactor.
Figure 2. Effect of sampling interval (time) on peak factor.

4.AnalysisofWaterDemandVariability
The analyses here presented are focused on the peak flow factor evaluated as the ratio between
the maximum
Figure 3value (evaluated
illustrates using ofdaily
the typical the minimum
demandavailable
pattern time of aggregation)
for one and the average
of the investigated towns
value of water
(Crispiano). daily consumption.
Observing this figure it is possible to recognize that the maximum water demand is
reachedearlyinthemorning;othertwopeaks,althoughoflesservalue,canbeobservedatmidday
4. Analysis of Water Demand Variability
andinthelateafternoon.ThistrendreflectstheclassicalpatternofanItalianresidentialareaand
confirmsthebehavioridentifiedbyMolinoetal.[28],Alvisietal.[29]anddeMarinisetal.[30].
Figure 3 illustrates the typical daily demand pattern for one of the investigated towns (Crispiano).
Observing this figure it is possible to recognize that the maximum water demand is reached early
40
in the morning; other two peaks, although of lesser value, can be observed at midday and in the
late afternoon.
35
This trend reflects the classical pattern of an Italian residential area and confirms the
behavior identified by Molino et al. [28], Alvisi et al. [29] and de Marinis et al. [30].
30
For each of the available time series and for each day of measurement a preliminary analysis
was carried25 out by evaluating representative parameters of flow rate like maximum, daily average,
minimum and secondary peaks, as well as the daily per capita water demand and the peak factor.
Q (l/s)

20
Data were then analyzed considering, for each municipality, the population served and the day of
the week and 15
the month of the first day of measurement campaign.
In fact, technical literature reports numerous data and experiences showing that water demand is
influenced 10not only by hourly variation but also by a seasonal and weekly variability depending on
climate and5 socio-economic conditions [19].
The analysis showed that water demand variability for different months and weekdays can be
related in a 0more
0.00
random
3.00
way to
6.00
water consumption
9.00 12.00
with respect
15.00
to the
18.00
observed
21.00
variability at daily,
weekly or monthly scale. Figure 4 shows for example Time (hours)
monthly variation of peak coefficient Cp for
towns with less than 20,000 inhabitants: it is possible to observe the absence of a marked seasonal
Figure3.Exampleofdailywaterflowrecordedduringthemeasurementcampaign(town:Crispiano).
trend. Peak factors show a maximum value in correspondence of May, but also a strong random
variability. The overall observation suggests that drinking water demand in Puglia is unaffected by
 Figure2.Effectofsamplinginterval(time)onpeakfactor.

4.AnalysisofWaterDemandVariability
Figure 3 illustrates the typical daily demand pattern for one of the investigated towns
Water 2017, 9, 96 7 of 14
(Crispiano). Observing this figure it is possible to recognize that the maximum water demand is
reachedearlyinthemorning;othertwopeaks,althoughoflesservalue,canbeobservedatmidday
climate and temperature demonstrating, following Cole et al. [31] that indoor consumption mainly
andinthelateafternoon.ThistrendreflectstheclassicalpatternofanItalianresidentialareaand
confirmsthebehavioridentifiedbyMolinoetal.[28],Alvisietal.[29]anddeMarinisetal.[30].
affects the nature of water use in this region.
Water2017,9,96 7of14

Foreachoftheavailabletimeseriesandforeachdayofmeasurementapreliminaryanalysis
40

wascarriedoutbyevaluatingrepresentativeparametersofflowratelikemaximum,dailyaverage,
35
minimumandsecondarypeaks,aswellasthedailypercapitawaterdemandandthepeakfactor.
Datawerethenanalyzedconsidering,foreachmunicipality,thepopulationservedandtheday
30

oftheweekandthemonthofthefirstdayofmeasurementcampaign.
25
Infact,technicalliteraturereportsnumerousdataandexperiencesshowingthatwaterdemand
isinfluencednotonlybyhourlyvariationbutalsobyaseasonalandweeklyvariabilitydepending
Q (l/s)

