modernism and the
posthumanist subject
the mit pross cambridge, massachusetts - london, englandreproduction and neg
the cognitive project of
neue sachlichkeit
ity whose esi to totality tecrhe twetch-emuy xanga ce fans
raf indnalad maw pcton Wheres vase
‘Siatrmatan a he pesumed ein prt oe
Sms Seen mere nee seleea
TRSLIN nl aro hgh core omg ve and
“Same "dese pln am poet pe
‘Sele npn pon oe rm
Mined ura a teaver te bt
{oP mater and between te ses cen THe
ste sponse fede oa mere ana
seeded te oral Kel Raman ence
See Mtataron Barina ta nd
tthe newepelan eerie i nee ee
‘Sa chllege be iy ck eee. In
thomsen nec ef the tual enperenc o Sch
Icons ha cree pd nde son
sith este brs anscric el t wy
Tn homolgy nisl eats io hs eee
Moreover, he rss
seas poston in architectural hitoriogaphy—the ue
anal suppression of everything tat sors architect in
favor of wie oral anlyis—stems rom this same Heol
try of high art Fe the historical avantgarde to mia
eins this cology, nde, presupresel a eontempors
so high arin commerce witha rather enenche cu
tora estalshment and it aims to authentic aesthetic
nowiedge Practices suchas dads sought sido and
Aeswoy this myth of shen to denystty and under
min the leptimizing discourse ofthe dominan cule,
‘whose ambition i wa save the pity ofr from the
encroachments of technologial moderation and mast
industalization, A elfor to extend the analy of sme of
these dlegtimising procfurs ino the Bounds o architec
ture “proper wil nvlve usin a futher discussion ofthe
ways in which the architecture ofthe nee Sahlichket
problems
tnd the concomitant centrality ofthe humanist subject. A
Vorschlag 2 City Bebasng of 1930" iste two die
ent oeasions of negational practice in architect, and two
siferen ideologies consequences. Bu wil be helpful to
teria with an example ofan interpretive method in which
form ssl viewed a stoncmous and the eubiect thereby
zeplyandinescapaly enmeshed in the material werd
‘may on St election, hay se a contentious propos
ton, evento those who would ess on an atonotns st
tus fr other arts. Yet ranecendent autonomy i xaetiy
‘what humanist readings of architecture hoe for and
endeavor to achieve, perhaps eecilly so hes nore
Sophisticated and eri moments, ks which perception i
racic a the detceton of various sre of esi con
eptual grid hidden within or hovering ave the work In
‘hes esay “Transpareny: Literal and Phenomend” for
‘tample, Cola Rose and Rober Stucky cence then
Selves wih architectrl for a "a cntinuns dialectic
Becween fac an implication” Rowe an sutky Jemen
strate that dhe rte facts of physi organization ean be
presented with signiane, inherent ambigity such that
‘hose facts may be ed n temo ompeting or xcilting
‘mental convert, Their analy of Le Corbusier’ League
of Nations project, and ofthe opposition i ines betweenod rated modernism was coed a stark dstinction to
the enmitve|
tras cultural conventions by problema
as of autonomous fom a well ste subject for which
‘hat form isa metaphor Inthe analysis here I hall man
tai an tention to acter form, But shall ty to
teeast the formal loge By which the avantgarde has co
‘envionaly been analyzed in drt include aspect of
Practice hat ave been neglected or deniated. Meyers
ject ence ur atten thos processes of modem
He tha le Beyond the individual subject, and we cn detect
this erties atte within the forms ehemseles
The operative ecnigue
fn the cognitive projet of Meyers neve Sachlichket she
practice of negation —the dismantling of tational ermal
Convention, the praduction of raptares and discontinuitey
the repudiation ofthe individual author = dhe ornate of
‘meaning. and he denial 0 the viewing subiet of space
pr from hfe in which the mind ee to dream, 10
‘Seape Bur negation sno ost sa saying ts the ative
“onsructing of «new perception, the forcing of new st
tion though fom, Meyer's poposeé Lear of Nations
bulding develop ertsin architect corals of pro
hoctivam that elow sme ofthe procedures already
“tnnounced inthe Co-op wrk. The fis sa building sytem
of recive spatial td constructional clls—part of an
Spemended nahicachial eld of pst and stuctra
Coordinater coupled with pla, ough, estentially moder
‘wing matvals ike "Ett an asbestos cement la
ding wed in place of more honor mater ik stone
sel conctcte and glass, with rbher Soong ork lab
tral and alainum set clings on te neo Sach
Thing system rests the appearance of having been
rmunipulated or mediated bya particular rustic personality
