Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Constitutional Issues
Colton Green
Imagine sitting at home watching the endless gossip that loiters about your local
news channel. It's raining outside, the fire is crackling, and your dog is snoring at your
feet. Suddenly, the peaceful atmosphere is interrupted. You tune in on what the
anchorman is saying. Horrified, you learn about the death of an innocent prison guard at
Graterford prison. You continue to listen only to be acknowledged that this murderer was
already serving life in prison for a triple murder; the murder of two infants, and an elderly
woman. Slapping your head in anger and frustration, you know that the life of the
innocent prison guard could have been saved if originally the cold blooded murderer
swallows you, and you began to wonder why a murderer could get away with such
crimes, four different times. For reasons such as these, the death penalty is constitutional
murder. Countless criminals have been convicted of murder, sentenced to life in prison,
and murdered again. Take Arthur James Julius for example. Julius was found guilty of
murder and sentenced to life in prison. He was given a brief leave from prison in 1978, in
which Julius committed yet another crime, the rape and murder of his cousin. Julius was
sentenced to death and was finally executed November 17th, 1989. The innocent life that
was taken by Julius’ second murder would have been saved, if Arthur James Julius would
have originally been sentenced to death for his first murder. Formerly, Opal Cooper was
an innocent elderly woman who was murdered in August 1974. Her murderer was
Howard Allen who was found guilty and sentenced to 21 years in prison. Howard Allen
was then released January 1985, less then ten years after being incarnated. On July 14th
Constitutional Issues 3
1987, at lunchtime, Ernestine Griffin was found murdered. On June 11th 1988 Howard
Allen was found guilty of Ernestine’s murder. But, six weeks previous to Ernestine’s
murder, Allen had struck again, breaking into the home of eighty-seven year old Laverne
Hale, viciously beating her to death. In 1994, a criminal was already serving two life
sentences, when sentenced to three more, after stabbing three prison guards. On October
22nd, 1983, two separate inmates who were both serving life sentences, in two different
instances murdered two prison guards at the federal penitentiary, in Marion, Illinois. “On
November 9, 1983 Associate U.S. Attorney General D. Lowell Jensen told a Senate
subcommittee that it is impossible to punish or even deter such prison murders because,
without a death sentence, a violent life-termed inmate has free rein ‘to continue to murder
as opportunity and his perverse motives dictate.’” (Lowe, W. (1996). How many more
innocent lives should be risked, giving cold hearted murderers more chances?
people that killing is wrong, by killing them.” This is most certainly not true. To “kill” is
lawful, malicious, killing of another human being under conditions specifically covered
in law”. Capitol punishment is taking the life of a murderer who took the live(s) of
innocent people, to furthermore protect innocent people and to show people that murder
is wrong. The death penalty is not murder because it is lawful. Is rape the same as love-
making? Neither is assault and self-defense? When two actions have the same outcome,
doesn’t mean they have the same intention. The end result of both killing and murder is
an automatic response, if, when under attack, you do whatever is possible to protect
yourself. If lethal force is expectable in self-defense at the moment of an attack, then why
is it not ok, after the fact, for prevention of further victimization of innocence? When
probing these similar moral implications how could one possibly stipulate that the death
The framers of the constitution were clearly not referring to the death penalty as
cruel and unusual punishment when writing the 8th amendment. As a matter of fact, they
supported capitol punishment. The death penalty was practiced regularly during the time
that the 8th amendment was written. They even constructed laws to carry it out. As Justice
Antonin Scalia put it… “The Fifth Amendment provides that ‘no persons shall be held to
answer for a capital… crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of Grand Jury… nor
be deprived of life… without the due process of law.’ This clearly permits the death
penalty to be imposed, and establishes beyond doubt that the death penalty is not on of
the ‘cruel and unusual punishments’ prohibited by the eighth amendment.” – Justice
Antonin Scalia. (Camical, C.) Take note of: “…a capital, or otherwise infamous
crime…”, “…be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb…”, “…nor be deprived of the life…
May it be, because of the definitions of words that make up the death penalty,
because it’s a deterrent to murder, or because self-defense justifies the matter. Next time
you are sitting at home enjoying the quite, safe atmosphere of your living room, let us
hope that following the ill-fated event of a murder, that it will never be followed by a
Work Cited
http://www.prodeathpenalty.com
How Lethal injection works. (1998). Retrieved February 9th, 2010 from
http://www.howstuffworks.com/lethal-injection.htm
Introduction to the death penalty. (n.d.). Retrieved February 4th, 2010 from
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/part-i-history-death-penalty
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_injection
Lowe, W. (1996). Pro capital punishment. Retrieved February 9th, 2010 from
http://www.wesleylowe.com/cp.html