20

onclimateandsocioeconomicconditions[19].
15
Theanalysisshowedthatwaterdemandvariabilityfordifferentmonthsandweekdayscanbe
relatedinamorerandomwaytowaterconsumptionwithrespecttotheobservedvariabilityatdaily,
10

weeklyormonthlyscale.Figure4showsforexamplemonthlyvariationofpeakcoefficientCpfor
5
townswithlessthan20,000inhabitants:itispossibletoobservetheabsenceofamarkedseasonal
trend. Peak0 factors show a maximum value in correspondence of May, but also a strong random
0.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 12.00 15.00 18.00 21.00
variability.TheoverallobservationsuggeststhatdrinkingwaterdemandinPugliaisunaffectedby
Time (hours)

climateandtemperaturedemonstrating,followingColeetal.[31]thatindoorconsumptionmainly
Figure3.Exampleofdailywaterflowrecordedduringthemeasurementcampaign(town:Crispiano).
affectsthenatureofwateruseinthisregion.
Figure 3. Example of daily water flow recorded during the measurement campaign (town: Crispiano).

3.50

3.00

2.50

2.00
Cp

1.50

1.00

0.50
November
June
January

July

September

October

December
March

April

August
February

May

Figure4.Peakcoefficient:observedmonthlyvariation.
Figure 4. Peak coefficient: observed monthly variation.

TheweeklyvariabilityofthepeakcoefficientisshowninFigure5andhighlightsasomehow
The weekly variability of the peak coefficient is shown in Figure 5 and highlights a somehow large
large and homogeneous
and homogeneous variability.
variability. Every
Every line line represents
represents the daily
the daily peak peak during
coefficient coefficient during the
the monitoring
monitoringcampaignforasingletown.Itisnotpossibletoidentifyadayofmaximumconsumption
campaign for a single town. It is not possible to identify a day of maximum consumption and not
andnotsignificantdifferencescanbefoundbetweenworkingdaysandtheweekend.Theresultsof
significant differences can be found between working days and the weekend. The results of this
thispreliminaryanalysisleadtotheconclusionthatthemaximumvalueofthepeakflowfactorC
preliminary analysis lead to the conclusion that the maximum value of the peak flow factor Cpp,,
computedasthemaximumofthevaluesforthedifferentdaysofmeasurement,canbeconsidered
computed as the maximum of the values for the different days of measurement, can be considered not
notaffectedbyweeklyand/ormonthlyvariation.
affected by weekly and/or monthly variation.
Peakfactorsareusuallyassumedtoincreasewhendecreasingthenumberofconsumers(e.g.,
Peak factors are usually assumed to increase when decreasing the number of consumers (e.g., [32]).
[32]). The dependence
The dependence on population
on population of the measured
of the measured (evaluated
(evaluated as maximum
as maximum values onvalues
weeklyon weekly
temporal
temporalscale)peakfactorC pisshowninFigure6,whereageneraldecreasingtrendcanbeobserved.
scale) peak factor Cp is shown in Figure 6, where a general decreasing trend can be observed. On the
On the
other other
hand, hand, numerical
numerical values are values are significantly
significantly lower thanlower
thosethan those proposed
proposed by most ofby most
the of the
empirical
empiricalrelationshipsjustmentionedinSection2.Observedvalues,exceptfortwotowns,Alezio
relationships just mentioned in Section 2. Observed values, except for two towns, Alezio and Sannicola,
andSannicola,donotexceed2.50.Acomparisonamongmeasureddataandtheempiricalformulas
ofHarmon[13],Babbitt[14],MetcalfandEddy[16],Johnson[17],Gifft[18]andDeMarinisetal.[22]
isillustratedinFigure6.Itcanbeobservedthatalltheusedliteratureformulas,exceptDeMariniset
al.[22],tendtooverestimatethevalueofthepeakcoefficientCp.Thisisquiteevident,inparticular,
Water 2017, 9, 96 8 of 14