of having ee fabricated fora price hee mooumen
tal pupose. The spatial and constructional elements con
‘ atend eet avaiiy to sciety tg, andthe fact
{hac they ate the result of entan modes of production,
reproducible for a wie variety of wien is fil, then,
tora the lling stem a presenti in any tah
rmpass on the mate congrenc te bling
the technical means ofits facture into the form of the :
nts 0 the iepoducsie
oceses ofits making seemingly generating town rope
sentation withor ahora mein
‘Though Meyer surely
‘ours a kindof postu hers, nt intend to eonstae
his ttirde a deterministic understanding of ehiecure
' index, What {wish o suggest insted ls that is stateey
efcetivey serves wo Block any aesthetic contemplation fom
stance. At thi point in the development ofthe poe
tvitavanegade, fetal sndewility means more than
emphasis onthe formal selreerentalty of achitectare,
‘mote than coming to terms with ts “edim’ ois
comtiven fats." The indvia tt of Meyer's project
sigs nothing les than a rejection of any tancendeta
‘conception ofthe atehitectral objet in favor ofa soeep
ton of architeceral practice at «wor, engaged atv
4 material intervention and organising fre, an indeation
ofthe potential involvement ofthe ashtet with cern
socially developed pocests, materials and sanders of
roduction that, in tun are denied with vocal evel:
‘on and an expression of a wish ote par inthe work of
neption that is fandamentl in other avant-garde pratces
such a consirictivism and dats,
xwe sigh el wee wth
Meyer's fr inthis text odin what he considers to be
inadequate atti seniiey seems sterminabley be
shes ech signing practice to slits, whet ms
Teck into unworke sara tough, emphatic, wordy
‘The radical quality of Meyer's approach, 2 of Rodchenko’,
suity continually perceived by aiienes 2 an ae
Sion rowand the architectural obec’ status as high at and
toward the individual o clas for which hat object is &
tnetaphor hes lagely in fatal indesicality sa negations
[Nations prog seems prompted by the acute ewareess
‘bat nicer the individual subject nr sabeeveatempts
to recover the authenticity of he obec any Tanger have &
place inthe massindustializd iy, bythe acknowl
rent of the absolute inomptlty eeween the realm of
‘ass culture a a scveconomi ality ordered by tat
fy, and diseaction and he realm of pti, conte
tie inner experience, The seond poposition of his project
thus involves seach for sense within larger conception
tf he reairy of the metopas, beyond sabective interior
Sty Rezading this new fame of meaning Meyer writes
xc
‘The satement stan apresvely theta, materialise
refs of sgnesion based om composition ful of
‘mimetic epesentation, a refatal af form stsel Second, ee
an explicit deste wo intgat at with i, ot eliminate
the ned for fom hi, on either case, to deny ee
onary level of aesthetic meaning beyond the psi
toes of taonalied bling tesbnigu, For tobe “arid
fn the eid of bding history” st comin balding tec
igus and technologies wieh emergent soil es, 0
Iterpencerte technology an the clive body 0 that
‘he proces of building actually becomes biloiel. Meyer
ds nt sek to propose ase of physical notation tha can
produce a transcendental cbt the viral obec of «
humanist reading! their meaning, the architectural ele
ments arcuate an aval reproductive sate rather
than sefamvlved objec: Moreover, istry i poe ax
the diving oreo hi sytem This dsprveging of «
peorlaine, sti esthetic deal in favor ofa nexus of
relationships beeween modes of production and changing
human needs mean shin architecture's meaning to he
ouside, to speak, where strctre i no longer predicated
on private, peycolopcl space but rather on publi, clrthe authenticity ofthe object a8
ba also the reproductive tech
meaning become re
mun’ by the dimensions and condiion ofthe progam. AS
Intended ob baing for work and co
This building is aeither heal or uly. asks be
fla ambition ste atomic eranseipton of 2
ally determined, empieal program into bul om. The
rehce ise
i mocion the processes of svebling an object made up of
inal sel rdueton hereby nee
rs terest the cognitive poh
et away fom the production of ated Ages or formal
gutomebiles, 600 sored
"a‘ure, sbuttng or esting alate themselves rm the
Shine econ system. The discotenens ofthe wo halves of
{he building the secretariat cower and assembly Ball,
‘klaes dhe absence of any underlying formal armatoe that
tight in eur engenders series of spatial emanation. The
