Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CHAPTER 6
Aggregates for Concrete
95
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:27 PM Page 96
Table 6-1. Rock and Mineral Constituents in Aggregates Lightwieght aggregates of expanded shale, clay, slate,
and slag (Figure 6-3) are used to produce structural light-
Minerals Igneous rocks Metamorphic rocks
weight concrete with a freshly mixed density ranging
Silica Granite Marble from about 1350 kg/m3 to 1850 kg/m3 (90 lb/ft3 to
Quartz Syenite Metaquartzite 120 lb/ft3). Other lightweight materials such as pumice,
Opal Diorite Slate scoria, perlite, vermiculite, and diatomite are used to
Chalcedony Gabbro Phyllite produce insulating lightweight concretes ranging in
Tridymite Peridotite Schist density from about 250 kg/m3 to 1450 kg/m3 (15 lb/ft3
Cristobalite Pegmatite Amphibolite to 90 lb/ft3). See Bohan and Ries (2008) and Chapter 20
Silicates Volcanic glass Hornfels for more information on lightweight aggregates.
Feldspars Obsidian Gneiss
Ferromagnesian Pumice Serpentinite Heavyweight materials such as barite, limonite, magne-
Hornblende Tuff tite, ilmenite, hematite, iron, and steel punchings or shot
Augite Scoria are used to produce heavyweight concrete and radiation-
Clay Perlite shielding concrete (ASTM C637, Standard Specification for
Illites Pitchstone Aggregates for Radiation-Shielding Concrete, and ASTM
Kaolins Felsite C638, Standard Descriptive Nonmenclature of Constituents of
Chlorites Basalt Aggregates for Radiation-Shielding Concrete). Heavyweight
Montmorillonites aggregates produce concretes ranging in density from
Sedimentary rocks
Mica 2900 kg/m3 to 6100 kg/m3 (180 lb/ft3 to 380 lb/ft3).
Zeolite Conglomerate
Carbonate Sandstone This chapter focuses on normalweight aggregates.
Calcite Quartzite Normalweight aggregates for use in concrete include
Dolomite Graywacke natural aggregate, manufactured aggregate, recycled-
Sulfate Subgraywacke concrete aggregate, and marine-dredged aggregate.
Gypsum Arkose
Anhydrite Claystone, siltstone,
Iron sulfide argillite, and shale
Pyrite Carbonates
Marcasite Limestone
Pyrrhotite Dolomite
Iron oxide Marl
Magnetite Chalk
Hematite Chert
Goethite
Ilmenite
Limonite Figure 6-3. Lightweight aggregate. Expanded clay (left) and expanded
shale (right).
For brief descriptions, see Standard Descriptive Nomenclature for
Constituents of Concrete Aggregates (ASTM C294).
Natural Aggregate
Aggregate Classification Gravel and sand are often a mixture of several minerals
or rocks. Natural gravel and sand are usually dug or
dredged from a pit, river, lake, or seabed. Weathering and
Aggregates are classified into three categories: normal-
erosion of rocks produces particles of stone, gravel, sand,
weight, lightweight, and heavyweight. The approximate
silt, and clay. Some natural aggregate deposits of gravel
bulk density of aggregate commonly used in normal
and sand can be readily used in concrete with minimal
weight concrete ranges from about 1200 kg/m3 to 1750
processing.
kg/m3 (75 lb/ft3 to 110 lb/ft3) while lightweight concrete
aggregates range from 560 kg/m3 to 1120 kg/m3 (35 lb/ft3 The quality (or soundness) of natural aggregate depends
to 70 lb/ft3), and heavyweight aggregates is typically over on the bedrock from which the particles were derived and
2100 kg/m3 (130 lb/ft3). the mechanism by which they were transported. Sand and
gravel derived from igneous and metamorphic rocks tend
The most commonly used normalweight aggregates-
to be sound, while sand and gravel derived from rocks
sand, gravel, and crushed stone, produce freshly mixed
rich in shale and siltstone are more likely to be unsound.
normalweight concrete with a density (unit weight) of
Natural aggregate deposited at higher elevations from
2200 kg/m3 to 2400 kg/m3 (140 lb/ft3 to 150 lb/ft3).
