Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 9

A)

t c AUC E t*E t t*E


0 0 3 0 0 0 0
3 2 7.5 0.051282 0.153846 3 0.153846
6 3 12 0.076923 0.461538 6 0.461538
9 5 10.5 0.128205 1.153846 9 1.153846
12 2 4.5 0.051282 0.615385 12 0.615385
15 1 1.5 0.025641 0.384615 15 0.384615
18 0 0 0 0 18 0
39

c vs t t*E
6 1.4

5 1.2
1
4
f(x) = 0.0006546951x^4 - 0.0215114104x^3 + 0.1599326599x^2 + 0.2740500241x + 0.0346320346
0.8
3
0.6
2
0.4
1 0.2

0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

B)
t c x E*x X
0 0 0.113016 0 0.016379
3 2 0.212922 0.010919 0.051108
6 3 0.300986 0.023153 0.107504
9 5 0.37843 0.048517 0.107115
12 2 0.446418 0.022893 0.053803
15 1 0.506035 0.012975 0.019463
18 0 0 0 0
0.355371
spacetime(t-tm)^2*Esigma^2 t (t-tm)^2*En x
0.230769 0 2.167046 0 0 6.113208 0.999522
0.923077 1.444697 2.78152 3 1.444697
2.423077 0.40965 0.706645 6 0.40965
2.653846 0.061447 1.140874 9 0.061447
1.5 0.699135 2.771279 12 0.699135
0.576923 1.148384 1.722576 15 1.148384
0 0 0 18 0
8.307692 11.28994

t*E (t-tm)^2*E
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
t c AUC E t*E spacetime(t-tm)^2*Esig^2 n
0 0 2.5 0 0 0.8 0 6.76 5.605536
5 1 7.5 0.016 0.08 2 2.704 11.88
10 2 12.5 0.032 0.32 3.2 2.048 6.2
15 3 15 0.048 0.72 3.8 0.432 1.56
20 3 12.5 0.048 0.96 3.6 0.192 4.4
25 2 7.5 0.032 0.8 2.7 1.568 9.68
30 1 3.75 0.016 0.48 1.2 2.304 11.54
35 0.5 1.25 0.008 0.28 0.7 2.312 5.78
40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
62.5 18 57.8
x
t c AUC E t*E spacetime(t-tm)^2*Esig^2 n
1 0 0 0 0 0.625 0 0 12.8
3 0 10 0 0 0.875 0 1.125
5 10 20 0.125 0.625 1.75 1.125 1.25
7 10 20 0.125 0.875 2.25 0.125 0.25
9 10 20 0.125 1.125 1.125 0.125 1.25
11 10 10 0.125 1.375 1.375 1.125 1.125
13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
80 8 5
Pe x
3.8 0.471
t C AUC E x x(t)*E Xbar
0 0 6 0 0 0 0.029268
4 3 16 0.0375 0.390244 0.014634 0.099444
8 5 20 0.0625 0.561404 0.035088 0.152367
12 5 18 0.0625 0.657534 0.041096 0.154102
16 4 12 0.05 0.719101 0.035955 0.110005
20 2 6 0.025 0.761905 0.019048 0.05793
24 1 2 0.0125 0.793388 0.009917 0.019835
28 0 0 0 0.817518 0 0
32 0 0 0 0.836601 0 0
80 0.622951
A) t C AUC E x x(t)*E Xbar
0 0 7.2 0 0 0 0.049684
4 3.6 13.6 0.076596 0.324324 0.024842 0.116379
8 3.2 10.8 0.068085 0.489796 0.033348 0.121945
12 2.2 7 0.046809 0.590164 0.027625 0.091624
16 1.3 4 0.02766 0.657534 0.018187 0.057401
20 0.7 2.2 0.014894 0.705882 0.010513 0.033661
24 0.4 1.2 0.008511 0.742268 0.006317 0.019193
28 0.2 0.6 0.004255 0.770642 0.003279 0.009935
32 0.1 0.3 0.002128 0.793388 0.001688 0.005104
36 0.05 0.1 0.001064 0.81203 0.000864 0.001728
40 0 0 0 0.827586 0 0
47 0.506652

B) t C AUC E t*E spacetime(t-tm)^2*Esig^2 n

0 0 7.2 0 0 0.612766 0 6.141929 2.548832


4 3.6 13.6 0.076596 0.306383 1.702128 3.070964 6.882399
8 3.2 10.8 0.068085 0.544681 2.212766 0.370235 1.00096
12 2.2 7 0.046809 0.561702 2.008511 0.130245 2.037739
16 1.3 4 0.02766 0.442553 1.480851 0.888624 4.561517
20 0.7 2.2 0.014894 0.297872 1.004255 1.392134 5.964125
24 0.4 1.2 0.008511 0.204255 0.646809 1.589928 5.836548
28 0.2 0.6 0.004255 0.119149 0.374468 1.328346 4.654589
32 0.1 0.3 0.002128 0.068085 0.212766 0.998949 3.399707
36 0.05 0.1 0.001064 0.038298 0.076596 0.700905 1.40181
40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
47 10.33191 41.88132
2 CSTRS do seem reasonable. n from part A was 6.1 CSTR
equivalents which produced a much greater extent of
reaction. Here the large deviation ensures the ratio of
spacetime squared to deviation is smaller.

Вам также может понравиться