Water2017,9,96 8of14
do not exceed 2.50. A comparison among measured data and the empirical formulas of Harmon [13],
Babbitt [14], Metcalf and Eddy [16], Johnson [17], Gifft [18] and De Marinis et al. [22] is illustrated in
fortownsoflessthan10,000inhabitantswheretheoverestimationreaches150%.Adifferentresultis
Figure 6. It can be observed that all the used literature formulas, except De Marinis et al. [22], tend to
obtained,instead,usingEquation(3)proposedbydeMarinisetal.[22]thatseemstorepresentwell
Water2017,9,96
overestimate
the average the value
value ofof themeasured
the peak coefficient
data. OnCpthe
. This is quite
other evident,
hand, informula
this last particular, towns8of14
for sufficiently
is not of less
than 10,000 inhabitants where the overestimation reaches 150%. A
precautionarysuggestingpeakfactorslowerthanthehigherobservedvalues.different result is obtained, instead,
fortownsoflessthan10,000inhabitantswheretheoverestimationreaches150%.Adifferentresultis
using Equation (3) proposed by de Marinis et al. [22] that seems to represent well the average value of
obtained,instead,usingEquation(3)proposedbydeMarinisetal.[22]thatseemstorepresentwell
thethe
measured
averagedata.
valueOn
of the
the other hand,data.
measured this On
lastthe
formula
otheris not sufficiently
hand, precautionary
this last formula suggesting
is not sufficiently
peak factors lower than the higher observed values.
precautionarysuggestingpeakfactorslowerthanthehigherobservedvalues.

Figure5.Weeklypeakflowcoefficient.

The analysis of the data has shown that maximum values of the peak coefficient Cp can be
represented as a function of the number of users, like most of the relationships provided by the
Figure5.Weeklypeakflowcoefficient.
Figure 5. Weekly peak flow coefficient.
technicalliteratureandinparticulartheHarmonformula.
The analysis of the data has shown that maximum values of the peak coefficient Cp can be
represented
3.50
as a function of the number of users, like most of the relationships provided by the
Measurement data set
technicalliteratureandinparticulartheHarmonformula. Babbitt (1932)
Gifft (1945)
Johnson (1942)
Metcalf & Eddy (1935)
3.00 Harmon (1918)
3.50 de Marinis (2004)
Measurement data set
Babbitt (1932)
Gifft (1945)
Johnson (1942)
2.50 Metcalf & Eddy (1935)
3.00 Harmon (1918)
de Marinis (2004)

2.00
Cp

2.50

1.50
2.00
Cp

1.00
1.50

0.50
1.00
1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000
Population

Figure6.Comparisonofexperimentaldataandliteratureformulasforthecorrespondingpopulation
Figure 6.0.50Comparison of experimental data and literature formulas for the corresponding population
usingalogarithmicscale.
using a logarithmic
1,000 scale. 10,000 100,000 1,000,000
Population

Figure6.Comparisonofexperimentaldataandliteratureformulasforthecorrespondingpopulation
usingalogarithmicscale.
Water 2017, 9, 96 9 of 14

The analysis of the data has shown that maximum values of the peak coefficient Cp can be
represented as a function of the number of users, like most of the relationships provided by the
technical literature and in particular the Harmon formula.

5. Theoretical Distribution of Peak Coefficient

Recent studies have shown how difficult it is to represent the water demand by adopting a
deterministic approach because of its randomness or uncertainty [1]. That consideration can be
confirmed observing sample data and their dispersion in Figure 6. In this context Zhang et al. [21],
developed a theoretical reliability-based methodology for the estimation of an instantaneous peak
factor (PF) for residential water use, using a probabilistic approach based on the PRP representation
and leading to the extreme value Gumbel distribution of the maxima.
Following this approach, the instantaneous peak flow factor is evaluated as follows:
s
1 + q 2
PF ( N/p) = 1 + p (7)
N

We exploited such a formulation, where N is the number of homes in the neighborhood evaluated
considering that each home has 2.6 people on average in Italy; * is the dimensionless peak hourly
demand factor assumed equal to 1.8, suitable to the Italian context (e.g., [19,20]); p is the pth percentile
(frequency factor) of Gumbel distribution given by Chow et al. [33]:

6
p = [0.5772 + ln ln(1/p)] (8)