glaciers may be superior to deposits in low areas. This is
96
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 97
because rock located high in an ice sheet has been carried procedure involves demolishing and removing the exist-
from higher, more mountainous areas, which tend to con- ing concrete, crushing the material in primary and
sist of hard, sound rocks. Sand and gravel that have been secondary crushers (Figure 6-4), removing reinforcing
smoothed by prolonged agitation in water usually are steel and other embedded items, grading and washing,
considered higher quality because they are harder and and stockpiling the resulting coarse and fine aggregate
have a more rounded shape than less abraded sand and (Figure 6-5) (ACI 555R-01). Dirt, gypsum board, wood,
gravel. However, the smooth surface of natural gravels and other foreign materials should be prevented from
can reduce the bond strength with the cement paste and contaminating the final product.
reduce overall concrete strength.
Recycled concrete is simply old concrete that has been
Manufactured Aggregate crushed to produce aggregate. Recycled-concrete aggre-
Manufactured aggregate (including manufactured sand) gate (RCA) is primarily used in pavement reconstruction.
is produced by crushing sound parent rock (igneous, It has been satisfactorily used as aggregate in granular
sedimentary, or metamorphic) at stone crushing plants. subbases, lean-concrete subbases, soil-cement, and in new
Crushed air-cooled blast-furnace slag is also used as fine concrete as the primary source of aggregate or as a partial
or coarse aggregate. replacement of new aggregate.
97
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 98
98
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 99
The presence of chlorides may affect the concrete by: Characteristics of Aggregates
(1) altering the time of set, (2) increasing drying shrinkage,
(3) significantly increasing the risk of corrosion of steel The important characteristics of aggregates for concrete are
reinforcement, and (4) causing efflorescence. Generally, listed in Table 6-2. Normal-weight aggregates should meet
marine aggregates containing large amounts of chloride the requirements of ASTM C33, Standard Specification for
should not be used in reinforced concrete. To reduce the Concrete Aggregates, or AASHTO M 6, Standard Specifica-
chloride content, marine-dredged aggregates can be tion for Fine Aggregate for Hydraulic Cement Concrete or
washed with fresh water. AASHTO M 80, Standard Specification for Coarse Aggregate
* The majority of the tests and characteristics listed are referenced in ASTM C33 (AASHTO M 6/M 80). ACI 221R-96 presents additional test
methods and properties of concrete influenced by aggregate characteristics.
99
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 100
Grading
Grading is the particle-size distribution of an aggregate as
determined by a sieve analysis (ASTM C136 or AASHTO
T 27). The range of particle sizes in aggregate is illustrated
in Figure 6-8. The aggregate particle size is determined
using wire-mesh sieves with square openings. The seven
standard ASTM C33 (AASHTO M 6/M 80) sieves for fine
aggregate have openings ranging from 150 m to 9.5 mm Figure 6-9. Making a sieve analysis test of coarse aggregate in a
(No. 100 sieve to 38 in.). The 13 standard sieves for coarse laboratory.
aggregate have openings ranging from 1.18 mm to 100 mm
(0.046 in. to 4 in.). Tolerances for the dimensions of open-
100
ings in sieves are listed in ASTM E11 (AASHTO M 92).
ate
highway construction, ASTM D448 (AASHTO M 43) lists
san
60
reg
e
gg
ea
es
o. 5 gate
Fin
ars
e
7
Siz aggr
particle sizes for general construction and highway work.
eN
The grading and grading limits are usually expressed as rse
Coa
20
the percentage of material passing each sieve. Figure 6-10 Optional,
shows these limits for fine aggregate and for one specific see text
Figure 6-10. Curves indicate the limits specified in ASTM C33 for fine
aggregate and for one commonly used size number (grading size) of
coarse aggregate.
100
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 101
In general, aggregates that do not have a large deficiency Other requirements of ASTM C33 (AASHTO M 6) for fine
or excess of any size and give a smooth grading curve will aggregates include:
produce the most satisfactory results. ASTM C33 allows for 1. The fine aggregate must not have more than 45%
the use of aggregates with gradings falling outside the retained between any two consecutive standard
specification limits provided it can be shown that good sieves.
quality concrete can be produced from those aggregates.