nga ogntive map thi centralizing datum or ound
‘Wool normaly provide is thereby bseaucte, and tension,
ration, and dfrene defn the rlaionshins
Inventing this percep
the two main halves ofthe bling is
‘on within each
the vemincation of any somapositional device that woul
rani the diverse pt nt a eaberet uni, thes further
‘ageatng ferences within the system, The general
tendency inthe fundamental buldng system toward an
‘Romination f tectonic parts banging to a ager but ide
terminate whole x sported nd developed by secondary
Tevet of tchitectni lament» sggomerasions of sky
Tighe commision roms, lcrre roms fics, restat
tanta brary, movement systems ike the paz
Tutways elevators, and "obogan” emergency ramps and
Information iseminating devices like ado antennae and
‘lumi sky signs. The unstable syntax ofthese ce
rent is determined by thee specif functional lations,
automata" supermpored onthe general system, heir
oman aie fom the massa, ndusril city
iaclfplan factory, porous, unyielding, Local symm
tes and unites are deployed in elevation and plan bt with
Chuneive relationship oone another Thos, aiulatons
srthin the ace ofthe levations are made wo em 1
Ten disribted over the srlice, the steppe plan profile
to nce aleatory and open-ended the architeturl ce
‘ents completely detachable and earangeale. To Be
‘bw oma decisions ave been made bythe ach
tect bt with the effect that we conceive the ullding nt
[Sa otgel formal organism but as a. asemblage of
Ucheccural particularities, a montage of discourse, each
art clashing wih the rest defined wholly in tems of hee
separ functional a mail ie The Body of the bil
ing thus contre to assume the forms cast upon it by the
forces of the city. a
“No pla ception
pleni worknoms fr the
tang
oresentaties of hel people No back cords lor
Sekt dloncy bt pe sé ns he pl
tin of what Rowe and Sty wold cl the ea as
posed wo er ited phenomenal wasp he
League of Nations bing apr he sense meaty
ee produced lin terms renal coo Ben
‘on, moral exhib tht we bly ned Dieetion
has fecome more and more an sar of et burs a
vent For enann ofr Meyer Hla ws meter
‘thoataua—eol obey, the enemy ef sce, the enemy
pope. Glass et another index of Meyers negro
Fal Meyer st
tars possible the cretion o any pessoa spc that
‘ph elt ine monumental iy. Teles of
tse by pring pater at ound eel llows hint ei
nvr mover of acs al cs above the inte
‘hon of aioe ks levator at state pin the
an ts de ac te eas ate beeen
the wing the sexta or aound the pephery fhe
tlt Spans pon nd uae ud
the pert ys
Pricer ins general vedas cloate
and continent The viewer walang th
aking tg the bling
fads msl always renal oes, nthe as beeen
the pinay spatial uni, compelled to move, constant
Aifereniting and recombining tal experiences ba nly
How cn we cutie
the suateis deployed by Meyer at «whe In whatsee
sant a an obec han a8 proce
= ‘The medium af photo-
‘Retest mop of selene psec
dada photomontage and Meyer's Co-op fatosaphy tes,
the fatality of modesty’ stated suice. Thus Meyer's
functional markings come tows a sorcession of units
fom the wreling of thos ager cultural process 2
serial progression of scprate integers whe differences are
ot medited by composition hut rather revel by a0
architecture conscious ofthe imedueey a ts dane
tions Like the dada photomontage, Meyer’ building pre
seats uel es a an objet than as muller eld
onverenc for the free apd signe of the masvindastial
tudes common to Meyer and the dads, 1
intend to ateibue to ether an unseliconsciousness with
vega t for, but rather to query the rounds on which
‘hes formal manipalation se mae, The works of Meyer
and the dale reflect awry, derisive awareness of the no
rmative humanist subject they delice and of he humanist
ideology of tonomy they renounce. usta the dada phot
montage aers to dhe urge ari convention ot
resenting uniave abrcate rectangularly famed object
‘rene t subversivey injects nt the singalariyof hat
jee the reproduced and dered images of orgie:
‘are, so Meyers diven toward conventional ways faci
tectu sensemabing the ar at once unaceptbe and
‘escapabe, vestiges of humanist perepions that have
become progessivly empty but cntinue to exer their
fore. whole ein of representation en iss, ut
the search for meaning snot abandoned. Tha eaneaic
ton, chat search, live, what ove Meyer toward 48
‘nsurevonary participation inthe cpl facie
ture, toward architecture ax aca pact.
