Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Philosophy of Education
March 21st
Essentialism in Teaching
Throughout elementary and middle school, I thought all teachers were out to get
all of the students. Many of my teachers were not interested in the well being of the
students. The start of high school was approaching quickly and was not looking forward
to the whole experience. The first period I was introduced to the American Government
teacher, Mr. Mason. He reassured the whole class that high school is not like the
movies and he would make learning about the past a blast. Throughout the day, many
teachers explained themselves and their classes but none of them compared to first
period. Mr. Mason was on a mission to educate all of his students in more than just
history.
Mr. Mason was also the offensive coach for football and the head track and field
coach. He was on a mission to teach kids more than when America became a country.
He taught hard work and the values of being a student athlete. Watching Mason do
what he loved and how he change a kids life just by being a small part of it, made me
consider teaching. It wasnt till my senior year when I job shadowed for seventh grade
science until realized how teaching can be beneficial for both the students and the
teachers. So I see myself as a teacher who helps kids understand the material in class
but also helps them learn things they can use outside of the classroom. My classroom
will take after a traditional desk and whiteboard classroom. With technology today,
there's a good chance there will be a smartboard in the room as well. But I have been in
classrooms with bean bags and comfy chairs. All they seemed to do was distract the
kids from the material they should be learning and get them into unnecessary trouble.
Discipline kids within the classroom has changed over the years, I dont believe that
disciplines the kids will do anything. Talking to the kid after class, or even telling the
parents about them is about I will do. If it gets worse than I'll let the principle deal with
the student. Since my classroom will be very basic, many people could say I'm an old
school teacher. Even my teaching philosophy is old school. After taking the test I scored
knowledge and skills exist that all people should possess (Kauchak 155).
The curriculum should be covered in the classroom, but within the curriculum it
should cover the students social, emotional, intellectual and physical development.
Considering that history is made everyday, it should cover current events just as much
as past events. I believe that all students should walk out of the classroom with a
does to much then you get away the curriculum. The curriculum I support is the null
curriculum. Even in our textbook it says most history teachers support this type because
it lets them choose which parts of history they choose to teach. The no child left behind
act also affects the null curriculum (Kauchak 286-7). The act made each state create its
own testing system to make sure all of the students know the information for the next
grade level. For example, Wyoming created the PAWS test (Wyoming Board of
Education). They don't test social studies but essentialism philosophy includes it so I
I believe students learn best when they are taught under certain conditions and in
certain ways. Some of these ways are presentations and group projects. History can be
very interesting but only if you teach or even chose how to present it. My experience
with all history teachers have been powerpoint presentations and taking notes over
them. I thought this was hard to retain information, so when Mr. Mason would read or
even give us the topic of the civil war and let us do a reenactment of the war. It stuck in
my head that the war started in April and why it started. With different subject it might be
easier for students to just listen to a lecture and take notes but for history I felt like it was
easier have a more hands on learning style. With the hands on learning style, it gives
the students something to look forward too. It gives everyone a chance to get involved
in the project and present their perception of how history happened. Essentialism wants
to get "back to the basics" and have skills that will prepare the student for the real world.
History is hard because the class is based on the past, but I could teach the students to
I believe that students change based on their knowledge of the subject. For
example, in any history class I could speak up and answer the questions. But in math or
English, I would sink in my seat even if I knew the answer. So I think students need to
walk into the classroom feeling comfortable, this would eliminate passive learners. Even
if it takes having the teacher calling on them. When I become a teacher I want students
to be able to participate in classroom discussion and know they are welcome to say
whatever they want. With a classroom like this, I understand that some issues will come
up but thats part of them knowing their roles within the classroom. But I believe that
being comfortable and active in the classroom can help the learning process of all the
students.
Going from hating teachers to finding one who motivated me and created such a
passion for helping others. Mr. Mason might have had a different type of curriculum and
philosophy but he showed me that being a teacher is something that change you as a
essentialism philosophy. I think the type of learning style and classroom environment I
will have will help me get the most success out of my students. One day I hope to
inspire my students like Mr. Mason did and teach them more than just the world's
history.
Sources
http://edu.wyoming.gov/educators/assessment/paws/