2. The fineness modulus (FM) must be not less than
Fine-Aggregate Grading. Requirements of ASTM C33 or 2.3 or more than 3.1, and not vary more than 0.2
AASHTO M 6/M 43 permit a relatively wide range in fine- from the average value of the aggregate source being
aggregate gradation, but specifications by other organiza- tested. If this value is outside the required 2.3 to 3.1
tions are sometimes more restrictive. The most desirable range, the fine aggregate should be rejected unless
fine-aggregate grading depends on the type of application, suitable adjustments are made in proportions of fine
the paste content, and the maximum size of coarse aggre- and coarse aggregate. If the FM varies by more than
gate. In leaner mixtures, or when small-size coarse aggre- 0.2 adjustments may need to be made with regard to
gates are used, a grading that approaches the maximum coarse and fine aggregate proportions as well as the
recommended percentage passing each sieve is desirable water requirements for the concrete mixture.
for workability. In general, if the water-cement ratio is kept 3. The amounts of fine aggregate passing the 300 m
constant and the ratio of fine-to-coarse aggregate is suitable, (No. 50) and 150 m (No. 100) sieves affect work-
a wide range in grading can be used without measurable ability, surface texture, air content, and bleeding of
effect on strength. However, the best economy will some- concrete. Most specifications allow 5% to 30% to pass
times be achieved by adjusting the concrete mixture pro- the 300 m (No. 50) sieve. The lower limit may be
portions to suit the gradation of the local aggregates. sufficient for easy placing conditions or where con-
crete is mechanically finished, such as in pavements.
Fine-aggregate grading within the limits of ASTM C33
However, for hand-finished concrete floors, or where
(AASHTO M 6) is generally satisfactory for most concretes.
a smooth surface texture is desired, fine aggregate
The ASTM C33 (AASHTO M 6) limits with respect to sieve
with at least 15% passing the 300 m (No. 50) sieve
size are shown in Table 6-3.
and 3% or more passing the 150 m (No. 100) sieve
should be used.
Table 6-3. Fine-Aggregate Grading Limits (ASTM C33/AASHTO M 6)
101
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010)
Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures EB001
Table 6-4. Grading Requirements for Coarse Aggregates (ASTM C33 and AASHTO M 80)
1/27/11
(31 2 to 11 2 in.)
2:28 PM
3 50 to 25 mm 100 90 to 100 35 to 70 0 to 15 0 to 5
(2 to 1 in.)
Page 102
(2 in. to No. 4)
for the same water-cement ratio: typically concrete with a applies to the collective amount of aggregate that passes
smaller maximum-size aggregate will have a higher com- through an assortment of sieves. As shown in Table 6-4,
pressive strength. This is especially true for high-strength the amount of aggregate passing the respective sieves is
concrete. The optimum maximum size of coarse aggregate given in percentages; it is called a sieve analysis.
for higher strength depends on factors such as relative
strength of the cement paste, paste-aggregate bond, and Maximum Size vs. Nominal Maximum Size Aggregate.
strength of the aggregate particles. Often there is confusion surrounding the term maximum
size of aggregate. ASTM C125, Standard Terminology
Maximum nominal size of aggregate, in. Relating to Concrete and Concrete Aggregates, defines this
3/16 3/8 1/2 3/4 1 11/2 2 3 43/8 term and distinguishes it from nominal maximum size
300 500 of aggregate. The maximum size of an aggregate is the
smallest sieve that all of a particular aggregate must pass
through (100% passing). The nominal maximum size of
Non-air-entrained concrete 400
an aggregate is the smallest sieve size through which the
200
major portion of the aggregate must pass (typically 85%
to 95% passing). The nominal maximum-size sieve may
Water, kg/m3
Water, lb/yd3
300
retain 5% to 15% of the aggregate depending on the size
number. For example, aggregate size number 67 has a
Air-entrained concrete
200 maximum size of 25 mm (1 in.) and a nominal maximum
100 size of 19 mm (34 in.) [90% to 100% of this aggregate must
pass the 19-mm (34-in.) sieve and all of the particles must
100 pass the 25-mm (1-in.) sieve].