The radical quality of
Meyers modemism ies inthe deal tat dha things are
Just wht they ae utely shorn of any metaphysical ly
sion of ainic authenticity, unity, o depth, Suspicious of
subecuvty andthe unied whale im which wabjetvty
rms ite the League of Nations projst Isa sectionfara
again the very ides of an autonomous War
eesiiy ofthe archer Mater
‘With the renaneition ofthe
piece exiting and for se
eaional vue of «prey inera mal nee
sreeopt of the work ua eleinvolved objec is ha
rec The work no longer presents an unbroken and
‘erogenous appearance, no loge stands complete 20d
vetmendes at were, gst the wor tater falls no
reared becoming one wordy hing [che among of
ve sna erect ats of modern society and
See produto ate thereby dsmanted and tht >
‘Fen reumed o ts unpoleped place within te ota
Tes the selenessness of
Meyer’ practic of negation tha 1 admine and tha 1 elewe
we rat ane project for archaecuralpractice—his nih
daa dane eatoma, beemonicrepertie of adiona
sc fon i fragmentation of orm ada
tring of he Bi
fron of semances, and his ab
‘Fron arncsubliation, he contemplative Bema
ae Bot neptan i fot, of eure unproblematic. FOr
pe setatag and dismantling ofthe older frns of expt
wh ne eanacendent of he sacred, and the subst
sat now forms of standardization, reicaton, ond
sae cain of bh subject nd objec pose cripling Fob
rene for mchterul rate apd the neve Sachlicbkel’s
var acmps to avent nee apd elaborate formal srt
Te nih wich gue what sere to be the wer
ee auiny heeween the emerging soil stuctre a
vassal live exerence 0 enact aki reer of
weit and act ae each ferent mark by thelr
eee on nt a spe and al-consming reali BY
Tou” Ladwg Hulbert’ poets and writings ad
aaraty emerged as striking iustaions ofl be amb
seer Jamendo inherent this postumanist a0
era temo resistances tot sella foward
nt sets of which ae present in Meyer's pS
Sich, dhe chit va te
tomo spon inter ef orccomeg he
dialectic, already formulated by Me terween =
Sh aa Meer, ween part a
is mole an maa wen he ome el
Indie oily othe ysl sd soci n is Gos
“The metool for lence ia molar machine tv
ng large-scale social, technical, and economic systems 7
rcarmanioing wth whist coment The
docile wchtecral ements athe mle eet
tcl nr nd shpe tet sn dtp?
pois of fu or erminton ante ad el nom
tom recived fm the loa ctr of
‘hte seer inure ane coe
nis of hat srr, The blon ete pap between
ton clr tnd el mines th os
ity of attributing signifi ce
iene othe at of eting
sang forma Theat alec
‘now radically rationalized and expanded. —
rom sans com
Hilberseimer’s Hochhausstadt project of 1921 —
oe oeee
‘ed interac law
Peps, ehen it not
surprising that while Hiberseimers toa unison of
ane calls andthe iba cts of te ity may hve
Teo fectove in shifting atehicctral caning fom te
ecpr li of thes
retools sel, dheartet was hard put
find nhs
ase tsource or invention, sks ite to asser that fom
reese tbeneimer commited base to te tain
Tom announced inthe Hochbaussta, is work viually
veel deel and instead became involved wth rial
rion Tse could propose nly the same fis
vie for is Vorchlag zur City Bebauung of 19802 be bad
qn Hocnhauntadt of 1924, and or Chicago a he ha for
tn tn 1926 and 1927, he exhibited project fo tower
nlf si of hn Siteen-story balldings now stack.
‘Fan berseimer abou ave maneuvered himself int
th para poston iste ttereting For we are ed 8
Pear the apparent that logical, axiomatic, ste
using organisation oe in which the produc
2a eure of signin x based om eprouction—