Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Benchmarking Exploring
Risk
Andy Philpott
EPOC
(www.epoc.org.nz)
Ziming Guan
(now at UBC/BC Hydro)
(New Zealand Herald May 21, 2009, downloaded from site: http://www.nzherald.co.nz)
ONS SDDP Workshop, August 17, 2011 Source: CC Report, p 177 Slide 10 of 31
New Zealand electricity market
Deadweight loss = empirical price of anarchy
ONS SDDP Workshop, August 17, 2011 Source: CC Report, p 200 Slide 15 of 31
New Zealand electricity market
What is counterfactual 1?
Fix hydro generation (at historical dispatch level).
Simulate market operation over a year with thermal plant
offered at short-run marginal (fuel) cost.
The Appendix of Borenstein, Bushnell, Wolak (2002)*
rigorously demonstrates that the simplifying assumption that
hydro-electric suppliers do not re-allocate water will yield a
higher system-load weighted average competitive price than
would be the case if this benchmark price was computed from
the solution to the optimal hydroelectric generation scheduling
problem described above
[Commerce Commission Report, page 190].
(x*,y*,p*)
(x0,y0,p0)
Counterfactual 1
In the year under investigation,
suppose all generators optimistically
wet predicted high inflows and used all
their water in summer. They were
right, and no thermal fuel was
needed at all. Counterfactual prices
are zero.
demand
demand WKO
MAN
N
H
HAW
demand
Set s=0
At t=s+1, solve a DOASA model to compute a
weekly centrally-planned generation policy for
t=s+1,,s+52.
In the detailed 18-node transmission system and
river-valley networks successively optimize
weeks t=s+1,,s+13, using cost-to-go functions
from cuts at the end of each week t, and
updating reservoir storage levels for each t.
Set s=s+13.
WKO
MAN
HAW