Slump approximately 75 mm (3 in.)
w/c ratio: 0.54 by mass The maximum size of aggregate that can be used gen-
0 0 erally depends on the size and shape of the concrete
450 member and on the amount and distribution of rein-
forcing steel (Figure 6-12). Requirements for limits on
700
nominal maximum size of aggregate particles are covered
400
by ACI 318 (ACI 318-08). The nominal maximum size of
Non-air-entrained concrete aggregate should not exceed:
600
Cement, kg/m3
Cement, lb/yd3
103
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 104
paste content
Resulting
Figure 6-13. For equal absolute volumes when different sizes are combined, the void-content decreases, thus the necessary paste content
decreases.
*This effect is independent of aggregate size. The voids are smaller, but the volume of voids is nearly the same (and high) when a single-size fine
aggregate is used compared to a coarse aggregate. For the idealized case of spheres, the void volume is about 36% regardless of the size of
particles.
104
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 105
Figure 6-15 illustrates a theoretical ideal uniform grada- Studies by the NRMCA (2007) have indicated that some
tion (well-graded aggregate). Well-graded aggregate, grading distributions that are not well graded can actually
having a balanced variety of sizes, maximizes the aggre- outperform well-graded aggregate blends. Particle shape
gate volume to the greatest extent. Sometimes mid-sized and texture can impact concrete performance. If problems
aggregate, around 9.5 mm (3 8 in.) in size, is lacking in an develop due to a poor gradation, alternative aggregates,
aggregate supply, resulting in a concrete with higher sand blending, or special screening of existing aggregates
and paste requirements. The higher sand and paste re- should be considered.
quirements may cause higher water demand; resulting in
Gap-Graded Aggregates. In gap-graded aggregates
poor workability, and possibly higher shrinkage. Strength
certain particle sizes are intentionally omitted. Typical
and durability may also be affected. Finer aggregates
gap-graded aggregates consist of only one size of coarse
require more paste because they have higher surface-to-
aggregate with all the particles of fine aggregate able to
volume ratios. Concrete mixtures that are well graded
pass through the voids in the compacted coarse aggregate.
generally will have less shrinkage and permeability, and
Gap-graded mixtures are used in architectural concrete
be more economical.
to obtain uniform textures in exposed-aggregate finishes.
They are also used in pervious concrete mixtures to im-
25 prove storm water management. They can also be used
in normal structural concrete to improve other concrete
20 properties and to permit the use of local aggregate gra-
dations (Houston 1962 and Litvin and Pfeifer 1965).
Percent retained
00
00
50
75
45
37.
25.
19.
12.
4.7
2.3
1.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
105
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 106
Air entrainment is usually required for workability since Particle Shape and Surface Texture
low-slump, gap-graded mixtures use a low fine aggregate The particle shape and surface texture of aggregate influ-
percentage and produce harsh mixes without entrained air. ence the fresh concrete properties more than the proper-
Segregation of gap-graded mixtures must be prevented by ties of hardened concrete. Rough-textured, angular,
restricting the slump to the lowest value consistent with elongated particles require more water to produce work-
good consolidation. This may vary from zero to 75 mm able concrete than do smooth, rounded, compact aggre-
(3 in.) depending on the thickness of the section, amount gates. In turn, aggregate particles that are angular require
of reinforcement, and height of placement. However, even more cement to maintain the same water-cementing mate-
low slump concrete has been known to segregate when rials ratio. Angular or poorly graded aggregates may also
exposed to vibration, such as in a dump truck during be more difficult to pump.
delivery. Close control of grading and water content is
Void contents of compacted fine or coarse aggregate can
also required because variations might cause segregation.
be used as an index of differences in the shape and texture
If a stiff mixture is required, gap-graded aggregates may
produce higher strengths than normal aggregates used of aggregates of the same grading. The mixing water and
with comparable cement contents. Because of their low cement requirement tend to increase as aggregate void
fine-aggregate volumes and low water-cement ratios, gap- content increases. Voids between aggregate particles
graded mixtures might be considered unworkable for increase with aggregate angularity.