Finally, and q are the daily average utilization factor for a single family home and a coefficient of
variation of PRP indoor water demand pulse, respectively assumed equal to 0.045 and 0.55, as reported
in Zhang et al. [21]. Using the above described parameters and considering the 99.9th percentile,
and Equation (7) becomes:
1.8
PF ( P) = 1.8 + (9)
N
where N is the population in thousands. It is worth noting that, due to the structure of Equation (7),
the dimensionless peak hourly demand factor also behaves as asymptotic value of the instantaneous
peak factor for increasing N.
In Figure 7 comparison between the peak flow factors obtained using the above theoretical
relationship and those extracted from the measurement campaign is reported; it is interesting to note
that the above theoretical relationship is able to interpolate the maximum values of peak factors,
providing a useful tool able to evaluate the maximum water demand using a precautionary approach
considering also the typology of available data. Figure 8 shows a comparison between the theoretical
curve in Equation (9) and values extracted from a previous study of the Politecnico di Bari in 1999 in
the same region and data deduced from other Italian areas [29,34,35].
Equation (9) seems to be compatible with other data, ensuring, at the same time, an acceptable
margin of safety for the design of a water supply.
Water 2017, 9, 96 10 of 14
Water2017,9,96 10of14
Water2017,9,96 10of14

Figure7.Theoreticalrelationshipcurveandmeasurementdatasetdependingonthepopulation.
Figure 7. Theoretical relationship curve and measurement dataset depending on the population.
Figure7.Theoreticalrelationshipcurveandmeasurementdatasetdependingonthepopulation.

Figure 8. Theoretical relationship curve and measured data of others Italian studies using the
Figure 8.Theoretical
Figure 8. Theoretical relationship
relationship curve
curve and and measured
measured data ofdata ofItalian
others others Italian
studies studies
using using the
the logarithmic
logarithmicscaleofpopulation.
logarithmicscaleofpopulation.
scale of population.
Itisnecessarytopointoutthatthepeakfactorsinvestigatedinthisresearch(whosevaluesare
Itisnecessarytopointoutthatthepeakfactorsinvestigatedinthisresearch(whosevaluesare
reportedinFigure6),arethemaximumvaluesevaluatedusingaweeklyobservationintervalplaced
It is necessary to point out that the peak factors investigated in this research (whose values are
reportedinFigure6),arethemaximumvaluesevaluatedusingaweeklyobservationintervalplaced
inarandomperiodoftheyear.Therefore,weusedthetheoreticalapproachproposedbyZhanget
reported in Figure 6), are the maximum values evaluated using a weekly observation interval placed in
inarandomperiodoftheyear.Therefore,weusedthetheoreticalapproachproposedbyZhanget
al.[21]fortheanalysisoftheinstantaneousPFs,inthehypothesisthatthepeakfactorsrandomly
a random period of the year. Therefore, we used the theoretical approach proposed by Zhang et al. [21]
al.[21]fortheanalysisoftheinstantaneousPFs,inthehypothesisthatthepeakfactorsrandomly
sampledduringthefieldcampaignbelongtoastatisticallyhomogeneouspopulationrepresenting
for the analysis of the instantaneous PFs, in the hypothesis that the peak factors randomly sampled
sampledduringthefieldcampaignbelongtoastatisticallyhomogeneouspopulationrepresenting
the base process of the Gumbel distribution of maxima. In order to test this hypothesis we
the base process of the Gumbel distribution of maxima. In order to test this hypothesis we
investigatedifthepeakfactorsobservedcanbeassumedexponentiallydistributed;byproducingan
investigatedifthepeakfactorsobservedcanbeassumedexponentiallydistributed;byproducingan
Water 2017, 9, 96 11 of 14

during the field campaign belong to a statistically homogeneous population representing the base
process of the Gumbel distribution of maxima. In order to test this hypothesis we investigated if
the peak factors observed can be assumed exponentially distributed; by producing an exponential
probability plot of the PF sampled variable (Figure 9). More in detail, assuming the PF random variable
as exponentially distributed, its non-exceedance probability distribution, p(PF) is:

p( PF ) = 1 e PF = 1 e e (10)

where e is the exponential distribution frequency factor and is the scale parameter of the exponential
distribution. Following the approach proposed by the Zhang et al. [21] the frequency factor of the
Gumbel distribution, p , may be calculated using the Equation (7) as follows:

PF/ 1 PF 1
p = r = r r (11)
1+ q 2 1+ q 2 1+ q 2
N N N

where p can be written also p = (PF ) with and parameters of the Gumbel distribution.
On the other hand, the Gumbel distribution is the extreme value distribution of the annual maxima
of a Poissonian number of independent and identically exponentially distributed random variables,
with the scale () parameter of Gumbel distribution equal to the scale parameter of the exponential
distribution [36]. Consequently, Equation (11) allows the evaluation of the scale parameter of the
exponential distribution hereafter reported:

1
= r (12)
1+ q 2
N
Water2017,9,96 12of14

Figure9.TheexponentialprobabilityplotofthePeakFactordistribution(diamondspoints)andthe
Figure 9. The exponential probability plot of the Peak Factor distribution (diamonds points) and the
linearregression(blackline).
linear regression (black line).

6.Conclusions
Thus, using Equations (10) and (12), the frequency factor of the exponential distribution e is
equalIn
to:this study, a water demand of 129 towns located in Puglia region (Southern Italy) was
investigatedusingtheavailableflowdata(characterizedbytimeseriesoflengthaboutsevendays)
collectedduringawaterlosscampaignfortherecoveryandrationalizationofdistributionnetworks.
Inparticular,theanalysiswasfocusedonthebehaviorofthepeakflowfactorsextractedfromthe
available time series respect to that investigated in recent papers. The analysis confirms what is
suggestedbyMilano[20]andAlvisietal.[29]:thatthereisagreateruniformityofthedailywater
consumptionduringthelastfiftyyears;thismayjustifypeakcoefficientvaluesratherlowand,atthe
Water 2017, 9, 96 12 of 14

PF
ln(1 p( PF )) = e = PF = r (13)
1+ q 2
N

Equation (13) allows for the evaluation of the PF probability distribution, p(PF), by filtering
the random variable from the influence of population. Looking at Figure 9, where the exponential
probability plot of the peak factor data is reported, it is possible to confirm the assumption that
the their distribution may be well represented by an exponential distribution. Apart from the
visual assessment of Figure 9, the goodness of fit to the linear regression (black line in Figure 9)
provides a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.97. Thus, demonstrating that by filtering the effect of
population of different towns, the randomly sampled peak factors can be ascribed to a unique regional
exponential distribution.

6. Conclusions
In this study, a water demand of 129 towns located in Puglia region (Southern Italy) was
investigated using the available flow data (characterized by time series of length about seven days)
collected during a water loss campaign for the recovery and rationalization of distribution networks.
In particular, the analysis was focused on the behavior of the peak flow factors extracted from the
available time series respect to that investigated in recent papers. The analysis confirms what is
suggested by Milano [20] and Alvisi et al. [29]: that there is a greater uniformity of the daily water
consumption during the last fifty years; this may justify peak coefficient values rather low and, at the
same time the poor representativeness of some literature expressions, normally suggested by technical
manuals, that may lead to unnecessary oversizing of urban water networks supply.
The magnitude of peak factor, as shown by data exploited in this study, is considerably lower
than literature values, especially for small towns. In detail, comparing peak factors measured with
literature values it can be concluded that literature formulas overestimate the peak factor in 99% to
100% of the observed cases (Table 5). The same table shows also the average and maximum value of
overestimation for each of the considered literature expressions. The magnitude of overestimation for
the small towns amounts from 3.83 for Gifft formula to 3.09 for the Harmon formula with intermediate
values for Babbit and Zhang formulas.

Table 5. Overestimation of peak hour factor using literature formulas.

Babbitt Gifft Harmon Zhang

Overestimated data 99.22% 100.00% 99.22% 100.00%
Average overestimation 1.98 2.13 1.84 2.07
Maximum overestimation 3.76 3.83 3.09 3.48

Available data allow the analysis of the daily, weekly, and seasonal variation of the peak coefficient
for the Puglia region leading to a definition of a relationship between the number of inhabitants and the
above mentioned peak factor. The proposed relationship is in agreement with recent Italian technical
literature reporting measurements of flow data even if at the moment international literature does
not report experimental analysis useful to test the validity of the proposed formula. An interesting
outcome of this study is that the design of water supply network is possible without considering the
use of monthly and weekly peak factors, since the current water demands appear no more sensitive to
these variations.

