Reviewer ID :

EVALUATION FORM FOR PAPER OF CONFERENCE OF INDONESIAN STUDENTS ASSOCIATION IN

SOUTH KOREA (CISAK) 2017

Paper ID:

Paper Title (at least the first four-words of paper title should be written):

Dear reviewers,
This form is consisted of three sections in two pages. First, please fill your identity and date at the top of this page,
followed by paper code and title. In this form, you are kindly asked to evaluate the paper article at hand based on
a number of criteria, and then give some additional comments and recommendation.

Section A. Evaluation on Criteria Basis

Please write your evaluation based on provided criteria below. In the column of notes, you may fill with (i) direct
short comments, or (ii) Ref.No., which refer to additional comment in Section Below (Section B). For example, you
may fill notes with "see Ref.No.1" in the notes column and correspond criteria, and write the detail of comments
in the next section B.

Criteria No. Description Pass without Notes

revision ? (Comments or Ref.
Yes No No.)
Title 1 Title is written to the point; reflects the content of
paper.
Abstract 2 Abstract contains sufficient overview, generic steps and
result.
3 Precise keywords are provided to represent content of
paper.
Body of Paper 4 The background demonstrates clear relationships of the
problems. The states of prior art are introduced well
with sufficient, latest, important topic of original
sources.
5 The paper clearly states research question(s), novelty
and statement why the question(s) is/are interesting.
Research objective then derived to respond the
question(s). Hypothesis and scope, if any, is stated
unambiguously
6 Appropriate methods and instruments for data
collection are explained in brief. The reliability and
validity of the instruments and data have been
demonstrated
7 Appropriate, correct and rigorous analyses are provided
to answer the research question(s). Technical language
and correct symbols have been used
8 Analysis results have been reported with accurate
interpretation and sound discussion. Proper evaluation
is performed regarding deviation of analysis result or
different with similar studies (if any).
Conclusion 9 Logical conclusion has been drawn concisely to
 summarize the study and describe implication of
research
References 10 References are arranged in alphabetical order and
standardized format. All reference list are cited or
quoted in the paper.
Picture 11 Images are shown effectively to point out specific
issues.
Table 12 Tables are presented informatively, compact.
Organization 13 Paper flows systematically and is easy to follow,
readability. Any terms and symbols are defined
explicitly
14 Formal, technical and academic language is used and
free from typographical as well as grammatical error.
Ethical Issue 15 Statement of paper does not excessively rely on
references (plagiarism prevention).
16 For any images or tables taken from other works,
permission and or original source is mentioned
17 No violation on corresponding accepted norm and
related legal rights are detected

Section B. Additional Comments

Please put your additional comments supported with specific location of words, sentences, image, table or
paragraph in the paper which you refer to. You may use new sheet with similar table format to write more
comments.

Ref. Location (Page, Section, Line) Comment

No.

Section C. Recommendation
For each number 1-3, please put one mark v or x within bracket [ ] to represent your recommendation.
1. Paper Acceptance 2. Recommendation Level for Best 3. Need second round (last) review?
[ ] Accepted without revision Paper Award [ ] Yes
[ ] Accepted with revision [ ] Not recommended [ ] No
[ ] Rejected for reason below [ ] High
[ ] Very High
4. Remark/Reason (if rejected):

Thank you very much for your valuable support to review this paper
p.s
Please send it back this review form to committee (cisak@cisak.perpika.kr) as pdf version.