some cast-in-place construction. When properly propor-
The bond between cement paste and a given aggregate
tioned, however, these concretes are readily consolidated
generally increases as particles change from smooth and
with vibration.
rounded to rough and angular. This increase in bond is a
Fineness Modulus. The fineness modulus (FM) of either consideration in selecting aggregates for concrete where
fine, coarse, or combined aggregate according to ASTM flexural strength is important or where high compressive
C125 is calculated by adding the cumulative percentages strength is needed.
by mass retained on each of a specified series of sieves
Flat and elongated aggregate particles should be avoided
and dividing the sum by 100. The specified sieves for
determining FM are: 150 m (No. 100), 300 m (No. 50), or at least limited to about 15% by mass of the total ag-
600 m (No. 30), 1.18 mm (No. 16), 2.36 mm (No. 8), 4.75 gregate. A particle is called flat and elongated when the
mm (No. 4), 9.5 mm (3 8 in.), 19.0 mm (3 4 in.), 37.5 mm ratio of length to thickness exceeds a specified value. See
(112 in.), 75 mm (3 in.) and, 150 mm (6 in.). ASTM D4791, Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elon-
gated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse
Fineness modulus is an index of the fineness of an aggre- Aggregate, for determination of flat, and/or elongated
gate. In general, the higher the FM, the coarser the aggre- particles. ASTM D3398, Standard Test Method for Index of
gate. However, different aggregate gradations may have Aggregate Particle Shape and Texture, provides an indirect
the same FM. The FM of fine aggregate is useful in mix- method of establishing a particle index as an overall
ture design calculations estimating the proportions of fine measure of particle shape or texture, while ASTM C295,
and coarse aggregates. An example of how the FM of a Standard Guide for Petrographic Examination of Aggregates
fine aggregate is determined (with an assumed sieve for Concrete, provides procedures for the petrographic
analysis) is shown in Table 6-5. examination of aggregate which includes evaluation of
particle shape and texture.
Table 6-5. Determination of Fineness Modulus of Fine Aggregates
A number of automated test machines are available for
Percentage
of individual Cumulative
rapid determination of the particle size distribution of
fraction Percentage percentage aggregate. These machines were designed to provide a
retained, passing, retained, faster alternative to the standard sieve analysis test. They
Sieve size by mass by mass by mass can capture and analyze digital images of the aggregate
9.5 mm (38 in.) 0 100 0 particles to determine gradation. Figure 6-16 shows a
4.75 mm (No. 4) 2 98 2 videograder that measures size and shape of an aggre-
2.36 mm (No. 8) 13 85 15 gate by using line-scan cameras wherein two-dimen-
1.18 mm (No. 16) 20 65 35 sional images are constructed from a series of line
600 m (No. 30) 20 45 55 images. Other machines use matrix-scan cameras to
300 m (No. 50) 24 21 79 capture two-dimensional snapshots of the falling aggre-
150 m (No. 100) 18 3 97 gate. Maerz and Lusher (2001) developed a dynamic
Pan 3 0 prototype imaging system that provides particle size
and shape information by using a miniconveyor system
Total 100 283
to parade individual fragments past two orthogonally
Fineness modulus oriented, synchronized cameras.
= 283 / 100 = 2.83
106
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 107
107
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 108
108
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 109
109
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 110
(AASTHO T 161). Deterioration is measured by (1) the Abrasion and Skid Resistance
reduction in the dynamic modulus of elasticity, (2) linear The abrasion resistance of an aggregate is often used as a
expansion, and (3) weight loss of the specimens. A failure general index of its quality. Abrasion resistance is essential
criterion of 0.035% expansion in 350 freeze-thaw cycles or when the aggregate is to be used in concrete subject to
less is used by a number of state highway departments to abrasion, as in heavy-duty floors or pavements. Low abra-
help indicate whether an aggregate is susceptible to D- sion resistance of an aggregate may increase the quantity
cracking. Different aggregate types may influence the cri- of fines in the concrete during mixing. Consequently, this
teria levels and empirical correlations between laboratory may increase the water requirement and require an adjust-
freeze-thaw tests. Field service records should be kept to ment in the water-cement ratio.
select the proper criterion (Vogler and Grove 1989).