Acknowledgments: Thanks to Acquedotto Pugliese S.p.A. for data provided and its collaboration.
Author Contributions: Gabriella Balacco and Alberto Ferruccio Piccinni conceived the study. Antonio Carbonara
provided data. Gabriella Balacco and Andrea Gioia did the computation. Gabriella Balacco, Antonio Carbonara,
Andrea Gioia and Vito Iacobellis analyzed the data and performed the analysis. Gabriella Balacco and
Andrea Gioia drafted the manuscript. Vito Iacobellis and Alberto Ferruccio Piccinni revised the manuscript.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Water 2017, 9, 96 13 of 14

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
1. Gargano, R.; Di Palma, F.; De Marinis, G.; Granata, F.; Greco, R. A stochastic approach for the water demand
of residential end users. Urban Water J. 2016, 13, 569582. [CrossRef]
2. Apollonio, C.; Balacco, G.; Fontana, N.; Giugni, M.; Marini, G.; Piccinni, A.F. Hydraulic transients caused by
air expulsion during rapid filling of undulating pipelines. Water 2016, 8, 25. [CrossRef]
3. Haque, M.M.; Egodawatta, P.; Rahman, A.; Goonetilleke, A. Assessing the significance of climate and
community factors on urban water demand. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 2015, 4, 222230. [CrossRef]
4. Gurung, T.R.; Stewart, R.A.; Beal, C.D.; Sharma, A.K. Smart meter enabled informatics for economically
efficient diversified water supply infrastructure planning. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 10231033. [CrossRef]
5. Chang, H.; Praskievicz, S. Sensitivity of urban water consumption to weather and climate variability at
multiple temporal scales: The case of Portland, Oregon. Int. J. Geospat. Environ. Res. 2014, 1, 7.
6. Beal, C.; Stewart, R.A. Identifying Residential Water End-Uses Underpinning Peak Day and Peak Hour
Demand. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2014, 140. [CrossRef]
7. Fair, G.M.; Geyer, J.C. Elements of Water Supply and Waste-Water Disposal; John Wiley&Sons Inc.: London,
UK, 1958.
8. Al Layla, M.A.; Ahamd, S.; Middlebrooks, E.J. Water Supply Engineering Design; Ann Arbor Science Publishers
Inc.: Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Belford, UK, 1977; pp. 1284.
9. Barnes, D.; Bliss, P.J.; Gould, B.W.; Vallentine, H.R. Water and Wastewater Engineering Systems; Pitman Books
Ltd.: London, UK, 1981.
10. Adams, R.W. The Analysis of Distribution Systems. Inst. Water Eng. 1961, 15, 415428.
11. Linaweaver, F.P.; Geyer, J.C.; Wolff, J.B. A Study of Residential Water Use; John Hopkins University: Baltimore,
MD, USA, 1967.
12. Gomella, C.; Guerre, H. La Distribution DeauDans Les Agglomrations Urbaines et Rurales; Editions Eyrolles:
Paris, France, 1970.
13. Harmon, W.G. Forecasting sewage at Toledo under dry weather conditions. Eng. News Rec. 1918, 80, 1233.
14. Babbitt, H.E. Sewerage and Sewage Treatment, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1928; pp. 2033.
15. Department of Environment and Conservation, Water Resources Management Division. Guidelines for the
Design, Construction, and Operation of Water and Sewerage Systems; Newfoundland and Labrador Department:
St. Johns, NL, Canada, 2005.
16. Metcalf, L.; Eddy, H.P. American Sewerage Practice, Volume III: Design of Sewers, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill:
New York, NY, USA, 1935; Volume I.
17. Johnson, C.F. Relation between average and extreme sewage flow rates. Eng. News Rec. 1942, 129, 500501.
18. Gifft, H.M. Estimating Variations in Domestic Sewage Flows. Water Works Sewerage 1945, 92, 175177.
19. Ippolito, G. Appunti di Costruzioni Idrauliche; Liguori Editore: Napoli, Italy, 1993; pp. 155158. (In Italian)
20. Milano, V. Acquedotti; Hoepli: Milan, Italy, 1996; pp. 1925. (In Italian)
21. Zhang, X.; Buchberger, S.; Van Zyl, J. A theoretical explanation for peaking factors. In Proceedings of the
ASCE EWRI Conferences, Anchorage, AK, USA, 1519 May 2005.
22. De Marinis, G.; Gargano, R.; Leopardi, A.; Tricarico, C. La richiesta di portata per piccoli agglomerati
residenziali. In Proceedings of the 23rd Convegno Di Idraulica E Costruzioni Idrauliche, Trento, Italy,
710 September 2004. (In italian)
23. Buchberger, S.G.; Wells, G.J. Intensity, duration and frequency of residential water demands. J. Water Resour.
Plan. Manag. 1996, 122, 1119. [CrossRef]
24. Blokker, E.J.M.; Vreeburg, J.H.G.; Van Dijk, J.C. Simulating residential water demand with a stochastic
end-use model. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2010, 136, 1926. [CrossRef]
25. Tricarico, C.; De Marinis, G.; Gargano, R.; Leopardi, A. Peak residential water demand. Water Manag. 2007,
160, 115121. [CrossRef]
26. De Marinis, G.; Gargano, R.; Leopardi, A. Un laboratorio di campo per il monitoraggio di una rete idrica:
Richieste di portataPrimi risultati. In Proceedings of the La Ricerca Delle Perdite e La Gestione Delle Reti
di Acquedotto, Perugia, Italy, 26 September 2003. (In italian)
Water 2017, 9, 96 14 of 14

