The issues that being present on the article is Whether curfew law should be necessary

or not. The curfew law is being apply to everyone who under the age of 17 to stay at home
from 11:00 p.m until 6:00 in the morning whether it is on weekdays, or weekends.

In the article, the author oppose the idea the implication of the curfew law.

The first type of support found in the article is research finding which appear in
paragraph 2, line 9 to 10. The example of research finding in the article is the word According
to one recent study, 146 of the countrys 200 major cities, almost 75% impose curfews of some
sort of minors

The second type of support found in the article is statistics which appear in paragraph 5,
line 35-37. The example of statistic found in the article is In Houston, a curfew was introduced
and youth crime went down by 22%. But in New York, where no curfews exists, youth crime
went down by 30%.

The first type of support is relevance to the topic as the study shows that study have been
conducted show most country oppose the idea of curfews.

The second type of support is relevance to the topic as the percentage of crime rates drops
when there is no curfews law exists.

The authors argument is valid because it is logical and well-reasoned. This shows in
paragraph 5, line 35-37 which is In Houston, a curfew was introduced and youth crime went
down by 22%. But in New York, where no curfews exists, youth crime went down by 30%.

The authors argument has objectivity as the support consists of clear evidence. For
example the author presents his or her argument by using research finding and statistics.

The article is complete as the author present adequate support. The curfews law need to
be abolished because it brings more harm than good for the teenagers. Teenagers also deserved a
freedom as an adults do. Preventing a juvenile crime by introducing curfews law is a good effort
but most crimes is committed by adults.

Based on paragraph 5, we can conclude that implying the curfews for children in a
society is not going to help preventing crimes among children. Furthermore, it brings more
negative effect towards them instead of positive effect.

Based on paragraph 10, we can also conclude that curfews should not be apply to only
children but to adults also, it is because most of the adults are the one who does not obey the
rules and increase the crime rates not children.