The most common test for abrasion resistance is the Los
Specifications may require that the aggregates resistance Angeles abrasion test (rattler method) performed in accor-
to weathering be demonstrated by exposure to a sodium dance with ASTM C131, Standard Test Method for Resistance
sulfate or magnesium sulfate solution ASTM C88, Standard to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and
Test Method for Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Impact in the Los Angeles Machine (AASHTO T 96) or ASTM
Sulfate or Magnesium Sulfate or AASHTO T 104. The test C535, Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of
consists of a number of immersion cycles (wetting and Large-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los
drying) for a sample of the aggregate in a sulfate solution; Angeles Machine. In this test a specified quantity of aggre-
this cycling creates a pressure through salt-crystal growth gate is placed in a steel drum containing steel balls, the
drum is rotated, and the percentage of material worn away
in the aggregate pores similar to that produced by freez-
is measured. Specifications often set an upper limit on this
ing water. Upon completion of the cycling, the sample is
mass loss. However, a comparison of the results of aggre-
then oven dried and the percentage of weight loss calcu-
gate abrasion tests with the abrasion resistance of concrete
lated. Unfortunately, this test is sometimes misleading. made with the same aggregate do not generally show a
Aggregates behaving satisfactorily in the test might pro- clear correlation. Mass loss due to impact in the rattler is
duce concrete with low freeze-thaw resistance; conversely, often as much as the mass loss caused by abrasion. The
aggregates performing poorly might produce concrete wear resistance of concrete is determined more accurately
with adequate resistance. This is attributed, at least in by abrasion tests of the concrete itself (see Chapter 9).
part, to the fact that the aggregates in the test are not
confined by cement paste (as they would be in concrete) To provide good skid resistance on pavements, the sili-
and the mechanisms of attack are not the same as in ceous particle content of the fine aggregate should be at
freezing and thawing. The test is most reliable for strati- least 25%. For specification purposes, the siliceous particle
fied rocks with porous layers or weak bedding planes. content is considered equal to the insoluble residue con-
tent after treatment in hydrochloric acid under standard-
An additional test that can be used to evaluate aggregates ized conditions (ASTM D3042, Standard Test Method for
for potential D-cracking is the rapid pressure release Insoluble Residue in Carbonate Aggregates). Certain manu-
method. An aggregate is placed in a pressurized chamber factured sands produce slippery pavement surfaces and
and the pressure is rapidly released causing the aggregate should be investigated for acceptance before use.
with a questionable pore system to fracture (Janssen and
Snyder 1994). The amount of fracturing relates to the Strength and Shrinkage
potential for D-cracking. The strength of an aggregate is rarely tested and generally
does not influence the strength of conventional concrete as
Wetting and Drying Properties much as the strength of the paste and the paste-aggregate
Weathering due to wetting and drying can also affect the bond. However, aggregate strength does become important
durability of aggregates. The expansion and contraction in high-strength concrete. Aggregate stress levels in concrete
coefficients of rocks vary with temperature and moisture are often much higher than the average stress over the entire
cross section of the concrete. Aggregate tensile strengths
content. If alternate wetting and drying occurs, severe
range from 2 MPa to 15 MPa (300 psi to 2300 psi) and com-
strain can develop in some aggregates. With certain types
pressive strengths from 65 MPa to 270 MPa (10,000 psi to
of rock this can cause a permanent increase in the volume
40,000 psi). Strength can be tested according to ASTM C170.
of the concrete and eventual concrete deterioration. Clay
lumps and other friable particles can degrade rapidly with Different aggregate types have different compressibility,
repeated wetting and drying. Popouts can also develop modulus of elasticity, and moisture-related shrinkage
due to the moisture-swelling characteristics of certain characteristics that influence the same properties in con-
aggregates, especially clay balls and shales. An experi- crete. Aggregates with high absorption may have high
enced petrographer can assist in determining the potential shrinkage on drying. Quartz and feldspar aggregates, along
for this distress. with limestone, dolomite, and granite, are considered low
shrinkage aggregates; while aggregates with sandstone,
shale, slate, hornblende, and graywacke are often associ-
ated with high shrinkage in concrete (Figure 6-23).