27. Gato-Trinidad, S.; Gan, K. Characterizing maximum residential water demand. Urban Water 2012, 15.
[CrossRef]
28. Molino, B.; Rasulo, G.; Taglialatela, L. Campagna di acquisizione dati per due complessi residenziali di
tipologia diversa: Determinazione della dotazione e del coefficiente di punta. In Proceedings of the XXI
Convegno Di Idraulica E Costruzioni Idrauliche, LAquila, Italy, 58 September 1988.
29. Alvisi, S.; Franchini, M.; Marinelli, A. Analisi statistica dei coefficienti orari e giornalieri della richiesta
idrica nelle reti acquedottistiche. In Proceedings of the 28th Convegno di Idraulica e Costruzioni Idrauliche,
Potenza, Italy, 1619 September 2002. (In Italian)
30. De Marinis, G.; Gargano, R.; Tricarico, C. Water models for a small number of users. In Proceedings of the
8th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symposium, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2730 August 2006.
31. Cole, G.; Stewart, R.A. Smart meter enabled disaggregation of urban peak water demand: Precursor to
effective urban water planning. Urban Water J. 2013, 10, 174194. [CrossRef]
32. Johnson, E. Degree of utilizationThe reciprocal of the peak factor. Its application in the operation of a
water supply and distribution system. Water SA 1999, 25, 111114.
33. Chow, V.T.; Maidment, D.R.; Mays, L.W. Applied Hydrology; McGraw-Hill Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1988;
p. 572.
34. Ermini, R.; Viparelli, R.; Silvagni, G. Il sistema idrico Basento-Camastra, Il servizio allutenza. In Proceedings
of the Sistemi Idropotabili Integrati, Bologna, Italy, 2122 November 1995. (In Italian)
35. Margaritora, G.; Moriconi, P. Consumi idropotabili del comune di Roma. In Proceedings of the La Conoscenza
Dei Consumi Per Una Migliore Gestione Delle Infrastrutture Acquedottistiche, Sorrento, Italy, 911 April
1990; pp. 175188. (In Italian)
36. Rossi, F.; Versace, P. Criteri e metodi per lanalisi statistica delle piene. Valutazione Delle Piene. CNR-Progetto
Finalizzato Conservazione Suolo 1982, 165, 63130. (In Italian)

2017 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).