110
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 111
Fire Resistance and Thermal Properties Clay lumps Affects work- ASTM C142 (AASHTO T 112)
and friable ability and
The fire resistance and thermal properties of concrete (con- particles durability, may
ductivity, diffusivity, and coefficient of thermal expansion) cause popouts
depend to some extent on the mineral constituents of the Chert of less Affects dura- ASTM C123 (AASHTO T 113)
aggregates used. Manufactured and some naturally occur- than 2.40 bility, may ASTM C295
ring lightweight aggregates are more fire resistant than relative cause popouts
normal-weight aggregates due to their insulating properties density
and high-temperature stability. In general, concrete con- Alkali- Causes ASTM C227
taining a calcareous coarse aggregate performs better under reactive abnormal ASTM C289
fire exposure than a concrete containing quartz or siliceous aggregates expansion, map ASTM C295
aggregate such as granite or quartzite. At about 590C cracking, and ASTM C342
(1060F), quartz expands 0.85% causing disruption to the popouts ASTM C586
ASTM C1260 (AASHTO T303)
concrete structure (ACI Committee 216 1989 and ACI ASTM C1293
Committee 221 1996). The coefficient of thermal expansion of ASTM C1567
aggregates ranges from 0.55 x 10-6 per C to 5 x 10-6 per C
111
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 112
Table 6-7. Some Potentially Harmful Reactive Minerals, Rock, and near the surface, they might disintegrate, pop out, or
Synthetic Materials cause stains. Potentially harmful chert in coarse aggregate
Alkali-carbonate can be identified using ASTM C123, Standard Test Method
Alkali-silica reactive substances* reactive substances** for Lightweight Particles in Aggregate (AASHTO T 113).
Andesites Opal Calcitic dolomites
Argillites Opaline shales Dolomitic limestones
Soft particles in coarse aggregate are especially objection-
Certain siliceous Phylites Fine-grained able because they cause popouts and can affect the dura-
limestones Quartzoses dolomites bility and wear resistance of concrete. If friable, they
and dolomites Cherts could break up during mixing and thereby increase the
Chalcedonic cherts Rhyolites amount of water required. Where abrasion resistance is
Chalcedony Schists
Cristobalite Siliceous shales
critical, such as in heavy-duty industrial floors, testing
Dacites Strained quartz may indicate that further investigation or another aggre-
Glassy or and certain gate source is warranted.
cryptocrystalline other forms
volcanics of quartz Clay lumps present in concrete may absorb some of the
Granite gneiss Synthetic and mixing water, cause popouts in hardened concrete, and
Graywackes natural silicious affect durability and wear resistance. They can also
Metagraywackes glass
Tridymite break up during mixing and thereby increase the
mixing-water demand.
* Several of the rocks listed (granite gneiss and certain quartz for-
mations for example) react very slowly and may not show evidence Mica is composed of flat plates that can either act as
of any harmful degree of reactivity until the concrete is over cleavage planes in coarse aggregate or as severely flat
20 years old.
** Only certain sources of these materials have shown reactivity.
particles in fine aggregate. Either particle size can result in
a decrease in concrete strength. The test for mica content
Aggregates are potentially harmful if they contain com- uses hazardous materials and is not commonly performed.
pounds known to react chemically with portland cement Previous local experience with aggregate containing mica
paste and produce any of the following: (1) significant can determine if the material can be used successfully.
volume changes of the paste, aggregates, or both; (2) inter-
Aggregates can occasionally contain particles of iron oxide
ference with the normal hydration of cement; and
and iron sulfide that result in unsightly stains on exposed
(3) otherwise harmful byproducts.
concrete surfaces (Figure 6-24). The aggregate should meet
Organic impurities may: delay setting and hardening of the staining requirements of ASTM C330, Standard Speci-
concrete, interfere with interaction of chemical admix- fication for Lightweight Aggregates for Structural Concrete
tures, reduce strength gain, and in unusual cases, cause (AASHTO M 195) when tested according to ASTM C641,
deterioration. Organic impurities such as peat, humus, Standard Test Method for Iron Staining Materials in Light-
and organic loam may not be as detrimental but should weight Concrete Aggregates; the quarry face and aggregate
be avoided. stockpiles should not show evidence of staining.
112
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 113
113
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:32 PM Page 114
acceptable and harmful particles have distinguishable Crushed aggregates segregate less than rounded (gravel)
relative densities. aggregates and larger-size aggregates segregate more
than smaller sizes. To avoid segregation of coarse aggre-
Jigging separates particles with small differences in gates, size fractions can be stockpiled and batched sepa-
density by pulsating water current. Upward pulsations of rately. Proper stockpiling procedures, however, should
water through a jig (a box with a perforated bottom) move eliminate this requirement. Specifications provide a range
the lighter material into a layer on top of the heavier mate- in the amount of material permitted in any size fraction
rial; the top layer is then removed. partly to accommodate some minor segregation in stock-
piling and batching operations.
Rising-current classification separates particles with large
differences in density. Light materials, such as wood and Washed aggregates should be stockpiled well before use
lignite, are floated away in a rapidly upward moving so that they can drain to a uniform moisture content.
stream of water. Damp fine material has less tendency to segregate than
dry material. When dry fine aggregate is dropped from
Crushing is also used to remove soft and friable particles
buckets or conveyors, wind can blow away the fines; this
from coarse aggregates. This process is sometimes the
should be avoided if possible.
only means of making material suitable for use. Unfor-
tunately, with any process some acceptable material is
always lost and removal of all harmful particles may be
difficult or expensive.
114
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 115
115
Chap. 6 (2010).qxd:EB001 (2010) 1/27/11 2:28 PM Page 116
Ozol, Michael A., Alkali-Carbonate Rock Reaction, Swenson, E.G., and Gillott, J.E., Alkali Reactivity of
Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete- Dolomitic Limestone Aggregate, Magazine of Concrete
Making Materials, ASTM STP 169D, edited by Lamond, Research, Vol. 19, No. 59, Cement and Concrete Associa-
Joseph F., and Pielert, James H., American Society for tion, London, June 1967, pages 95 to 104.
Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 2006, pages
Thomas, Michael D.A.; Fournier, Benoit; and Folliard,
410 to 424.
Kevin J., Report on Determining the Reactivity of Concrete
PCA, Bulking of Sand Due to Moisture, ST20, Portland Aggregates and Selecting Appropriate Measures for Prevent-
Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois, 1935, 2 pages. ing Deleterious Expansion in New Concrete Construction,
FHWA-HIF-09-001, Federal Highway Administration,
PCA, Effect of Moisture on Volume of Sand (1923), PCA
Washington, D.C., April 2008, 28 pages.
Major Series 172, Portland Cement Association, Skokie,
Illinois, 1955, 1 page. Vogler, R.H., and Grove, G.H., Freeze-thaw testing of
coarse aggregate in concrete: Procedures used by Mich-
Shilstone, James M., Sr., Concrete Mixture Optimization,
igan Department of Transportation and other agencies,
Concrete International, American Concrete Institute, Farm-
Cement, Concrete, and Aggregates, American Society for
ington Hills, Michigan, June 1990, pages 33 to 39.
Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania,
Stark, David, Characteristics and Utilization of Coarse Aggre- Vol. 11, No. 1, Summer 1989, pages 57 to 66.
gates Associated with D-Cracking, Research and Develop-
Wigum, B.J., Norwegian Petrographic Method Devel-
ment Bulletin RD047, Portland Cement Association,
opment and Experiences During a Decade of Service,
http://www.cement.org/pdf_files/RD047.pdf, 1976.
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Alkali-
Stark, David, The Use of Recycled-Concrete Aggregate from Aggregate Reaction in Concrete, Vol. I, International
Concrete Exhibiting Alkali-Silica Reactivity, Research and Academic Publishers World Publishing Corporation,
Development Bulletin RD114, Portland Cement Associa- October 15-19, 2004, pages 444 to 452.
tion, 1996.
116